欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 2046-2052.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.02046

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

玉米和大豆光合有效辐射吸收比例与植被指数和叶面积指数的关系

杨飞1,2;张柏1,*;宋开山1;王宗明1;刘焕军1,2;杜嘉1,2   

  1. 1中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所，吉林长春130012； 2中国科学院研究生院，北京100039
  • 收稿日期:2008-03-17 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-11-13 网络出版日期:2008-09-06
  • 通讯作者: 张柏

Relationship between Fraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation and Vegetation Indices, Leaf Area Index of Corn and Soybean

YANG Fei12, ZHANG Bai1*,SONG Kai-Shan1,WANG Zong-Ming1,LIU Huan-Jun12,DU Jia12   

  1. 1 Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130012, Jilin; 2 Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China
  • Received:2008-03-17 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-11-13 Published online:2008-09-06
  • Contact: ZHANG Bai
  • Supported by:

    国家自然科学基金项目(40871187);中国科学院东北振兴科技行动计划重点项目(DBZX-2-030);中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目(KZCX-SW-356);中国科学院长春净月潭遥感实验站开放基金

PDF

2766

被引次数

41

摘要：

基于东北典型黑土区的玉米和大豆的实测光谱反射率、光合有效辐射及叶面积数据，选取常用的9种植被指数，并根据光谱曲线特征和植被指数结构建立了两种新的植被指数，对其估算玉米和大豆冠层FPAR效果进行了对比分析。结果表明，各植被指数与冠层光合有效辐射吸收比例(FPAR)的关系因植被类型而异。以近、短波红外波段较以可见光、近红外波段计算植被指数的估算效果好。NDVI、RVI在可见光、近红外波段计算的植被指数中估算FPAR效果较好，玉米估算模型R2分别为0.81和0.82，大豆估算模型R2均为0.81；NDSI、RSI在近、短波红外波段计算的植被指数中较好，玉米估算模型R2均为0.86，大豆估算模型R2均为0.84，优于NDVI和RVI。试验表明，利用近、短波红外波段估算FPAR是可行的；冠层含水量较土壤背景对FPAR影响更大；玉米和大豆冠层FPAR与叶面积指数(LAI)呈较好的对数关系，估算模型R2分别为0.75和0.70；但用植被指数估算FPAR效果要优于用叶面积指数。

关键词: 玉米, 大豆, 光合有效辐射吸收比例, 植被指数, 叶面积指数

Abstract:

Based on the measured reflectance, photosynthetically active radiation, and leaf area index (LAI), nine common vegetation indices and two vegetation indices, developed by the authors according to the characteristic of reflectance curves and the vegetation index structures, were used to estimate fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR) in corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merri.]. The relationships between vegetation indices and FPAR differed in different vegetation types. The performances of of near infrared and shortwave bands were better than these of visible and near infrared bands in FPAR estimatin by vegetation indices. Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and ratio vegetation index (RVI) were the best in the vegetation indices calculated by reflectance in visible and near infrared bands for FPAR estimation, with R2 of estimating models 0.82 and 0.81 for corn, both of 0.81 for soybean. Normalized difference shortwave index (NDSI) and ratio shortwave index (RSI) were best in the vegetation indices calculated by near infrared and shortwave bands with almost the same R2 values for NDSI and RSI in corn (0.86) and soybean (0.84). It is suggested that the near infrared and shortwave bands are feasible to be used for FPAR estimation. According to the field experiments, the water content of vegetation canopy had larger effect on FPAR estimation than soil background. The canopy FPAR and LAI showed good logarithm relations in corn and soybean canopy with R2 values of 0.75 and 0.70, respectively, indicating that vegetation indices are better than LAI for FPAR estimation.

Key words: Corn, Soybean, Fraction of photosynthetically active radiation, Vegetation index, Leaf area index

[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[3] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[4] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[5] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[6] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[7] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[8] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[9] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[10] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[11] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[12] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[13] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[14] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[15] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2