欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 620-630.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00620

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

黄淮地区大豆重要亲本间产量的杂种优势、配合力及其遗传基础

杨加银12，盖钧镒1*   

  1. 1南京农业大学大豆研究所/国家大豆改良中心/作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室，江苏南京 210095；2江苏徐淮地区淮阴农科所，江苏淮安 223001
  • 收稿日期:2008-09-26 修回日期:2008-12-13 出版日期:2009-04-12 网络出版日期:2009-02-13
  • 通讯作者: 盖钧镒
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展规划（973规划）项目（2006CB101708，2009CB118404），国家高技术研究发展计划（863计划）项目（2006AA100104, 2009AA101106），国家自然科学基金项目（30671266），国家科技支撑计划项目（2006BAD13B05-7），高等学校创新引智计划（B08025）资助。

Heterosis,Combining Ability and Their Genetic Basis of Yield among Key Parental Materials of soybean in Huang-Huai Valleys

YANG Jia-Yin12,GAI Jun-Yi1*   

  1. 1Soybean Research Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University/National Center for Soybean Improvement/National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm enhancement,Nanjing 210095,China;2Huaiyin Institute of Agricultural Sciences of xuhuai Region,Huaian 223001,China
  • Received:2008-09-26 Revised:2008-12-13 Published:2009-04-12 Published online:2009-02-13
  • Contact: GAI Jun-Yi

PDF

2478

被引次数

45

摘要：

2003—2005年以选自黄淮地区及美国的8个大豆重要亲本品种(系)及其组配的28个双列杂交组合为材料, 分析大豆亲本间的产量杂种优势及其配合力, 探讨高优势组合的遗传基础, 包括杂种优势与亲本系数、SSR标记遗传距离的相关。结果表明: (1)黄淮地区大豆亲本间存在产量超亲优势, 平均20.39%, 组合间差异甚大, 变幅–5.34%~76.88%, 优选出豫豆22×晋豆27、淮豆4号×晋豆27、诱变30×蒙90-24, 超亲优势分别为76.88%、29.90%和34.42%, 超标率均在25.00%以上, 晋豆27和诱变30为优秀亲本材料。单株荚数及单株粒数的优势和产量优势相对一致；(2) 大豆亲本间产量杂种优势既与双亲一般配合力之和及特殊配合力有关, 又不完全相关。高优势高产组合的亲本产量配合力特点为亲本之一具有较高的一般配合力, 或双亲具有较高的一般配合力之和, 兼有较高的特殊配合力。单株荚数和单株粒数的情况和产量一致；(3) 按亲本系数聚类和按SSR标记遗传相似系数聚类揭示的8个亲本间的遗传关系相对一致, 均分为两组, 一组包含6个黄淮中、南部品种(系), 另一组包含1个山西和1个美国品种。要获得高优势高产组合, 亲本间必须具有一定的遗传距离, 但遗传距离大并不一定都高产高优势, 还有其他因素决定杂种优势。

关键词: 大豆, 产量, 杂种优势, 一般配合力, 特殊配合力, 亲本系数, SSR标记

Abstract:

In recent years, breeding for hybrid cultivars of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] for utiliazation of heterosis has been paid great attention, but there are few reports published on the fundamental aspects regarding the heterosis in soybeans.. In fact, for a real utilization of hybrid soybean, the important prerequisite is high heterosis. Therefore, a fundamental effort in hybrid breeding is the choice of parents and identification of superior hybrid combinations. In the paper, heterosis and combining ability were determined using eight key parental materials, including seven from Huang-Huai region and one from US as well as their 28 F1 diallel crosses in Huaian, Jiangsu, China from 2003 to 2005, and relationships between F1 performance and its pedigree-based and SSR-based genetic distances were investigated. The results showed that there were heterobeltiosis in yield among parents in Huang-Huai region with average heterobeltiosis of 20.39%, and a big difference among hybridized combinations with a range from –5.34% to 76.88%. We screened combinations, among them, Yudou 22 × Jindou 27, Huaidou 4 × Jindou 27, and Youbian 30 × Meng 9024 had the heterobeltiosis in yield of 76.88%, 29.90%, and 34.42%, respectively. Among those parents used above, Youbian 30 and Jindou 27 were the elite. Heterosis of pods per plant and seeds per plant were relatively in accord with yield heterosis. Yield heterosis in parents was related to general combining ability(GCA) and specific combining ability(SCA). One of parents has high GCA or both have high GCA and high SCA in high-yield combinations. Parents-based cluster and SSR-based cluster analysis revealed that genetic relationships for eight parents were basically consistent, and eight parents were grouped into two groups, one including six varieties from middle and south of Huang-Huai region, the other consisting of one from Shanxi and one from America. Therefore, certain genetic distanceis require for a cross with high heterosis and high yield, but genetic distance is not an only determinant factor for high-yield heterosis.

Key words: Soybean, Yield, Heterosis, General combining ability, Specific combining ability, Coefficient of parentage, SSR marker

[1] Wentz J B, Stewart R T. Hybrid vigor in soybeans. J Am Soc Agron, 1924, 16: 534–540
[2] Veatch C. Vigor in soybeans as affected by hybridity. J Am Soc Agron, 1930, 22: 289–310
[3] Section of Soybean Research, Department of Agronomy, Northeast Agricultural College (东北农学院农学系大豆课题组). Investigation on heterosis of F1 of soybean. Acta Genet Sin (遗传学报), 1977, 4(3): 228–232(in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] Palmer R G, Gai J Y, Sun H, Burton J W. Production and evaluation of hybrid soybean. Plant Breed Rev, 2001, 21: 263–307
[5] Leffel R C, Weiss M G. Analysis of diallel crosses among ten varieties of soybean. Agron J, 1958, 50: 528–534
[6] Ma Y-H(马育华), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒), Hu Y-Z(胡蕴珠). Studies on genetic variation of successive generations after hybridization in soybeans: II. Combining ablity and related genetic parameters. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1983, 9(4): 249–258(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] Gai J-Y(盖钧镒), Ma Y-H(马育华), Hu Y-Z(胡蕴珠). Heterosis and combining ability performed in F1 and F3 hybrids between soybean cultivars from the PRC and US. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 1984, 3(3): 183–191 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] Zhao L-M(赵丽梅), Sun H(孙寰), Wang S-M(王曙明), Wang Y-Q(王跃强), Huang M(黄梅), Li J-P(李建平). Breeding of hybrid soybean HybSoy 1. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2004, 26(3): 15–17(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] Cox T S, Kiang Y T, Gorman M B, Rodgers D M. Relationship between coefficient of parentage and genetic similarity indices in the soybean. Crop Sci, 1985, 25: 529–532
[10] Sneller C H. Pedigree analysis of elite soybean lines. Crop Sci, 1994, 34: 1515–1522
[11] Manjarrez-Sandoval P, Carter T E Jr, Webb D M, Burton J W. Heterosis in soybean and its prediction by genetic similarity measures. Crop Sci, 1997, 37: 1443–1452
[12] Smith O S, Smith J S C, Bowen S L, Tenborg R A, Wall S J. Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1 grain yield, grain yield, heterosis and RFLPs. Theor Appl Genet, 1990, 80: 833–840
[13] Stuber C W, Lincoln S E, Wolff D W, Helentjaris T, Lander E S. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred using molecular markers. Genetics, 1992, 132: 823–839
[14] Cerna F J, Cianzio S R, Rafalski A, Tingey S, Dyer D. Relationship between seed yield heterosis and molecular marker heterozygosity in soybean. Theor Appl Genet, 1997, 95: 460–467
[15] Bohn M, Utz H F, Melchinger A E. Genetic similarities among winter wheat cultivars determined on the basis of RFLPs, AFLPs, and SSRs and their use for predicting progeny variance. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 228–237
[16] Zhang Q F, Gao Y J, Saghai Maroof M A, Yang S H, Li J X. Molecular divergence and hybrid performance in rice. Mol Breed, 1995, 1: 133–142
[17] Lackey J A. Chromosome numbers in the Phaseoleae (Fabaceae: Faboideae) and their relation to taxonomy. Am J Bot, 1980, 67: 595–602
[18] Doyle J J, Doyle J L. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus, 1990, 12: 13–15
[19] Ma Y-H(马育华). Basis of Quantitative Trait Genetics for Plant Breeding (植物育种的数量遗传学基础). Nanjing: Jiangsu Science and Technology Press, 1982. pp 376–426 (in Chinese)
[20] Zhang Y D, Kang M S, Lamkey K R. DIALLEL-SAS05: A comprehensive program for Griffing’s and Gardner-Eberhart analyses. Agron J, 2005, 97: 1097–1106
[21] Nei M, Li W H. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in term of restriction endonucleases. Proc Nat1 Acad Sci USA, 1979, 76: 5269–5273
[22] Rohlf F J. NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System (Version 2.10e). New York: Exeter Software, 1989
[23] Weiss M G, Weber C R, Kalton R R. Early generation testing in soybeans. J Am Soc Agron, 1947, 39: 791–811
[24] Weber C R, Empig L T, and Thorne J C. Heterotic performance and combining ability of two-way F1 soybean hybrids. Crop Sci, 1970, 10: 159–160
[25] Ma Y-H(马育华), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒), Hu Y-Z(胡蕴珠). A study on genetic variability of successive generations after hybridization in soybean: I. Heterosis and inbreeding depression. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1983, 16(5): 1–6 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26] Wang S-M(王曙明), Sun H(孙寰), Wang Y-Q(王跃强), Zhao L-M(赵丽梅), Li N(李楠), Fu L-S(付连舜), Li W-D(李卫东), Qi N (齐宁), Xing H(邢邯), Li L(李磊). Studies on heterosis and screening of highly heterotic combinations in soybean: I. F1 seed yield heterosis and screening of highly heterotic combinations. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2002, 21(3): 161–167(in Chinese with English abstract)
[27] Burton J W, Brownie C. Heterosis and inbreeding depression in two soybean single crosses. Crop Sci, 2006, 46: 2643–2648
[28] Ortiz-Perez E, Cianzio S R, Wiley H, Horner H T, Davis W H, Palmer R G. Insect-mediated cross-pollination in soybean
[Glycine max (L.) Merrill]: I. Agronomic performance. Field Crops Res, 2007, 101: 259–268
[29] Palmer R G, Ortiz-Perez E, Cervantes-Martinez I G, Wiley H, Hanlin S J, Healy R A, Horner H T, Davis W H. Hybrid soybean-current status and future outlook. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Soybean Seed Research Conference. American Seed Trade Association Seed Expo, 2003
[30] Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Genetic Improvement and Germplasm Study of Soybean in China(我国大豆遗传改良和种质研究). In: Science and Technology at the Frontier in China. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2002. pp 667–684(in Chinese)
[31] Zhang B(张博), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟), Chang R-Z(常汝镇). Primary study on predicting heterosis by SSR marker distance among soybean cultivars. Soybean Sci(大豆科学), 2003, 22(3): 166–171(in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[3] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[4] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[5] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[6] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[7] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[8] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[9] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[10] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[11] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[12] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[13] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[14] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[15] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2