欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (01): 142-152.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00142

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

应用GGE双标图分析甘蔗品种(系)的产量和品质性状

罗俊，张华，邓祖湖，许莉萍，徐良年，袁照年，阙友雄*   

  1. 福建农林大学 / 农业部福建甘蔗生物学与遗传育种重点实验室 / 国家甘蔗产业技术研发中心, 福建福州 350002
  • 收稿日期:2012-04-23 修回日期:2012-09-05 出版日期:2013-01-12 网络出版日期:2012-10-08
  • 通讯作者: 阙友雄, E-mail: queyouxiong@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家现代农业(甘蔗)产业技术体系建设项目(CARS-20)和国家农作物品种区域试验项目(农财发2010(30)号)资助。

Analysis of Yield and Quality Traits in Sugarcane Varieties (Lines) with GGE-Biplot

LUO Jun,ZHANG Hua,DENG Zu-Hu,XU Li-Ping,XU Liang-Nian,YUAN Zhao-Nian,QUE You-Xiong*   

  1. Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University/Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture / Sugarcane Research & Development Center, China Agriculture Research System, Fuzhou 350002, China
  • Received:2012-04-23 Revised:2012-09-05 Published:2013-01-12 Published online:2012-10-08
  • Contact: 阙友雄, E-mail: queyouxiong@hotmail.com

RichHTML

PDF

1353

被引次数

34

摘要：

采用GGE双标图分析7个甘蔗参试品种在7个试点的产量和品质性状。结果表明, 云蔗05-51(YZ05-51)为单茎产量高且稳定性强的品种, 福农39(FN39)和柳城03-1137(LC03-1137)的单茎产量较高, 但稳定性较差; 福农38 (FN38)、粤甘35 (YG35)和新台糖22 (ROC22)有效茎数较高, 但稳定性较差; 福农39 (FN39)和云蔗05-51 (YZ05-51)为蔗茎产量较高且稳定性强的品种, 福农38 (FN38)和柳城03-1137 (LC03-1137)蔗茎产量高, 但稳定性较差; 福农39 (FN39)和赣南02-70 (GN02-70)为甘蔗蔗糖分较高且稳定性强的品种, 云蔗05-51 (YZ05-51)和福农38 (FN38)甘蔗蔗糖分较高, 但稳定性较差; 福农39 (FN39)为产糖量较高且稳定性较强的品种, 福农38(FN38)、云蔗05-51 (YZ05-51)和柳城03-1137 (LC03-1137)的产糖量较高、但稳定性较差。云南瑞丽和云南临沧2个试点单茎产量的代表性和区分力较强; 云南保山和广西来宾2个试点有效茎数的代表性和区分力较强; 广西崇左和云南临沧2个试点蔗茎产量的区分力较强; 广西百色和柳州2个试点甘蔗蔗糖分的区分力较强; 广西百色和云南临沧2个试点产糖量的区分力较强。

关键词: GGE双标图, 甘蔗, 蔗茎产量, 产糖量, 稳定性分析, 品种适应性

Abstract:

GGE (genotype main effect plus genotype-environment interaction) biplot analysis, based on principal component analysis (PCA), is an effective method to assess the multi-environment trials (METs). It allows a full exploration of G×E interaction, variety yield stability, and test-site suitability. In the present study, we applied GGE biplot to evaluate the genotype effects and G×E interaction of sugarcane main characters and at the same time, analyze the stability of yield and quality traits, and representativeness and discrimination of testing site, with seven sugarcane varieties planted in seven different testing sites. The results showed that YZ05-51 had high yield per stalk and better yield stability than the other varieties, while FN39 and LC03-1137 had high yield per stalk but low stability. FN38, YG35, and ROC22 had high stalk numbers but low stability. FN39 and YZ05-51 had high cane yield and good stability, while FN38 and LC03-1137 had high cane yield but low stability. FN39 and GN02-70 had high sucrose content and good stability, while YZ05-51 and FN38 had high sucrose content but low stability. FN39 had higher sucrose content and better yield stability, while FN38, YZ05-51, and LC03-1137 had high sucrose yield but low stability. Ruili City and Lincang City in Yunnan Province had better representativeness and discrimination in yield per stalk, while Baosan City in Yunnan Province and Laibing City in Guangxi Province had better representativeness and discrimination in stalk numbers; Chongzuo City in Guangxi Province and Lincang City in Yunnan Province had better discrimination in cane yield, while Baise City and Liuzhou City in Guangxi Province had better discrimination in sucrose content; Baise City in Guangxi Province and Lincang City in Yunnan Province had better discrimination in sucrose yield. This study demonstrates a simple and effective method for analyzing data, and evaluating the yield stability and adaptability of sugarcane varieties involved in national regional trials and favorite test sites.

Key words: GGE biplot, Sugarcane, Cane yield, Sucrose content, Stability analysis, Variety (lines) adaptability

[1]Chen R-K(陈如凯), Xu L-P(许莉萍), Lin Y-Q(林彦铨), Deng Z-H(邓祖湖), Zhang M-Q(张木清), Luo J(罗俊), Zhang H(张 华), Gao S-J(高三基), Xu J-S(徐景升), Xu L-N(徐良年), Que Y-X(阙友雄), Chen P-H(陈平华), Yuan Z-N(袁照年), Lin G-D(林国栋). Modern Sugarcane Genetic Breeding (现代甘蔗遗传育种). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2011. pp 2–12 (in Chinese)



[2]Li Z-X(李志贤), Wang J-W(王建武), Yang W-T(杨文亭), Shu Y-H(舒迎花), Du Q(杜清), Liu L-L(刘丽玲), Shu L(舒磊). Effects of reduced nitrogen application on the yield, quality, and economic benefit of sugarcane intercropped with soybean. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2011, 22(3): 713–719 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]Luo J(罗俊), Zheng X-W(郑学文), Chen R-K(陈如凯), Yuan Z-N(袁照年), Gao S-J(高三基), Zhang H(张华), Wen S-H(文尚华), Deng Z-H(邓祖湖). Technical Regulations for Sugarcane Variety Test (农作物品种试验技术规程甘蔗). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2009. pp 1–8 (in Chinese)



[4]Chen R-K(陈如凯), Wen S-H(文尚华), Zhang H(张华), Luo J(罗俊), Zheng X-W(郑学文), Gao S-J(高三基), Deng Z-H(邓祖湖). Specification of Sugarcane Variety Identification (农作物品种鉴定规范甘蔗). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2009. pp 1–8 (in Chinese)



[5]Jin W-L(金文林). The rank analysis model of evaluating crop varieties yield stability in regional trims. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2000, 26(6): 925–930 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[6]Yan W K, Molnar S J, Fregeau-Reid J, McElroya A A, Tinkera N. Associations among oat traits and their responses to the environment in North America. J Crop Improv, 2007, 20: 1–29



[7]Crossa J, Fox P N, Pfeiffer W H, Rajaram S, Gauch Jr H G. AMMI adjustment for statistical analysis of an internal wheat yield trial. Theor Appl Genet, 1991, 81: 27–37



[8]Chang L(常磊), Chai X(柴守玺). Application of AMM I model in the stability analysis of spring wheat in rainfed area. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2006, 26(11): 3677–3684 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[9]Guo T-C(郭天财), Ma D-Y(马冬云), Zhu Y-J(朱云集), Wang C-Y(王晨阳), Xia G-J(夏国军), Luo Y(罗毅). Genotype, environment and their interactive effects on main quality traits of winter-sown wheat variety. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2004, 37(7): 948–953 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]Liu W-J(刘文江), Li H-J(李浩杰), Wang X-D(汪旭东), Zhou K-D(周开达). Stability analysis for elementary characters of hybrid rice by AMMI model. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2002, 28(4): 569–573 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]Zhang J-Y(张坚勇),Wan X-Y(万向元), Xiao Y-H(肖应辉), Wang C-M(王春明), Liu S-J(刘世家), Chen L-M(陈亮明), Zhai H-Q(翟虎渠), Wan J-M(万建民). Analysis on stability of eating quality of cooked rice (Orzya sadva L.). Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 37(6): 788–794 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]Liu X-Y(刘旭云), Xie Y-J(谢永俊), Yang D(杨德), Zhang X-S(张锡顺). Analysis and research of AMMI model for rape varieties regional trials. Southwest China J Agric Sci (西南农业学报), 2001, 14(2): 27–30 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]Xu L-N(徐良年), Deng Z-H(邓祖湖), Chen R-K(陈如凯), Zhang M-Q(张木清), Zhang H(张华), Gao S-J(高三基), Luo J(罗 俊). Stability analysis on yield and quality characters of new sugarcane varieties. Chin J Trop Crops (热带作物学报), 2006, 27(2):50–54 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]Luo J(罗俊), Yuan Z-N(袁照年), Zhang H(张华), Chen Y-Q(陈由强), Chen R-K(陈如凯). Stability analysis on yield characters of sugarcane ratoon. Chin J Appl Environ Biol (应用与环境生物学报), 2009, 15(4): 488–494 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]Zhang H(张华), Luo J(罗俊), Yuan Z-N(袁照年), Lin Y-Q(林彦铨), Deng Z-H(邓祖湖), Xu L-N(徐良年), Chen R-K(陈如凯). Analysis of productivity and stability of sugarcane varieties in the national regional trial. Chin J Trop Crops (热带作物学报), 2008, 29(6): 744–750 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]Deng Z-H(邓祖湖), Xu L-N(徐良年), Gao S-J(高三基), Zhang H(张华), Luo J(罗俊), Chen R-K(陈如凯). Stability analysis and evaluation of sugarcane varieties introduced. Chin J Trop Crops (热带作物学报), 2008, 29(5): 589–595 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]Gauch H G Jr, Piepho H P, Annicchiarico P. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE: further considerations. Crop Sci, 2008, 48: 866−889



[18]Yan W, Kang M S, Ma B L, Woods S, Cornelius P L. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci, 2007, 47: 643−655



[19]Yan W-K(严威凯), Sheng Q-L(盛庆来), Hu Y-G(胡跃高), Hun L A. GGE biplot: all ideal tool for studying genotype by environment interaction of regional yield trial data. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2001, 27(1): 21–27 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[20]Yan W-K(严威凯). Optimal use of biplots in analysis of multi-Location variety test data. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(11): 1805–1819 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[21]Yan W, Hunt L A, Sheng Q L, Szlavnics Z. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on GGE biplot. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 596−605



[22]Yan W, Holland J B. A heritability-adjusted GGE Biplot for test environment evaluation. Euphytica, 2010, 171: 355–369



[23]Zhang Z-F(张志芬), Fu X-F(付晓峰), Liu J-Q(刘俊青), Yang H-S(杨海顺). Yield stability and testing-site representativeness in national regional trials for oat variety based on GGE-Biplot analysis. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(8): 1377–1385 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[24]Chen S-L (陈四龙), Li Y-R(李玉荣), Cheng Z-S(程增书), Liu J-S(刘吉生). GGE-Biplot analysis of effects of planting density n growth and yield components of high oil peanut. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(7): 1328–1335 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[25]Shang Y(尚毅), Li S-Q(李少钦), Li D-R(李殿荣). GGE biplot analysis of diallel cross of B. napus L. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(2): 243−248 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[26]Zhou C-J(周长军), Tian Z-Y(田中艳), Li J-Y(李建英), Liu Y(杨柳), Wu Y-K(吴耀坤), Du Z-Q(杜志强), Tang J-H(唐金华), Shi C(师臣). GGE-Biplot analysis on yield stability and testing-site representativeness of soybean lines in multi-environment trials. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2011, 30(2): 318−322 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[27]Chang L(常磊), Chai X(柴守玺). Application of GGE biplot in spring wheat yield stability analysis in rainfed areas of China. Chin J Eco-Agric (中国生态农业学报), 2010, 18(5): 988−994 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[28]Xu N-Y(许乃银), Jin S-Q(金石桥). Identifying discriminating and representative locations in cotton regional trials using GGE Biplot. Jiangxi Cotton (江西棉花), 2010, 32(3): 7−12 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[29]Sun M(孙敏), Jiang W-M(蒋文敏), Li H-Y(李慧英), Liu Z(刘壮), Yu X-L(于学鹏), Zhang L(张雷).Analysis of stable-production character by GGE Biplot on sunflower hybrids. Heilongjiang Agric Sci (黑龙江农业科学), 2010, (9): 11−13 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[30]Tang Q-Y(唐启义), Feng M-G(冯明光). DPS Data Processing System: Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Data Mining (DPS数据处理系统——实验设计、统计分析及数据挖掘). Beijing: Science Press, 2010 (in Chinese)
[1] 肖健, 陈思宇, 孙妍, 杨尚东, 谭宏伟. 不同施肥水平下甘蔗植株根系内生细菌群落结构特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1222-1234.
[2] 周慧文, 丘立杭, 黄杏, 李强, 陈荣发, 范业赓, 罗含敏, 闫海锋, 翁梦苓, 周忠凤, 吴建明. 甘蔗赤霉素氧化酶基因ScGA20ox1的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1017-1026.
[3] 孔垂豹, 庞孜钦, 张才芳, 刘强, 胡朝华, 肖以杰, 袁照年. 不同施肥水平下丛枝菌根真菌对甘蔗生长及养分相关基因共表达网络的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 860-872.
[4] 杨宗桃, 刘淑娴, 程光远, 张海, 周营栓, 商贺阳, 黄国强, 徐景升. 甘蔗类泛素蛋白UBL5应答SCMV侵染及其与SCMV-6K2的互作[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 332-341.
[5] 张海, 程光远, 杨宗桃, 刘淑娴, 商贺阳, 黄国强, 徐景升. 甘蔗PsbR亚基应答SCMV侵染及其与SCMV-6K2的互作[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1522-1530.
[6] 傅华英, 张婷, 彭文静, 段瑶瑶, 许哲昕, 林艺华, 高三基. 甘蔗新品种(系)苗期白条病人工接种抗性鉴定与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1531-1539.
[7] 苏亚春, 李聪娜, 苏炜华, 尤垂淮, 岑光莉, 张畅, 任永娟, 阙友雄. 甘蔗割手密种类甜蛋白家族鉴定及栽培种同源基因功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1275-1296.
[8] 黄宁, 惠乾龙, 方振名, 李姗姗, 凌辉, 阙友雄, 袁照年. 甘蔗β-胡萝卜素异构酶基因家族的鉴定、定位和表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5): 882-893.
[9] 王恒波, 陈姝琦, 郭晋隆, 阙友雄. 甘蔗抗黄锈病G1标记的分子检测及候选抗病基因WAK的分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 577-586.
[10] 张荣跃, 王晓燕, 杨昆, 单红丽, 仓晓燕, 李婕, 王长秘, 尹炯, 罗志明, 李文凤, 黄应昆. 甘蔗新品种及主栽品种对褐锈病抗性与Bru1基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 376-382.
[11] 仓晓燕, 夏红明, 李文凤, 王晓燕, 单红丽, 王长秘, 李婕, 张荣跃, 黄应昆. 甘蔗优良品种(系)对黑穗病的抗性评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2290-2296.
[12] 张海, 程光远, 杨宗桃, 王彤, 刘淑娴, 商贺阳, 赵贺, 徐景升. 甘蔗ScCRT1基因克隆及其应答SCMV侵染分子机制的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(1): 94-103.
[13] 郑清雷,余陈静,姚坤存,黄宁,阙友雄,凌辉,许莉萍. 甘蔗Rieske Fe/S蛋白前体基因ScPetC的克隆及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(6): 844-857.
[14] 王恒波,祁舒婷,陈姝琦,郭晋隆,阙友雄. 甘蔗栽培种单倍体基因组SSR位点的发掘与应用[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(4): 631-642.
[15] 罗俊,林兆里,李诗燕,阙友雄,张才芳,杨仔奇,姚坤存,冯景芳,陈建峰,张华. 不同土壤改良措施对机械压实酸化蔗地土壤理化性质及微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(4): 596-613.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2