欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (08): 1156-1165.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

抗青枯病花生种质的遗传多样性

姜慧芳1,2;廖伯寿2;任小平2;雷永2;傅廷栋1;Mace E3;Crouch J H3   

  1. 1华中农业大学植物科学技术学院,湖北武汉430070;2中国农业科学院油料作物研究所,湖北武汉430062;3International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru 502324, India
  • 收稿日期:2005-09-21 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-08-12 网络出版日期:2006-08-12

Genetic Diversity Assessment in Peanut Genotypes with Bacterial Wilt Resistance

JIANG Hui-Fang1 2,LIAO Bo-Shou2,REN Xiao-Ping2,LEI Yong2,FU Ting-Dong1,Mace E 3,Crouch J H 3

  

  1. 1Plant Science and Technology Colleage, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei; 2Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430062, Hubei, China; 3International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru 502324, India
  • Received:2005-09-21 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-08-12 Published online:2006-08-12

摘要:

以栽培种花生2个亚种4个植物学类型的31份对青枯病具有不同抗性的种质为材料,通过SSR和AFLP技术分析了其DNA多样性,并与通过形态和种子品质性状揭示的表型多样性进行了比较。结果表明,不同类型的抗青枯病花生品种之间存在丰富的DNA多样性,SSR揭示的品种间遗传距离大于AFLP揭示的品种间遗传距离,基于二者的聚类分析结果趋势一致,结合花生的植物学类型、地理来源和系谱分析,以SSR的聚类结果与表型性状的聚类结果更为吻合。感病优质高产品种“中花5号”与密枝亚种的普通型和龙生型的抗病材料的差异很大,与育种中被广泛利用的抗源“协抗青”和“台山三粒肉”的差异相对较小,与“远杂9102”的差异更小。

关键词: 花生, 抗青枯病种质, DNA多样性, SSR, AFLP, 形态多样性

Abstract:

Bacterial wilt disease is a serious threat to peanut production in China. Understanding the genetic diversity in peanut genotypes with bacterial wilt resistance and enhancing the germplasm resources are helpful for peanut breeding for disease resistance. In this study, the DNA polymorphism among 31 genotypes with various bacterial wilt resistance including 4 botanical types from 2 subspecies of cultivated peanut were assessed by SSR and AFLP analysis. Polymorphism in morphological characters and seed chemical composition were also analyzed. The results indicated that there was enough polymorphism in the peanut genotypes with bacterial wilt resistance based on SSR and AFLP analysis. The SSR-based genetic distance was bigger than the AFLP-based genetic distance among the 31 genotypes. But the cluster based on SSR data was very similar to that based on AFLP data. Considering the botanical type, origin and pedigree of the genotypes used in the study, the cluster based on SSR data was conformed with that based on morphological and seed quality characters. However, there were a few differences between the cluster through AFLP approach and that through morphological and seed quality characters. The distances between the high yielding varieties with bacterial wilt susceptivity “Zhonghua 5” and the genotypes of Var. Virginia and Hirsuta were big relatively. But the distances between “Zhonghua 5” and “Yuanza 9102” as well as the two donors used widely “Xiekangqing” and “Tanshan Sanlirou” were small.

Key words: Peanut, Germplasm with bacterial wilt resistance, DNA polymorphism, SSR, AFLP, morphological polymorphism

中图分类号: 

  • S565
[1] 郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657.
[2] 陆一楚, 李振影, 买春海, 赵晓蕊, 王利祥. 夜间复合体关键基因AhLUX1正向调控花生结瘤的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1658-1668.
[3] 谷春苗, 王润风, 黄璐, 刘浩, 鲁清, 李海芬, 李少雄, 何双呈, 洪彦彬, 陈小平, 谭斌, 余倩霞. 花生WOX基因家族的全基因组分析及不定芽再生候选基因的鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1326-1340.
[4] 张颖星, 宋裕祯, 王跃, 曹越, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. EMS诱导糜子优异性状突变体的筛选及表型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1388-1400.
[5] 田春艳, 陆鑫, 吴才文, 徐超华, 刘家勇, 边芯, 桃联安. 基于荧光SSR的甘蔗创新种质遗传多样性分析及育种潜力评估[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1057-1072.
[6] 于天一, 王春晓, 肖丽, 钟召迪, 王宣仓, 赵勇, 路亚, 吴月, 吴正锋. 不同结瘤特性花生品种氮素累积、产量及品质特性对氮肥用量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 881-894.
[7] 张胜忠, 李国卫, 戈立江, 王菲菲, 胡晓辉, 苗华荣, 李燕, 钟文, 陈静. 花生机械脱壳损伤相关农艺指标筛选与QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 644-652.
[8] 王菲菲, 张胜忠, 杨贵华, 苗华荣, 胡晓辉, 张则林, 刘莎莎, 乔利仙, 单世华, 陈静. 331份花生种质苗期耐盐性综合评价和强耐盐种质鉴选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 279-294.
[9] 金欣欣, 宋亚辉, 苏俏, 杨永庆, 王瑾. 高产高油高油酸花生品种的生长发育及干物质生产特征[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 191-201.
[10] 迟晓元, 刘庆, 张君, 赵旭红, 李美, 于天一, 潘丽娟, 许静, 姜骁, 殷祥贞, 马俊卿, 陈娜. 不同花生品种(系)耐盐碱性田间鉴定及各性状指标相关性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 85-98.
[11] 孙辰硕, 张月, 田泽锴, 晏立英, 康彦平, 陈玉宁, 王欣, 淮东欣, 王前前, 姜慧芳, 罗怀勇, 黄莉, 廖伯寿, 王志慧, 雷永. 花生种质果柄强度的遗传分化与主要影响因子分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 118-130.
[12] 万书波, 张佳蕾, 高华鑫, 王才斌. 中国花生高产栽培研究进展与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1703-1711.
[13] 郭腾达, 崔梦杰, 陈琳杰, 韩锁义, 郭敬坤, 吴晨迪, 付留洋, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 张新友. 花生磷脂酰肌醇转运蛋白基因AhSFH的克隆及其响应黄曲霉菌侵染的表达特征分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1489-1500.
[14] 李文佳, 廖泳俊, 黄璐, 鲁清, 李少雄, 陈小平, 金晶炜, 王润风. 花生开花时间的全基因组关联分析及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1400-1408.
[15] 林伟津, 郭泽佳, 刘浩, 李海芬, 王润风, 黄璐, 余倩霞, 陈小平, 洪彦彬, 李少雄, 鲁清. 花生荚果产量相关性状QTL定位与候选基因分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 969-981.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!