欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 138-150.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.03072

所属专题： 玉米：遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学

• • 上一篇    下一篇

玉米抗倒伏相关性状QTL的关联和连锁分析

于芮苏1(), 田小康1, 刘斌斌1, 段迎新1, 李婷1, 张秀英2, 张兴华1, 郝引川1, 李勤2, 薛吉全1,*(), 徐淑兔1,*()   

  1. 1西北旱区玉米生物学与遗传育种重点实验室 / 西北农林科技大学农学院, 陕西杨凌 712100
    2陕西省汉中农业科学研究所, 陕西汉中723000
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-10 接受日期:2021-04-14 出版日期:2022-01-12 网络出版日期:2021-06-18
  • 通讯作者: 薛吉全,徐淑兔
  • 作者简介:E-mail: 1169390776@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目“七大农作物育种专项”(2018YFD0100203);国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(玉米)资助(CARS-02-64)

Dissecting the genetic architecture of lodging related traits by genome-wide association study and linkage analysis in maize

YU Rui-Su1(), TIAN Xiao-Kang1, LIU Bin-Bin1, DUAN Ying-Xin1, LI Ting1, ZHANG Xiu-Ying2, ZHANG Xing-Hua1, HAO Yin-Chuan1, LI Qin2, XUE Ji-Quan1,*(), XU Shu-Tu1,*()   

  1. 1Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Maize in Arid Area of Northwest Region, College of Agronomy, Northwest Agriculture and Technology University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
    2Hanzhong Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Hanzhong 723000, Shaanxi China
  • Received:2020-12-10 Accepted:2021-04-14 Published:2022-01-12 Published online:2021-06-18
  • Contact: XUE Ji-Quan,XU Shu-Tu
  • Supported by:
    Seven Major Crop Breeding Projects of the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFD0100203);China Agriculture Research System (Maize).(CARS-02-64)

RichHTML

37

PDF

1075

摘要：

倒伏是影响玉米高产和机械化收获的重要因素, 明确玉米抗倒伏相关性状的遗传基础, 增强玉米品种抗倒伏能力, 可为玉米高产宜机收育种提供理论依据。本研究以国内外收集的153份自交系为材料, 利用6H90K SNP芯片检测的70,438个高质量SNP标记对地上第3节茎秆强度、株高、穗位高和穗位系数进行全基因组关联分析, 分别检测到与茎秆强度、株高、穗位高和穗位系数相关位点5个、14个、16个和21个, 单个关联位点最大效应值为13.24。同时以KA105/KB020的F5群体为试验材料, 采用QTL IciMapping V4.2软件的完备区间作图法进行QTL定位, 检测到21个与抗倒伏相关的QTL, 可解释表型变异3.86%~16.58%。结合关联分析和连锁分析结果发现, 2个QTL区间与关联分析的候选区间重合。经过候选区段的基因功能注释和文献查阅, 挖掘到GRMZM2G105391、GRMZM2G014119和GRMZM2G341410等与细胞壁生物合成、细胞分裂和细胞伸长的相关基因可供进一步分析。本研究结果为进一步解析玉米抗倒伏性状的遗传基础提供参考。

关键词: 玉米, 倒伏, 关联分析, 连锁分析

Abstract:

Lodging is one of the main factors affecting the grain yield and mechanized harvesting in maize. Dissecting the genetic basis of lodging related traits can provide a theoretical basis for high yield and mechanized harvest breeding of maize. In this study, genome-wide association study (GWAS) and linkage analysis were combined to identify the significant loci interrelated with lodging related traits using 153 inbred lines from China and abroad. We detected 5, 14, 16, and 21 SNPs significant SNPs related to stem strength, plant height, ear height, and ear height-to-plant height ratio, respectively. Among these significant SNPs, the maximum effect value of a single site was 13.24. Twenty-one QTLs related to lodging related traits were identified by linkage analysis, which explaining the phenotypic variations of 3.86%-16.58% in F5 population constructed by KA105 and KB020. Further, we noticed that two QTL intervals were coincided with the candidate intervals of association analysis. Finally, GRMZM2G105391, GRMZM2G014119, and GRMZM2G341410 candidate genes related to cell wall biosynthesis, cell division and elongation were predicted by functional annotation for these candidate regions. These results can provide a new reference for further analysis of the genetic basis of lodging resistance in maize.

Key words: maize, lodging, association analysis, linkage analysis

表1

AM153群体抗倒伏性状的基本统计描述"

性状
Trait		 年份
Year		 范围
Range		 平均值±标准差
Mean±SD		 偏度
Skewness		 峰度
Kurtosis		 变异系数
CV (%)
茎秆强度 2018 32.99-66.23 50.21±6.24 0.12 -0.01 12.43
SS 2019 33.34-72.28 53.3±7.57 -0.08 -0.17 14.20
SS-BLUP 43.74-60.62 52.04±3.32 0.24 0.13 6.38
株高 2018 170.30-280.70 221.92±23.11 0.28 -0.37 10.41
PH 2019 143.00-252.20 200.99±21.56 0.13 -0.42 10.73
PH-BLUP 160.99-277.91 212.22±20.14 0.41 0.12 9.49
穗位高 2018 48.00-108.30 79.73±12.58 -0.21 -0.28 15.78
EH 2019 49.00-108.30 70.95±9.69 0.3 0.79 13.66
EH-BLUP 53.08-110.48 75.88±9.82 0.38 0.98 12.94
穗位系数 2018 0.26-0.53 0.40±0.05 0.31 0.98 12.41
EH/PH 2019 0.25-0.47 0.35±0.04 0.4 0.82 10.47
EH/PH-BLUP 0.28-0.46 0.35±0.03 0.5 0.87 9.49

表2

AM153群体抗倒伏性状的方差份析"

变异
Variation		 茎秆强度SS 株高PH 穗位高EH 穗位系数EH/PH
MS F MS F MS F MS F
基因型Genotypes (G) 119.15 2.24*** 1756.59 16.72*** 401.50 10.49*** 0.005 8.90***
年份Year 1430.55 26.24*** 65,572.72 624.12*** 12,290.33 321.08*** 0.007 12.06***
基因型×年份G×Year 63.29 1.19 221.13 2.10*** 77.43 2.02*** 0.001 1.81***
误差Error 53.14 105.06 38.28 0.001
遗传力H2 (%) 72.62 92.77 89.26 86.96

图1

AM153群体(图A)和F5群体(图B)抗倒伏性状相关性分析 *、**和***分别表示在P < 0.05、P < 0.01和P < 0.001水平显著; 18、19分别表示2018年和2019年; YU、HZ分别表示榆林和汉中。缩写同表1。"

图2

抗倒伏性状显著SNP分布图 缩写同表1。"

表3

抗倒伏性状关联位点分析"

SNP序号 染色体 位置 候选区间 -log10 (P) 效应值 性状
SNP ID Chr. Position Candidate interval Effect Trait
SNP372 1 7,693,562 7,493,562-7,893,562 4.29 10.08 19EH, 19PH
SNP524 1 10,449,649 10,249,649-10,649,649 3.41 4.87 18EH, 18PH
SNP3638 1 84,326,155 84,126,155-84,526,155 4.81 -1.48 18SS, SS-BLUP
SNP6691 1 205,781,890 205,581,890-205,981,890 3.73 -0.01 19EH/PH, EH/PH-BLUP
SNP8730 1 253,324,984 253,124,984-253,524,984 3.28 7.56 19PH, PH-BLUP
SNP11723 2 13,290,858 13,090,858-13,490,858 3.59 9.47 19EH, 19PH
SNP13557 2 53,646,990 53,446,990-53,846,990 3.06 -5.12 18EH, 19EH
SNP19390 2 233,508,755 233,308,755-233,708,755 3.31 8.17 18PH,19PH
SNP20574 3 18,803,909 18,603,909-19,003,909 3.58 -0.02 19EH/PH, EH/PH-BLUP
SNP20816 3 24,476,830 24,276,830-24,676,830 4.23 3.99 19SS, SS-BLUP
SNP24414 3 155,835,074 155,635,074-156,035,074 4.18 -0.02 19EH/PH,19EH
SNP28310 4 10,227,629 10,027,629-10,427,629 4.72 4.48 18PH, 19PH, PH-BLUP
SNP29286 4 33,460,646 33,260,646-33,660,646 3.07 -9.27 19PH, PH-BLUP
SNP29306 4 33,912,195 33,712,195-34,112,195 4.23 -13.25 19PH, 19EH
SNP29662 4 43,179,107 42,979,107-43,379,107 3.06 7.25 19PH, 19EH
SNP30918 4 107,290,607 107,090,607-107,490,607 3.82 -0.04 19EH/PH, EH/PH-BLUP
SNP36977 5 27,793,091 27,593,091-27,993,091 3.50 -0.01 19EH/PH, EH/PH-BLUP
SNP37167 5 32,584,178 32,384,178-32,784,178 3.26 -0.02 19EH/PH, EH/PH-BLUP
SNP38017 5 61,705,387 61,505,387-61,905,387 4.11 -0.02 19EH/PH, EH/PH-BLUP
SNP38046 5 62,710,291 62,510,291-62,910,291 3.28 -0.02 19EH/PH, EH/PH-BLUP
SNP38174 5 68,434,295 68,234,295-68,634,295 4.32 -0.01 19EH/PH, EH/PH-BLUP
SNP38176 5 68,449,337 68,249,337-68,649,337 4.37 -0.01 19EH/PH, EH/PH-BLUP
SNP38400 5 78,025,941 77,825,941-78,225,941 3.62 -0.01 19EH/PH, EH/PH-BLUP
SNP39705 5 141,210,709 141,010,709-141,410,709 3.20 0.01 19EH/PH, EH/PH-BLUP
SNP40214 5 157,008,514 156,808,514-157,208,514 3.38 2.89 19SS, SS-BLUP
SNP40603 5 167,979,920 167,779,920-168,179,920 3.44 -0.01 19EH/PH, EH/PH-BLUP
SNP44092 6 45,709,401 45,509,401-45,909,401 3.22 -4.54 18EH, 18PH
SNP45353 6 96,088,816 95,888,816-96,288,816 3.40 3.70 19EH, EH-BLUP
SNP48778 7 1,222,716 1,022,716-1,422,716 3.02 -8.07 19EH, 19PH
SNP49397 7 14,735,621 14,535,621-14,935,621 3.99 2.30 18SS, SS-BLUP
SNP50621 7 75,380,048 75,180,048-75,580,048 6.01 2.00 18SS, SS-BLUP
SNP54911 8 13,140,414 12,940,414-13,340,414 3.41 -0.01 19EH/PH, EH/PH-BLUP
SNP56153 8 70,742,498 70,542,498-70,942,498 4.30 -0.03 19EH/PH, EH/PH-BLUP
SNP57890 8 129,488,487 129,288,487-129,688,487 4.14 -9.73 18EH, 19EH, EH-BLUP
18PH, 19PH, PH-BLUP
SNP58030 8 133,307,178 133,107,178-133,507,178 4.78 -6.36 18EH, 19EH, 19PH
SNP58106 8 135,487,306 135,287,306-135,687,306 3.46 0.01 19EH/PH, EH/PH-BLUP
SNP58751 8 152,898,327 152,698,327-153,098,327 4.62 0.02 18EH/PH, EH/PH-BLUP
SNP59767 8 172,230,824 172,030,824-172,430,824 3.83 4.61 19EH,19PH
SNP59786 8 172,434,870 172,234,870-172,634,870 3.23 0.01 18EH, EH/PH-BLUP
SNP62666 9 89,001,322 88,801,322-89,201,322 3.28 -0.01 19EH/PH, EH/PH-BLUP
SNP62670 9 89,192,523 88,992,523-89,392,523 3.46 -0.02 19EH/PH, EH/PH-BLUP
SNP62676 9 89,529,835 89,329,835-89,729,835 3.73 -0.01 19EH/PH, EH/PH-BLUP
SNP62844 9 93,667,191 93,467,191-93,867,191 3.13 4.19 18EH, 19EH
SNP64186 9 129,539,571 129,339,571-129,739,571 3.26 3.90 18EH, 19EH

表4

F5群体抗倒伏性状的基本统计描述"

性状
Trait		 环境
Environment		 亲本 Parents RILs群体 RILs population
KA105 KB020 范围
Range		 平均数±标准差
Mean±SD		 偏度
Skewness		 峰度
Kurtosis		 变异系数
CV (%)
茎秆强度 YU 55.78 b 63.30 a 30.44-74.01 53.24±8.32 -0.20 0.02 15.62
SS HZ 47.96 51.41 35.09-65.69 49.92±6.33 -0.11 -0.35 12.68
BLUP 51.87 b 57.35 a 29.33-62.81 51.28±4.51 -0.14 -0.07 8.79
株高 YU 223.90 234.70 159.90-275.10 222.37±28.25 -0.23 -0.29 12.70
EH HZ 201.10 b 254.44 a 145.20-300.00 217.86±24.03 -0.38 1.09 11.03
BLUP 213.00 b 244.54 a 158.90-281.24 219.78±21.95 -0.16 -0.10 9.99
穗位高 YU 65.70 62.60 38.50-94.80 72.60±10.98 -0.11 -0.42 15.12
PH HZ 58.80 b 76.67 a 42.50-96.50 68.15±11.51 -0.08 -0.39 16.88
BLUP 62.25 b 69.82 a 49.63-90.21 70.30±9.05 -0.11 -0.54 12.88
穗位系数 YU 0.29 0.26 0.22-0.45 0.33±0.03 -0.01 0.92 10.17
EH/PH HZ 0.29 0.30 0.20-0.43 0.31±0.03 0.01 0.55 12.35
BLUP 0.29 b 0.27 a 0.23-0.42 0.31±0.03 0.09 0.79 8.50

表5

F5群体抗倒伏性状方差分析"

变异 茎秆强度SS 株高PH 穗位高EH 穗位系数EH/PH
Variation MS F MS F MS F MS F
基因型 Genotype (G) 157.78 4.96*** 2429.31 11.75*** 431.22 11.75*** 0.004 2.64***
环境 Environment (E) 3748.35 117.72*** 5380.57 26.03*** 4153.35 26.03*** 0.150 95.67***
基因型×环境 G×E 46.94 1.47*** 274.35 1.33** 64.73 1.32* 0.003 1.85***
误差 Error 31.84 206.70 52.48 0.002
遗传力 H2 (%) 83.40 92.80 90.50 66.67

图3

抗倒伏性状QTL分布图 缩写同表1和图1。"

表6

F5群体抗倒伏性状QTL定位"

性状 QTL 染色体 左翼标记 右翼标记 环境 LOD 贡献率 加性效应
Trait Chr. Left marker Right marker Environment R2 (%) Add
茎秆强度 qSS5-1 5 5_140763773 5_140763857 YU 4.22 9.12 2.46
SS qSS5-2 5 5_156167500 5_157012388 BLUP 10.35 16.58 2.02
qSS5-3 5 5_158723309 5_159130066 HZ 7.66 9.99 2.39
qSS5-4 5 5_178122149 5_179051498 HZ 4.14 5.22 -1.73
qSS5-5 5 5_144226809 5_181226757 BLUP 3.59 5.52 -1.19
qSS5-6 5 5_199338390 5_199672364 HZ 4.38 5.53 1.81
qSS6 6 6_67861806 6_68984948 YU 4.24 9.05 -2.47
BLUP 3.43 5.05 -1.13
株高 qPH1-1 1 1_112646044 1_115306380 YU 24.56 9.40 18.83
PH qPH1-2 1 1_120199828 1_160600750 YU 36.96 16.53 -25.07
BLUP 6.25 5.31 -6.36
qPH2-1 2 2_9013265 2_10394566 HZ 3.97 4.46 -5.66
qPH2-2 2 2_18731394 2_19945073 BLUP 5.16 4.32 -5.70
性状 QTL 染色体 左翼标记 右翼标记 环境 LOD 贡献率 加性效应
Trait Chr. Left marker Right marker Environment R2 (%) Add
qPH5-1 5 5_135497925 5_135725252 BLUP 5.39 4.52 -5.80
qPH5-2 5 5_164963962 5_166327830 BLUP 10.49 9.44 8.40
qPH5-3 5 5_1683956 5_1727799 HZ 3.45 3.86 -5.27
qPH6 6 6_68984948 6_128701322 HZ 5.16 7.94 -7.65
YU 12.43 4.83 -13.55
BLUP 11.76 11.63 -9.44
qPH7 7 7_11482224 7_14968823 BLUP 4.78 4.04 5.50
穗位高 qEH1 1 1_107294393 1_109785426 HZ 4.88 9.07 -3.58
EH YU 5.33 5.96 -3.06
BLUP 7.16 10.16 -3.11
qEH2 2 2_190284923 2_192872800 YU 4.81 5.39 -2.90
qEH6-1 6 6_68984948 6_128701322 YU 7.56 11.33 -4.25
qEH6-2 6 6_112247546 6_117497921 BLUP 3.65 5.00 -2.18
qEH10 10 10_13473790 10_18247431 YU 4.02 4.49 2.66
BLUP 3.65 5.05 2.20
[1] 黄璐, 乔江方, 刘京宝, 夏来坤, 朱卫红, 李川, 周庆伟. 夏玉米不同密植群体抗倒性及机收指标探讨. 华北农学报, 2015, 30:198-201.
Huang L, Qiao J F, Liu J B, Xia L K, Zhu W H, Li C, Zhou Q W. Research on the relationship between maize lodging resistance and grain mechanically harvesting qualities in different planting density. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2015, 30:198-201 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] 曹铁华, 梁烜赫, 李刚, 任军, 王洪君, 陈宝玉, 王立春. 玉米倒伏和扶直的产量效应研究. 玉米科学, 2013, 21(6):81-83.
Cao T H, Liang X H, Li G, Ren J, Wang H J, Chen B Y, Wang L C. Yield effect of lodging and lifting up in maize after being attacked in Jilin province. J Maize Sci, 2013, 21(6):81-83 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] Xue J, Xie R Z, Zhang W F, Wang K R, Hou P, Ming B, Gou L, Li S K. Research progress on reduced lodging of high-yield and -density maize. J Integr Agric, 2017, 16:2717-2725.
[4] Sheri A M, Larry L D, Bruce E H. Divergent selection for rind penetrometer resistance and its effects on European corn borer damage and stalk traits in corn. Crop Sci, 2004, 44:711-717.
[5] 李凯, 张晓祥, 管中荣, 沈亚欧, 潘光堂. 玉米株高和穗位高的全基因组关联分析. 玉米科学, 2017, 25:1-7.
Li K, Zhang X X, Guan Z R, Shen Y O, Pan G T. Genome-wide association analysis of plant height and ear height in maize. J Maize Sci, 2017, 25:1-7 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] Zuber M S, Grogan C O. A new technique for measuring stalk strength in corn. Crop Sci, 1961, 1:378-380.
[7] 薛军, 王克如, 谢瑞芝, 勾玲, 张旺锋, 明博, 侯鹏, 李少昆. 玉米生长后期倒伏研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51:1845-1854.
Xue J, Wang K R, Xie R Z, Gou L, Zhang W F, Ming B, Hou P, Li S K. Research progress of maize lodging during late stage. Sci Agric Sin, 2018, 51:1845-1854 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 耿爱军, 杨建宁, 张兆磊, 张姬, 李汝莘. 国内外玉米收获机械发展现状及展望. 农机化研究, 2016, 38:251-257.
Geng A J, Yang J N, Zhang Z L, Zhang J, Li R S. Discuss about the current situation and future of corn harvest machinery about domestic and abroad. J Agric Mech Res, 2016, 38:251-257 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 王永学, 张战辉, 刘宗华. 玉米抗倒伏性状的配合力效应及通径分析. 河南农业大学学报, 2011, 45(1):1-6.
Wang Y X, Zhang Z H, Liu Z H. Combining ability and path analysis of lodging resistance traits in maize. J Henan Agric Univ, 2011, 45(1):1-6 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] 李清超, 李永祥, 杨钊钊, 刘成, 刘志斋, 李春辉, 彭勃, 张岩, 王迪, 谭巍巍, 孙宝成, 石云素, 宋燕春, 张志明, 潘光堂, 黎裕, 王天宇. 基于多重相关RIL群体的玉米株高和穗位高QTL定位. 作物学报, 2013, 39:1521-1529.
Li Q C, Li Y X, Yang Z Z, Liu C, Liu Z Z, Li C H, Peng B, Zhang Y, Wang D, Tan W W, Sun B C, Shi Y S, Song Y C, Zhang Z M, Pan G T, Wang T Y, Li Y. QTL mapping for plant height and ear height by using multiple related RIL populations in maize. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39:1521-1529 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] Haixiao H, Yujie M, Hongwu W, Hai L, Shaojiang C. Identifying quantitative trait loci and determining closely related stalk traits for rind penetrometer resistance in a high-oil maize population. Theor Appl Genet 2012, 124:1439-1447.
[12] 靳英杰, 李鸿萍, 安盼盼, 程思贤, 赵向阳, 余天雨, 李潮海. 玉米抗倒性研究进展. 玉米科学, 2019, 27(2):94-98.
Jin Y J, Li H P, An P P, Cheng S X, Zhao X Y, Yu T Y, Li C H. Research progress on the lodging resistance of maize. J Maize Sci, 2019, 27(2):94-98 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] Li X, Zhou Z, Ding J, Wu Y, Zhou B, Wang R, Ma J, Wang S, Zhang X, Xia Z, Chen J, Wu J. Combined linkage and association mapping reveals QTL and candidate genes for plant and ear height in maize. Front Plant Sci, 2016, 7:833.
[14] Zhang Y, Liang T, Chen M, Zhang Y, Wang T, Lin H, Rong T, Zou C, Liu P, Lee M, Pan G, Shen Y, Lübberstedt T. Genetic dissection of stalk lodging-related traits using an IBM Syn10 DH population in maize across three environments (Zea mays L.). Mol Genet Genomics, 2019, 294:1277-1288.
[15] 刘敬贤, 黄亚群, 陈景堂, 祝丽英, 赵永锋, 郭晋杰. 基于高密度连锁图谱定位玉米株高QTL. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(13):38-41.
Liu J X, Huang Y Q, Chen J T, Zhu L Y, Zhao Y F, Guo J J. QTL mapping for plant height in maize based on high density linkage map. Jiangsu Agric Sci, 2019, 47(13):38-41 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] Henderson C R. General flexibility of linear model techniques for sire evaluation. J Dairy Sci, 1974, 57:963-972.
[17] Saghai M M, Biyashev R M, Yang G P, Zhang Q, Allard R W. Extraordinarily polymorphic microsatellite DNA in barley: species diversity, chromosomal locations, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1994, 91:5466-5470.
[18] Browning B L, Browning S R. Genotype imputation with millions of reference samples. Am J Hum Genet, 2016, 98:116-126.
[19] 徐云碧, 杨泉女, 郑洪建, 许彦芬, 桑志勤, 郭子锋, 彭海, 张丛, 蓝昊发, 王蕴波, 吴坤生, 陶家军, 张嘉楠. 靶向测序基因型检测(GBTS)技术及其应用. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53:2983-3004.
Xu Y B, Yang Q N, Zhang H J, Xu Y F, Sang Z Q, Guo Z F, Peng H, Zhang C, Lan H F, Wang Y B, Wu K S, Tao J J, Zhang J N. Genotyping by target sequencing (GBTS) and its applications. Sci Agric Sin, 2020, 53:2983-3004 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] Yang L, Li T, Liu BB, Li R R, Yu R S, Zhang X Y, Li Q, Xu S T, Xue J Q. Genetic analysis of ear-related traits under different pollination treatments in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Breed, 2021, 140:211-222.
[21] Liu X, Huang M, Fan B, Buckler E S, Zhang Z. Iterative usage of fixed and random effect models for powerful and efficient genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet, 2016, 12:1-24.
[22] Barrett J C, Fry B, Maller J, Daly M J. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics, 2005, 21:263-265.
[23] Ueda Y, Frimpong F, Qi Y, Matthus E, Wu L, Höller S, Kraska T, Frei M. Genetic dissection of ozone tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by a genome-wide association study. J Exp Bot, 2015, 66:293-306.
[24] Wang Y, Chantreau M, Sibout R, Hawkins S. Plant cell wall lignification and monolignol metabolism. Front Plant Sci, 2013, 4:220.
[25] Boerjan W, Ralph J, Baucher M. Lignin biosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2003, 54:519-546.
[26] Baldacci C F, Le Roy J, Huss B, Lion C, Créach A, Spriet C, Duponchel L, Biot C, Baucher M, Hawkins S, Neutelings G. UDP-GLYCOSYLTRANSFERASE 72E3 plays a role in lignification of secondary cell walls in Arabidopsis. Int J Mol Sci, 2020, 21:6094.
[27] Pan Z Q, Kentsis A, Dias D C, Yamoah K, Wu K. Nedd8 on cullin: building an expressway to protein destruction. Oncogene, 2004, 23:1985-1997.
[28] Bostick M, Lochhead S R, Honda A, Palmer S, Callis J. Related to ubiquitin 1 and 2 are redundant and essential and regulate vegetative growth, auxin signaling, and ethylene production in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 2004, 16:2418-2432.
[29] Beló A, Zheng P, Luck S, Shen B, Meyer D J, Li B, Tingey S, Rafalski A. Whole genome scan detects an allelic variant of fad2 associated with increased oleic acid levels in maize. Mol Genet Genomics, 2008, 279:1-10.
[30] Li Q, Yang X, Xu S, Cai Y, Zhang D, Han Y, Li L, Zhang Z, Gao S, Li J, Yan J. Genome-wide association studies identified three independent polymorphisms associated with α-tocopherol content in maize kernels. PLoS One, 2012, 7:36807.
[31] Zhang Y, Cui M, Zhang J M, Zhang L, Li C L, Kan X, Sun Q, Deng D X, Yin Z T. Confirmation and fine mapping of a major QTL for aflatoxin resistance in maize using a combination of linkage and association mapping. Toxins, 2016, 8:258.
[32] Cui M, Jia B, Liu H, Kan X, Zhang Y, Zhou R, Li Z, Yang L, Deng D, Yin Z. Genetic mapping of the leaf number above the primary ear and its relationship with plant height and flowering time in maize. Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8:1437.
[33] Hu H, Meng Y, Wang H, Liu H, Chen S. Identifying quantitative trait loci and determining closely related stalk traits for rind penetrometer resistance in a high-oil maize population. Theor Appl Genet, 2012, 124:1439-1447.
[34] Krakowsky M D, Lee M, Coors J G. Quantitative trait loci for cell wall components in recombinant inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.): II. Leaf sheath tissue. Theor Appl Genet, 2006, 112:717-726.
[35] Hu H, Liu W, Fu Z, Homann L, Technow F, Wang H, Song C, Li S, Melchinger A E, Chen S. QTL mapping of stalk bending strength in a recombinant inbred line maize population. Theor Appl Genet, 2013, 126:2257-2266.
[36] Barrière Y, Méchin V, Lefevre B, Maltese S. QTLs for agronomic and cell wall traits in a maize RIL progeny derived from a cross between an old Minnesota13 line and a modern Iodent line. Theor Appl Genet, 2012, 125:531-549.
[37] 张体付, 梁帅强, 吕远大, 蒋璐, 赵涵. 基于三重测交群体解析玉米株高与穗位高杂种优势QTL. 核农学报, 2017, 31:837-843.
Zhang T F, Liang S Q, Lyu Y D, Jiang L, Zhao H. QTL analysis of heterosis for plant height and ear position using triple testcross population in maize. J Nucl Agric Sci, 2017, 31:837-843 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[38] 李凯, 张晓祥, 管中荣, 沈亚欧, 潘光堂. 玉米株高和穗位高的全基因组关联分析. 玉米科学, 2017, 25(6):1-7.
Li K, Zhang X X, Guan Z R, Shen Y O, Pan G T. Genome-wide association analysis of plant height and ear height in maize. J Maize Sci, 2017, 25(6):1-7 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[39] Krakowsky M D, Lee M, Coors J G. Quantitative trait loci for cell-wall components in recombinant inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.): I. Stalk tissue. Theor Appl Genet, 2005, 111:337-346.
[40] 何坤辉, 常立国, 崔婷婷, 渠建洲, 郭东伟, 徐淑兔, 张兴华, 张仁和, 薛吉全, 刘建超. 多环境下玉米株高和穗位高的QTL定位. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49:1443-1452.
He K H, Chang L G, Cui T T, Qu J Z, Guo D W, Xu S T, Zhang X H, Zhang R H, Xue J Q, Liu J C. Mapping QTL for plant height and ear height in maize under multi-environments. Sci Agric Sin, 2016, 49:1443-1452 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[41] Zhang Y, Liu P, Zhang X, Zheng Q, Chen M, Ge F, Li Z, Sun W, Guan Z, Liang T, Zheng Y, Tan X, Zou C, Peng H, Pan G, Shen Y. Multi-locus genome-wide association study reveals the genetic architecture of stalk lodging resistance-related traits in maize. Front Plant Sci, 2018, 9:611.
[42] Ku L, Zhang L, Tian Z, Guo S, Su H, Ren Z, Wang Z, Li G, Wang X, Zhu Y, Zhou J, Chen Y. Dissection of the genetic architecture underlying the plant density response by mapping plant height-related traits in maize (Zea mays L.). Mol Genet Genomics, 2015, 290:1223-1233.
[43] Cheng J, Wen S, Bie Z. Overexpression of hexose transporter CsHT3 increases cellulose content in cucumber fruit peduncle. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2019, 145:107-113.
[44] Ke S, Luan X, Liang J, Hung Y H, Hsieh T F, Zhang X Q. Rice OsPEX1, an extension-like protein, affects lignin biosynthesis and plant growth. Plant Mol Biol, 2019, 100:151-161.
[45] Ahmad K F, Engel C K, Privé G G. Crystal structure of the BTB domain from PLZF. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1998, 95:12123-12128.
[46] Norberg M, Holmlund M, Nilsson O. The BLADE ON PETIOLE genes act redundantly to control the growth and development of lateral organs. Development, 2005, 132:2203-2213.
[47] Yu X C, Zhu S Y, Gao G F, Wang X J, Zhao R, Zou K Q, Wang X F, Zhang X Y, Wu F Q, Peng C C, Zhang D P. Expression of a grape calcium-dependent protein kinase ACPK1 in Arabidopsis thaliana promotes plant growth and confers abscisic acid-hypersensitivity in germination, post-germination growth, and stomatal movement. Plant Mol Biol, 2007, 64:531-538.
[1] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[2] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[3] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[4] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[5] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[6] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[7] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[8] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[9] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[10] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[11] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[12] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[13] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[14] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[15] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2