欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (08): 1151-1155.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

水稻耐低磷种质的苗期筛选与鉴定

高方远1,2 陆贤军1 康海岐1,2 孙淑霞1 刘光春1 任光俊1   

  1. 1四川省农业科学院作物研究所,四川成都 610066; 2 四川大学生命科学院,四川成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2005-07-29 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-08-12 网络出版日期:2006-08-12

Screening and Identification for Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Tolerance to Pi Deficiency at Seedling Stage

GAO Fang-Yuan1 2, LU Xian-Jun1, KANG Hai-Qi1 2, SUN Shu-Xia1, LIU Guang-Chun1 and REN Guang-Jun1   

  1. 1 Crop Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066,Sichuan;2 Life Science College, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2005-07-29 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-08-12 Published online:2006-08-12

摘要:

从以成恢448为轮回亲本,M401为供体亲本构建的回交后代BC1F6筛选出的耐低磷材料(GP9)和低磷敏感材料(GP14)及其亲本用于盆栽试验,设置P2(2.31 mg/kg)、P30(30 mg/kg)和P80(80 mg/kg)3个磷处理水平,以P80处理为对照计算性状相对值,研究不同磷处理浓度对供试材料6个生物学性状的影响。结果表明,P2处理较P30处理更能反映不同材料性状相对值间的差异,宜用于苗期耐低磷筛选。P2处理时,GP9与GP14及其亲本播种后52 d、59 d和66 d的相对分蘖数差异均达极显著水平,建议采用相对分蘖数作为水稻苗期耐低磷筛选的主要鉴别指标。同时,运用相对叶面积、相对绿叶数和相对叶龄进行综合评定。

关键词: 水稻, 耐低磷, 筛选指标

Abstract:

Phosphorus (P) shortage in soil is a key-limiting factor in agricultural production. There are P-efficiency differences among different rice genotypes, screening and cultivating low-P tolerant cultivars have become very important. To evaluate the screening method and identification indexes, Chenghui 448(GP1), the recurrent parent, M401(GP4), the donor parent, low-P tolerant line GP9 and low-P sensitive line GP14 identified from backcross progenies of Chenghui 448/M401 were used in pot soil cultural experiments with three treatments, including the original P concentration of supplied soil (P2, 2.31 mg/kg), and two supplementary P application levels of P30 (30 mg/kg) and P80 (80 mg/kg). The concentration P80 was used as the normal control; the effects of different inorganic phosphorus supply on relative number of tillers, relative leaf area, relative number of green leaves, relative leaf age, relative chlorophyll content and relative plant height of cultivars were investigated. The main results were summarized as follows: Genotypic differences were found distinctly in many traits with P2 treatment, which was better than P30 treatment to distinguish low-Pi tolerant genotypes from those sensitive to P deficiency at seedling stage. Under P2 condition, the differences among the relative number of tillers in different lines for 52 d, 59 d and 66 d were significant, indicating that relative number of tillers may be used as main index for screening and identifying the tolerance to Pi deficiency. In addition, relative leaf area, relative number of green leaves and relative leaf age can be employed to evaluate the tolerance to Pi deficiency in rice germplasm, comprehensively.

Key words: Rice, Tolerance to Pi deficiency, Screening criteria

中图分类号: 

  • S511
[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[7] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[8] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[9] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
[10] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[11] 陈悦, 孙明哲, 贾博为, 冷月, 孙晓丽. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子参与逆境胁迫应答的分子机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 781-790.
[12] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[13] 巫燕飞, 胡琴, 周棋, 杜雪竹, 盛锋. 水稻延伸因子复合体家族基因鉴定及非生物胁迫诱导表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 644-655.
[14] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[15] 王琰, 陈志雄, 姜大刚, 张灿奎, 查满荣. 增强叶片氮素输出对水稻分蘖和碳代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 739-746.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!