欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (12): 2059-2069.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.02059

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 •    下一篇

大豆育成品种农艺性状QTL与SSR标记的关联分析

张军1,2;赵团结1;盖钧镒1,*   

  1. 1南京农业大学大豆研究所/国家大豆改良中心/作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室，江苏南京210095；2滨州职业学院，山东滨州256603
  • 收稿日期:2008-04-08 修回日期:2008-07-13 出版日期:2008-12-12 网络出版日期:2008-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 盖钧镒
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展规划(973规划)项目(2006CB101708);国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2006AA100104);国家自然科学基金项目(30490250,30671266);教育部高等学校创新引智计划(B08025);农业部公益性行业专项(200803060)

Association Analysis of Agronomic Trait QTLs with SSR Markers in Released Soybean Cultivars

ZHANG Jun12,ZHAO Tuan-Jie1,GAI Jun-Yi1*   

  1. 1Soybean Research Institute, National Center for Soybean Improvement, National Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu; 2Binzhou Vocational College, Binzhou 256603, Shandong, China
  • Received:2008-04-08 Revised:2008-07-13 Published:2008-12-12 Published online:2008-10-10
  • Contact: GAI Jun-Yi

PDF

3409

被引次数

166

摘要：

利用85个SSR标记，对大豆育成品种群体(190份代表性材料)的基因组进行扫描，在检测群体结构基础上搜索连锁不平衡位点，并采用TASSEL软件的GLM方法对11个大豆农艺性状QTL进行关联分析。结果表明：(1) 在公共图谱上共线性或非共线性的SSR位点组合均广泛存在连锁不平衡(LD)，但不平衡程度D′>0.5的组合数只占总位点组合的1.71%，共线位点D′值随遗传距离衰减较快；(2) SSR数据遗传结构分析表明，育成品种群体由7个亚群体组成，矫正后全群体共有45个位点累计136个位点(次)与11个大豆农艺性状QTL关联，其中22个位点(次)与家系连锁定位的QTL区间相重，有43个位点(次) 2年重复出现；(3) 一些标记同时与2个或多个性状关联，可能是性状相关或一因多效的遗传基础；(4) 育成品种群体关联位点与地方品种群体和野生群体只有少数相同，群体间育种性状的遗传结构有相当大差异；(5) 发掘出农艺性状优异等位变异及其载体品种，包括增效最大的产量等位变异Satt347-300 (+932 kg hm-2，中豆26)，生物量等位变异Satt365-294(+3 123 kg hm-2，黄毛豆)，蛋白质含量等位变异Be475343-198 (+0.41%，淮豆4号)，脂肪含量等位变异Satt150-273 (+2.32%，科丰15)等。在此基础上作了设计育种的探讨。

关键词: 大豆育成品种, 农艺性状, SSR标记, 关联分析, 优良等位变异, 设计育种

Abstract:

The genotyping data of 85 simple-sequence repeat (SSR) markers on released cultivar population (RCP) (a representative sample with 190 accessions) were obtained and analyzed for LD of pairwise loci and population structure, and then for association between SSR loci and 11 soybean agronomic traits under TASSEL GLM (General linear model) program. The results showed that: (1) LD was detected extensively not only among syntenic markers but also among nonsyntenic ones, while the loci pairs with D′>0.5 accounted for only 1.71% of the total ones. The syntenic D′ value attenuated fastly along with the increase of genetic distance. (2) Genetic structure analysis showed that RCP was composed of seven subpopulations. The 45 SSR loci with a total of 136 loci (time) were found to be associated with 11 agronomic traits in the RCP. Among those, 22 loci (times) were consistent with mapped QTLs from family-based linkage mapping procedure and 43 loci (times) were consistently detected in two experiment years. (3) There also found a certain number of loci associated simultaneously with two or more traits, which might be the genetic reason of correlation among traits as well as the pleiotropic effects of gene(s). (4) There found only a few association loci in released cultivar population coincided with those in landrace and wild populations, indicating the large difference of genetic structure between the populations. (5) The elite alleles of the agronomic traits along with their carriers were detected, such as the allele Satt347-300 for largest positive yield effect (+932 kg hm-2 for Zhongdou 26)，Satt365-294 for biomass(+3 123 kg hm-2 for Huangmaodou)，Be475343-198 for protein content (+0.41% for Huaidou 4)，Satt150-273 for oil content (+2.32% for Kefeng 15), and were used to illustrate their potential in breeding programs.

Key words: Released soybean cultivar, Agronomic trait, SSR marker, Association analysis, Elite allele, Breeding by design

[1]Flint-Garcia S A, Thuillet A C, Yu J M, Pressoir G, Romero S M, Mitchell S E, Doebley J, Kresovich S, Goodman M M, Buckler E S. Maize association population: A high resolution platform for quantitative trait locus dissection. Plant J, 2005, 44: 1054-1064
[2]Eizenga G C, Agrama H A, Lee F N, Yan W, Jia Y. Identify-ing novel resistance genes in newly introduced blast resistant rice germplasm. Crop Sci, 2006, 46: 1870-1878
[3]Maccaferri M, Sanguineti M C, Noli E, Tuberosa R. Popula-tion structure and long-range linkage disequilibrium in a du-rum wheat elite collection. Mol Breed, 2005, 15: 271-289
[4]Roy J K, Bandopadhyay R, Rustgi S, Balyan H S, Gupta P K. Association analysis of agronomically important traits using SSR, SAMPL and AFLP markers in bread wheat. Curr Sci, 2006, 90: 683-689
[5]Agrama H A, Eizenga G C, Yan W. Association mapping of yield and its components in rice cultivars. Mol Breed, 2007, 19: 341-356
[6]Wilson L M, Whitt S R, Ibá?ez A M, Rocheford T R, Good-man M M, Buckler E S. Dissection of maize kernel composi-tion and starch production by candidate gene association. Plant Cell, 2004, 16: 2719-2733
[7]Ivandic V, Hackett C A, Nevo E, Keith R, Thomas W T B, Forster B P. Analysis of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in wild barley from the Fertile Crescent: Associations with ecology, geography and flowering time. Plant Mol Biol, 2002, 48: 511-527
[8]Thornsberry J M, Goodman M M, Doebley J, Kresovich S, Niel-sen D, Buckler E S. Dwarf8 polymorphisms associate with varia-tion in flowering time. Nat Genet, 2001, 28: 286-289
[9]Breseghello F, Sorrells M E. Association mapping of kernel size and milling quality in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cul-tivars. Genetics, 2006, 172: 1165-1177
[10]Wen Z-X(文自翔), Zhao T-J(赵团结), Zheng Y-Z(郑永战), Liu S-H(刘顺湖), Wang C-E(王春娥), Wang F(王芳), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Association analysis of agronomic and quality traits with SSR markers in Glycine max and Glycine soja in China: I. Population structure and associated markers. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(7): 1169-1178 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Aljanabi S M, Forget L, Dookun A. An improved and rapid protocol for the isolation of polysaccharide- and polyphe-nol-free sugarcane DNA. Plant Mol Biol Rep, 1999, 17: 1-8
[12]Cregan P B, Jarvik T, Bush A L, Shoemaker R C, Lark K G, Kahler A L, Kaya N, Van Toai T T, Lohnes D G, Chung J, Specht J E. An integrated genetic linkage map of the soybean genome. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 1464-1490
[13]Farnir F, Coppieters W, Arranz J J, Berzi P, Cambisano N, Grisart B, Karim L, Marcq F, Moreau L, Mni M, Nezer C, Simon P, Vanmanshoven P, Wagenaar D, Georges M. Exten-sive genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in cattle. Genome Res, 2000, 10: 220-227
[14]Pritchard J K, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of popula-tion structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 2000, 155: 945-959
[15]Edward Buckler Lab. Maize Diversity Research (2007-01-30) http://www.maizegenetics.net/bioinformatics/tassel
[2007-03-20]
[16]Wen Z-X(文自翔), Zhao T-J(赵团结), Zheng Y-Z(郑永战), Liu S-H(刘顺湖), Wang C-E(王春娥), Wang F(王芳), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Association analysis of agronomic and quality traits with SSR markers in Glycine max and Glycine soja in China: Ⅱ. Ex-ploration of elite alleles. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(8): 1339-1349 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[2] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[3] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[4] 张颖星, 宋裕祯, 王跃, 曹越, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. EMS诱导糜子优异性状突变体的筛选及表型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1388-1400.
[5] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[6] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[7] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
[8] 鲁雅妮, 丁超杰, 张煜, 杜习军, 齐学礼, 胡琳, 许为钢. 河南省200份小麦品种苗期茎基腐病抗性鉴定与全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 363-375.
[9] 李诗晴, 王茜, 王素华, 张耀文, 王丽侠. 绿豆种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定及相关基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 376-388.
[10] 李瑞, 余意雯, 王敦亮, 田婷, 孙灵湘, 陶玥玥, 孙华. 长江中下游油菜薹油兼用模式菜籽产量特征比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 620-630.
[11] 迟晓元, 刘庆, 张君, 赵旭红, 李美, 于天一, 潘丽娟, 许静, 姜骁, 殷祥贞, 马俊卿, 陈娜. 不同花生品种(系)耐盐碱性田间鉴定及各性状指标相关性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 85-98.
[12] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 基于北纬30°分界的长江中游油菜增产策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 99-117.
[13] 李云香, 郭千纤, 侯万伟, 张小娟. 引进ICARDA小麦苗期根系抗旱性状的全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2387-2398.
[14] 李璐琪, 程宇坤, 白斌, 雷斌, 耿洪伟. 小麦叶片气孔相关性状全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2266-2284.
[15] 蔡金珊, 李超男, 王景一, 李宁, 柳玉平, 景蕊莲, 李龙, 孙黛珍. 小麦幼苗根系性状全基因组关联分析及TaSRL-3B优异等位基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2020-2032.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2