欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (08): 1156-1165.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

抗青枯病花生种质的遗传多样性

姜慧芳1,2;廖伯寿2;任小平2;雷永2;傅廷栋1;Mace E3;Crouch J H3   

  1. 1华中农业大学植物科学技术学院,湖北武汉430070;2中国农业科学院油料作物研究所,湖北武汉430062;3International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru 502324, India
  • 收稿日期:2005-09-21 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-08-12 网络出版日期:2006-08-12

Genetic Diversity Assessment in Peanut Genotypes with Bacterial Wilt Resistance

JIANG Hui-Fang1 2,LIAO Bo-Shou2,REN Xiao-Ping2,LEI Yong2,FU Ting-Dong1,Mace E 3,Crouch J H 3

  

  1. 1Plant Science and Technology Colleage, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei; 2Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430062, Hubei, China; 3International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru 502324, India
  • Received:2005-09-21 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-08-12 Published online:2006-08-12

摘要:

以栽培种花生2个亚种4个植物学类型的31份对青枯病具有不同抗性的种质为材料,通过SSR和AFLP技术分析了其DNA多样性,并与通过形态和种子品质性状揭示的表型多样性进行了比较。结果表明,不同类型的抗青枯病花生品种之间存在丰富的DNA多样性,SSR揭示的品种间遗传距离大于AFLP揭示的品种间遗传距离,基于二者的聚类分析结果趋势一致,结合花生的植物学类型、地理来源和系谱分析,以SSR的聚类结果与表型性状的聚类结果更为吻合。感病优质高产品种“中花5号”与密枝亚种的普通型和龙生型的抗病材料的差异很大,与育种中被广泛利用的抗源“协抗青”和“台山三粒肉”的差异相对较小,与“远杂9102”的差异更小。

关键词: 花生, 抗青枯病种质, DNA多样性, SSR, AFLP, 形态多样性

Abstract:

Bacterial wilt disease is a serious threat to peanut production in China. Understanding the genetic diversity in peanut genotypes with bacterial wilt resistance and enhancing the germplasm resources are helpful for peanut breeding for disease resistance. In this study, the DNA polymorphism among 31 genotypes with various bacterial wilt resistance including 4 botanical types from 2 subspecies of cultivated peanut were assessed by SSR and AFLP analysis. Polymorphism in morphological characters and seed chemical composition were also analyzed. The results indicated that there was enough polymorphism in the peanut genotypes with bacterial wilt resistance based on SSR and AFLP analysis. The SSR-based genetic distance was bigger than the AFLP-based genetic distance among the 31 genotypes. But the cluster based on SSR data was very similar to that based on AFLP data. Considering the botanical type, origin and pedigree of the genotypes used in the study, the cluster based on SSR data was conformed with that based on morphological and seed quality characters. However, there were a few differences between the cluster through AFLP approach and that through morphological and seed quality characters. The distances between the high yielding varieties with bacterial wilt susceptivity “Zhonghua 5” and the genotypes of Var. Virginia and Hirsuta were big relatively. But the distances between “Zhonghua 5” and “Yuanza 9102” as well as the two donors used widely “Xiekangqing” and “Tanshan Sanlirou” were small.

Key words: Peanut, Germplasm with bacterial wilt resistance, DNA polymorphism, SSR, AFLP, morphological polymorphism

中图分类号: 

  • S565
[1] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[2] 李海芬, 魏浩, 温世杰, 鲁清, 刘浩, 李少雄, 洪彦彬, 陈小平, 梁炫强. 花生电压依赖性阴离子通道基因(AhVDAC)的克隆及在果针向地性反应中表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1558-1565.
[3] 刘嘉欣, 兰玉, 徐倩玉, 李红叶, 周新宇, 赵璇, 甘毅, 刘宏波, 郑月萍, 詹仪花, 张刚, 郑志富. 耐三唑并嘧啶类除草剂花生种质创制与鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1027-1034.
[4] 陈小红, 林元香, 王倩, 丁敏, 王海岗, 陈凌, 高志军, 王瑞云, 乔治军. 基于高基元SSR构建黍稷种质资源的分子身份证[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 908-919.
[5] 张霞, 于卓, 金兴红, 于肖夏, 李景伟, 李佳奇. 马铃薯SSR引物的开发、特征分析及在彩色马铃薯材料中的扩增研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 920-929.
[6] 丁红, 徐扬, 张冠初, 秦斐斐, 戴良香, 张智猛. 不同生育期干旱与氮肥施用对花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.
[7] 黄莉, 陈玉宁, 罗怀勇, 周小静, 刘念, 陈伟刚, 雷永, 廖伯寿, 姜慧芳. 花生种子大小相关性状QTL定位研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 280-291.
[8] 汪颖, 高芳, 刘兆新, 赵继浩, 赖华江, 潘小怡, 毕晨, 李向东, 杨东清. 利用WGCNA鉴定花生主茎生长基因共表达模块[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1639-1653.
[9] 王建国, 张佳蕾, 郭峰, 唐朝辉, 杨莎, 彭振英, 孟静静, 崔利, 李新国, 万书波. 钙与氮肥互作对花生干物质和氮素积累分配及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1666-1679.
[10] 石磊, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 高伟, 张忠信, 齐飞艳, 刘娟, 董文召, 张新友. 花生AhFAD2-1基因启动子及5'-UTR内含子功能验证及其低温胁迫应答[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1703-1711.
[11] 高芳, 刘兆新, 赵继浩, 汪颖, 潘小怡, 赖华江, 李向东, 杨东清. 北方主栽花生品种的源库特征及其分类[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1712-1723.
[12] 张鹤, 蒋春姬, 殷冬梅, 董佳乐, 任婧瑶, 赵新华, 钟超, 王晓光, 于海秋. 花生耐冷综合评价体系构建及耐冷种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1753-1767.
[13] 薛晓梦, 吴洁, 王欣, 白冬梅, 胡美玲, 晏立英, 陈玉宁, 康彦平, 王志慧, 淮东欣, 雷永, 廖伯寿. 低温胁迫对普通和高油酸花生种子萌发的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1768-1778.
[14] 郝西, 崔亚男, 张俊, 刘娟, 臧秀旺, 高伟, 刘兵, 董文召, 汤丰收. 过氧化氢浸种对花生种子发芽及生理代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1834-1840.
[15] 张旺, 冼俊霖, 孙超, 王春明, 石丽, 于为常. CRISPR/Cas9编辑花生FAD2基因研究[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1481-1490.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!