欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 1866-1874.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01866

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同种植方式下氮素营养对陆稻中旱3号和水稻扬粳9538米质的影响

张亚洁,陈莹莹,闫国军,杜斌,周彧然,杨建昌*   

  1. 扬州大学/江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室,江苏扬州225009
  • 收稿日期:2009-01-05 修回日期:2009-04-15 出版日期:2009-10-12 网络出版日期:2009-08-07
  • 通讯作者: 杨建昌,Tel:0514-87979317; E-mail:jcyang @yzu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(30671225,30771274),江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK2006069),扬州大学高层次人才科研启动基金项目资助。

Effects of Nitrogen Nutrition on Grain Quality in Upland Rice Zhonghan 3 and Paddy Rice Yangjing 9538 under Different Cultivation Methods

ZHANG Ya-Jie,CHEN Ying-Ying,YAN Guo-Jun,DU Bin,ZHOU Yu-Ran,YANG Jian-Chang*   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology, Jiangsu Province / Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
  • Received:2009-01-05 Revised:2009-04-15 Published:2009-10-12 Published online:2009-08-07
  • Contact: YANG Jian-Chang,Tel:0514-87979317; E-mail:jcyang @yzu.edu.cn

摘要:

以粳型陆稻中旱3号和粳型水稻扬粳9538为材料,设置裸地旱种和水种两种方式及低氮(100 kg hm-2)、常氮(200 kg hm-2)和高氮(300 kg hm-2) 3种氮素水平,比较了陆稻和水稻米质的差异。结果表明,旱种高氮处理下陆稻和水稻的产量以及水种高氮处理下水稻的产量较常氮有所下降,但水种高氮处理下陆稻的产量较常氮增加;增加施氮量使陆稻的垩白粒率和垩白度均先增加后下降,两品种稻米的直链淀粉含量下降,蛋白质含量增加,而水稻在旱种方式下垩白粒率和垩白度下降,在水种方式下增加。陆稻以常氮处理及水稻以低氮处理的崩解值最高,消减值最小。旱种使陆稻外观和营养品质有所改善;陆稻和水稻旱种的其他品质指标与水种无显著差异。与水稻相比,陆稻的营养品质较优,外观和蒸煮品质稍差,蒸煮和营养品质指标与叶片含氮率的相关程度较低表明陆稻和水稻的米质对种植方式和氮素的响应有明显差异。对陆稻和水稻的高产优质栽培途径进行了讨论。

关键词: 陆稻, 水稻, 旱种, 氮素, 米质

Abstract:

Upland rice and dry-cultivated paddy rice have been attracted more and more attention because of limited water resources in China. Researches on interaction between water and nitrogen supplies for crop resistance to drought stress has become a hot topic in crop physiology. However, the information linking to the effect of nitrogen nutrition on grain quality of upland rice and paddy rice under different cultivation methods is unavailable. The objective of this study was to evaluate the difference between upland rice and paddy rice and interaction between cultivation methods and N levels. One upland rice cultivar Zhonghan 3 (japonica) and one paddy rice cultivar Yangjing 9538 (japonica) were grown under either moist cultivation (MC, control) or bare dry-cultivation (DC) conditions, with three N levels, low amount of nitrogen (LN, 100 kg ha-1), normal amount of nitrogen (NN, 100 kg ha-1), and high amount of nitrogen (HN, 300 kg ha-1). The results showed that, compared with NN, the grain yield under HN was lower for both upland and paddy rice under DC and for paddy rice under MC, whereas it was higher for upland rice under MC. Under both DC and MCthe percentage of chalky grains and the chalkiness of upland rice were increased under NN and reduced under HN. With the increase in N levels, amylose content was reduced and protein content was increased for both upland and paddy rice. However, the percentage of chalky grains and the chalkiness of paddy rice was decreased under DC and increased under MC. Breakdown viscosity was the highest and setback viscosity was the lowest for upland rice under NN and for paddy rice under LN. The bare dry cultivation can improve appearance quality and nutrient quality for upland rice. There was no significant difference in other rice quality indices between upland rice and paddy rice under DC. Compared with paddy rice, upland rice showed better nutrient quality and poor appearance quality and cooking quality. The correlation coefficient between cooking and nutrient quality and leaf nitrogen content was smaller for upland rice than for paddy rice. The results suggest that the response to cultivation methods and nitrogen levels varies largely between upland rice and paddy rice. The approaches to increase grain yield and grain quality for both paddy and upland rice were discussed.

Key words: Upland rice, Paddy rice, Dry Cultivation, Nitrogen, Rice quality

[1] Benbi D K. Efficiency of nitrogen use by dry-land wheat in a sub-humid region in relation to optimizing the amount of available water. J Agric Sci, 1989, 115: 7-10

[2] Jin K(金轲), Wang D-S(汪德水), Cai D-X(蔡典雄), Zhou Y(周涌), Guo S-C(郭世昌), Huang F(黄峰), Wang C-L(王翠玲). Differences of root morphology and physiological characteristics between two rape genotypes with different P-efficiency. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 1999, 5(1): 1-7 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[3] Jin Z-X(金正勋), Qiu T-Q(秋太权), Sun Y-L(孙艳丽), Zhao J-M(赵久明), Jin X-Y(金学泳). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on chalkiness ratio and cooking and eating quality properties of rice grain. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2001, 7(1): 31-35(in Chinese with English abstract)

[4] Xu C-M(徐春梅), Wang D-Y(王丹英), Shao G-S(邵国胜), Zhang X-F(章秀福). Effects of transplanting density and nitrogen fertilizer rate on yield formation and grain quality of super high yielding rice Zhongzao 22. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2008, 22(5): 507-512 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5] Huang Y-C(黄元财), Wang B-L(王伯伦), Wang S(王术), Jia B-Y(贾宝艳). Effect of amount of N-applied on grain yield and quality of rice. J Shenyang Agric Univ (沈阳农业大学学报), 2006, 37(5): 688-692 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6] Zhan X-C(占新春), Zhou G-X(周桂香), Wu S(吴爽), Zhang P-J(张培江), Xu J-P(徐继萍). Effects of amount of nitrogen applied and planting density on grain quality of Fengliangyou 1. Hybrid Rice (杂交水稻), 2006, 21(6): 66-68 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7] Liu J-L(柳金来), Song J-J(宋继娟), Zhou B-M(周柏明), Cui M-Y(崔明元), Liu R-Q(刘荣清), Li C-M(李长梅). Relation of applying N quantity and rice quality. Soil Fert (土壤肥料), 2005, (1): 17-19 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8] Xu R-L(许仁良), Dai Q-G(戴其根), Huo Z-Y(霍中洋), Wang X-Q(王秀芹). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer quantity on different rice variety quality. J Yangzhou Univ (Agric & Life Sci Edn)(扬州大学学报·农业生命科学版), 2005, 26(1): 66-68, 84 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9] Zhang H-C(张洪程), Wang X-Q(王秀芹), Dai Q-G(戴其根), Huo Z-Y(霍中洋), Xu K(许轲). Effects of N-application rate on nitrogen uptake of hybrid yield, quality and characters of rice variety Liangyoupeijiu. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2003, 36(7): 800-806 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10] Jin J(金军), Xu D-Y(徐大勇), Cai Y-X(蔡一霞), Hu S-Y(胡署云), Ge M(葛敏), Zhu Q-S(朱庆森). Effect of N-fertilizer on main quality characters of rice and RVA profile parameters. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(2): 154-158 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[11] Jiang L-G(江立庚), Cao W-X(曹卫星), Gan X-Q(甘秀芹), Wei S-Q(韦善清), Xu J-Y(徐建云), Dong D-F(董登峰), Chen N-P(陈念平), Lu F-Y(陆福勇), Qin H-D(秦华东). Nitrogen uptake and utilization under different nitrogen management and influence on grain yield and quality in rice. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2004, 37(4): 490-496 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12] Wopereis-Pura M M, Watanabe H, Moreira J, Wopereis M C. Effect of late nitrogen application on rice yield, grain quality and profitability in the Senegal River valley. Eur J Agron, 2002, 17: 191-198

[13] Aulakh M S, Malhi S S. Interactions of nitrogen with other nutrients and water: Effect on crop yield and quality, nutrient use efficiency, carbon sequestration, and environmental pollution. Adv Agron, 2005, 86: 341-409

[14] Sun Y-L(孙艳丽), Shen P(沈鹏), Jin Z-X(金正勋), Jin X-Y(金学泳), Ma H(马红). Effect of nitrogen on the protein fractions content and cooking and eating quality of rice grain. J North Agric Univ (东北农业大学学报), 2002, 33(2): 134-138 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15] Ye Q-B(叶全宝), Zhang H-C(张洪程), Li H(李华), Huo Z-Y(霍中洋), Wei H-Y(魏海燕), Xia K(夏科), Dai Q-G(戴其根), Xu K(许轲). Effects of amount of nitrogen applied and planting density on RVA profile characteristic of japonica rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(1): 124-130 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16] Chen X-H(陈新红), Liu K(刘凯), Xu G-W(徐国伟), Wang Z-Q(王志琴), Yang J-C(杨建昌). Effect of nitrogen and soil moisture on nutrient absorption and quality of rice. J Northwest Sci-Tech Univ Agric (Nat Sci Edn)(西北农林科技大学学报·自然科学版), 2004, 32(3): 15-19 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17] You X-T(尤小涛), Jing Q(荆奇), Jiang D(姜东), Dai T-B(戴廷波), Zhou D-Q(周冬琴), Cao W-X(曹卫星). Effects of nitrogen application on nitrogen utilization and grain yield and quality in rice under water saving irrigation. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2006, 20(2): 199-204 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18] Cheng J-F(程建峰), Pan X-Y(潘晓云), Liu Y-B(刘宜柏). Effect of different Irrigation and fertilization conditions on rice quality of hybrid early rice. Acta Agric Jiangxi (江西农业学报), 2001, 13(1): 15-19 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19] Peng X-L(彭显龙), Yu C-L(于彩莲). Effects of nitrogen and irrigation on rice in cold area of northeastern China. J Northeast Agric Univ (东北农业大学学报), 2008, 39(2): 261-264 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[20] Cheong J I. Effects of slow-release fertilizer application on rice grain quality at different culture methods. Korean J Crop Sci, 1996, 41: 286-294

[21] Sharma D K, Sharma D R. Sustainable use of poor quality water with proper scheduling of irrigation and nitrogen levels for a rice crop. Water Sci Tech, 1999, 40: 111-114

[22] Grigg B C, Beyrouty C A, Norman R J, Gbur E E, Hanson M G, Wells B R. Rice response to changes in floodwater and N timing in southern USA. Field Crops Res, 2000, 66: 73-79

[23] Belder P, Spiertz J H J, Bouman B A M, Lu G, Tuong T P. Nitrogen economy and water productivity of lowland rice under water-saving irrigation. Field Crops Res, 2005, 93: 169-185

[24] Zhang Z C, Zhang S F, Yang J C, Zhang J H. Yield, grain quality and water use efficiency of rice under non-flooded mulching cultivation. Field Crops Res, 2008, 108: 71-81

[25] Kozak M, Singh P K, Verma M R, Hore D K. Causal mechanism for determination of grain yield and milling quality of lowland rice. Field Crops Res, 2007, 102: 178-184

[26] Cheng W D, Zhang G P, Zhao G P, Yao H G, Xu H M. Variation in rice quality of different cultivars and grain positions as affected by water management. Field Crops Res,2003, 80: 245-252

[27] Bouman B A M, Peng S, Castaneda A R, Visperas R M. Yield and water use of irrigated tropical aerobic rice systems. Agric Water Manage, 2005, 74: 87-105

[28] Guo Y-M(郭咏梅), Mu P(穆平), Liu J-F(刘家富), Lu Y-X(卢义宣), Li Z-C(李自超). Comparative studies on quality characters of rice under water- and dry-cultivation conditions. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(11): 1443-1448 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[29] Li X-X(李小湘). Effects of environmental conditions on ear- grain components and rice quality of Baxiludao. Crop Res (作物研究), 1999, (2): 18-19 (in Chinese)

[30] Zhang Y-J(张亚洁), Zhou Y-R(周彧然), Sun B(孙斌), Diao G-H(刁广华), Lin Q-S(林强森), Yang J-C(杨建昌). Effects of cultivation methods on grain quality in upland rice cv. Zhonghan 3 and paddy rice cv. Wuxiangjing 99-8. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(1): 31-37 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[31] Yang J-C(杨建昌), Wang Z-Q(王志琴), Chen Y-F(陈义芳), Cai Y-X(蔡一霞), Liu L-J(刘立军), Zhu Q-S(朱庆森). Preliminary studies on grain yield and quality of dry-cultivated rice. Jiangsu Agric Res (江苏农业研究), 2000, 21(3): 1-5 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[32] Wu D-X(吴殿星), Shu Q-Y(舒庆尧), Xia Y-W(夏英武). Rapid identification of starch viscosity property of early Indica rice varieties with different apparent amylose content by RVA profile. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2001, 15(1): 57-59 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[33] Ling Q-H(凌启鸿). Crop Population Quality (作物群体质量). Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 2000. pp 154-178 (in Chinese)

Zhang Y-J(张亚洁), Zhou Y-R(周彧然), Du B(杜斌), Yang J- C(杨建昌). Effects of nitrogen nutrition on grain yield of upland and paddy rice under different cultivation methods. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(6): 1005-1013 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 郭星宇, 刘朋召, 王瑞, 王小利, 李军. 旱地冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率及土壤氮素平衡对降水年型与施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[7] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[8] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[9] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[10] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
[11] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[12] 陈悦, 孙明哲, 贾博为, 冷月, 孙晓丽. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子参与逆境胁迫应答的分子机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 781-790.
[13] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[14] 闫宇婷, 宋秋来, 闫超, 刘爽, 张宇辉, 田静芬, 邓钰璇, 马春梅. 连作秸秆还田下玉米氮素积累与氮肥替代效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 962-974.
[15] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!