欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (05): 885-895.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00885

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

行数与行距配置对带状条播小麦群体及个体质量的影响

郑亭,樊高琼*,陈溢,李金刚,荣晓椒,李国瑞,杨文钰   

  1. 农业部西南作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室 / 四川农业大学农学院，成都611130
  • 收稿日期:2012-08-01 修回日期:2012-12-07 出版日期:2013-05-12 网络出版日期:2013-01-28
  • 通讯作者: 樊高琼, E-mail:fangao20056@126.com,Tel: 028-86290972
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由四川省育种攻关项目(2011NZ0098-15-3), 四川省学带培养资金和四川农业大学优秀硕士论文培育基金(YSPY1203)资助。

Effect of Number and Interspace of Planting Rows on Population and Individual Quality of Strip-Drilling Wheat

ZHENG Ting,FAN Gao-Qiong*,CHEN Yi,LI Jin-Gang,RONG Xiao-Jiao,LI Guo-Rui,YANG Wen-Yu   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture / College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
  • Received:2012-08-01 Revised:2012-12-07 Published:2013-05-12 Published online:2013-01-28
  • Contact: 樊高琼, E-mail:fangao20056@126.com,Tel: 028-86290972

RichHTML

PDF

2061

被引次数

8

摘要：

为探索四川丘陵区机播带状小麦最优行数与行距配置方式及其播种机开沟器间距设计，2010—2012连续两年度，以紧凑型品种川农27和半紧凑型品种绵麦367为材料，在带宽2 m和150×104 hm-2固定密度下，以传统“双三零”模式(带宽2 m，20 cm等行距5行)为对照，设置每带3行和行距30 cm + 30 cm (F3-1)、每带3行和行距35 cm + 35 cm (F3-2)、每带3行和行距40 cm + 40 cm (F3-3)、每带4行和行距20 cm + 20 cm + 20 cm (F4-1)、每带4行和行距20 cm + 30 cm + 20 cm (F4-2)以及每带4行和行距20 cm + 40 cm + 20 cm (F4-3)等6种配置方式，研究其对田间通风透光和群体及个体质量的影响。结果表明，种植行数由5行减少到3或4行，同时增大行距后，孕穗期倒三叶位及基部透光率显著提高，群体内部空气流通加强。通风透光条件的改善显著提升了内行群体及个体质量，但对边行的影响较小，边行优势大幅削减，内行表现为成穗率提高，有效穗增多，孕穗到乳熟期叶面积消减速率减缓，干物质积累量增多，穗粒数、单穗重及产量提高。F3-3和F4-3处理的产量超过对照，是该地区带状机条播小麦行数与行距的最佳配置方式；F3-2和F4-2处理的产量与对照相当，但内行个体质量指标优于对照，也可替代传统“双三零”模式。

关键词: 行数与行距, 带状条播, 小麦, 群体及个体质量

Abstract:

Winter wheat is widely planted in the hilly regions in southwest china, mainly in strip-relay-intercropping system. Wheat land is traditionally prepared in strips containing five equidistant rows. The objective of this study was to optimize the number and interspace of planting rows for land preparation using machines in the hilly regions in Sichuan Province, China. A two-year field experiment was carried out, using two plant-type cultivars, Chuannong 27 of the compact-short type and Mianmai 367 of the intermediate type. Under fixed strip width (2m) and planting density (150×104ha-1), six planting patterns were compared, which were traditional pattern (CK), three-row with 30cm+30cm intervals (F3-1), three-row with 35cm+35cm intervals (F3-2), three-row with 40cm+40cm intervals (F3-3), four-row with 20cm+20cm+20cm intervals (F4-1), four-row with 20cm+30cm+20cm intervals (F4-2), and four-row with 20 cm+40 cm+20 cm intervals (F4-3). The field aeration light transmission condition and quality of population and individual were surveyed at different growth stages.The results indicated that reduction of row number per strip and increase of row spacing resulted in higher light transmission rate at the top and basal parts of plant population at booting stage, and the circulation of air reinforced. With the improved aeration and light transmission condition, quality of population and individual and yield significantly increased, but those of edge row almost remained unchanged, thus the border advantage was cut down. Meanwhile, the related quality index of inner row showed that, spike setting rate and effective spike number increased, furthermore, the decline rate of leaf area greatly decreased from booting to milky stage, besides, the accumulation of dry weight increased, and then, grain per spike, spike weight and yield increased. Finally,higher yields were obtained in treatmentsF3-3 and F4-3 compared to CK. Therefore, treatments F3-3 or F4-3 had the optimum number and interspace of planting rows for mechanical sowing strip wheat in these regions. In addition, the yield of F3-2 and F4-2 was equivalent to that of CK, but most indexes of individual quality of inner rows were better than those of CK, so F3-2 and F4-2 could replace the traditional double-three-zero strip planting pattern, too.

Key words: Number and interspace of planting row, Strip drilling, Wheat, Population and individual quality

[1]Sichuan Provincial Agricultural Department (四川省农业厅). Sichuan Agricultural Statistical Yearbook (四川农业统计年鉴), 2011. pp 173–176 (in Chinese)



[2]Wang M-J(王明杰), Fang Y-P(方一平). On fundamental elements and drive capacity of economic development in hilly regions of Sichuan province. J Mount Sci (山地学报), 2008, 26(6): 707–713 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]Yong T-W(雍太文), Ren W-J(任万军), Yang W-Y(杨文钰). The connotation characteristic and cultivation technique of the new cropping pattern of wheat/maize/soybean tricropping system on dryland. Gengzuo yu Zaipei (耕作与栽培), 2006, (6): 48–50 (in Chinese)



[4]Tang Y-L(汤永禄), Li Z-S(李朝苏), Yu X-F(余秀芳), Mo T-X(莫太相), Shu Z-G(舒泽刚). The assemble of mechanical sowing trip wheat and demonstration effect in southwest dry land. Gengzuo yu Zaipei (耕作与栽培), 2010, (4): 60–61 (in Chinese)



[5]Fan G-Q(樊高琼), Yang W-Y(杨文钰), Ren W-J(任万军), Zheng T(郑亭), Yong T-W(雍太文), Wang X-C(王小春), Chen M-X(陈明祥), Bai W-J(白文进). Effects of different bandwidth on the yield and border effect of relaying wheat. J Sichuan Agric Univ (四川农业大学学报), 2009, 27(2): 133–136 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[6]Zheng T(郑亭), Fan G-Q(樊高琼), Wang X-F(王秀芳), Wu Z-W(吴中伟), Yang W-Y(杨文钰), Mao S-M(毛树明), Sun W-J(孙万军), Song Z-Q(宋宗奇). Effect of tillage management, sowing depth and soil-covering on the seedlings quality of mechanical sowing wheat under intercropping condition. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2011, 27(5): 164–168 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]Fan G-Q(樊高琼), Li J-G(李金刚), Wang X-F(王秀芳), Zheng T(郑亭), Guo X(郭翔), Chen Y(陈溢), Wu Z-W(吴中伟), Yang W-Y(杨文钰). Lodging resistance of winter wheat in response to nitrogen and planting density and border effect under relay intercropping condition. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2012, 38(7): 1307–1317 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]Zhao B-Q(赵秉强), Yu S-L(余松烈), Li F-C(李凤超), Yu Z-W(于振文). Study on the edge effect in winter wheat: II. The correlation of planting density and the edge effect in winter wheat. Gengzuo yu Zaipei (耕作与栽培), 1997, (5): 12–16 (in Chinese)



[9]Wang X-C(王小春), Yang W-Y(杨文钰), Fan G-Q(樊高琼). Effects of wheat different planting density and field arrangement on quality of the seedling of maize and intercropping population yield. J Southwest China Normal Univ (西南师范大学学报), 2010, 35(1): 63–27 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]Liu Y-J(刘印杰), Feng L-Z(冯兰芝). The effect of wide and narrow spacing row planting on individual development and yield. Henan Agric Sci (河南农业科学), 1997, (10): 8–9 (in Chinese)



[11]Yang W-P(杨文平), Guo T-C(郭天财), Liu S-B(刘胜波), Wang C-Y (王晨阳), Wang Y-H(王永华), Ma D-Y(马冬云). Effects of row spacing in winter wheat on canopy structure and microclimate in later growth stage. J Plant Ecol (植物生态学报), 2008, 32(2): 485–490 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]Ding R-X(丁瑞霞), Jia Z-K(贾志宽), Han Q-F(韩清芳), Ren G-X(任广鑫), Wang J-P(王俊鹏). Border effect and physiological characteristic response of foxtail millet to different micro-catchment strip shapes in semiarid region of south Ningxia. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2006, 39(3): 494–501 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]Rich P A. Influence of cultivar, row spacing, and number of rows on yield of wheat plots. Agron J, 1973, 65: 331–333



[14]Chen Y-H(陈雨海), Yu Y-G(李永庚), Yu S-L(余松烈), Yu Z-W(于振文). Border effect and standardization of cropping patterns of wheat. J Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 2003, 23(2): 68–71 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]Liu A-N(刘安能), Liu Z-G(刘祖贵), Zhou X-G(周新国), Meng Z-J(孟兆江), Chen J-P(陈金平). Study on edge effect and ecological effect in system of winter wheat intercropping the cotton. J Mount Agric Biol (山地农业生物学报), 2005, 24(6): 471–476 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]Zhao B-Q(赵秉强), Yu S-L(余松烈), Li F-C(李凤超), Yu Z-W(于振文). Studies on correlation of strip type population and yield in wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2000, 26(3): 278–284 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]Chen Y-H(陈雨海), Yu S-L(余松烈), Yu Z-W(于振文). Relation between amount or distribution of PAR interception and grain output of wheat communities. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2003, 29(5): 730–734 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2