欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (01): 142-152.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00142

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

应用GGE双标图分析甘蔗品种(系)的产量和品质性状

罗俊，张华，邓祖湖，许莉萍，徐良年，袁照年，阙友雄*   

  1. 福建农林大学 / 农业部福建甘蔗生物学与遗传育种重点实验室 / 国家甘蔗产业技术研发中心, 福建福州 350002
  • 收稿日期:2012-04-23 修回日期:2012-09-05 出版日期:2013-01-12 网络出版日期:2012-10-08
  • 通讯作者: 阙友雄, E-mail: queyouxiong@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家现代农业(甘蔗)产业技术体系建设项目(CARS-20)和国家农作物品种区域试验项目(农财发2010(30)号)资助。

Analysis of Yield and Quality Traits in Sugarcane Varieties (Lines) with GGE-Biplot

LUO Jun,ZHANG Hua,DENG Zu-Hu,XU Li-Ping,XU Liang-Nian,YUAN Zhao-Nian,QUE You-Xiong*   

  1. Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University/Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture / Sugarcane Research & Development Center, China Agriculture Research System, Fuzhou 350002, China
  • Received:2012-04-23 Revised:2012-09-05 Published:2013-01-12 Published online:2012-10-08
  • Contact: 阙友雄, E-mail: queyouxiong@hotmail.com

RichHTML

PDF

1913

被引次数

34

摘要：

采用GGE双标图分析7个甘蔗参试品种在7个试点的产量和品质性状。结果表明, 云蔗05-51(YZ05-51)为单茎产量高且稳定性强的品种, 福农39(FN39)和柳城03-1137(LC03-1137)的单茎产量较高, 但稳定性较差; 福农38 (FN38)、粤甘35 (YG35)和新台糖22 (ROC22)有效茎数较高, 但稳定性较差; 福农39 (FN39)和云蔗05-51 (YZ05-51)为蔗茎产量较高且稳定性强的品种, 福农38 (FN38)和柳城03-1137 (LC03-1137)蔗茎产量高, 但稳定性较差; 福农39 (FN39)和赣南02-70 (GN02-70)为甘蔗蔗糖分较高且稳定性强的品种, 云蔗05-51 (YZ05-51)和福农38 (FN38)甘蔗蔗糖分较高, 但稳定性较差; 福农39 (FN39)为产糖量较高且稳定性较强的品种, 福农38(FN38)、云蔗05-51 (YZ05-51)和柳城03-1137 (LC03-1137)的产糖量较高、但稳定性较差。云南瑞丽和云南临沧2个试点单茎产量的代表性和区分力较强; 云南保山和广西来宾2个试点有效茎数的代表性和区分力较强; 广西崇左和云南临沧2个试点蔗茎产量的区分力较强; 广西百色和柳州2个试点甘蔗蔗糖分的区分力较强; 广西百色和云南临沧2个试点产糖量的区分力较强。

关键词: GGE双标图, 甘蔗, 蔗茎产量, 产糖量, 稳定性分析, 品种适应性

Abstract:

GGE (genotype main effect plus genotype-environment interaction) biplot analysis, based on principal component analysis (PCA), is an effective method to assess the multi-environment trials (METs). It allows a full exploration of G×E interaction, variety yield stability, and test-site suitability. In the present study, we applied GGE biplot to evaluate the genotype effects and G×E interaction of sugarcane main characters and at the same time, analyze the stability of yield and quality traits, and representativeness and discrimination of testing site, with seven sugarcane varieties planted in seven different testing sites. The results showed that YZ05-51 had high yield per stalk and better yield stability than the other varieties, while FN39 and LC03-1137 had high yield per stalk but low stability. FN38, YG35, and ROC22 had high stalk numbers but low stability. FN39 and YZ05-51 had high cane yield and good stability, while FN38 and LC03-1137 had high cane yield but low stability. FN39 and GN02-70 had high sucrose content and good stability, while YZ05-51 and FN38 had high sucrose content but low stability. FN39 had higher sucrose content and better yield stability, while FN38, YZ05-51, and LC03-1137 had high sucrose yield but low stability. Ruili City and Lincang City in Yunnan Province had better representativeness and discrimination in yield per stalk, while Baosan City in Yunnan Province and Laibing City in Guangxi Province had better representativeness and discrimination in stalk numbers; Chongzuo City in Guangxi Province and Lincang City in Yunnan Province had better discrimination in cane yield, while Baise City and Liuzhou City in Guangxi Province had better discrimination in sucrose content; Baise City in Guangxi Province and Lincang City in Yunnan Province had better discrimination in sucrose yield. This study demonstrates a simple and effective method for analyzing data, and evaluating the yield stability and adaptability of sugarcane varieties involved in national regional trials and favorite test sites.

Key words: GGE biplot, Sugarcane, Cane yield, Sucrose content, Stability analysis, Variety (lines) adaptability

[1]Chen R-K(陈如凯), Xu L-P(许莉萍), Lin Y-Q(林彦铨), Deng Z-H(邓祖湖), Zhang M-Q(张木清), Luo J(罗俊), Zhang H(张 华), Gao S-J(高三基), Xu J-S(徐景升), Xu L-N(徐良年), Que Y-X(阙友雄), Chen P-H(陈平华), Yuan Z-N(袁照年), Lin G-D(林国栋). Modern Sugarcane Genetic Breeding (现代甘蔗遗传育种). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2011. pp 2–12 (in Chinese)



[2]Li Z-X(李志贤), Wang J-W(王建武), Yang W-T(杨文亭), Shu Y-H(舒迎花), Du Q(杜清), Liu L-L(刘丽玲), Shu L(舒磊). Effects of reduced nitrogen application on the yield, quality, and economic benefit of sugarcane intercropped with soybean. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2011, 22(3): 713–719 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]Luo J(罗俊), Zheng X-W(郑学文), Chen R-K(陈如凯), Yuan Z-N(袁照年), Gao S-J(高三基), Zhang H(张华), Wen S-H(文尚华), Deng Z-H(邓祖湖). Technical Regulations for Sugarcane Variety Test (农作物品种试验技术规程甘蔗). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2009. pp 1–8 (in Chinese)



[4]Chen R-K(陈如凯), Wen S-H(文尚华), Zhang H(张华), Luo J(罗俊), Zheng X-W(郑学文), Gao S-J(高三基), Deng Z-H(邓祖湖). Specification of Sugarcane Variety Identification (农作物品种鉴定规范甘蔗). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2009. pp 1–8 (in Chinese)



[5]Jin W-L(金文林). The rank analysis model of evaluating crop varieties yield stability in regional trims. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2000, 26(6): 925–930 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[6]Yan W K, Molnar S J, Fregeau-Reid J, McElroya A A, Tinkera N. Associations among oat traits and their responses to the environment in North America. J Crop Improv, 2007, 20: 1–29



[7]Crossa J, Fox P N, Pfeiffer W H, Rajaram S, Gauch Jr H G. AMMI adjustment for statistical analysis of an internal wheat yield trial. Theor Appl Genet, 1991, 81: 27–37



[8]Chang L(常磊), Chai X(柴守玺). Application of AMM I model in the stability analysis of spring wheat in rainfed area. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2006, 26(11): 3677–3684 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[9]Guo T-C(郭天财), Ma D-Y(马冬云), Zhu Y-J(朱云集), Wang C-Y(王晨阳), Xia G-J(夏国军), Luo Y(罗毅). Genotype, environment and their interactive effects on main quality traits of winter-sown wheat variety. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2004, 37(7): 948–953 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]Liu W-J(刘文江), Li H-J(李浩杰), Wang X-D(汪旭东), Zhou K-D(周开达). Stability analysis for elementary characters of hybrid rice by AMMI model. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2002, 28(4): 569–573 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]Zhang J-Y(张坚勇),Wan X-Y(万向元), Xiao Y-H(肖应辉), Wang C-M(王春明), Liu S-J(刘世家), Chen L-M(陈亮明), Zhai H-Q(翟虎渠), Wan J-M(万建民). Analysis on stability of eating quality of cooked rice (Orzya sadva L.). Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 37(6): 788–794 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]Liu X-Y(刘旭云), Xie Y-J(谢永俊), Yang D(杨德), Zhang X-S(张锡顺). Analysis and research of AMMI model for rape varieties regional trials. Southwest China J Agric Sci (西南农业学报), 2001, 14(2): 27–30 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]Xu L-N(徐良年), Deng Z-H(邓祖湖), Chen R-K(陈如凯), Zhang M-Q(张木清), Zhang H(张华), Gao S-J(高三基), Luo J(罗 俊). Stability analysis on yield and quality characters of new sugarcane varieties. Chin J Trop Crops (热带作物学报), 2006, 27(2):50–54 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]Luo J(罗俊), Yuan Z-N(袁照年), Zhang H(张华), Chen Y-Q(陈由强), Chen R-K(陈如凯). Stability analysis on yield characters of sugarcane ratoon. Chin J Appl Environ Biol (应用与环境生物学报), 2009, 15(4): 488–494 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]Zhang H(张华), Luo J(罗俊), Yuan Z-N(袁照年), Lin Y-Q(林彦铨), Deng Z-H(邓祖湖), Xu L-N(徐良年), Chen R-K(陈如凯). Analysis of productivity and stability of sugarcane varieties in the national regional trial. Chin J Trop Crops (热带作物学报), 2008, 29(6): 744–750 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]Deng Z-H(邓祖湖), Xu L-N(徐良年), Gao S-J(高三基), Zhang H(张华), Luo J(罗俊), Chen R-K(陈如凯). Stability analysis and evaluation of sugarcane varieties introduced. Chin J Trop Crops (热带作物学报), 2008, 29(5): 589–595 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]Gauch H G Jr, Piepho H P, Annicchiarico P. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE: further considerations. Crop Sci, 2008, 48: 866−889



[18]Yan W, Kang M S, Ma B L, Woods S, Cornelius P L. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci, 2007, 47: 643−655



[19]Yan W-K(严威凯), Sheng Q-L(盛庆来), Hu Y-G(胡跃高), Hun L A. GGE biplot: all ideal tool for studying genotype by environment interaction of regional yield trial data. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2001, 27(1): 21–27 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[20]Yan W-K(严威凯). Optimal use of biplots in analysis of multi-Location variety test data. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(11): 1805–1819 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[21]Yan W, Hunt L A, Sheng Q L, Szlavnics Z. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on GGE biplot. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 596−605



[22]Yan W, Holland J B. A heritability-adjusted GGE Biplot for test environment evaluation. Euphytica, 2010, 171: 355–369



[23]Zhang Z-F(张志芬), Fu X-F(付晓峰), Liu J-Q(刘俊青), Yang H-S(杨海顺). Yield stability and testing-site representativeness in national regional trials for oat variety based on GGE-Biplot analysis. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(8): 1377–1385 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[24]Chen S-L (陈四龙), Li Y-R(李玉荣), Cheng Z-S(程增书), Liu J-S(刘吉生). GGE-Biplot analysis of effects of planting density n growth and yield components of high oil peanut. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(7): 1328–1335 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[25]Shang Y(尚毅), Li S-Q(李少钦), Li D-R(李殿荣). GGE biplot analysis of diallel cross of B. napus L. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(2): 243−248 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[26]Zhou C-J(周长军), Tian Z-Y(田中艳), Li J-Y(李建英), Liu Y(杨柳), Wu Y-K(吴耀坤), Du Z-Q(杜志强), Tang J-H(唐金华), Shi C(师臣). GGE-Biplot analysis on yield stability and testing-site representativeness of soybean lines in multi-environment trials. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2011, 30(2): 318−322 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[27]Chang L(常磊), Chai X(柴守玺). Application of GGE biplot in spring wheat yield stability analysis in rainfed areas of China. Chin J Eco-Agric (中国生态农业学报), 2010, 18(5): 988−994 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[28]Xu N-Y(许乃银), Jin S-Q(金石桥). Identifying discriminating and representative locations in cotton regional trials using GGE Biplot. Jiangxi Cotton (江西棉花), 2010, 32(3): 7−12 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[29]Sun M(孙敏), Jiang W-M(蒋文敏), Li H-Y(李慧英), Liu Z(刘壮), Yu X-L(于学鹏), Zhang L(张雷).Analysis of stable-production character by GGE Biplot on sunflower hybrids. Heilongjiang Agric Sci (黑龙江农业科学), 2010, (9): 11−13 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[30]Tang Q-Y(唐启义), Feng M-G(冯明光). DPS Data Processing System: Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Data Mining (DPS数据处理系统——实验设计、统计分析及数据挖掘). Beijing: Science Press, 2010 (in Chinese)
[1] 崔致远, 秦晨展, 刘星雨, 张海, 曾康, 黄国强, 徐景升. 甘蔗类四跨膜蛋白ScTSPAN18与6K2互作应答SCMV侵染研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1618-1630.
[2] 田春艳, 陆鑫, 吴才文, 徐超华, 刘家勇, 边芯, 桃联安. 基于荧光SSR的甘蔗创新种质遗传多样性分析及育种潜力评估[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1057-1072.
[3] 杨宗桃, 杨婷, 王禹童, 艾静, 李燕烨, 刘家勇, 邓军, 赵勇, 张跃彬. 甘蔗CLC基因家族鉴定与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 722-734.
[4] 万慧兰, 吴华英, 曾丹, 钱禛锋, 赵昌祖, 廖然超, 何丽莲, 李富生. 蔗茅耐寒相关基因EfWRKY51克隆分析及功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2048-2059.
[5] 胡亮亮, 周洪妹, 王晓磊, 王素华, 李彩菊, 魏云山, 王丽侠, 程须珍, 陈红霖. 小豆产量相关性状的基因型与环境互作效应及稳定性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2581-2594.
[6] 匡博文, 韦妳, 刘金典, 陈美燕, 毛兴洁, 段维兴, 杨细平. 基于甘蔗及其近缘属参考基因组开发SSR标记及数据库[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 103-116.
[7] 李旭娟, 李纯佳, 田春艳, 孔春艳, 徐超华, 刘新龙. 甘蔗硝酸盐转运蛋白1/肽转运蛋白家族6.4基因(ScNPF6.4)克隆及其调控分蘖功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8): 2131-2142.
[8] 玉泉馨, 杨宗桃, 张海, 程光远, 焦文迪, 曾康, 罗廷绪, 黄国强, 王璐, 徐景升. 甘蔗类钙调素ScCML13与SCMV运动蛋白P3N-PIPO的互作研究[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1855-1866.
[9] 许乃银, 金石桥, 晋芳, 刘丽华, 徐剑文, 刘丰泽, 任雪贞, 孙全, 许栩, 庞斌双. 基于SNP标记的小麦品种遗传相似度及其检测准确度分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 887-896.
[10] 薛丽, 李心怡, 黄勇泰, 欧财篮, 吴小青, 余泽怀, 崔泽田, 张木清, 邓祖湖, 余凡. 甘蔗与斑茅杂交染色体组构成特征研究[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 633-644.
[11] 田春艳, 边芯, 郎荣斌, 俞华先, 桃联安, 安汝东, 董立华, 张钰, 经艳芬. 甘蔗3个育种性状与SSR标记的关联分析及优异等位变异发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2): 310-324.
[12] 邵扬, 郭延平, 周丙月, 张峰, 张兴民, 王玉萍. 蚕豆产量组分的基因型与环境互作及稳定性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 149-160.
[13] 王恒波, 冯春燕, 张以星, 谢婉婕, 杜翠翠, 吴明星, 张积森. 甘蔗割手密种转录因子NAP亚家族的鉴定及SsNAP2a参与叶片衰老的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 110-125.
[14] 杜翠翠, 吴明星, 张雅婷, 谢婉婕, 张积森, 王恒波. 甘蔗割手密种糖转运蛋白基因SsSWEET11的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2385-2397.
[15] 莫广玲, 余陈静, 梁艳兰, 周定港, 罗俊, 王莫, 阙友雄, 黄宁, 凌辉. 甘蔗ScbHLH13基因的RT-PCR克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2485-2497.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2