欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11): 1910-1914.

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    

西藏主要农区青稞品种的遗传多样性分析

孟凡磊1;强小林2;佘奎军1;唐亚伟2;胡银岗1,3,*   

  1. 1 西北农林科技大学农学院,陕西杨凌712100;2 西藏自治区农牧科学院青稞研究与发展中心,西藏拉萨850032;3 陕西省农业分子生物学重点实验室,陕西杨凌712100
  • 收稿日期:2006-12-30 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-11-12 网络出版日期:2007-11-12
  • 通讯作者: 胡银岗

Genetic Diversity Analysis among Hulless Barley Varieties from the Major Agricultural Areas of Tibet

MENG Fan-Lei1,QIANG Xiao-Lin2,SHE Kui-Jun1,TANG Ya-Wei2,HU Yin-Gang13*   

  1. 1 College of Agriculture, Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agricultural and Forest, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi; 2 Hulless Barley Research and Development Center, Tibet Academy of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Lhasa 850032, Tibet; 3 Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Agriculture, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
  • Received:2006-12-30 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-11-12 Published online:2007-11-12
  • Contact: HU Yin-Gang

摘要:

采用内含子切接点引物(intron-splice junction primer)和长随机引物的PCR分子标记方法,对来自西藏主要农区的29个青稞育成品种和3个农家种的遗传多样性进行了分析。结果表明,选用的5个引物共扩增出稳定清晰的条带39条,其中26条(66.7%)为多态性条带。根据PCR扩增的条带建立[1,0]型数据矩阵,应用NTSYSpc2.1数据分析软件计算各品种间的遗传相似系数,并据此进行聚类分析,结果表明,西藏主要农区青稞品种间有一定的遗传差异,但总体遗传差异较小,遗传基础相对狭窄;聚类结果与各品种的实际生产利用情况较为接近,可以反映出这些青稞品种较为明显的区域特征。

关键词: 青稞, 种质资源, 遗传多样性, 聚类分析

Abstract:

To investigate the genetic diversity among hulless barley (Hordeum vulgare var. nudum Hook. f.)varieties in the major agricultural areas of Tibet and to promote the efficient utilization of those varieties, the genetic diversity among 29 hulless barley varieties and 3 landraces from those areas were analyzed using PCR with intron-splice junction primers and long random primers. The results indicated that 39 distinct PCR bands in total were amplified using 5 primers selected, and 26 of them were polymorphic. A [1, 0] data matrix was established based on the PCR patterns, and the genetic similarity coefficients among those cultivars were calculated using Dice’s index of NTSYSpc 2.1 software. Cluster analysis of the hulless barley varieties was then conducted based on the genetic similarity coefficients using UPMGA method of the same software. The result showed that there were some diversities among those hulless barley cultivars, but in general, their genetic differences were less and the genetic distances were relatively narrow; and the dendrogram obtained from cluster analysis could reflect the distribution and the geographic characteristics of those cultivars clearly.

Key words: Hulless barley (Hordeum vulgare var. nudum Hook. f.), Germplasm resource, Genetic diversity, Cluster analysis

[1] 马小倩, 秦娜, 代书桃, 秦家范, 李小艳, 王淑婷, 刘忠玲, 李君霞. 175份谷子种质在2种环境下的表型变异分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1757-1773.
[2] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[3] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[4] 徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 王若若, 王磊, 张立异. 397份高粱种质资源在贵州表型多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1073-1087.
[5] 田春艳, 陆鑫, 吴才文, 徐超华, 刘家勇, 边芯, 桃联安. 基于荧光SSR的甘蔗创新种质遗传多样性分析及育种潜力评估[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1057-1072.
[6] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
[7] 李诗晴, 王茜, 王素华, 张耀文, 王丽侠. 绿豆种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定及相关基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 376-388.
[8] 黄丽霞, 张卫卫, 甄一越, 王秋宝, 田洪岭, 李国栋, 刘龙龙, 张丽君. 盐胁迫下苦荞萌发期耐盐碱性评价及种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 459-479.
[9] 梅飘, 刘丁丁, 叶圆圆, 张晨禹, 丁诗琦, 李亚奇, 王培鑫, 梅菊芬, 马春雷. 基于茶树液相功能芯片的白化茶树资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2358-2370.
[10] 马娟娥, 姚有华, 姚晓华, 吴昆仑, 崔永梅. 青稞HvERF039基因的克隆及功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2341-2357.
[11] 文璇, 钟秀丽, 王尚文, 金涛, 彭君, 刘恩科. 基于耐性指数的青稞苗期耐低氮种质筛选及不同氮效率类型综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1949-1958.
[12] 王天译, 杨绣娟, 赵佳佳, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 李晓华, 郝水源, 郑军. 山西小麦醇溶蛋白多样性及其对面粉品质效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1784-1800.
[13] 梁红凯, 赵苏蒙, 陆琼, 周鹏, 智慧, 刁现民, 贺强. 谷子微核心种质的构建[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1435-1444.
[14] 旺姆, 卓嘎, 扎桑, 西若曲宗, 达瓦顿珠, 郭刚刚, 张京, 卓嘎, 伦珠朗杰. 基于6个表型性状的青稞种质遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1526-1537.
[15] 程红娜, 秦丹丹, 许甫超, 徐晴, 彭严春, 孙龙清, 徐乐, 郭英, 杨新泉, 徐得泽, 董静. 彩色青稞和彩色小麦籽粒的代谢组学比较分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 932-942.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!