欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (09): 1688-1697.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01688

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

固定和染色方法对小麦胚乳细胞结构显示的影响

王玲玲1,**,刘智1,**,熊飞1,李栋梁1,周卫东2,陈义芳2,王忠1,*   

  1. 1扬州大学 / 江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室 / 农业部长江中下游作物生理生态与栽培重点开放实验室,江苏扬州 225009;2扬州大学分析测试中心,江苏扬州 225009
  • 收稿日期:2012-02-10 修回日期:2012-04-20 出版日期:2012-09-12 网络出版日期:2012-07-03
  • 通讯作者: 王忠, E-mail: wangzhong@yzu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(31071341, 31171482)和江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK2011445)资助。

Effect of Fixation and Staining Methods on Structure Observation of Endosperm Cell of Wheat

WANG Ling-Ling1,**,LIU Zhi1,**,XIONG Fei1,LI Dong-Liang1,ZHOU Wei-Dong2,CHEN Yi-Fang2,WANG Zhong1,*   

  1. 1Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province / Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Cultivation in Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River of Ministry of Agriculture, Yangzhou 225009, China; 2Testing Center, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China?
  • Received:2012-02-10 Revised:2012-04-20 Published:2012-09-12 Published online:2012-07-03
  • Contact: 王忠, E-mail: wangzhong@yzu.edu.cn

摘要: 以扬麦16小麦颖果为材料,采用戊二醛-四氧化锇(GA-OsO4)或高锰酸钾固定,并分别用5种染色方法[甲苯胺蓝-O (TBO)、多色性染液、高碘酸–希夫试剂(PAS)、考马斯亮蓝和PAS-TBO]进行半薄切片染色,对超薄切片进行醋酸双氧铀和柠檬酸铅染色,在光学显微镜和透射电镜下观察比较了小麦胚乳细胞结构显示的差异。结果表明,GA-OsO4固定的半薄切片染色效果整体上优于高锰酸钾固定,但是在PAS-TBO复染中,高锰酸钾固定制样效果最好。在超薄切片观察中,GA-OsO4固定制样能较好地保存胚乳细胞超微结构,但对膜性结构显示不够清晰,而高锰酸钾固定制样则能较好地固定细胞的膜性结构,并且能够增强膜结构反差,只是对多糖和蛋白质的固定和显色较差。因此,应根据观察对象来选择适当的固定及染色方法。

关键词: 小麦, 胚乳细胞, 固定方法, 染色方法, 半薄切片, 超薄切片

Abstract: Two fixing methods and five staining agents were used to compare which one is best for optimal observation of endosperm cell of wheat under optical and transmission electron microscopes. Caryopsis samples of Yangmai 16 were fixed with glutaraldehyde-osmium tetroxide (GA-OsO4) or potassium permanganate and stained withtoluidine blue (TBO), polychromatic dye, periodic acid schiff (PAS), coomassie brilliant blue, or PAS-TBO during the preparation of semi-thin sections. The GA-OsO4 fixation showed better overall performance than the potassium permanganate fixation, but the best observation was got by potassium permanganate fixationand PAS-TBO counterstaining. The GA-OsO4 fixation had the advantage of preserving endosperm cell intrinsic feature in ultra-thin section but the disadvantage of unclear display of the membranous structure. The potassium permanganate fixation was able to show the structure of the cell endomembranevividly with satisfactory contrast between background and membranous structure; however, the color stained in polysaccharide and protein was poor. Therefore, appropriate fixation and staining methods should be based on the target and objective of experiment.

Key words: Wheat, Endosperm cell, Fixation method, Stain method, Semi-thin section, Ultra-thin section

[1]Buttrose M S. Ultrastructure of the developing wheat endosperm. Aust J Biol Sci, 1963, 16: 305–317

[2]Bechtel D B, Gains R L, Pomeranz Y. Early stages in wheat endosperm formation and protein body initiation. Annu Bot, 1982, 50: 507–518

[3]Parker M L. The relationship between A-type and B-type starch granules in the developing endosperm of wheat. J Cereal Sci, 1985, 3: 271–278

[4]Shewry P R, Napier J A, Tatham A S. Seed storage proteins: structures and biosynthesis. Plant Cell, 1995, 7: 945–956

[5]Langeveld S M J, van Wijk R, Stuurman N, Kijne J W, de Pater S. B-type granule containing protrusions and interconnection between amyloplasts in developing wheat endosperm revealed by transmission electron microscopy and GFP expression. J Exp Bot, 2000, 51: 1357–1361

[6]Shewry P R, Halford N G. Cereal seed storage proteins: structures, properties and role in grain utilization. J Exp Bot, 2002, 53: 947–958

[7]Kumamaru T, Ogawa M, Satoh H, Okita T W. Protein body biogenesis in cereal endosperms. In: Olsen O A ed. Plant Cell Monogry: Endosperm. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin, 2007. pp 141–158

[8]Sheng J(盛婧), Guo W-S(郭文善), Zhu X-K(朱新开), Feng C-N(封超年), Peng Y-X(彭永欣). Starch granules development in grain endosperm of wheat for different end uses. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(9): 953–954 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9]Wei C-X(韦存虚), Zhang J(张军), Zhou W-D(周卫东), Chen Y-F(陈义芳), Xu R-G(许如根). Accumulation of storage protein and formation of protein body during wheat endosperm development. J Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 2009, 29(1): 73–78 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10]Yin Y-A(银永安), Qi J-C(齐军仓), Li W-H(李卫华), Cao L-P(曹连莆), Wang Z-B(王自布). Physico- chemical characteristics of A, B type starch granule in wheat endosperm. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2010, 43(11): 2372–2379 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[11]Liu Z(刘智), Wang L-L(王玲玲), Zhou W-D(周卫东), Chen Y-F(陈义芳), Wang Z(王忠). The effect of fixation and staining methods on observed the endosperm cell in rice. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2011, 25(6): 667–671 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12]Bechtel D B, Zayas I, Kaleikau L, Pomeranz Y. Size distribution of wheat starch granules during endosperm development. Cereal Chem, 1990, 67: 59–63

[13]Liu D-J(刘冬娟), Zhu S-W(祝素文), Li Y-J(李艳杰). The application of semi-section staining with borax toluidine blue. J Chin Med Univ (中国医科大学学报), 2004, 33(1): 33 (in Chinese)

[14]Wang S(王爽), Wang C-M(王春梅), Chen-D(陈丹), Huang X-F(黄晓峰). Polychromatic dying method on semithin resin sections resin. J Fourth Mil Med Univ (第四军医大学学报), 2002; 23(9): 775 (in Chinese)

[15]Lyon H O, Schulte E K, Prento P, Barer M R, Béné M C. Standardized staining methods: feulgen-rossenbeck reaction for desoxyribonucleic acid and periodic acid -schiff (PAS) procedure. Biotech Histochem, 2002, 77: 121–125

[16]Hu S-Y(胡适宜), Xu L-Y(徐丽云). A cytochemical technique for demonstration of lipids, polysaccharides and protein bodies in thick resin sections. Aata Bot Sin (植物学报), 1990, 32(11): 841–846 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17]Dang J M, Copeland L. Studies of the fracture surface of rice grains using environmental scanning electron microscopy. J Sci Food Agric, 2004, 84: 707–713

[18]Buttrose M S. Submicroscopic development and structure of starch granules in cereal endosperms. J Ultrastructure Res, 1960, 4: 231–257

[19]Fu H-L(付洪兰). Practical Electronic Microscope Technology (实用电子显微镜技术). Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2004. pp 12–13 (in Chinese)

[20]Song J-D(宋今丹). The membrane structure of cultured cell by potassium permanganate fixed. J Chin Electron Microscopy Soc (电子显微学报), 1990, 9(3): 1 (in Chinese)

[21]Loussert C, Popineau Y, Mangavel C. Protein bodies ontogeny and localization of prolamin components in the developing endosperm of wheat caryopses. J Cereal Sci, 2008, 47: 445–456

[22]Hughes C E. The Developing Endosperm of Triticum aestivum (L.): an Ultrastructural and Morphometric Study. PhD Dissertation of University of Nottingham, 1976

[23]Wei C-X(韦存虚), Zhang J(张军), Zhou W-D(周卫东), Chen Y-F(陈义芳), Xu R-G(许如根). Accumulation of storage protein and formation of protein body during barley endosperm development. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(2): 334–340 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[24]Luo Y-Y(罗玉英). Ultrastructural study on the division of amyloplast in pollen grain of Polygouatum samizui. J Chive Electr Microse Soc (电子显微学报), 1995, 3: 166–169 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[5] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[6] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1Pod-D1Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[7] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!