欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (5): 1166-1177.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.44175

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

芥菜型油菜不同组织硫苷含量的QTL定位与候选基因分析

张金泽1(), 周庆国2, 肖莉晶1, 金海润1, 欧阳青静1, 龙旭1, 晏中彬1, 田恩堂1,*()   

  1. 1贵州大学农学院, 贵州贵阳 550025
    2安徽鼎科种业有限责任公司, 安徽合肥 230001
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-20 接受日期:2025-01-23 出版日期:2025-05-12 网络出版日期:2025-02-17
  • 通讯作者: *田恩堂, E-mail: erictian121@163.com
  • 作者简介:E-mail: a3184349049@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    贵州省科技支撑计划项目(黔科合支撑[2022]重点031);国家自然科学基金项目(32160483);国家自然科学基金项目(32360497);贵州大学国家自然科学基金后补助项目([2023] 093号)

QTL mapping and candidate gene analysis of glucosinolate content in various tissues of Brassica juncea

ZHANG Jin-Ze1(), ZHOU Qing-Guo2, XIAO Li-Jing1, JIN Hai-Run1, OU-YANG Qing-Jing1, LONG Xu1, YAN Zhong-Bin1, TIAN En-Tang1,*()   

  1. 1College of Agriculture, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, China
    2Anhui Dingke Seed Industry Co, Ltd., Hefei 230001, Anhui, China
  • Received:2024-10-20 Accepted:2025-01-23 Published:2025-05-12 Published online:2025-02-17
  • Contact: *E-mail: erictian121@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Support Program(Guizhou Kehe Support [2022] Key 031);National Natural Science Foundation of China(32160483);National Natural Science Foundation of China(32360497);Post-Funded Project for National Natural Science Foundation of Guizhou University([2023] No. 093)

摘要:

硫苷是重要的次生代谢物, 在油菜生长发育、病虫害防御等方面均具有重要作用。本研究以芥菜型油菜品系YufengZC和Qichi881为亲本创建的包含197个RIL-F8株系的作图群体(QY-RIL群体)为研究材料, 测定了全部株系的叶片、茎秆、花蕾和种子的硫苷含量。结果表明, 同一株系不同组织间硫苷含量存在显著差异, 而不同株系间相同组织的硫苷含量也存在较大变异, 且总体呈正态分布。相关性分析发现, 花蕾、茎秆与种子间硫苷含量呈显著正相关关系, 而叶片的硫苷含量仅与花蕾呈显著正相关关系。此外, 本研究还对叶片、茎秆、花蕾和种子硫苷含量的调控基因进行了QTL定位, 分别鉴定到9、10、9和18个QTL, 包含6个在多组织中共同检测到的cQTL (consensus QTL)。结合cQTL区间序列信息及所含基因的表达分析结果, 初步筛选出6个候选基因, 其中BjuB018426 (GTR1)和BjuB020498 (GTR2)参与硫苷从营养组织向生殖组织的转运, 可能是造成本研究中硫苷含量差异分布的重要调控基因。本研究结果可为解析芥菜型油菜不同组织的硫苷合成与分配机制及选育不同硫苷含量的多功能品种奠定基础。

关键词: 芥菜型油菜, 硫苷含量, QTL定位, 候选基因, 硫苷转运

Abstract:

Glucosinolates are critical secondary metabolites that play a pivotal role in the growth and development of rapeseed, as well as in its defense against diseases and pests. In this study, a mapping population comprising 197 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) of Brassica juncea was utilized to investigate glucosinolate distribution and genetic regulation. The glucosinolate contents in leaves, stems, buds, and seeds were quantified across all lines. The results revealed significant differences in glucosinolate content among different tissues within the same line and considerable variation across lines within the species, exhibiting an overall normal distribution. Correlation analysis showed a strong positive correlation in glucosinolate content among buds, stems, and seeds, as well as a notable positive correlation between leaves and flower buds. To further elucidate the genetic regulation of glucosinolate content, quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping was conducted, resulting in the identification of 9, 10, 9, and 18 QTLs associated with glucosinolate content in leaves, stems, buds, and seeds, respectively. By integrating QTL interval sequence information with gene expression data, six candidate genes were preliminarily identified. Among them, BjuB018426 (GTR1) and BjuB020498 (GTR2) were implicated in the transport of glucosinolates from vegetative tissues to reproductive tissues, suggesting their potential roles as key regulatory genes underlying the differential distribution of glucosinolates observed in this study. These findings provide valuable insights into the mechanisms governing glucosinolate synthesis and distribution across various tissues in Brassica juncea. Moreover, they offer a foundational basis for breeding multifunctional varieties with tailored glucosinolate profiles to meet diverse agricultural and industrial needs.

Key words: Brassica juncea, glucosinolate contents, QTL mapping, candidate genes, glucosinolate transport

表1

不同组织硫苷含量描述性统计分析"

性状
Trait
组织
Tissue
最小值
Min.
最大值
Max.
平均值
Mean
标准差
SD
变异系数
CV (%)
偏度
Skewness
峰度
Kurtosis
硫苷含量
Glucosinolate contents
(μmol g-1)
叶片Leaves 17.62 82.36 37.70 9.74 25.84 1.08 1.93
茎秆Stems 0.09 12.97 5.50 3.36 60.65 -0.42 -0.18
花蕾Buds 27.21 85.39 60.30 10.36 17.18 0.36 -1.02
种子Seeds (S1) 81.09 190.25 134.75 20.88 15.50 0.07 -0.39
种子Seeds (S2) 50.70 197.10 130.99 20.13 15.37 -0.21 1.18

图1

不同组织硫苷含量的频数分布 S1为2023年收获的种子, S2为2024年收获的种子。"

图2

不同组织硫苷含量的相关性热图 * 和**分别表示在0.05和0.01水平上相关性显著。S1为2023年收获的种子, S2为2024年收获的种子。"

图3

不同组织的QTL在芥菜性油菜染色体上的分布 A和B分别为不同组织的QTL在A基因组和B基因组的分布。QTL名称表示同表2。"

表2

不同组织中与硫苷含量相关的QTL的相关信息"

组织
Tissue
性状位点
Trait locus
染色体
Chromosome
QTL峰值
QTL peak (cM)
QTL区间
QTL interval (cM)
最近的SNP标记
Recent SNP marker
LOD值
LOD score
表型贡献率
PVE (%)
叶片
Leaves
qL-A02 A02 35.86 31.97-38.91 Marker 4,424,668 3.44 7.85
qL-A03 A03 27.14 23.50-31.22 Marker 1,757,168 11.46 26.40
qL-A04 A04 33.40 28.29-37.03 Marker 4,955,778 4.14 9.60
qL-A05 A05 43.18 39.57-48.06 Marker 470,368 3.51 8.10
qL-B02 B02 54.16 49.39-58.75 Marker 51,065 3.51 8.10
qL-B03 B03 95.18 93.13-98.55 Marker 4,697,670 3.29 7.59
qL-B05 B05 15.33 11.89-19.87 Marker 3,595,171 3.15 7.29
qL-B06 B06 32.54 26.25-35.41 Marker 3,645,990 3.67 8.44
qL-B08 B08 92.18 87.52-93.50 Marker 982,815 3.45 7.80
茎秆
Stems
qS-A02 A02 37.27 33.69-44.78 Marker 4,545,960 4.39 10.13
qS-A03 A03 26.36 21.44-32.09 Marker 1,838,334 7.02 16.20
qS-A04 A04 35.05 30.16-36.40 Marker 5,062,389 4.20 9.60
qS-A06 A06 76.01 73.67-80.43 Marker 1,382,718 3.45 7.80
qS-A08 A08 13.60 11.00-17.51 Marker 731,978 3.87 9.00
qS-A09 A09 0.53 0-7.19 Marker 4,053,639 3.00 6.90
qS-B04 B04 3.47 0-8.52 Marker 2,409,165 5.64 12.90
qS-B05 B05 13.22 9.48-17.74 Marker 3,360,685 3.81 8.70
qS-B06 B06 32.54 29.94-34.90 Marker 3,645,990 3.69 8.40
qS-B08 B08 90.87 86.75-96.93 Marker 920,085 4.20 9.60
花蕾
Buds
qF-A02 A02 35.86 31.97-39.78 Marker 4,424,668 2.61 6.08
qF-A03 A03 26.11 21.69-31.48 Marker 1,944,874 9.39 22.35
qF-A04 A04 31.35 28.00-36.08 Marker 4,981,184 3.17 7.20
qF-A07 A07 38.85 33.93-44.88 Marker 2,098,338 3.42 7.80
qF-A09 A09 48.23 43.38-52.24 Marker 3,898,423 3.18 7.50
qF-B01 B01 33.91 29.17-37.58 Marker 1,517,061 5.31 12.00
qF-B05 B05 11.89 6.32-15.33 Marker 3,601,337 4.32 9.90
qF-B06 B06 31.51 29.09-34.90 Marker 3,631,838 3.90 8.85
qF-B07 B07 15.49 11.13-20.50 Marker 2,661,101 3.48 8.10
种子
Seeds (S1)
qS1-A01 A01 96.91 91.17-100.11 Marker 3,090,840 3.10 7.44
qS1-A02 A02 33.69 28.47-39.78 Marker 4,441,071 4.25 10.13
qS1-A03 A03 23.76 20.92-27.14 Marker 1,809,778 8.11 19.20
qS1-A04 A04 34.19 32.26-37.03 Marker 4,999,692 2.95 9.00
qS1-A08 A08 16.73 13.09-23.10 Marker 602,965 3.11 7.38
qS1-B03 B03 94.66 91.57-98.55 Marker 4,754,822 3.00 7.20
qS1-B05 B05 14.01 9.48-17.74 Marker 3,441,132 3.72 8.70
qS1-B06 B06 28.09 25.21-35.16 Marker 3,847,963 3.33 7.89
qS1-B08 B08 91.13 79.77-92.72 Marker 1,000,761 3.15 7.35
种子
Seeds (S2)
qS2-A02 A02 35.04 31.97-39.78 Marker 4,487,079 4.30 9.90
qS2-A03 A03 25.58 23.76-31.73 Marker 1,900,789 6.39 15.06
qS2-A04 A04 28.90 27.14-33.40 Marker 4,925,233 3.75 9.00
qS2-B01 B01 5.01 0.87-9.59 Marker 1,451,547 3.06 7.20
qS2-B03 B03 96.73 93.13-100.63 Marker 4,648,733 3.42 8.10
qS2-B04 B04 49.07 46.08-54.87 Marker 2,242,137 4.12 9.68
qS2-B05 B05 11.89 8.17-15.33 Marker 3,601,337 3.74 8.78
qS2-B06 B06 34.12 31.51-37.73 Marker 3,783,270 3.69 8.70
qS2-B08 B08 93.50 88.29-97.48 Marker 856,065 3.00 6.36

表3

主效区间与硫苷含量相关的候选基因"

cQTL名称
cQTL name
区间范围
Interval range (cM)
候选基因ID
Candidate gene ID
拟南芥同源基因信息
Information of
Arabidopsis
homologous genes
基因功能
Gene function
cQTLA02 33.69-38.78 BjuA043503/BjuB010312 AT1G74080, MYB122 参与吲哚族硫苷生物合成与调控
Involved in indole glucosinolate biosynthesis and regulation
BjuA005541/BjuB010311 AT1G74100, SOT16 硫苷合成中硫基团转移
Sulfate group transfer in glucosinolate biosynthesis
cQTLA04 32.26-33.40 BjuA024283/BjuO013418 AT3G27785, MYB118 调控参与硫苷合成的下游基因
Regulates downstream genes involved in glucosinolate biosynthesis
BjuA015922/BjuB024226 AT2G22300, CAMTA3 响应钙信号调控硫苷合成
Responds to calcium signals to regulate glucosinolate biosynthesis
cQTLB05 11.89-15.33 BjuA002613 AT2G22330, CYP79B3 参与色氨酸途径, 生成吲哚硫苷的前体物质
Involved in the tryptophan pathway, producing precursor substances for indole glucosinolates
BjuO011663/BjuA003553 AT4G30530, GGP1 负责转化前体物质的酶
Enzyme responsible for converting precursor substances
cQTLB06 31.51-34.90 BjuA040529/BjuB003228 AT4G21990, APR3 提供硫苷合成所需的还原性硫
Provides reduced sulfur needed for glucosinolate biosynthesis
BjuA003915/BjuA040691 AT4G17880, MYC4 调节硫苷合成相关基因的表达
Regulates the expression of genes related to glucosinolate biosynthesis
cQTLA03 23.76-27.14 BjuB020498 AT5G62680, GTR2 参与硫苷从源到库组织的运输
Involved in transporting glucosinolates from source to sink tissues
BjuA009868 介导硫苷长距离运输
Mediates long-distance transport of glucosinolates
cQTLB08 88.29-92.72 BjuB018426/BjuA022496 AT3G47960, GTR1 将蛋氨酸和色氨酸衍生的硫苷转运到种子
Transports glucosinolates derived from methionine and tryptophan to seeds

图4

高低硫苷含量材料不同组织候选基因表达热图 纵坐标是候选基因及拟南芥中功能缩写, 横坐标表示高低硫苷含量材料不同组织样品缩写。其中H和L分别代表高和低硫苷含量的材料; F、L、S和Z07分别代表花蕾、叶片、茎秆和拨蕾自交7 d后的角果; R1、R2和R3代表3个重复, FPKM代表该基因在给定样本中的相对表达水平。"

[1] Essoh A P, Monteiro F, Pena A R, Pais M S, Moura M, Romeiras M M. Exploring glucosinolates diversity in Brassicaceae: a genomic and chemical assessment for deciphering abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2020, 150: 151-161.
[2] Raboanatahiry N, Li H X, Yu L J, Li M T. Rapeseed (Brassica napus): processing, utilization, and genetic improvement. Agronomy, 2021, 11: 1776.
[3] Xiao M L, Wang H D, Li X N, Mason A S, Fu D H. Rapeseed as an ornamental. Horticulturae, 2022, 8: 27.
[4] Meng L B, Zhang Y H, Yu S P, Ogundeji A O, Zhang S, Li S M. Temporal assessment of biofumigation using mustard and oilseed rape tissues on Verticillium dahliae, soil microbiome and yield of eggplant. Agronomy, 2022, 12: 2963.
[5] Zheng Q, Liu K D. Worldwide rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) research: a bibliometric analysis during 2011-2021. Oil Crop Sci, 2022, 7: 157-165.
[6] Liu W B, Li S, Tao J B, Liu X Y, Yin G Y, Xia Y, Wang T, Zhang H Y. CARM30: China annual rapeseed maps at 30 m spatial resolution from 2000 to 2022 using multi-source data. Sci Data, 2024, 11: 356.
[7] Kang L, Qian L W, Zheng M, Chen L Y, Chen H, Yang L, You L, Yang B, Yan M L, Gu Y G, et al. Genomic insights into the origin, domestication and diversification of Brassica juncea. Nat Genet, 2021, 53: 1392-1402.
doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00922-y pmid: 34493868
[8] Nguyen V P T, Stewart J, Lopez M, Ioannou I, Allais F. Glucosinolates: natural occurrence, biosynthesis, accessibility, isolation, structures, and biological activities. Molecules, 2020, 25: 4537.
[9] Kanstrup C, Jimidar C C, Tomas J, Cutolo G, Crocoll C, Schuler M, Klahn P, Tatibouët A, Nour-Eldin H H. Artificial fluorescent glucosinolates (F-GSLs) are transported by the glucosinolate transporters GTR1/2/3. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24: 920.
[10] Mann A, Kumari J, Kumar R, Kumar P, Pradhan A K, Pental D, Bisht N C. Targeted editing of multiple homologues of GTR1 and GTR2 genes provides the ideal low-seed, high-leaf glucosinolate oilseed mustard with uncompromised defence and yield. Plant Biotechnol J, 2023, 21: 2182-2195.
[11] Lou P, Zhao J J, He H J, Hanhart C, Pino Del Carpio D, Verkerk R, Custers J, Koornneef M, Bonnema G. Quantitative trait loci for glucosinolate accumulation in Brassica rapa leaves. New Phytol, 2008, 179: 1017-1032.
[12] 赵卫国, 塔娜, 王灏. 甘蓝型油菜种子硫代葡萄糖苷含量的QTL定位及候选基因分析. 西北植物学报, 2024, 44: 1261-1272.
Zhao W G, Ta N, Wang H. QTL mapping and candidate gene identification of seed glucosinolate content in Brassica napus. Acta Bot Boreali-Occident Sin, 2024, 44: 1261-1272 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] Wei D Y, Cui Y X, Mei J Q, Qian L W, Lu K, Wang Z M, Li J N, Tang Q L, Qian W. Genome-wide identification of loci affecting seed glucosinolate contents in Brassica napus L. J Integr Plant Biol, 2019, 61: 611-623.
[14] Antonious G F, Bomford M, Vincelli P. Screening Brassica species for glucosinolate content. J Environ Sci Health B, 2009, 44: 311-316.
doi: 10.1080/03601230902728476 pmid: 19280485
[15] 王倩, 杨旭, 张金泽, 肖莉晶, 余坤江, 田恩堂. 芥菜型油菜茎秆抗倒伏相关性状的组织观察与QTL初定位. 植物遗传资源学报, 2024, 25: 431-439.
doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20230904003
Wang Q, Yang X, Zhang J Z, Xiao L J, Yu K J, Tian E T. Microstructure observation and QTL mapping of traits related to stalk lodging resistance in Brassica juncea. J Plant Genet Resour, 2024, 25: 431-439 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] 杨旭, 余坤江, 向阳, 代文东, 杜才富, 田恩堂. 芥菜型油菜RIL群体QTL定位能力评价与分析. 分子植物育种, 网络首发[2023-11-01], http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20231101.0933.002.
Yang X, Yu K J, Xiang Y, Dai W D, Du C F, Tian E T. Evaluation and analysis of QTL mapping ability in RIL population of Brassica juncea. Mol Plant Breed, Published online [2023-11-01], http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20231101.0933.002 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] 李培武, 周海燕. 油菜硫代葡萄糖苷检测技术研究进展. 中国油料作物学报, 2008, 30: 127-131.
Li P W, Zhou H Y. A review on analytical methods for glucosinolates. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2008, 30: 127-131 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] 李东华, 叶春苗. 萝卜籽中活性成分提取及抑菌效果的研究. 沈阳化工大学学报, 2013, 27(1): 25-29.
Li D H, Ye C M. Active constituents and bacteriostatic offect in radish seed. J Shenyang Univ Chem Technol, 2013, 27(1): 25-29 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] 晏伟. 芥菜型油菜主要脂肪酸性状的QTL定位与分析. 贵州大学硕士学位论文, 贵州贵阳, 2022.
Yan W. QTL Mapping and Analysis of Main Fatty Acid Traits in Brassica juncea. MS Thesis of Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China, 2022 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] Manrique-Carpintero N C, Coombs J J, Cui Y H, Veilleux R E, Buell C R, Douches D. Genetic map and QTL analysis of agronomic traits in a diploid potato population using single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Crop Sci, 2015, 55: 2566-2579.
[21] Voorrips R E. MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered, 2002, 93: 77-78.
doi: 10.1093/jhered/93.1.77 pmid: 12011185
[22] Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg S L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods, 2015, 12: 357-360.
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3317 pmid: 25751142
[23] Pertea M, Kim D, Pertea G M, Leek J T, Salzberg S L. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat Protoc, 2016, 11: 1650-1667.
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.095 pmid: 27560171
[24] 张金泽, 周庆国, 王倩, 肖莉晶, 金海润, 欧阳青静, 余坤江, 田恩堂. 芥菜型油菜响应菌核病侵染表达特性与高抗性关联基因分析. 作物学报, 2025, 51: 621-631.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.44120
Zhang J Z, Zhou Q G, Yang X, Wang Q, Xiao L J, Jin H R, Ou-Yang Q J, Yu K J, Tian E T. Analysis of genes associated with expression characteristics and high resistance in response to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum infection in Brassica juncea. Acta Agron Sin, 2025, 51: 621-631 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.44120
[25] Halkier B A, Gershenzon J. Biology and biochemistry of glucosinolates. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2006, 57: 303-333.
pmid: 16669764
[26] Zhang L, Kawaguchi R, Enomoto T, Nishida S, Burow M, Maruyama-Nakashita A. Glucosinolate catabolism maintains glucosinolate profiles and transport in sulfur-starved Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol, 2023, 64: 1534-1550.
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcad075 pmid: 37464897
[27] Brown P D, Tokuhisa J G, Reichelt M, Gershenzon J. Variation of glucosinolate accumulation among different organs and developmental stages of Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytochemistry, 2003, 62: 471-481.
doi: 10.1016/s0031-9422(02)00549-6 pmid: 12620360
[28] 田志涛, 赵永国, Lenka Havlickova, He Zhe S, Real Harper, Ian Bancroft, 邹锡玲, 张学昆, 陆光远. 甘蓝型油菜种子和角果皮中硫苷含量的动态变化及转录组关联分析. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51: 635-651.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.04.004
Tian Z T, Zhao Y G, Havlickova L, He Z S, Harper R, Bancroft I, Zou X L, Zhang X K, Lu G Y. Dynamic and associative transcriptomic analysis of glucosinolate content in seeds and silique walls of Brassica napus. Sci Agric Sin, 2018, 51: 635-651 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] 李培武. 甘蓝型油菜叶片与种子硫苷相关性研究. 华中农业大学博士学位论文, 湖北武汉, 2007.
Li P W. Correlation Between Glucosinolates in Leaves and Seeds of Brassica napus L. PhD Dissertation of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China, 2007.(in Chinese with English abstract).
[30] Rout K, Sharma M, Gupta V, Mukhopadhyay A, Sodhi Y S, Pental D, Pradhan A K. Deciphering allelic variations for seed glucosinolate traits in oilseed mustard (Brassica juncea) using two bi-parental mapping populations. Theor Appl Genet, 2015, 128: 657-666.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-015-2461-9 pmid: 25628164
[31] He Y J, Fu Y, Hu D X, Wei D Y, Qian W. QTL mapping of seed glucosinolate content responsible for environment in Brassica napus. Front Plant Sci, 2018, 9: 891.
[32] Rahman H, Kebede B, Zimmerli C, Yang R C. Genetic study and QTL mapping of seed glucosinolate content in Brassica rapa L. Crop Sci, 2014, 54: 537-543.
[33] Fu Y, Lu K, Qian L W, Mei J Q, Wei D Y, Peng X H, Xu X F, Li J N, Frauen M, Dreyer F, et al. Development of genic cleavage markers in association with seed glucosinolate content in canola. Theor Appl Genet, 2015, 128: 1029-1037.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-015-2487-z pmid: 25748114
[34] Schnug E, Ceynowa J. Phytopathological aspects of glucosinolates in oilseed rape. J Agron Crop Sci, 1990, 165: 319-328.
[35] Du L C, Ann Halkier B. Biosynthesis of glucosinolates in the developing silique walls and seeds of Sinapis alba. Phytochemistry, 1998, 48: 1145-1150.
[36] Chen S, Petersen B L, Olsen C E, Schulz A, Halkier B A. Long-distance phloem transport of glucosinolates in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol, 2001, 127: 194-201.
doi: 10.1104/pp.127.1.194 pmid: 11553747
[37] Petersen B L, Chen S X, Hansen C H, Olsen C E, Halkier B A. Composition and content of glucosinolates in developing Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta, 2002, 214: 562-571.
pmid: 11925040
[38] Tang Y S, Zhang G R, Jiang X Y, Shen S L, Guan M W, Tang Y H, Sun F J, Hu R, Chen S, Zhao H Y, et al. Genome-wide association study of glucosinolate metabolites (mGWAS) in Brassica napus L. Plants (Basel), 2023, 12: 639.
[39] Nour-Eldin H H, Halkier B A. Piecing together the transport pathway of aliphatic glucosinolates. Phytochem Rev, 2009, 8: 53-67.
[40] Madsen S R, Olsen C E, Nour-Eldin H H, Halkier B A. Elucidating the role of transport processes in leaf glucosinolate distribution. Plant Physiol, 2014, 166: 1450-1462.
doi: 10.1104/pp.114.246249 pmid: 25209984
[41] Nambiar D M, Kumari J, Augustine R, Kumar P, Bajpai P K, Bisht N C. GTR1 and GTR2 transporters differentially regulate tissue-specific glucosinolate contents and defence responses in the oilseed crop Brassica juncea. Plant Cell Environ, 2021, 44: 2729-2743.
[42] Tan Z D, Xie Z Q, Dai L H, Zhang Y T, Zhao H, Tang S, Wan L L, Yao X, Guo L, Hong D F. Genome- and transcriptome-wide association studies reveal the genetic basis and the breeding history of seed glucosinolate content in Brassica napus. Plant Biotechnol J, 2022, 20: 211-225.
[1] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[2] 郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657.
[3] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[4] 马亮, 马璐, 张舒钰, 章慧敏, 王仁明, 宋旭东, 张振良, 冒宇翔, 陆虎华, 陈国清, 郝德荣, 周广飞. 玉米苞叶数目转录组分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 790-801.
[5] 刘长友, 王珅, 时会影, 沈颖超, 孙蕾, 王彦, 张志肖, 苏秋竹, 田静, 范保杰. 基于饭豆基因资源的小豆远缘杂交群体抗豆象QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 936-944.
[6] 鲁雅妮, 丁超杰, 张煜, 杜习军, 齐学礼, 胡琳, 许为钢. 河南省200份小麦品种苗期茎基腐病抗性鉴定与全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 363-375.
[7] 王雅致, 杨飚, 季香林, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 二倍体马铃薯抗旱资源鉴定及抗旱基因初步筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 72-84.
[8] 董丽华, 董成艳, 李正楠, 余静, 叶靓, 刘芳, 谭静. 玉米禾谷镰孢穗腐病抗性候选基因的筛选与鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 131-147.
[9] 李璐琪, 程宇坤, 白斌, 雷斌, 耿洪伟. 小麦叶片气孔相关性状全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2266-2284.
[10] 蔡金珊, 李超男, 王景一, 李宁, 柳玉平, 景蕊莲, 李龙, 孙黛珍. 小麦幼苗根系性状全基因组关联分析及TaSRL-3B优异等位基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2020-2032.
[11] 杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[12] 赵超男, 王金凤, 张玉, 张丽, 李瑞琦, 王鹏飞, 李鸽子, 张宏军, 虞波, 康国章. 全基因组关联分析定位与挖掘小麦氮高效基因[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1801-1813.
[13] 胡蒙, 沙丹, 张晟瑞, 谷勇哲, 张世碧, 李静, 孙君明, 邱丽娟, 李斌. 大豆分枝数QTL定位及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1747-1756.
[14] 邵顺伟, 陈卓, 兰振东, 蔡兴奎, 邹华芬, 李晨曦, 唐景华, 朱熙, 张彧, 董建科, 金辉, 宋波涛. 基于BSA-seq技术的块茎芽眼深度QTL定位分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1725-1735.
[15] 李文佳, 廖泳俊, 黄璐, 鲁清, 李少雄, 陈小平, 金晶炜, 王润风. 花生开花时间的全基因组关联分析及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1400-1408.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!