欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12): 1557-1561.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

烤烟几种主要化学成分的遗传分析

肖炳光; 朱军;卢秀萍; 李永平; 白永富   

  1. 浙江大学农业与生物技术学院,浙江杭州310029
  • 收稿日期:2004-09-06 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2005-12-12 网络出版日期:2005-12-12
  • 通讯作者: 朱军

Genetic Analysis for Chemical Constituents in Flue-cured Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)

XIAO Bing-Guang; ZHU Jun; LU Xiu-Ping; LI Yong-Ping; BAI Yong-Fu   

  1. College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, Zhejiang
  • Received:2004-09-06 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2005-12-12 Published online:2005-12-12
  • Contact: ZHU Jun

摘要: 本文以14个烤烟品种(系)及其配制的41个杂交组合为材料,利用包括基因型与环境互作的加性-显性遗传模型进行烟叶化学成分的遗传和相关分析。结果表明,烟碱主要受加性主效应控制,总糖、还原糖、两糖差、总氮、蛋白质、氧化钾受显性×环境互作效应影响最大。没有一个参试亲本和杂交组合同时在两糖差、烟碱上表现负向效应,而在氧化钾上表现正向效应。性状相关分析表明,总氮、烟碱、蛋白质这类含氮化合物之间呈正向表现型相关、基因型相关和加性遗传相关,而与总糖、还原糖呈负向表现型相关、基因型相关和加性遗传相关。两糖差、烟碱、含钾量之间各相关系数较小或无显著相关,可以通过广泛配制组合或推广大后代群体同步减少两糖差,降低烟碱,提高含钾量。

关键词: 烤烟, 化学成分, 加性-显性模型, 基因型×环境互作

Abstract: Chemical constituents are the major factors attributed to leaf quality in the flue-cured tobacco, and are sensitive to environments. Despite inheritance of some chemical characteristics was reported, information on genotype by environment interaction is generally lacking. The objectives of this research were to evaluate the genetic effects for chemical constituents, and to understand the genetic correlations among the traits analyzed. By using randomized complete block design, 14 flue-cured tobacco cultivars(or breeding lines) and their 41 F1 crosses were grown in four locations with two replications at each location in Yunnan Province in 2002. Percents of total sugar, reducing sugar, sugar difference between percents of total sugar and reducing sugar, percents of total nitrogen, nicotine, protein and K2O were evaluated for the cured leaves. A genetic model including additive and dominance effects and their interaction with environments was applied for genetic and correlation analyses. Additive, dominance, additive by enviroment interaction and dominance by environment interaction genetic effects appeared to play an importance role in the inheritance of additive variance to phenotypic variance was 0.302(See in Table 1). Dominance×environment interaction effects played a major role for total sugar, reducing sugar,sugar difference, total nitrogen, protein, and K2O. No parents and crosses investigated had negative effects for sugar difference and nicotine, but positive effects for K2O.The analysis of correlation among chemical constituents revealed that there were positive correlations of phenotypic, genotypic and additive effects among the nitrogenous compounds such as total nitrogen, nicotine, protein, and negative correlation with total sugar and reducing sugar for phenotypic, genotypic and additive effects. Sugar difference, nicotine and K2O had low or no correlation with each others(Table 4). The predominance of additive genetic variance for nicotine in this study suggests that the most effective breeding procedures for improving nititine content will be those which lead to the superior homozygous lines. The predominance of dominance by environment interaction variance for those which lead to the superior homozygous lines. The predominance of dominance by environment interaction variance for sugar difference and K2O percent suggests that the utility of heterosis should be considered in specific environments. It is possible to decrease sugar difference and nicotine, and increase K2O simultaneously in tobacco leaves by making more crosses or enlarging offspring population.

Key words: Flue-cured tobacco, Chemical constituents, Additive-dominance model, Genotype by environment interaction

中图分类号: 

  • S572
[1] 刘青丽,蒋雨洲,邹焱,张云贵,张恒,石俊雄,李志宏. 烟田生态系统碳收支研究[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(8): 1258-1265.
[2] 赵松超,李一凡,刘博远,赵铭钦. 晾制密度对雪茄烟叶膜脂过氧化作用及品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(7): 1090-1098.
[3] 李成江,李大肥,周桂夙,许龙,徐天养,赵正雄. 不同种类生物炭对植烟土壤微生物及根茎病害发生的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(2): 289-296.
[4] 周健飞,武云杰,薛刚,张安乾,田培,彭玉富,杨铁钊. 烤烟成熟期烟叶GS同工酶活性与氮素运转的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(1): 111-117.
[5] 沈杰,蔡艳,何玉亭,李启权,杜宣延,王昌全,罗定棋. 基于归一化法的烤烟干物质积累建模与特征分析[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(03): 442-453.
[6] 涂勇,杨文钰,刘卫国,雍太文,江连强,王小春. 大豆与烤烟不同套作年限对根际土壤微生物数量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(05): 733-742.
[7] 肖炳光, 邱杰,曹培健,桂毅杰,卢秀萍,李永平,樊龙江. 利用基因组简约法开发烟草SNP标记及遗传作图[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(03): 397-404.
[8] 刘青丽,陈阜,张云贵,李志宏,焦永鸽,谷海红. 我国西南烟区典型植烟土壤烤烟氮素的吸收规律[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(03): 486-493.
[9] 童治军,焦芳婵,吴兴富,王丰青,陈学军,李绪英,高玉龙,张谊寒,肖炳光,吴为人. 烤烟6个农艺性状的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(08): 1407-1415.
[10] 张吉顺,王仁刚,杨春元,吴春,史跃伟,王志红,王轶,任学良. 国内外烤烟品种农艺性状的遗传多样性及与SRAP标记的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(06): 1029-1041.
[11] 姚金保, 张平平, 任丽娟, 杨学明, 马鸿翔, 姚国才, 张鹏, 周淼平. 小麦抗倒指数遗传及其与茎秆特性的相关分析[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(03): 452-458.
[12] 云菲,刘国顺,史宏志. 光氮互作对烟草气体交换和部分碳氮代谢酶活性及品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(3): 508-516.
[13] 彭云,赵正雄,李忠环,董艳,陈荣平,王胱霖,王永,杨自控. 不同前茬对烤烟生长、产量和质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(2): 335-340.
[14] 宋朝鹏, 宫长荣, 武圣江, 刘文博, 贺帆, 刘闯, 张勇刚, 张卫建. 密集烘烤过程中烤烟细胞生理和质地变化[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(11): 1967-1973.
[15] 武德传,周冀衡,樊在斗,李文璧,张一扬,杨程,徐发华,朱 凯,段凤云,王德勋. 云南烤烟多酚含量空间变异分析[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(1): 141-146.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!