欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 560-565.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00560

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

持绿型高粱B35灌浆期对干旱的生理生化响应

黄瑞冬;孙璐;肖木辑;周宇飞   

  1. 沈阳农业大学农学院,辽宁沈阳110161
  • 收稿日期:2008-06-24 修回日期:2008-10-18 出版日期:2009-03-12 网络出版日期:2009-01-16
  • 通讯作者: 黄瑞冬，r_huang@126.com; Tel: 024-88487135
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAD02B00),辽宁省教育厅资助项目(20060768)资助

Physiological and Biochemical Responses to Drought during filling Stage in Stay Green Sorghum B35

HUANG Rui-Dong;SUN Lu;XIAO Mu-Ji;ZHOU Yu-Fei   

  1. College of Agronomy,Shenyang Agricultural University,Shenyang 110161,China
  • Received:2008-06-24 Revised:2008-10-18 Published:2009-03-12 Published online:2009-01-16

PDF

1578

被引次数

24

摘要：

在盆栽条件下, 对典型持绿型高粱品系B35在开花后10 d和开花后30 d进行1周的干旱胁迫, 胁迫结束后测定与持绿性或抗旱性相关的生理生化指标。结果表明, 持绿型高粱品系B35与对照普通高粱品系三尺三相比, 具有较高的叶绿素含量(SPAD值)、净光合速率(Pn)和叶片、茎秆、籽粒含氮量, 且干旱胁迫使其值下降幅度较小。与对照相比, 干旱胁迫条件使B35叶片的相对电导率和丙二醛(MDA)含量增加量较少, 游离脯氨酸含量的增加量较多, 叶水势下降幅度较大。B35的超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和过氧化物酶(POD)活性均较高。因此, 我们认为在干旱逆境中持绿型高粱品系B35能够在光合作用、氮素积累、叶片质膜透性、渗透调节能力和保护酶活性等方面有效进行自身的生理调节, 以适应干旱胁迫。

关键词: 高粱, 持绿性, 抗旱性, 生理生化特性

Abstract:

Effects of drought on a typical stay green sorghum line B35 were investigated through analyzing the physiological and biochemical characteristics of sorghum plants with the treatments of weekly drought stress starting on the 10th day and the 30th day after anthesis respectively in pot experiment. Compared with CK, the stay green sorghum B35 showed higher chlorophyll content (SPAD value), photosynthetic rate and nitrogen content in leaf, stem and grain. Under the condition of drought stress, the increments of electrical conductivity rate, malondialdehyde content in B35 were less than those in CK, the increments of proline contents and decrements of leaf water potential in B35 were more than those in CK. The activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxydase (POD) of B35 were higher than those of CK. We suggested that the stay green sorghum line could perform the physiological autoregulation effectively at the aspects of photosynthesis, nitrogen accumulation, cell membrane permeability of leaf, osmoregulation ability and activities of protective enzymes to adapt the drought.

Key words: Sorghum, Stay green, Drought resistance, Physiological and biochemical characteristics

[1]Rosenow D T, Quisenberry J E, Wendt C W. Drought tolerant sorghum and cotton germplasm. Agric Water Manag, 1983, 7: 207–222
[2]Borrell A K, Hammer G L. Nitrogen dynamics and the physiological basis of stay-green in sorghum. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 1295–1307
[3]Duncan R R, Bockhoit A J, Miler F R. Descriptive comparison of senescent and nonsenescent sorghum genotypes. Agron J, 1981, 73: 849–853
[4]Walulu R S, Rosenow D T, Wester D B, Nguyen H T. Inheritance of the stay green trait in sorghum. Crop Sci, 1994, 34: 970–972
[5]Gentinetta E, Ceppi D, Perico G, Motto M, Salamini F. A major gene for delayed senescence in maize: Pattern of photosynthates accumulation and inheritance. Plant Breed, 1986, 97: 193–203
[6]Spano G, Di Fonzo N, Perrotta C, Platani C, Ronga G, Lawlor DW, Napier J A, Shewry P R. Physiological characterization of 'stay-green' mutants in durum wheat. J Exp Bot, 2003, 54: 1415–1420
[7]Pierce R O, Knowles P F, Phillips D A. Inheritance of delayed leaf senescence in soybean. Crop Sci, 1984, 24: 515–518
[8]Yue B, Xue W, Luo L. QTL Analysis for flag leaf characteristics and their relationships with yield and yield traits in rice. Acta Genet Sin, 2006, 33: 824–832
[9]Sun L(孙璐), Huang R-D(黄瑞冬). Research on the root morphological and physiological characteristics of stay green sorghum. J Anhui Agric Sci (安徽农业科学), 2007, 35(15): 4433–4434(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]Xu W-H(徐文华), Wang K-J(王空军), Wang Y-J(王永军), Zhao J-R(赵久然), Dong S-T(董树亭), Hu C-H(胡昌浩). Comparison of yield and nutritive value in sorghum, sudangrass and sorghum sudangrass hybrd. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(8): 1218–1222(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Ge J-L(葛江丽), Shi L(石雷), Gu W-B(谷卫彬), Tang Y-D(唐宇丹), Zhang J-Z(张金政), Jiang C-D(姜闯道), Ren D-M(任大明). Photosynthetic characteristics and the regulation of photosystem II function in salt-stressed sweet sorghum seedlings. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(8): 1272–1278(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]Zhang X-Z(张宪政). Crop Physiological Approach(作物生理研究法). Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1992(in Chinese)
[13]Feng X-M(冯学民), Zhou H-F(周洪飞). Experiment and Statistics (试验与统计). Harbin: Harbin Engineering University Press, 2002(in Chinese)
[14]Xu W, Rosenow D T, Nguyen H T. Stay green trait in grain sorghum: Relationship between visual rating and leaf chlorophyll concentration. Plant Breed, 2000, 119: 365–367
[15]Thomas H, Rogers L J. Turning over an old leaf. Univ Wales Rev Sci Technol, 1989, 6: 29–38
[16]Borrell A K, Hammer G L, Van Oosterom E. Stay-green: A consequence of the balance between supply and demand for nitrogen during grain filling? Ann Appl Biol, 2001, 138: 91–95
[17]Thomas H, Smart C M. Crops that stay green. Appl Biol, 1993, 123: 193–219
[18]Bai X-L(白相历), Qi H(齐华), Liu M(刘明), Zhang Z-P(张振平). Study on the relationship between drought resistance and physiological index of maize. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2007, 15(5): 79–83(in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]Li N-N(李娜娜), Hao J-P(郝建平), Yang J-Z(杨锦忠), Yan X-B(阎心柏). Effects of water-permeability plastic film mulching on physiological characteristics of sorghum in drought land. J Shanxi Agric Univ (Nat Sci Edn)(山西农业大学学报·自然科学版), 2007, 27(2): 146–148 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]Ma R-K(马瑞昆), Jia X-L(贾秀领), Zhang Q-G(张全国), Zhang L-H(张丽华), Yao Y-R(姚艳荣), Yang L-H(杨利华). Physiological characteristics of water in wheat cultivar SX733: The effect of water-saving irrigation. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(9): 1446–1451 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]Yan Y(阎勇), Luo X-L(罗兴录), Zhang X-S(张兴思), Lan W-B(兰旺彬). Comparison of maize physiological characters under different treatment of irrigation. Chin Agric Sci Bull (中国农学通报), 2007, 23(9): 323–326(in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 王兴荣, 李玥, 张彦军, 李永生, 汪军成, 徐银萍, 祁旭升. 青稞种质资源成株期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1279-1287.
[2] 张海燕, 解备涛, 姜常松, 冯向阳, 张巧, 董顺旭, 汪宝卿, 张立明, 秦桢, 段文学. 不同抗旱性甘薯品种叶片生理性状差异及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 518-528.
[3] 韩贝, 王旭文, 李保奇, 余渝, 田琴, 杨细燕. 陆地棉种质资源抗旱性状的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 438-450.
[4] 王媛, 王劲松, 董二伟, 武爱莲, 焦晓燕. 长期施用不同剂量氮肥对高粱产量、氮素利用特性和土壤硝态氮含量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 342-350.
[5] 董二伟, 王劲松, 武爱莲, 王媛, 王立革, 韩雄, 郭珺, 焦晓燕. 行距和密度对高粱籽粒灌浆、淀粉及氮磷钾累积特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2459-2470.
[6] 张瑞栋,肖梦颖,徐晓雪,姜冰,邢艺凡,陈小飞,李邦,艾雪莹,周宇飞,黄瑞冬. 高粱种子对萌发温度的响应分析与耐低温萌发能力鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(6): 889-901.
[7] 宝力格,陆平,史梦莎,许月,刘敏轩. 中国高粱地方种质芽期苗期耐盐性筛选及鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(5): 734-744.
[8] 徐银萍, 潘永东, 刘强德, 姚元虎, 贾延春, 任诚, 火克仓, 陈文庆, 赵锋, 包奇军, 张华瑜. 大麦种质资源成株期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(3): 448-461.
[9] 王瑞,凌亮,詹鹏杰,于纪珍,楚建强,平俊爱,张福耀. 控制高粱分蘖与主茎株高一致性的基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(6): 829-838.
[10] 张海燕,解备涛,汪宝卿,董顺旭,段文学,张立明. 不同甘薯品种抗旱性评价及耐旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(3): 419-430.
[11] 张笑笑,潘映红,任富莉,蒲伟军,王道平,李玉斌,陆平,李桂英,朱莉. 基于多重表型分析的准确评价高粱抗旱性方法的建立[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(11): 1735-1745.
[12] 李龙,毛新国,王景一,昌小平,柳玉平,景蕊莲. 小麦种质资源抗旱性鉴定评价[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(7): 988-999.
[13] 王建伟,贺晓岚,李文旭,陈新宏. 小麦近缘属植物1-FFT基因的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(6): 814-823.
[14] 朱广龙,宋成钰,于林林,陈许兵,智文芳,刘家玮,焦秀荣,周桂生. 外源生长调节物质对甜高粱种子萌发过程中盐分胁迫的缓解效应及其生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(11): 1713-1724.
[15] 赵燕燕, 习岗. 高粱种子萌发过程中超微弱光子辐射的特征[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(05): 783-789.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2