欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (05): 736-743.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00736

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

棉花霜前皮棉产量主位点组遗传分析

艾尼江1,2,朱新霞1,3,管荣展1,万英2,张天真1,*   

  1. 1南京农业大学作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室/棉花研究所,江苏南京210095;2新疆石河子棉花所,新疆石河子832000;3新疆石河子大学生命科学,新疆石河子832000
  • 收稿日期:2009-11-02 修回日期:2010-02-06 出版日期:2010-05-12 网络出版日期:2010-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 张天真, E-mail: cotton@njau.edu.cn; Fax: 025-84395307
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究计划(973)项目(2006CB101708),江苏省创新学者攀登项目(BK2008036)和高等学校创新引智计划(B08025)资助。

Genetic Analysis of Major Loci Groups of Pre-frost Lint Yield in Upland Cotton

Ainijiang1,2,ZHU Xin-Xia1,3,GUAN Rong-Zhan1,WAN Ying2,ZHANG Tian-Zhen1,*   

  1. 1 Cotton Research Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University / National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing 210095, China; 2 Xinjiang Shihezi Cotton Research Institute, Shihezi 832000, China; 3 College of Life Sciences, Xinjiang Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China
  • Received:2009-11-02 Revised:2010-02-06 Published:2010-05-12 Published online:2010-03-15
  • Contact: ZHANG Tian-Zhen,E-mail:cotton@njau.edu.cn; Fax: 025-84395307

摘要:

选用不同来源的6个棉花品种作亲本, 按照Griffing P(P–1)/2不完全双列杂交方法配制15个杂交组合。应用QTL检测体系的主位点组基因型和基因效应, 估计主位点组霜前皮棉产量杂种优势并分析有利位点组与杂种优势的关系。结果表明, 霜前皮棉产量主位点组解释的变异占表型变异的36.79%, 主位点组与环境互作解释的变异占表型变异的33.46%, 环境解释的变异占表型变异的10.37%, 微位点组解释的变异很低, 占表型变异的3.27%。6个棉花品种的霜前皮棉产量的遗传受5个主位点组基因控制, 其加性效应(aJ)分别为5.99**、-1.26**、-0.92**、-0.75和3.01, 显性效应(dJ)分别为2.55**、4.16**、7.95**、5.32**和-7.71**各主位点组基因的效应方向、大小不等。主位点组中亲优势变幅15.55%~133.56%, 平均63.34%, 高亲优势变幅15.39%~93.82%, 平均44.56%。棉花霜前皮棉产量杂种优势主要取决于主位点组基因的杂合性。在棉花育种实践中, 通过分析亲本及组合的主位点组基因型, 能够得到有价值信息。配制早熟、高产杂交组合的同时, 结合分子聚合设计育种, 把优质、抗病虫、抗逆等性状集于一体, 可培育出综合性状优良的常规品种, 从而提高育种效率。,

关键词: 棉花, 霜前皮棉, 主位点组, 遗传效应, 主位点组x环境互作

Abstract:

Early-maturity is closely related to yield and quality of cotton. Cotton growing season in the north of China, especially in the early-maturing cotton area, is short. So early-maturity has decisive significance for the improvement of yield and quality of cotton in this specific area. In the special ecological environment of northern Xinjiang cotton growing region and the Yellow River growing region with wheat-cotton interplanting, improving the pre-frost lint yield primarily depends on the early-maturing cotton varieties with, shorter growth period and more pre-frost boll numbers. In the early-maturing Upland cotton area, pre-frost lint yield largely determines the proportion of high-quality cotton. However, research on molecular breeding for cotton earliness is still lacking at home and abroad. The early-, mid- and late-maturing materials with large genetic differences were used as parents in this study. The genotypes and the relative genetic effects of major loci groups based on Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) detection system were first adopted to estimate the magnitude of heterosis for pre-frost lint yield, and to analyze the relationship between favourable loci groups and heterosis. According to Griffing’s P(P–1)/2 Incomplete Diallel Cross design, fifteen combinations were made by six cotton varieties from different origins. The results showed that the phenotypic variations explained by major loci groups (G), G×E, environment (E) and minor loci group were 36.79%, 33.46%, 10.37%, and 3.27%, respectively. The pre-frost lint yield was controlled by five isolated major gene loci groups with additive effects of 5.99**, –1.26**, –0.92**, –0.75, and 3.01; and dominant effects of 2.55**, 4.16**, 7.95**, 5.32**, and –7.71**, respectively. Mid-parent heterosis of lint yield for major loci groups ranged from 15.55 to 133.56%, with an average of 63.34%, whereas high-parent heterosis ranged from 15.39% to 93.82%, with an average of 44.56%. Pre-frost lint yield heterosis was mainly determined by the gene heterozygosity of major loci groups. The hybrid combination, P2×P5, had highest favorable loci aggregation and surpassed all hybrid combinations in this study in pre-frost lint yield. This shows that genes related to pre-frost lint yield exist in the early- and mid-maturing parents. On the basis of parent materials genotypic estimation, with this method, genotypes aggregating favorable loci can be identified, or the donor with unfavorable locus can be changed to achieve the strong heterotic combinations. Combined with molecular design breeding, conventional cultivars with excellent comprehensive characteristics including high-quality; resistance to insect pests, disease, stress; and other properties can be developed with enhanced breeding efficiency.

Key words: Cotton, Pre-frost lint yield, Major loci groups, Genetic effects, MLGsxenvironment interaction


[1] Cotton Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (中国农业科学院棉花研究所). China Cotton Genetic Breeding (中国棉花遗传育种学). Jinan: Shandong Science and Technology Press, 2003 (in Chinese)


[2] Sun J-L(孙君灵), Du X-M(杜雄明), Zhou Z-L(周忠丽), Pan Z-E(潘兆娥), Pang B-Y(庞保印). Analysis on heritability and heterosis main traits of Bt transgenic cotton sGK9708 with different types. Cotton Sci (棉花学报), 2003, 15(6): 323–327 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[3] Han X-M(韩祥铭), Liu Y-X(刘英欣). Genetic analysis for yield and its components in upland cotton. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2002, 28(4): 533–536 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[4] Zhou Y-Y(周有耀). A study on inheritance of main economic traits and correlations in upland cotton. J Beijing Agric Univ (北京农业大学学报), 1986, 12(3): 314, 352 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[5] Stuber C W, Lincoln S E, Wolff D W, Helentjaris T Lander E S. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics, 1992, 132: 823–839


[6] Wang B-H(汪保华), Wu Y-T(武耀廷), Huang N-T(黄乃泰), Guo W-Z(郭旺珍), Zhu X-F(朱协飞), Zhang T-Z(张天真). QTL analysis of epistatic effects on yield and yield component traits for elite hybrid derived RILs in Upland cotton. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(11): 1755–1762 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[7] Gai J-Y(盖钧镒), Zhang Y-M(章元明), Wang J-K(王健康). Genetic System of Quantitative Traits in Plants (植物数量性状遗传体系). Beijing: Science Press, 2003: 10−16 (in Chinese)


[8] Guan R-Z(管荣展), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Applications of Diallel Cross Design to the Improvement of Heterosis of Elite Crosses and the Distinction Loci Groups among Parents. PhD Dissertation of Nanjing Agriculture University, 1997 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[9] Guan R-Z(管荣展), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Detection of differential QTLs among a group of parents under additive-dominance model by use of diallel design. J Biomath (生物数学学报), 2001, 16(5): 545−552 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[10] Gai J-Y(盖钧镒), Guan R-Z(管荣展), Wang J-K(王建康). Methods of genetic experiments for the detection of QTL system in plants. World Sci-Tech R&D (世界科技研究与发展), 1999, 21(1): 34−40 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[11] Qi C-K(戚存扣), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Analysis of genotype difference and gene effects of flowering time of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) from various ecological origins. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2002, 28(4): 455−460 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[12] Yang Q-L(杨庆利), Wang J-F(王建飞), Ding J-J(丁俊杰), Zhang H-S(张红生). Inheritance of salt tolerance in some rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars at the seedling stage. J Nanjing Agric Univ (南京农业大学学报), 2004, 27(4): 6−10 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[13] Kutner M H, Nachtsheim C J, Neter J. Applied Linear Regression Models, 4th edn. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2005. pp 343−383


[14] Wan J-M(万建民). Perspectives of molecular design breeding in crops. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(4): 455−462 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[15] Tian J-C(田纪春), Den Z-Y(邓志英), Mu L-H(牟林辉). Molecular design breeding in crops and breeding of new super-wheat cultivars. Shandong Agric Sci (山东农业科学), 2006, (5): 30−32 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[2] 张曦, 王广恩, 李邵琦, 刘祎, 李俊兰, 钱玉源. 基于转录组测序解析陆海杂交姊妹系马克隆值差异的形成机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1442-1458.
[3] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
[4] 周琦翔, 朱艳, 汪楚博, 朱柏林, 李俊博, 宋利兵. 基于DSSAT模型模拟气候变化对新疆棉花物候期及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 590-602.
[5] 郭栋财, 吕涛, 蔡永生, 买吾鲁达·艾合买提, 全家, 曲延英, 郑凯. 棉花纤维品质相关性状QTL元分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1445-1466.
[6] 王亚雯, 戚正阳, 尤佳琦, 聂新辉, 曹娟, 杨细燕, 涂礼莉, 张献龙, 王茂军. 棉花60K功能位点基因芯片的制备及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1178-1188.
[7] 丁俊沣, 许映飞, 张祥, 陈媛, 陈德华. 生长调节剂吲哚丁酸对移栽棉苗成活及生长发育的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3331-3341.
[8] 哈丽哈什·依巴提, 张炎, 李青军, 徐新朋, 何萍. 基于产量反应和农学效率的棉花智能化推荐施肥方法研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3052-3064.
[9] 李亚玮, 徐盈盈, 左春阳, 刘若男, 梁亚军, 孔杰, 张献龙, 闵玲. 棉花减数分裂进程鉴定体系构建及其对高温胁迫的响应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2570-2580.
[10] 陈佳伟, 林艳, 张明星, 周诗晶, 饶力群, 周池, 李鑫. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌YCH92对棉花根际土壤微生物群落及棉花产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2821-2835.
[11] 谢章书, 谢学方, 屠小菊, 刘爱玉, 董合忠, 周仲华. 植物激素对棉花蕾铃脱落的调控研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 1-29.
[12] 辛明华, 秘雅迪, 王国平, 李小飞, 李亚兵, 董合林, 韩迎春, 冯璐. 行距配置和种植密度对棉花干物质生产及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 221-232.
[13] 李超, 付小琼. 基于GYT双标图综合评价黄河流域中熟杂交棉花区域试验品种[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 30-43.
[14] 黄林玉, 张潇月, 李豪, 邓梅, 康厚扬, 魏育明, 王际睿, 蒋云峰, 陈国跃. 小麦农家种成株期条锈病抗性QTL定位及其育种效应解析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2167-2178.
[15] 艾莎, 李莎, 方治伟, 李论, 李甜甜, 高利芬, 陈利红, 肖华锋, 万人静, 闫多子, 武星廷, 彭海, 韩瑞玺, 周俊飞. 棉花MNP标记位点开发及其在DNA指纹图谱构建中的应用[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2267-2278.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!