欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (01): 70-75.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同供水条件下小麦不同绿色器官的气孔特性研究

张永平1,2;王志敏1*;吴永成1; 张霞1   

  1. 中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院,北京100094
  • 收稿日期:2004-12-24 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-01-12 网络出版日期:2006-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 王志敏

Stomatal Characteristics of Different Green Organs in Wheat under Different Irrigation Regimes

ZHANG Yong-Ping1,2; WANG Zhi-Min1*; WU Yong-Cheng1 and ZHANG Xia1   

  1. College of Agronomy and Bio-technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094
  • Received:2004-12-24 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-01-12 Published online:2006-01-12
  • Contact: WANG Zhi-Min

摘要:

为了考察小麦叶片与非叶器官气孔结构特性的差异及其对供水条件的反应,本研究设置不同灌水处理,利用电镜观察小麦灌浆期不同绿色器官的气孔分布和结构特征,并分析其与气孔特性指标间的关系。结果表明,在不同灌水处理下看到各非叶器官(穗、旗叶鞘和穗下节间)均分布着气孔,但其数目少于旗叶叶片。护颖仅在远轴面存在气孔;外稃在多水条件下(4水处理)近轴面出现较多气孔,而远轴面看不到气孔,但在水分胁迫(无水处理)条件下,气孔却出现在远轴面而不在近轴面;在不同水分处理下均观察到芒上明显的气孔分布。从气孔大小看,穗各部分(护颖、外稃、内稃和芒)略小于其他器官。随着灌水次数的减少,各器官气孔密度呈增大趋势,气孔器及气孔孔径表现出长度增加、宽度减小的特征。限水灌溉下非叶器官(穗、旗叶鞘和穗下节间)在籽粒灌浆期气孔导度、蒸腾速率和光合速率的稳定性高于叶片。相关分析表明,不同器官的气孔导度与蒸腾速率均呈显著正相关,非叶器官气孔导度与光合速率的相关程度明显低于叶片。说明在干旱少水条件下,叶与非叶器官蒸腾作用均会减弱,叶片光合速率亦相应降低,而非叶器官光合速率可能保持相对稳定,可相对提高其水分利用效率。

关键词: 小麦, 气孔结构, 非叶器官, 光合速率

Abstract:

Stomata are the channel of CO2 and water vapour exchange between the plant and atmosphere, and contributing to photosynthesis, transpiration and temperature fitness of plant. There have been many reports about the stomatal structure and characteristics focused on the leaf blades, the major photosynthetic organs, in wheat but only a few reports about stomatal distribution on the ear(especially on the awn), whereas, no any report on stomatal structure characteristics and their relations to photosynthetic rate and transpiration rate of various non-leaf green organs in wheat under different water condition. In current study, a field experiment was conducted with two cultivars (Lumai 21 and SJZ 8) and three irrigation treatments[No irrigation, Two irrigations (1 500 m3∙hm-2) and Four irrigations (3 000 m3∙hm-2) in the growing period of wheat], in order to asses differences in stomatal structure characteristics and their response to irrigation between flag leaf blade and non-leaf green organs (flag leaf sheath, peduncle, glume, lemma, palea and awn). Stomatal structure and distribution on leaf blade and non-leaf green organs in winter wheat were observed, and the stomatal conductance, transpiration rate and photosynthetic rate were also measured in response to different supplemental irrigation treatments. It was showed that under different irrigation treatments, stomata could be found on all surfaces of flag leaf blade , sheath and peduncle, and also on the surface of awn and abaxial surface of glume in ear. However, for lemma, stomata appeared only on the adaxial (not on the abaxial )side under both two and four irrigation treatments, and only on the abaxial side under water stress(no irrigation). In size, stomat apparatus on the ear(glume, lemma, palea and awn)was smaller than that on other organs. With the decrease of water supply, the width of stomatal aperture was also decreased, while both stomat frequency and stomatal aperture length of various organs were increased. Compared with flag leaf blade, non-leaf green organs (flag leaf sheath, peduncle and ear) was less sensitive to supplemental irrigation, and showed higher stability in stomatal conductance, transpiration rate and photosynthetic rate during the later filling period. There was a positive correlation between stomatal conductance and transpiration rate in various organs, while the coefficient of correlation in non-leaf green organs was lower than that in leaf blade. The results suggested that with the decrease of water supply, transpiration rates were declined for both the leaf blades and non-leaf green organs, then, photosynthetic rates might be remarkably decreased in leaf blades, however, relatively stable in non-leaf green organs, which may lead to higher water use efficiency (WUE) in non-leaf green organs than in leaf blades.

Key words: Wheat, Stomatal structure, Non-leaf organs, Photosynthetic rate

中图分类号: 

  • S512
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8] 任依涵, 赵曼利, 代晶, 李银水, 顾炽明, 杨璐, 杜雪竹, 胡文诗, 秦璐. 油菜叶片功能氮动态变化对光合速率及光合氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1459-1471.
[9] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[10] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[11] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[12] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[13] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[14] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[15] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!