欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (03): 507-510.

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同优势抗虫棉杂交组合不同生育期基因表达差异初探

邢朝柱1 ; 喻树迅1,* ; 赵云雷2; 郭立平1 ; 张献龙2; 苗成朵1 ; 王海林1   

  1. 1中国农业科学院棉花研究所,河南安阳455004;2华中农业大学,湖北武汉430070
  • 收稿日期:2006-02-27 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-03-12 网络出版日期:2007-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 喻树迅

Primary Study on Gene Differential Expression of Pest-resistant Cotton Hybrids between Different Heterosis Crosses

XING Chao-Zhu 1;YU Shu-Xun 1,*; ZHAO Yun-Lei 2; GUO Li-Ping 1;ZHANG Xian-Long 2; MIAO Cheng-Duo 1; WANG Hai-Lin 1   

  1. 1 Cotton Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455004, Henan; 2 Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
  • Received:2006-02-27 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-03-12 Published online:2007-03-12
  • Contact: YU Shu-Xun

摘要:

采用DDRT-PCR技术对3个产量优势差异较大的杂交棉组合及其亲本在4个生育期叶片cDNA进行扩增和差显,结果表明,产量高、中、低优势组合与其亲本基因差异表达比例从蕾期到花铃期总体上呈递减趋势;杂种特异表达在前3个生育期高优势组合高于中或低优势组合,特异表达可能对杂种优势的产生起一定作用;单亲表达一致是基因差异表达中最主要表达模式,但在各生育期高、中、低优势组合之间变化幅度较小,表明此模式可能与杂种优势发挥无明显关系。

关键词: 抗虫杂交棉, 杂种优势, 生育期, 基因差异表达

Abstract:

Leaf cDNA of 3 pest-resistant cotton crosses with remarkable different yield heterosis and their parents in 4 growth stages were amplified by DDRT-PCR (The mRNA Differential Display) with 45 primers combinations. The results were as follows: The proportions of genes differential expression between F1 and their parents were degressive tendency from square stage to boll stage in these crosses. The percentages of genes differential expression in the high heterotic cross were higher than those in the low heterotic crosses in four growth stages, which showing a closely relationship between gene differential expression and heterosis occurrence. The percentages of M3 (bands expressed only F1) in the high heterotic crosses surpassed those in middle or low heterotic crosses at three earlier growing stages, which suggested M3 played an important role in yield heterosis occurrence. M4 (bands expressed in one parent and F1) was the main expression pattern in gene differential expression, but varied within narrow range in four growing stages, which indicated no remarkable correlation between yield heterosis and M4.

Key words: Pest-resistant cotton crosses, Heterosis, Growth stages, Gene differential expression

[1] 孟然, 李赵嘉, 冯薇, 陈悦, 刘路平, 杨春燕, 鲁雪林, 王秀萍. 大豆不同生育时期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008.
[2] 熊强强, 孙长辉, 顾雯霏, 陆彦尧, 周年兵, 郭保卫, 刘国栋, 魏海燕, 朱金燕, 张洪程. 基于生育期、产量和品质对70份粳糯品种(系)的综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 728-743.
[3] 孙现军, 于太飞, 胡正, 申鑫萍, 戈文艺, 姜雪敏, 王世佳, 于思佳, 武书羽, 韩龙植, 张辉, 姜奇彦. 基于“标准差系数加权法”的水稻全生育期耐盐碱鉴定与资源筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3369-3376.
[4] 裴法敬, 张文轩, 张晓, 王昕钰, 彭少兵, 米甲明. 长粒香型的超短生育期水稻新品系创制[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1684-1698.
[5] 宋梦媛, 郭中校, 苏禹霏, 邓昆鹏, 兰天娇, 程钰鑫, 包淑英, 王桂芳, 窦金光, 姜泽锴, 王明海, 徐宁. 一种绿豆柱头外露突变体的转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 957-968.
[6] 范惠玲, 白生文, 路妍, 彭小星, 周仙莉, 张红岩, 滕长才, 武学霞, 刘玉皎. 155份蚕豆种质资源全生育期耐盐碱性鉴定与综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(12): 3035-3045.
[7] 方然, 袁丽媚, 王玉林, 芦思佳, 孔凡江, 刘宝辉, 孔令平. 生育期基因E1~E4不同突变组合对大豆纬度适应性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(12): 3013-3024.
[8] 夏秀忠, 张宗琼, 农保选, 冯锐, 郭辉, 陈灿, 梁树辉, 荘洁, 廖祖宇, 宋国显, 杨行海, 李丹婷. 深水稻全生育期耐盐性状的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(10): 2493-2502.
[9] 宋兆建, 冯紫旖, 屈天歌, 吕品苍, 杨晓璐, 湛明月, 张献华, 何玉池, 刘育华, 蔡得田. 四倍体水稻回复二倍体品系的籼粳属性鉴定和杂种优势利用初探[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2039-2050.
[10] 李璐璐, 明博, 高尚, 谢瑞芝, 王克如, 侯鹏, 薛军, 李少昆. 不同熟期玉米品种籽粒田间脱水特征差异性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1643-1652.
[11] 陈冰嬬, 于淼, 葛占宇, 李洪奎, 黄炎, 李海青, 石贵山, 谢利, 徐宁, 闫峰, 高士杰, 周紫阳, 王鼐. 春播早熟区高粱杂种优势群及杂种优势模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(2): 343-353.
[12] 温明星, 肖进, 徐涛, 孙丽, 王宗宽, 王海燕, 王秀娥. 利用55K芯片进行小麦生育期相关性状的QTL定位及效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(12): 3188-3203.
[13] 杨豪, 向仕华, 刘丽, 宁可君, 杨雪, 舒英杰, 何庆元. 川渝大豆生育期性状的全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(10): 2727-2737.
[14] 潘想成, 杨国栋, 符迎迎, 王昕钰, 熊渠, 徐乐, 彭少兵. 新育成超短生育期品系在双季稻双直播下的产量表现及农艺特性[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(10): 2738-2752.
[15] 商蒙非, 石晓宇, 赵炯超, 李硕, 褚庆全. 气候变化背景下中国不同区域玉米生育期高温胁迫时空变化特征[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(1): 167-176.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!