欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (03): 447-455.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00447

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同种植密度下的夏玉米冠层结构及光合特性

吕丽华1;陶洪斌1;夏来坤1; 张雅杰1; 赵明2; 赵久然3;王璞1,*

  

  1. 1 农业部作物栽培与耕作学重点实验室/ 中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院,北京100094;2 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,北京100081;3 北京市农林科学院玉米研究中心,北京100089
  • 收稿日期:2007-05-30 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-03-12 网络出版日期:2008-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 王璞

Canopy Structure and Photosynthesis Traits of Summer Maize under Different Planting Densities

LÜ Li-Hua1,TAO Hong-Bin1,XIA Lai-Kun1, HANG Ya-Jie1,ZHAO Ming2,ZHAO Jiu-Ran3,WANG Pu1,*   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Farming System, Ministry of Agriculture / College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094; 2 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081; 3 Maize Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100089, China

  • Received:2007-05-30 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-03-12 Published online:2008-03-12
  • Contact: WANG Pu

摘要: 研究了种植密度对夏播玉米(CF008、郑单958和金海5号)冠层结构及光合特性的影响,目的是通过密度调控,构建高效冠层,发挥品种潜力,同时确立不同夏玉米品种高产高效冠层的定量化技术指标。结果表明,3个夏玉米品种均在中或低密度下(CF008为9.75和11.25万株 hm-2,郑单958为8.25和9.75万株 hm-2,金海5号为6.75和8.25万株 hm-2)构建的冠层较合理,冠层光合性能较高。冠层内透光率、叶夹角、茎粗、叶绿素相对含量(SPAD值)和净光合速率(Pn)均随着密度的增加而降低,说明高密度易造成群体内光分布不合理,导致光合性能的降低。灌浆中期前群体光合势(LAD)和叶面积指数(LAI)均表现为中或高密度条件下较高,而后为中或低密度下较高,并且吐丝后LAD所占比率为中或低密度处理显著高于高密度处理,说明高密度条件下冠层结构不合理,造成生育后期叶片提早衰老。在中或低密度下,群体穗位层透光率较大,吐丝期和灌浆中期分别为13.4%~19.45%和16.19%~21.48%;叶面积发展动态较为合理,吐丝期LAI达5.59~6.75,成熟期仍然保持在2.24~3.68,尤其中上层叶片LAI高值持续期较长;吐丝期中上层叶片Pn达到33.6~43.8 μmol CO2 m-2 s-1;吐丝后的群体LAD较高,特别是中密度下LAD达172.01~235.91 m2 d m-2,后期光合面积持续时间较长,更有利于玉米产量的提高。

关键词: 夏玉米, 密度, 叶面积指数, 透光率, FONT-FAMILY: 宋体, mso-ansi-language: EN-US

Abstract: Canopy structure has strong effects on photosynthesis and grain yield in maize (Zea mays L.). Planting density is one of the most important factors that can regulate canopy structure. Many researches have shown that leaf area index (LAI) and leaf area duration (LAD) increase accordantly with the proper increase of planting density, but the percent transmission decreases sharply under excessive high density, resulting in uneven light distribution within canopy and photosynthesis reduction. We need to know which proper planting densities for cultivars lead to little influence on photosynthesis and higher grain yield in summer maize. However, so far few reports on this topic have been found and no quantitative criteria can be used in evaluating canopy structure of different maize cultivars. Therefore, we conducted an experiment with three cultivars and three planting densities in the field having medium soil fertility and application of 180 kg N ha-1 in Wuqiao Experimental Station (37°41′02″N,116°37′23″E) of China Agricultural University in 2006 to establish such quantitative criteria for high yielding cultivars in North China Plain. The split plot design was employed with main plot of plant density (low, medium, and high respectively), sub-plot of cultivar (CF008, Zhengdan 958, and Jinhai 5 respectively), and three replicates in each sup-plot. According to plant type, the densities of three cultivars were 9.75×104 (low), 11.25×104 (medium), and 12.45×104 (high) plants ha-1 for CF008; 8.25×104 (low), 9.75×104 (medium), and 11.25×104 (high) plants ha-1 for Zhengdan 958; and 6.75×104 (low), 8.25×104 (medium), and 9.75×104 (high) plants ha-1 for Jinhai 5. The high-yielding canopy structure and photosynthesis were obtained under both low and medium densities of the three cultivars. Percent transmission, leaf angle, and stem diameter decreased with the increase of plant density. The chlorophyll relative content (SPAD) and the rate of net photosynthesis rate (Pn) were the smallest under high density because of the uneven light distribution within canopy. For CF008, SPAD value of ear leaf and the third leaf under ear decreased sharply in later growth stages. LAD and LAI values before mid-filling stage were greater under medium or high densities, while different tendency occurred in the maturity stages. Moreover, the proportion of after-silking LAD was greater under low or medium densities, showing that canopy structure was unsuitable under high density due to early senescence. For Zhengdan 958 and Jinhai 5, LAD after silking was greater than that before silking, which was benefit for high grain yield. Our results confirmed that proper planting density can establish high-yielding canopy structure and improve population photosynthesis and yield in maize. We also obtained a series quantitative criteria for high-yielding canopy structure based on the data from Wuqiao area: percent transmission of 13.4%–19.45% in silking stage and 16.19%–21.48% in mid-filling stage under low or medium densities; LAI of 5.59–6.75 in silking stage and 2.24–3.68 in maturity stage, especially highen in middle and upper leaf layers in maturity stage under low or medium densities; Pn of 33.6–43.8 μmol CO2 m-2 s-1 in middle and upper layer leaves in silking stage under low or medium densities; higher LAD after silking under low or medium densities, with 172.01–235.91 m2 d m-2 under medium density.

Key words: Summer maize, Density, Leaf areaindex, Percent transmission, Photosynthesis

[1] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[2] 张全军, 吴东丽, 刘聪, 朱永超, 杨大生, 孔祥胜. 1981—2024年长江中下游油菜发育期时空格局演变特征[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1140-1152.
[3] 马海会, 张国平, 杨思存, 王红丽. 不同密度下氮肥运筹对半干旱区青贮玉米碳氮积累与转运特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1193-1207.
[4] 刘吉昌, 李思烨, 李雪婷, 王洪章, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 任昊. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐型夏玉米品种根系生长及养分吸收效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 565-577.
[5] 孟凡琦, 房孟颖, 罗艺, 卢霖, 董学瑞, 王亚菲, 郭丽娜, 闫鹏, 董志强, 张凤路. 乙烯利-甜菜碱-水杨酸合剂对夏玉米耐热性和产量的调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1299-1311.
[6] 宋利, 刘广周, 张华, 卢庭启, 卿春燕, 杨云山, 郭晓霞, 胡单, 李少昆, 侯鹏. 密植滴灌水肥一体化对西南夏玉米产量及土壤细菌群落的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 992-1004.
[7] 辛雨宁, 任昊, 王洪章, 梁明磊, 于涛, 刘鹏. 喷施6-苄氨基腺嘌呤(6-BA)对授粉后高温胁迫下夏玉米籽粒灌浆及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 418-431.
[8] 崔栋, 王同超, 杨松林, 任佰朝, 高英波, 于宁宁, 张吉旺. 灌溉方式和种植密度优化协同提高夏玉米产量和水分利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3026-3037.
[9] 辛明华, 秘雅迪, 王国平, 李小飞, 李亚兵, 董合林, 韩迎春, 冯璐. 行距配置和种植密度对棉花干物质生产及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 221-232.
[10] 张琪祺, 陈杰昌, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 赵思明, 贾才华, 周广生. 高密度直播对油菜冷榨菜籽油品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2358-2370.
[11] 孙照华, 任昊, 王洪章, 王子强, 姚海燕, 辛爱美, 赵斌, 张吉旺, 任佰朝, 刘鹏. 叶面喷施硅制剂对滨海盐碱地夏玉米叶片光合性能及籽粒产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2383-2395.
[12] 彭杰, 谢晓麒, 张钊, 姚晓芬, 邱深, 陈丹丹, 顾晓娜, 王玉洁, 王晨晨, 杨国正. 夏直播棉花产量与冠层微环境的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2371-2382.
[13] 宁宁, 余新颖, 秦梦倩, 娄洪祥, 王宗铠, 王春云, 贾才华, 徐正华, 王晶, 蒯婕, 汪波, 赵杰, 周广生. 关键栽培措施对菜籽油综合品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1554-1567.
[14] 徐泽, 吴莘玲, 刘震宇, 李涵佳, 冷鑫华, 吴天凡, 陈媛, 张祥, 陈德华. 密度与氮素对夏播棉氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1584-1596.
[15] 岳海旺, 魏建伟, 刘朋程, 陈淑萍, 卜俊周. 基于GYT双标图分析对黄淮海生态区玉米品种综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 836-856.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!