欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (06): 1044-1055.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01044

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

杂交籼稻机械化种植的分蘖特性

雷小龙1,刘利1,刘波1,黄光忠2,马荣朝1,*,任万军1,*   

  1. 1四川农业大学 / 农业部西南作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室, 四川温江 611130; 2成都市郫县农村发展局, 四川郫县 611730
  • 收稿日期:2013-10-21 修回日期:2014-03-04 出版日期:2014-06-12 网络出版日期:2014-04-08
  • 通讯作者: 马荣朝, E-mail: marongcao@163.com; 任万军, E-mail: rwjun@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家粮食丰产科技工程项目(2011BAD16B05, 2013BAD07B13-2)和国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201303102)资助。

Tillering Characteristics of Indica Hybrid Rice under Mechanized Planting

LEI Xiao-Long1,LIU Li1,LIU Bo1,HUANG Guang-Zhong2,MA Rong-Chao1,*,REN Wan-Jun1,*   

  1. 1 Sichuan Agricultural University / Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Wenjiang 611130, China; 2 Pixian Bureau of Rural Development, Pixian 611730, China
  • Received:2013-10-21 Revised:2014-03-04 Published:2014-06-12 Published online:2014-04-08
  • Contact: 马荣朝, E-mail: marongcao@163.com; 任万军, E-mail: rwjun@126.com

摘要:

为探明不同播期杂交籼稻机械化种植的分蘖特性及其与产量的关系, 以F优498为材料, 采用二因素裂区设计, 研究了早播与迟播2个处理下机直播、机插、手插3种种植方式的杂交籼稻分蘖发生与成穗特点及各分蘖穗的穗部性状。结果表明: (1) 一次分蘖群对产量贡献大且稳定, 均在58.67%~63.82%之间; 主茎对产量贡献率以机直播最高, 手插最低; 机插和手插二次分蘖群占产量比例均显著高于机直播。(2) 不同种植方式分蘖发生与成穗规律不同, 机直播与机插分蘖发生均属一次高峰型, 手插属二次高峰型。机直播分蘖发生早而快, 一次分蘖群发生在主茎第1~第8叶位, 其中第1~第4叶位分蘖成穗率较高, 二次分蘖成穗以第1、第2叶位为主。机插分蘖发生晚、起点低, 但比较集中, 一次分蘖群以3/0~8/0发生为主, 3/0~6/0分蘖成穗率较高, 二次分蘖群成穗以第3~第5叶位为主。手插秧田与本田均发生分蘖, 分蘖发生叶位数多, 持续时间长, 一次分蘖群发生在主茎第1、第2、第4~第8叶位, 其中第1、第2、第4、第5和第6叶位成穗率较高, 二次分蘖群发生与成穗主要在第1、第2叶位。分蘖成穗叶位数和产量均随播期延迟而减少。(3) 3种种植方式的主茎及中低叶位一次分蘖枝梗数和每穗粒数多, 粒大, 单穗重高; 高叶位一次分蘖和二次分蘖枝梗数和穗粒均较少, 稻穗小。机直播优势叶位为第1~第4叶位, 机插为第3~第6叶位, 手插为第1、第2、第4、第5和第6叶位, 对产量贡献率分别达70.51%、73.83%和76.81%。优势叶位分蘖发生与成穗率高, 稻穗大, 对产量贡献率高, 应优化农艺措施挖掘其增产潜力。

关键词: 杂交籼稻, 机械化种植, 分蘖特性, 优势叶位, 成穗率

Abstract:

 

In order to explore tillering characteristics and its relationships with yield of indica hybrid rice with mechanized planting and different sowing dates, a split plot field experiment was conducted using F you 498 with mechanized direct-seeding, mechanized transplanting and artificial transplanting and two sowing date treatments. The main results are as follows: (1) The major and stable contribution to yield was from primary tillers group, ranging from 58.67% to 63.82% among different planting methods. The contribution to yield from main stem was significantly different, with the highest in mechanized direct-seeding and the lowest in artificial transplanting. Yield of secondary tillers group was much lower in mechanized direct-seeding than in mechanized and artificial transplanting. (2) The tillering and panicle formation pattern was different for different planting methods which had a changing trend with a single peak for mechanized direct-seeding and transplanting and with two peaks for artificial transplanting. Tillers of mechanized direct-seeding had early and fast emergence and its primary tillers group emerged from leaf 1 to leaf 8, among which tillers from leaf 1 to leaf 4 had higher percentage of emerging and earbearing, and secondary tillers group earbeared mainly in leaf 1 and leaf 2. Tillers of mechanized transplanting had relatively late, low and concentrated emergence, the primary tillers group mainly emerged from 3/0 to 8/0, among which leaf position of 3/0 to 6/0 had higher rate of panicle formation, and secondary tillers group emerged and earbeared mainly in leaf 3, leaf 4, and leaf 5. The number of tillering leaf positions of artificial transplanting was more and tillering time was longer in seeding bed and field. The primary tillers group mainly emerged from leaf 1 to leaf 8 besides leaf 3, among which the tillers of leaf 1, leaf 2, leaf 4, leaf 5, and leaf 6 had higher earbearing percentage, secondary tillers group emerged and earbeared mainly in leaf 1 and leaf 2. The number of tillering and earbearing leaf positions and yield decreased with delaying sowing date. (3) The main stem and primary tillers in low and middle earbearing leaf positions had larger number of earbearing tiller branches, spikelets per panicle, grain weight and grain weight per panicle among three planting methods. The number of earbearing tiller branches and spikelets per panicle of secondary tillers and primary tillers in high earbearing leaf positions were fewer, so their panicles were small. Leaf 1 to leaf 4 in mechanized direct-seeding, leaf 3 to leaf 6 in mechanized transplanting and leaf positions of 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 in artificial transplanting were the superior leaf positions. Their contributions to yield were 70.51%, 73.83% and 76.81%, respectively. The tillers group of superior leaf positions in each planting method had higher rates of tiller emerging and panicle formation, larger panicles and higher contribution to yield. Thus, we should optimize agronomic measures for tillers of superior leaf positions to increase yield potential.

Key words: Indica hybrid rice, Mechanized planting, Tillering characteristics, Superior leaf position, Earbearing tiller percentage

[1]杨文钰, 屠乃美. 作物栽培学各论. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003. p 19



Yang W Y, Tu N M. Individual Introduction to Crop Production. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2003. p 19 (in Chinese)



[2]张洪程, 吴桂成, 吴文革, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 高辉, 魏海燕, 黄幸福, 龚金龙. 水稻“精苗稳前、控蘖优中、大穗强后”超高产定量化栽培模式. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43: 2645−2660



Zhang H C, Wu G C, Wu W G, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Gao H, Wei H Y, Huang X F, Gong J L. The SOI model of quantitative cultivation of super-high yielding rice. Sci Agric Sin, 2010, 43: 2645−2660 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]凌启鸿, 苏祖芳, 张海泉. 水稻成穗率与群体质量的关系及其影响因素的研究. 作物学报, 1995, 21: 463–469



Ling Q H, Su Z F, Zhang H Q. Relationship between ear bearing tiller percentage and population quality and its influential factors in rice. Acta Agron Sin, 1995, 21: 463–469 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]凌启鸿, 张洪程, 蔡建中, 苏祖芳, 凌励. 水稻高产群体质量及其优化控制探讨. 中国农业科学, 1993, 26(6): 1−11



Ling Q H, Zhang H C, Cai J Z, Su Z F, Ling L. Investigation on the population quality of high yield and its optimizing control programme in rice. Sci Agric Sin, 1993, 26(6): 1−11 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[5]Li X Y, Qian Q, Fu Z M, Wang Y H, Xiong G S, Zeng D L, Wang X Q, Liu X F, Teng S, Hiroshi F, Yuan M, Luo D, Han B, Li J Y. Control of tillering in rice. Nature, 2003, 422: 618-621



[6]Ao H J, Peng S B, Zou Y B, Tang Q Y, Visperas R M. Reduction of unproductive tillers did not increase the grain yield of irrigated rice. Field Crops Res, 2010, 116: 108–115



[7]李荣田, 崔成焕, 姜廷波, 秋太权, 龚振平. 水稻品种分蘖特性对产量影响分析. 东北农业大学学报, 1996, 27(1): 9−14



Li R T, Cui C H, Jiang T B, Qiu T Q, Gong Z P. Analysis of effect of tillering traits on yielding among rice varieties. J Northeast Agric Univ, 1996, 27(1): 9−14 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]詹可, 邹应斌. 水稻分蘖特性及成穗规律研究进展. 作物研究, 2007, 21: 588−592



Zhan K, Zou Y B. Research progress in tillering characteristics and panicle laws of rice. Crop Res, 2007, 21: 588−592 (in Chinese)



[9]汪秀志, 钱永德, 吕艳东, 刘丽华, 郑桂萍. 施肥和密度对寒地水稻分蘖状况及产量的影响. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2011, 37(1): 69−76



Wang X Z, Qian Y D, Lü Y D, Liu L H, Zheng G P. Effects of N-fertilizer application and density on tiller and yield of rice in cold area. J Zhejiang Univ (Agric & Life Sci), 2011, 37(1): 69−76 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]丁艳锋, 黄丕生, 凌启鸿. 水稻分蘖发生及与特定部位叶片叶鞘含氮率的关系. 南京农业大学学报, 1995, 18(4): 14−18



Ding Y F, Huang P S, Ling Q H. Relationship between emergence of tiller and nitrogen concentration of leaf blade or leaf sheath on specific node of rice. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 1995, 18(4): 14−18 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]郑永美, 丁艳锋, 王强盛, 李刚华, 王惠芝, 王绍华. 起身肥对水稻分蘖和氮素吸收利用的影响. 作物学报, 2008, 34: 513−519



Zheng Y M, Ding Y F, Wang Q S, Li G H, Wang H Z, Wang S H. Effect of nitrogen applied before transplanting on tillering and nitrogen utilization in rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34: 513−519 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]苏祖芳, 周兴安, 张亚洁, 李国生, 姚志发, 沈富荣, 姚友权. 搁田始期对水稻成穗率、产量形成和群体质量的影响. 中国水稻科学, 1996, 10: 95–102



Su Z F, Zhou X A, Zhang Y J, Li G S, Yao Z F, Shen F R, Yao Y Q. Effect of the beginning period of draining paddy field on the percentage of effective tillers, yield formation and population quality in rice. Chin J Rice Sci, 1996, 10: 95–102 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]俞爱英, 林贤青, 曾孝元, 吴增琪, 朱贵平. 不同灌溉方式对水稻分蘖成穗规律及产量影响研究. 灌溉排水学报, 2007, 26(1): 66−68



Yu A Y, Lin X Q, Zeng X Y, Wu Z Q, Zhu G P. Studies of different water managements on tillers and panicles and mechanism of high-yield of rice. J Irrig Drainage, 2007, 26(1): 66−68 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]陈慧哲, 朱德峰, 林贤青, 张玉屏. 稀植条件下杂交稻分蘖成穗规律和穗粒结构研究. 杂交水稻, 2004, 19(6): 51−54



Chen H Z, Zhu D F, Lin X Q, Zhang Y P. Studies on the tillering dynamics, panicle formation and composition of panicles of hybrid rice under sparse transplanting density. Hybrid Rice, 2004, 19(6): 51−54 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]乔晶, 王强盛, 王绍华, 刘正辉, 郝建华, 丁艳锋. 机插杂交粳稻基本苗数对分蘖发生与成穗的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2010, 33(1): 6−10



Qiao J, Wang Q S, Wang S H, Liu Z H, Hao J H, Ding Y F. Effects of basic seedlings on tiller emerging and earbearing of machine-transplanted hybrid japonica rice. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 2010, 33(1): 6−10 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]苏昌龙, 杨桂兰, 黄姚英, 吴文和, 李佳林. 不同分蘖苗移栽与氮肥运筹对超高产杂交水稻产量的影响. 贵州农业科学, 2013, 41(3): 19−22



Su C L, Yang G L, Huang Y Y, Wu W H, Li J L. Effects of transplantation of tillering seedlings and nitrogen management on super high-yield hybrid rice yield. Guizhou Agric Sci, 2013, 41(3): 19−22 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]廖学群, 隗溟, 朱自均. 秧田秧苗分蘖结构对水稻生长发育的影响. 西南农业大学学报, 2005, 27(1): 9−13



Liao X Q, Wei M, Zhu Z J. Effects of tillering components of seedlings on the growth and development of rice. J Southwest Agric Univ, 2005, 27(1): 9−13 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]周美兰, 周连玉, 李小勇, 唐启源, 邹应斌. 早稻分蘖化学控制的研究. 湖南农业大学学报, 2001, 27: 425−427



Zhou M L, Zhou L Y, Li X Y, Tang Q Y, Zou Y B. Chemical control of rice tillering of early rice. J Hunan Agric Univ, 2001, 27: 425−427 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[19]袁钊和, 陈巧敏, 杨新春. 论我国水稻抛秧、插秧、直播机械化技术的发展. 农业机械学报, 1998, 29(3): 181−183



Yuan Z H, Chen Q M, Yang X C. Development of mechanized cast-transplanting, transplanting and seeding in China. Trans CSAM, 1998, 29(3): 181−183 (in Chinese)



[20]顾建清, 徐嘉梁, 戴鼎, 朱阿多, 袁继栋. 不同水稻机械化种植方案技术经济分析. 中国农机化, 2012, (5): 37−40



Gu J Q, Xu J L, Dai D, Zhu A D, Yuan J D. Technical and economic analysis of different mechanized rice planting schemes. Chin Agric Mech, 2012, (5): 37−40 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[21]袁奇, 于林惠, 石世杰, 邵建国, 丁艳锋. 机插秧每穴栽插苗数对水稻分蘖与成穗的影响. 农业工程学报, 2007, 23(10): 121−125



Yuan Q, Yu L H, Shi S J, Shao J G, Ding Y F. Effects of different tiller production planting seedlings per hill on outgrowth and quantities of for machine-transplanted rice. Trans CSAE, 2007, 23(10): 121−125 ( in Chinese with English abstract)



[22]郑家国, 杨文钰, 池忠志, 任万军, 姜心禄, 樊高琼, 陈兴福. 四川盆地稻田周年高产高效种植模式. 四川农业科技, 2010, (5): 20−21



Zheng J G, Yang W Y, Chi Z Z, Ren W J, Jiang X L, Fan G Q, Chen X F. Annual high-yield, high-efficiency paddy cropping patterns of Sichuan basin. Sichuan Agric Sci & Technol, 2010, (5): 20−21 (in Chinese)



[23]Samonte S O P B, Wilson L T, Tabien R E. Maximum node production rate and main culm node number contributions to yield and yield-related traits in rice. Field Crops Res, 2006, 96: 313−319



[24]凌启鸿, 张洪程, 苏祖芳, 凌励. 水稻叶龄模式. 北京: 科学出版社, 1994. pp 84−85



Ling Q H, Zhang H C, Su Z F, Ling L. Leaf Age Model of Rice. Beijing: Science Press, 1994. pp 84−85 (in Chinese)



[25]李刚华, 王绍华, 杨从党, 黄庆宇, 李德安, 宁加朝, 凌启鸿, 丁艳锋. 超高产水稻适宜单株成穗数的定量计算. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41: 3556−3562



Li G H, Wang S H, Yang C D, Huang Q Y, Li D A, Ning J C, Ling Q H, Ding Y F. Quantitative calculation of optimum panicle number per plant of super high-yield rice. Sci Agric Sin, 2008, 41: 3556−3562 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[26]李杰, 张洪程, 龚金龙, 常勇, 吴桂成, 郭振华, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕. 稻麦两熟地区不同栽培方式超级稻分蘖特性及其与群体生产力的关系. 作物学报, 2011, 37: 309−320



Li J, Zhang H C, Gong J L, Chang Y, Wu G C, Guo Z H, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y. Tillering characteristics and its relationships with population productivity of super rice under different cultivation methods in rice-wheat cropping areas. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37: 309−320 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[27]雷小龙, 刘利, 苟文, 马荣朝, 任万军. 种植方式对杂交籼稻植株抗倒伏特性的影响. 作物学报, 2013, 39: 1814−1825



Lei X L, Liu L, Gou W, Ma R C, Ren W J. Effects of planting methods on culm lodging resistance of indica hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39: 1814−1825 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[28]李刚华, 李德安, 宁加朝, 黄庆宇, 顾伟, 杨从党, 王绍华, 凌启鸿, 丁艳锋. 种植密度和施肥量对超高产杂交籼稻秧苗素质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2008, 22: 610–616



Li G H, Li D A, Ning J C, Huang Q Y, Gu W, Yang C D, Wang S H, Ling Q H, Ding Y F. Effects of nitrogen level and seeding density on seeding quality of indica-type super-high yielding hybrid rice. Chin J Rice Sci, 2008, 22: 610–616 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[1] 吕腾飞, 谌洁, 代邹, 马鹏, 杨志远, 郑传刚, 马均. 缓释氮肥与尿素配施对机插杂交籼稻碳氮积累的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(10): 1966-1977.
[2] 李敏, 罗德强, 江学海, 蒋明金, 姬广梅, 李立江, 周维佳. 控水增密模式对杂交籼稻减氮后产量形成的调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(9): 1430-1447.
[3] 韦还和,葛佳琳,张徐彬,孟天瑶,陆钰,李心月,陶源,丁恩浩,陈英龙,戴其根. 盐胁迫下粳稻品种南粳9108分蘖特性及其与群体生产力的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(8): 1238-1247.
[4] 韩超,许方甫,卞金龙,徐栋,裘实,赵晨,朱盈,刘国栋,张洪程,魏海燕. 淮北地区机械化种植方式对不同生育类型优质食味粳稻产量及品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(11): 1681-1693.
[5] 邢志鹏,朱明,吴培,钱海军,曹伟伟,胡雅杰,郭保卫,魏海燕,许轲,霍中洋,戴其根,张洪程*. 稻麦两熟制条件下钵苗机插方式对不同类型水稻品种米质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(04): 581-595.
[6] 罗德强,王绍华,江学海,李刚华,周维佳,李敏,姬光梅,丁艳锋,凌启鸿,刘正辉. 贵州省高原山区杂交籼稻不同产量水平群体的特征[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(12): 1817-1826.
[7] 吕伟生,曾勇军*,石庆华,潘晓华,黄山,商庆银,谭雪明,李木英,胡水秀. 机插早稻分蘖成穗特性及基本苗公式参数研究[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(03): 427-436.
[8] 许俊伟,孟天瑶,荆培培,张洪程*,李超,戴其根,魏海燕,郭保卫. 机插密度对不同类型水稻抗倒伏能力及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(11): 1767-1776.
[9] 田青兰,李培程,刘利,张强,任万军. 四川不同生态区高产栽培条件下的杂交籼稻的稻米品质[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(08): 1257-1268.
[10] 韦还和,李超,张洪程,孙玉海,孟天瑶,杨筠文,马荣荣,王晓燕,戴其根,霍中洋,许轲,魏海燕. 水稻甬优12超高产群体分蘖特性及其与群体生产力的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(10): 1819-1829.
[11] 雷小龙,刘利,刘波,黄光忠,郭翔,马荣朝,任万军. 机械化种植对杂交籼稻F优498产量构成与株型特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(04): 719-730.
[12] 雷小龙,刘利,苟文,马荣朝,任万军. 种植方式对杂交籼稻植株抗倒伏特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(10): 1814-1825.
[13] 李杰, 张洪程, 龚金龙, 常勇, 吴桂成, 郭振华, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕. 稻麦两熟地区不同栽培方式超级稻分蘖特性及其与群体生产力的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(02): 309-320.
[14] 王胜军;万建民;陆作楣. 利用SSR分子标记划分杂交籼稻亲本群的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(10): 1437-1443.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!