欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 552-559.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00530

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同生态棉区棉花单铃重构成因子的特征

赵瑞海;韩春丽;勾玲;雷军;张旺锋*   

  1. 石河子大学/新疆生产建设兵团绿洲生态农业重点实验室,新疆石河子832003
  • 收稿日期:2008-09-24 修回日期:2008-10-05 出版日期:2009-03-12 网络出版日期:2009-01-16
  • 通讯作者: 张旺锋
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(39960037),教育部优秀青年老师资助计划项目(2069),石河子大学高层次人才科研启动资金项目(RCZX200514)资助

Characteristics of Components for Cotton Single Boll Weight in Different Ecological Regions

ZHAO Rui-Hai;HAN Chun-Li;GOU Ling;LEI Jun;ZHANG Wang-Feng*   

  1. Shehezi University/Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecological Agriculture of Xinjiang Production and construction Group, shihezi 832003,China
  • Received:2008-09-24 Revised:2008-10-05 Published:2009-03-12 Published online:2009-01-16
  • Contact: ZHANG Wang-Feng

摘要:

为了解棉花单铃重及与其构成因子间在数量上的变化规律, 阐明新疆棉花单铃重较高的内部原因, 以不同生态棉区选育的棉花品种为试验材料, 分别在新疆库尔勒、石河子和河北南宫市3种植,分期播种, 并在不同生育期对相应部位棉铃挂牌标记, 吐絮收获后, 对所标记棉铃统一考种, 测定单铃重及短绒重、每粒种子着生纤维根数等构成因子。结果表明,棉花单铃重以南疆棉区最高,除短绒重和每粒种子着生纤维重在北疆棉区略高外, 其他铃重构成因子均以南疆棉区最高, 河北棉区最低。单铃重、单铃纤维重、每粒种子着生纤维总重及每粒种子着生纤维重均与其相应的构成因子显著正相关。除衣分和单铃种子数表现为北疆自育早熟品种略高于内地引进早中熟品种外, 单铃重及其他单铃重构成因子均表现为内地引进早中熟品种高于北疆自育早熟品种。单铃重构成因子均以新疆2个棉区较高, 除生态因素影响外, 这是新疆棉区, 特别是南疆棉区单铃重较高的主要内部因素。

关键词: 生态棉区, 品种, 单铃重, 单铃重构成因子

Abstract:

Cotton production plays an extremely important role in the local economy, and the income from cotton is one of the major finance for farmers in Xinjiang. The cotton production of Xinjiang that is the biggest cotton production base in China has been rapidly developed since 1990s, and the sowing area, yield per hectare and total yield of cotton all rank first in China. The objective of this study was to analyse the cotton single boll weight and its components, and explore the mechanism of getting a higher single boll weight. Thesame cotton cultivars bred in different eco-regions were planted in northern Xinjiang (Shihezi), southern Xinjiang (Kuerle) and Huanghuaihai cotton region (Nangong) at the different sowing dates. The cotton boll of the fruit branch was labeled in different growth stages and the cotton single boll weight and its components were determined after the labeled cotton boll opened and harvested. The results showed that cotton boll weight grown in southern Xinjiang was the highest among three cotton eco-regions. The components of single boll weight except linter weight and lint gross weight were higher in southern Xinjiang than in the other cotton eco-regions. There were positive correlations between single boll weight, fiber weight per boll, lint gross weight per seed, lint weight per seed and their components. The components of single boll weight except lint percentage and seed number per boll of early-middle-maturing cultivars bred in Huanghuaihai cotton region were higher than those of early-maturing cultivars bred in northern Xinjiang. The components of cotton single boll weight in Xinjiang were higher than those in Huanghuaihai cotton region. Besides climatic-ecologic factors, these results above may indicate the major reason of causing higher single boll weight in Xinjiang, especially in southern Xinjiang.

Key words: Eco-region, Cultivar, Single boll weight, Components of single boll weight

[1] Mao S-C(毛树春). Studies on Sustainable Development of Cotton in China (中国棉花可持续发展研究). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1999. pp 18–20(in Chinese)
[2] Guo B-L(郭柏林). Geographic evaluation of the quality of cotton produced in China. Acta Agric Shanghai (上海农业学报), 1996, 12(3): 43–47(in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] Liu G-L(刘更另), Qiu J-J(邱建军). Study on scientific construction of Xinjiang cotton region. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1998, 34(6): 641–650(in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] Reviewing group of high yield in Xinjiang, Cotton Science Society of Xinjiang, Cotton Science Society of China (中国棉花学会新疆棉花学会新疆高产棉田鉴定考察组). Report of authenticating and technology review on high yield cotton field in Xinjiang. China Cotton (中国棉花), 1991, (1): 2–4(in Chinese)
[5] Cotton Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (中国农业科学院棉花研究所). Cotton Cultivation in China (中国棉花栽培学). Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishing House, 1983: 66–67(in Chinese)
[6] Tang C-M(唐灿明), Zhu G-C(朱广春). Correlation analysis of cotton boll weight and its components. China Cotton (中国棉花), 1990, (6): 9–10(in Chinese)
[7] Ma X-M(马新明), Wang X-C(王小纯), Yang Q-H(杨青华), Li B-B(李秉柏), Gao L-Z(高亮之). Studies on the simulation model on the cotton boll weight. Acta Gossypii Sin (棉花学报), 1999, 11(5): 278–279(in Chinese)
[8] Li M-C(李蒙春). Research on the physiological mechanism of the high yield cotton in Xinjiang. J Xinjiang Agric Univ (新疆农业大学学报), 1999, 22(1): 1–8(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] Zhang W-F(张旺锋), Gou L(勾玲), Li M-C(李蒙春), Liu K-Z(刘克贞), Li Z-S(李正尚), Li Z-H(李正河), Cai H-M(蔡红梅), Guo S-M(郭世明). Studies on the relationship between canopy apparent photosynthesis rate and yield. Acta Gossypii Sin (棉花学报), 1999, 11(4): 185–190(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] Li S-K(李少昆), Zhang W-F(张旺锋), Ma F-Y(马富裕), Wang K-R(王克如), Mu Z-X(慕自新). A study on physiological characteristics of super high-yield (Lint 2000 kg hm-2) cotton in north Xinjiang. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2000, 26(4): 508–512(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] Wang K-R(王克如), Li S-K(李少昆), Song G-J(宋光杰), Chen G(陈刚), Cao S-Z(曹拴柱). Studies on cultivated physiological indexes for high-yielding cotton in Xinjiang. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2002, 35(6): 638–644(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] Zhang W-F(张旺锋), Gou L(勾玲), Wang Z-L(王振林), Li S-K(李少昆), Yu S-L(余松烈), Cao L-P(曹连莆), Li W-M(李伟明). Changes of cotton single boll weight at different eco-region and correlation with meterological factor. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2002, 35(7): 872–877(in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] Lou C-H(娄成后), Wang X-C(王学臣). Physiological Basis for Yield Formation of Crops (作物产量形成的生理学基础). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. p 301 (in Chinese)
[14] Hu F-L(胡凤玲), Liu C-J(刘从九), Jiang X-Y(姜晓悦). Theory and Practice of Cotton Fiber Inspection (棉纤维检验理论与实务). Beijing: China Business Press, 1996. p 256 (in Chinese)
[15] Zhang W-Y(张文英), Mei Y-J(梅拥军). Conditional variable analysis of yield components in upland cotton. Chin Agric Sci Bull (中国农学通报), 2004, 20(2): 109–113(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] Zhang J-B(张金帮), Wang Y(王勇), Mao Y-F(毛允峰). Effect of meteorological factors on cotton boll weight and lint percentage. Jiangxi Cottons (江西棉花), 2000, 22(2): 29–32(in Chinese)
[17] Shan S-H(单世华), Shi P(施培), Sun X-Z(孙学振), Zhou Z-G(周治国). Advance in affect of temperature on cotton fiber development. J Shandong Agric Univ (Nat Sci)(山东农业大学学报·自然科学版), 2002, 33(3): 395–398(in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] Gipson T R, Ray L L. Temperature-variety interrelationships in cotton: I. Boll and fibre development. Cotton Growers Rev, 1970, 47: 257–271
[19] O'kelly J C, Carr J. Elongation of the Cotton fiber. In: Loomis W E ed. Growth and Differentiation in Plants. Iowa State College Press, 1953. pp 55–68
[20] Gipson T R, Ray L L. Fiber elongation rates in five varieties of cotton as influenced by night temperature. Crop Sci, 1969, 9: 339–341
[21] Du X-M(杜雄明), Pan J-J(潘家驹). Factors influencing cotton fiber initiation and development. Chin Bull Life Sci (生命科学), 2000, 12(4): 177–180(in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 徐田军, 张勇, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘宏伟, 陈传永, 王元东. 宜机收籽粒玉米品种冠层结构、光合及灌浆脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1526-1536.
[3] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[4] 闫岩, 张钰石, 刘础荣, 任丹阳, 刘洪润, 刘雪晴, 张明才, 李召虎. 冬小麦-夏玉米轮作“双晚”种植模式下的品种匹配与资源效率[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 423-436.
[5] 陈新宜, 宋宇航, 张孟寒, 李小艳, 李华, 汪月霞, 齐学礼. 干旱对不同品种小麦幼苗的生理生化胁迫以及外源5-氨基乙酰丙酸的缓解作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 478-487.
[6] 傅华英, 张婷, 彭文静, 段瑶瑶, 许哲昕, 林艺华, 高三基. 甘蔗新品种(系)苗期白条病人工接种抗性鉴定与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1531-1539.
[7] 习玲, 王昱琦, 朱微, 王益, 陈国跃, 蒲宗君, 周永红, 康厚扬. 78份四川小麦育成品种(系)条锈病抗性鉴定与抗条锈病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1309-1323.
[8] 董明辉, 陈培峰, 江贻, 曹鹏辉, 宋云生, 顾俊荣, 谢裕林, 乔中英, 张文地, 黄丽芬. 江苏太湖地区不同生育类型粳稻品种产量对不同播期气候因子的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5): 952-963.
[9] 许乃银, 赵素琴, 张芳, 付小琼, 杨晓妮, 乔银桃, 孙世贤. 基于GYT双标图对西北内陆棉区国审棉花品种的分类评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 660-671.
[10] 董玉新, 韦炳奇, 吴强, 张永平. 内蒙古平原灌区“春麦冬播”种植效应及品种适应性[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 481-493.
[11] 雷永, 王志慧, 淮东欣, 高华援, 晏立英, 李建国, 李威涛, 陈玉宁, 康彦平, 刘海龙, 王欣, 薛晓梦, 姜慧芳, 廖伯寿. 花生籽仁蔗糖含量近红外模型构建及在高糖品种培育中的应用[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 332-341.
[12] 张荣跃, 王晓燕, 杨昆, 单红丽, 仓晓燕, 李婕, 王长秘, 尹炯, 罗志明, 李文凤, 黄应昆. 甘蔗新品种及主栽品种对褐锈病抗性与Bru1基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 376-382.
[13] 刘少荣, 杨扬, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 康定明, 范亚明, 任洁, 江彬, 葛建镕, 成广雷, 王凤格. 基于农艺及品质性状与SSR标记的青贮玉米品种遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2362-2370.
[14] 吕国锋, 别同德, 王慧, 赵仁慧, 范金平, 张伯桥, 吴素兰, 王玲, 汪尊杰, 高德荣. 长江下游麦区新育成品种(系) 3种主要病害的抗性鉴定及抗病基因/ QTL的分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2335-2347.
[15] 仓晓燕, 夏红明, 李文凤, 王晓燕, 单红丽, 王长秘, 李婕, 张荣跃, 黄应昆. 甘蔗优良品种(系)对黑穗病的抗性评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2290-2296.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!