欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 856-871.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.83059

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

8种水旱环境下2个玉米群体穗部性状QTL间的上位性及环境互作效应分析

赵小强,任斌,彭云玲(),徐明霞,方鹏,庄泽龙,张金文,曾文静,高巧红,丁永福,陈奋奇   

  1. 甘肃省干旱生境作物学重点实验室 / 甘肃农业大学农学院, 甘肃兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-16 接受日期:2018-12-24 出版日期:2019-06-12 网络出版日期:2019-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 赵小强,任斌,彭云玲
  • 作者简介:赵小强, E-mail: zhaoxq3324@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFD0100203-4);中国科学院“西部之光”项目(20180504);甘肃省重点研发计划(18YF1NA071);甘肃省自然科学基金项目(18JR3RA189);甘肃省重大科技专项(17ZD2NA016)

Epistatic and QTL × environment interaction effects for ear related traits in two maize (Zea mays) populations under eight watering environments

Xiao-Qiang ZHAO,Bin REN,Yun-Ling PENG(),Ming-Xia XU,Peng FANG,Ze-Long ZHUANG,Jin-Wen ZHANG,Wen-Jing ZENG,Qiao-Hong GAO,Yong-Fu DING,Fen-Qi CHEN   

  1. Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science / College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
  • Received:2018-08-16 Accepted:2018-12-24 Published:2019-06-12 Published online:2019-06-12
  • Contact: Xiao-Qiang ZHAO,Bin REN,Yun-Ling PENG
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the National Key R&D Project(2018YFD0100203-4);Chinese Academy of Sciences “Light of West China” Program(20180504);Lanzhou Sci & Technol Project (2018-1-103), the Key R&D Program of Gansu, China(18YF1NA071);the National Science Foundation of Gansu Province(18JR3RA189);the Key Science and Technology Projects in Gansu Province(17ZD2NA016)

RichHTML

14

PDF

1186

摘要：

深入剖析干旱胁迫条件下玉米穗部性状的遗传机制可为玉米抗旱高产分子育种提供参考依据。以大穗型旱敏感自交系TS141为共同亲本, 分别与小穗型强抗旱自交系廊黄和昌7-2杂交, 构建了含有202个(LTPOP)和218个(CTPOP)家系的F2:3群体, 在8种水旱环境下进行单穗重、穗轴重、穗粒重、百粒重、出籽率及穗长等6个穗部性状的表型鉴定, 并采用复合区间作图法(CIM)和基于混合线性模型的复合区间作图法(MCIM)对其进行单环境和多环境联合数量性状位点(QTL)分析。结果表明, 采用CIM法, 单环境下在2套F2:3群体间检测到62个穗部性状QTL, 其中干旱胁迫环境下检测到38个QTL, 进一步在2套F2:3群体多个干旱胁迫环境下检测到10个稳定表达的QTL (sQTL), 分别位于Bin 1.01-1.03、Bin 1.03-1.04、Bin 1.05、Bin 1.07、Bin 1.07-1.08、Bin 2.04、Bin 4.08、Bin 5.06-5.07、Bin 6.05和Bin 9.04-9.06。采用MCIM法, 联合分析定位到54个穗部性状联合QTL, 其中24个表现显著的QTL与环境互作(QTL×E), 17对参与了显著的加性与加性/显性(AA/AD)上位性互作, 其表型贡献率较低。这些研究结果可为系统地剖析玉米穗部性状的分子遗传机制提供理论依据; 且这2套F2:3群体多个环境下检测到的sQTL可作为穗部性状改良的重要候选染色体区段, 用于图位克隆或抗旱高产分子育种, 但要注重环境及上位性互作效应的影响。

关键词: 玉米, 干旱, 穗部性状, QTL, QTL与环境互作, 上位性

Abstract:

Exploring genetic mechanisms of ear related traits in maize (Zea mays) under drought stress is important in maize molecular breeding for drought tolerance and high yield. Two F2:3 populations, namely 202 F2:3 families (LTPOP) and 218 F2:3 families (CTPOP) derived from the common male parent TS141 with drought-sensitive and larger ear and female parents Langhuang/Chang 7-2 with higher drought tolerance and small ear were used to investigate ear weight (EW), cob weight (CW), grain weight (GW), 100-kernel weight (KW), kernel ratio (KR), and ear length (EL) under eight watering environments, and then to analyze quantitative trait locus (QTL) in a single environment by composite interval mapping (CIM) and in the eight environments by mixed linear model based on composite interval mapping (MCIM). Sixty-two QTLs for ear related traits were detected in two F2:3 populations in a single environment by CIM, among than 38 QTLs were mapped under water-stressed environments, and further analysis showed that ten stable QTLs (sQTLs) were simultaneously identified in two F2:3 populations under multiple water-stressed environments, these sQTLs were located in Bin 1.01-1.03, Bin 1.03-1.04, Bin 1.05, Bin 1.07, Bin 1.07-1.08, Bin 2.04, Bin 4.08, Bin 5.06-5.07, Bin 6.05, and Bin 9.04-9.06. Fifty-four joint QTLs for ear related traits were identified in the eight environments by joint analysis with MCIM, among than 24 had significant QTL by environment interaction (QTL×E), and 17 significant epistatic interactions with additive by additive/dominance (AA/AD) effects, with less phenotypic variation. These results lay a foundation for systematically revealing molecular genetic mechanism of ear related traits, these sQTLs detected in two F2:3 populations under multiple environments are important genomic regions that could be used in positional cloning and molecular breeding for drought tolerance and high yield, however, more attention should be paid to the effects of environment or epistatic interaction.

Key words: maize (Zea mays), drought, ear correlative traits, QTL, QTL by environment interaction (QTL×E), epistasis

图1

4个试验点(武威、张掖、古浪和景泰)气象数据"

表1

8种水分环境下F2:3群体(LTPOP/CTPOP) 6个穗部性状的表型值"

性状Trait 环境
Env.		 双亲
Parents		 F1杂交种
F1 hybrid		 LTPOP群体
LTPOP population
廊黄
Langhuang		 TS141 F1LT 均值
Mean		 变幅
Range		 变异系数
CV (%)		 偏度Skewness 峰度Kurtosis
EW E1 71.33±6.89 111.30±9.72 184.27±7.03 149.81±43.25 52.85-285.91 28.87 0.315 0.313
(g) E2 66.58±7.95 100.67±8.44 163.51±6.79 133.19±51.83 43.27-265.43 38.92 0.453 -0.327
E3 88.29±10.43 128.85±6.45 197.80±6.74 163.19±41.49 70.21-281.87 25.42 0.086 -0.338
E4 84.14±6.77 110.56±8.01 169.14±7.83 152.76±51.41 52.27-276.94 33.65 0.382 -0.577
CW E1 12.53±1.65 29.90±2.15 33.71±2.81 27.65±9.43 9.47-53.31 34.11 0.326 -0.490
(g) E2 9.85±1.23 21.81±1.89 26.58±2.44 25.11±8.23 7.91-50.34 32.77 0.230 -0.051
E3 15.75±2.05 33.78±3.13 37.83±3.15 30.79±10.85 10.87-60.03 35.22 0.636 -0.141
E4 11.66±2.78 23.04±2.61 31.09±3.07 28.17±9.56 8.50-51.23 33.92 0.294 -0.410
GW E1 59.81±4.70 82.40±4.82 150.56±5.11 123.16±33.98 65.07-208.15 27.59 0.815 0.206
(g) E2 56.73±3.96 71.92±3.17 136.93±5.09 108.22±24.72 61.14-186.27 22.84 -0.192 -0.887
E3 64.54±4.51 85.07±4.66 159.97±4.85 132.46±25.05 68.94-207.92 18.91 -0.620 0.753
E4 60.48±5.03 73.52±4.49 138.05±4.23 125.01±23.36 65.31-194.58 18.68 0.904 0.727
KW E1 19.70±2.51 25.15±1.67 40.06±3.40 27.05±7.52 18.40-50.15 27.80 0.853 0.728
(g) E2 15.80±1.38 20.05±1.41 33.95±4.18 25.65±6.39 12.00-45.50 24.91 0.308 -0.376
E3 20.55±1.62 32.70±1.72 43.97±3.79 33.80±7.20 13.75-60.25 21.30 0.617 -0.407
E4 25.70±1.70 24.80±2.03 31.20±3.73 25.90±6.45 13.35-45.50 24.90 0.467 -0.339
性状Trait 环境
Env.		 双亲
Parents		 F1杂交种
F1 hybrid		 LTPOP群体
LTPOP population
廊黄
Langhuang		 TS141 F1LT 均值
Mean		 变幅
Range		 变异系数
CV (%)		 偏度Skewness 峰度Kurtosis
KR E1 83.43±1.84 77.34±1.67 83.93±2.01 81.59±4.94 70.63-91.08 6.05 0.711 -0.095
E2 81.02±1.35 73.08±1.55 82.15±1.84 78.80±5.79 65.97-88.84 7.35 -0.093 0.268
E3 85.14±1.42 79.62±1.73 85.92±1.85 83.01±5.05 71.89-92.51 6.08 -0.216 0.670
E4 82.26±1.61 73.98±1.89 83.93±1.79 80.56±5.93 68.05-89.93 7.36 -0.326 -0.431
EL E1 9.23±1.68 15.33±1.74 20.17±1.40 15.74±2.72 9.18-22.78 17.29 -0.069 0.000
(cm) E2 8.05±1.21 13.10±1.46 18.83±2.05 14.82±3.08 8.20-21.30 20.74 -0.203 -0.855
E3 9.55±2.02 15.62±1.31 20.84±1.87 15.81±2.92 9.10-23.20 18.46 0.073 -0.089
E4 8.72±1.04 12.60±1.76 17.68±1.92 15.07±2.52 8.21-19.80 16.69 -0.497 0.047
双亲
Parents		 F1杂交种
F1 hybrid		 CTPOP群体
CTPOP population
昌7-2
Chang 7-2		 TS141 F1CT 均值
Mean		 变幅
Range		 变异系数
CV (%)		 偏度Skewness 峰度Kurtosis
EW E5 63.68±4.57 107.64±7.99 235.32±7.15 121.00±39.89 27.07-224.56 32.97 0.528 0.041
(g) E6 59.05±6.22 96.47±6.80 215.76±6.98 111.20±38.62 22.34-211.91 34.73 0.596 0.152
E7 54.79±3.16 101.26±5.43 228.43±7.68 105.30±38.29 13.20-200.00 36.37 -0.033 -0.191
E8 50.00±2.69 90.43±5.90 205.37±8.03 90.03±41.93 12.07-198.34 46.26 0.238 -0.220
CW E5 6.86±3.30 21.41±3.88 30.28±1.89 17.51±6.71 4.24-41.21 38.33 0.577 0.619
(g) E6 5.90±5.28 17.68±4.72 26.77±2.01 15.81±5.84 4.16-35.99 36.94 0.701 1.037
E7 6.22±2.19 18.64±3.61 28.95±1.68 16.81±5.74 5.09-32.56 34.14 0.258 -0.119
E8 5.03±3.00 15.11±2.45 23.72±1.74 14.49±6.12 4.03-32.08 42.26 0.425 -0.368
GW E5 56.82±4.01 86.25±3.77 205.07±7.56 104.49±33.19 25.17-184.38 31.76 -0.911 0.150
(g) E6 52.12±3.65 73.79±4.09 189.99±6.70 95.39±28.05 19.78-180.21 29.41 0.228 1.006
E7 49.57±4.22 82.63±4.73 199.48±5.79 89.87±30.82 10.92-174.89 34.29 0.858 0.417
E8 43.97±3.99 70.32±4.36 180.55±6.04 77.54±31.21 9.95-173.24 40.25 0.325 0.271
KW E5 15.15±1.24 23.40±2.14 34.77±2.13 25.20±6.27 6.15-46.14 24.88 0.275 0.761
(g) E6 13.95±1.90 20.10±1.00 29.94±1.78 22.00±7.50 5.05-45.60 34.09 0.435 1.069
E7 14.05±1.05 21.21±1.12 31.26±1.69 22.80±6.29 8.40-42.71 27.58 0.483 0.407
E8 10.80±1.76 14.97±1.33 28.78±1.55 21.60±5.37 6.15-44.43 24.86 0.438 0.696
KR E5 87.22±2.16 80.19±2.32 88.36±1.69 85.50±4.89 73.47-90.80 5.72 0.916 0.188
E6 85.81±2.02 73.73±1.85 86.03±1.57 83.17±5.63 65.13-87.96 6.77 -0.470 0.735
E7 84.64±1.90 79.42±2.13 84.75±1.96 84.04±5.30 71.90-91.83 6.31 0.438 -0.307
E8 80.09±2.11 70.68±2.26 80.77±2.01 79.99±6.37 62.38-90.48 7.96 0.691 -0.740
EL E5 8.15±2.36 13.15±1.77 21.86±2.04 13.55±2.50 7.30-21.20 18.47 0.522 0.903
(cm) E6 7.02±2.69 10.44±3.10 17.99±1.21 12.49±2.32 6.80-20.60 18.59 0.164 0.455
E7 7.08±1.57 12.53±2.85 19.78±11.36 12.91±2.14 7.30-20.30 16.57 0.357 0.723
E8 6.00±2.31 10.48±2.08 16.04±1.02 12.01±2.59 5.70-18.30 21.52 -0.283 -0.218

图2

6个穗部性状RC和杂种优势分析缩写见表1。Abbreviations correspond with these given in Table 1."

Table 2

Complex variance for six ear related traits in F2:3 populations （LTpop/CTpop）under eight watering envrionments"

Table 2

Phenoty and genetic correlation analysis among six ear relaits in F2:3 populations （LTpop/CTpop）"

图3

采用CIM和MCIM法不同水分环境下F2:3群体（LTpop/CTpop）6个穗部性状QTL在染色体上的分布 "

表4

多环境下采用MCIM法对F2:3群体(LTPOP/CTPOP) 6个穗部性状联合QTL及QTL×E分析"

性状Trait QTL Chr. QTL位置 QTL position A AE1/
AE5		 AE2/
AE6		 AE3/
AE7		 AE4/
AE8		 h2A
(%)		 h2AE
(%)
cM Mb 标记区间
Marker interval
LTPOP群体 LTPOP population
EW qEW-Ch.1-2 1 60.7 0.05 umc2025-umc1395 -2.07 12.56
qEW-J2-1 2 89.2 4.40 bnlg1520-umc1736 -1.55 -0.81 -0.95 9.43 7.08
qEW-Ch.4-1 4 183.6 46.16 umc2041-umc2287 -0.98 7.18
qEW-Ch.9-1 9 54.4 16.69 umc1120-umc2134 -1.70 6.33
qEW-J10-1 10 2.7 0.26 umc1319-bnlg1451 1.41 0.66 0.89 12.95 6.59
CW qCW-Ch.1-1 1 35.8 22.79 umc2224-bnlg1484 1.09 0.86 10.20 8.12
qCW-Ch.2-1 2 23.0 2.71 umc1555-umc1024 0.30 4.98
qCW-J2-1 2 87.5 4.40 bnlg1520-umc1736 -1.37 -0.79 -0.65 9.03 6.84
qCW-Ch.4-1 4 179.9 46.16 umc2041-umc2287 0.24 6.16
qCW-Ch.9-1 9 67.3 23.41 umc1120-umc2346 -1.58 8.54
GW qGW-J1-1 1 114.2 5.03 phi308707-umc1847 -1.20 -0.64 -0.37 0.45 8.14 5.01
qGW-J2-1 2 10.5 0.39 umc2363-umc2403 -0.53 4.85
qGW-J2-2 2 101.8 0.24 bnlg1520-umc1736 -1.55 -0.86 -0.40 -0.71 9.31 6.86
qGW-Ch.4-1 4 181.9 1.32 umc2041-umc2287 -1.31 8.32
qGW-Ch.8-1 8 44.2 0.01 bnlg1863-umc2075 -0.35 -0.26 -0.17 2.79 1.24
KW qKW-Ch.1-2 1 114.2 5.03 phi308707-umc1847 -1.06 -0.63 -0.20 -0.48 8.02 2.87
qKW-Ch.4-1 4 181.0 4.16 umc2041-umc2287 -1.28 8.17
qKW-J6-1 6 94.9 20.76 bnlg2191-mmc0523 0.72 5.48
qKW-Ch.6-1 6 119.7 11.12 umc2040-bnlg1174a 0.41 3.56
性状Trait QTL Chr. QTL位置 QTL position A AE1/
AE5		 AE2/
AE6		 AE3/
AE7		 AE4/
AE8		 h2A
(%)		 h2AE
(%)
cM Mb 标记区间
Marker interval
KR qKR-Ch.1-1 1 40.7 1.56 bnlg1484-umc1917 1.11 11.69
qKR-J1-1 1 95.4 2.30 bnlg1025-mmc0041 0.60 0.37 5.30 2.73
qKR-Ch.6-1 6 119.8 0.03 umc2040-bnlg1174a 0.47 3.51
qKR-Ch.7-1 7 110.5 1.01 umc1708-umc1768 0.65 5.37
qKR-J8-1 8 88.3 0.54 umc2356-umc1607 0.84 0.26 0.43 -0.31 8.14 2.20
EL qEL-Ch.9-1 9 66.5 23.41 umc1120-umc2346 0.64 5.36
qEL-Ch.10-1 10 50.1 2.85 umc1345-umc2016 0.82 6.49
CTPOP群体 CTPOP population
EW qEW-Ch.1-1 1 138.4 17.57 bnlg1025-mmc0041 -0.90 5.06
qEW-J2-1 2 124.3 4.40 bnlg1520-umc1736 -1.76 -0.88 -0.74 10.93 6.00
qEW-Ch.5-1 5 236.0 2.96 umc2216-umc1072 1.03 4.71
qEW-Ch.6-1 6 81.3 22.97 mmc0523-umc2141 -0.77 4.84
qEW-J8-1 8 8.8 4.96 umc1327-bnlg1194 1.19 0.95 4.90 4.63
qEW-J10-1 10 4.9 0.26 umc1319-bnlg1451 1.01 0.81 0.58 0.66 10.25 7.11
CW qCW-Ch.1-1 1 27.1 22.79 umc2224-bnlg1484 1.10 0.73 0.58 6.49 4.57
qCW-J1-1 1 159.0 19.78 phi308707-umc2289 1.13 -0.79 -0.43 0.68 5.40 4.34
qCW-J5-1 5 113.8 15.76 umc1226-umc1815 -0.88 -0.54 4.92 3.59
qCW-Ch.8-1 8 107.0 32.89 umc2218-umc2356 -1.20 7.93
qCW-Ch.9-1 9 51.8 16.69 umc1120-umc2134 -1.82 9.29
qCW-J10-1 10 3.3 0.26 umc1319-bnlg1451 1.07 0.55 6.05 4.18
GW qGW-J1-1 1 154.9 17.51 mmc0041-phi308707 -2.03 -0.84 -0.66 -0.41 -0.68 11.07 5.50
qGW-J2-1 2 38.6 2.01 umc2363-umc1024 -0.88 7.31
qGW-J2-2 2 127.1 0.24 bnlg1520-umc1736 -1.63 -0.89 -0.41 -0.64 -0.50 9.95 4.19
qGW-Ch.4-1 4 120.3 0.66 umc2041-umc2188 -1.77 10.14
qGW-J6-1 6 97.4 0.03 umc2040-bnlg1174a -1.05 8.96
qGW-J8-1 8 40.7 0.01 bnlg1863-umc2075 -0.84 -0.36 -0.52 7.20 4.47
KW qCW-J1-1 1 155.0 17.51 mmc0041-phi308707 -0.78 -0.58 7.10 6.03
qKW-Ch.4-1 4 `120.5 0.66 umc2041-umc2188 -1.02 8.95
qKW-Ch.6-1 6 81.0 22.97 mmc0523-umc2141 0.44 4.06
KR qKR-J1-1 1 139.3 2.30 bnlg1025-mmc0041 0.51 0.26 0.39 4.15 2.93
qKR-J6-1 6 88.1 0.17 umc2141-umc2040 0.58 4.20
qKR-J7-1 7 118.0 1.01 umc1708-umc1768 0.73 6.12
qKR-Ch.8-1 8 114.9 1.96 umc2356-phi233376 0.62 0.37 0.18 5.04 2.11
EL qEL-J1-1 1 154.6 17.51 mmc0041-phi308707 -0.79 -0.66 7.04 6.18
qEL-Ch.4-1 4 120.3 0.66 umc2041-umc2188 -1.32 9.16
qEL-Ch.10-1 10 142.6 0.75 bnlg1839-umc1249 0.36 3.41

Table 2

Epistatic interactions among QTLS for six ear related traits in F2:3 population （LTpop/CTpop）under multiple environments"

[1] 王崇桃, 李少昆 . 玉米生产限制因素评估与技术优先序. 中国农业科学, 2010,43:1136-1146.
Wang C T, Li S K . Assessment of limiting factors and techniques prioritization for maize production in China. Sci Agric Sin, 2010,43:1136-1146 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] Zhao X Q, Peng Y L, Zhang J W, Fang P, Wu B Y . Identification of QTLs and meta-QTLs for seven agronomic traits in multiple maize populations under well-watered and water-stressed conditions. Crop Sci, 2018,58:507-520.
[3] 谭巍巍, 李永祥, 王阳, 刘成, 刘志斋, 彭勃, 王迪, 张岩, 孙宝成, 石云素, 宋燕春, 杨德光, 王天宇, 黎裕 . 在干旱和正常水分条件下玉米穗部性状QTL分析. 作物学报, 2011,37:235-248.
Tan W W, Li Y X, Wang Y, Liu C, Liu Z Z, Peng B, Wang D, Zhang Y, Sun B C, Shi Y S, Song Y C, Yang D G, Wang T Y, Li Y . QTL mapping of ear traits of maize under different water regimes. Acta Agron Sin, 2011,37:235-248 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] Nikolic A, Andjelkovic A, Dodig D, Ignjatovic-Micic D . Quantitative trait loci for yield and morphological traits in maize under drought stress. Genetika-Belgrade, 2011,43:263-276.
[5] Almeida G D, Nair S, Borém A, Cairns J, Trachsel S, Ribaut J M, Bänziger M, Prasanna B M, Crossa J, Babu R . Molecular mapping across three populations reveals a QTL hotspot region on chromosome 3 for secondary traits associated with drought tolerance in tropical maize. Mol Breed, 2014,34:701-715.
doi: 10.1007/s11032-014-0068-5 pmid: 4092235
[6] Guo J F, Su G Q, Zhang J P, Wang G Y . Genetic analysis and QTL mapping of maize yield and associate agronomic traits under semi-arid land condition. Afr J Biotech, 2008,7:1829-1838.
[7] Lu G H, Tang J H, Yan J B, Ma X Q, Li J S, Chen S J, Ma J C, Liu Z X, Zhang Y R, Dai J R . Quantitative trait loci mapping of maize yield and its components under different water treatments at flowering time. J Integr Plant Biol, 2006,48:1233-1243.
doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2006.00289.x
[8] Sabadin P K, de-Souza C L, de-Souza A P, Franco G A A . QTL mapping for yield components in a tropical maize population using microsatellite markers. Hereditas, 2008,145:194-203.
doi: 10.1111/j.0018-0661.2008.02065.x
[9] Calderón C I, Yandell B S, Doebley J F . Fine mapping of a QTL associated with kernel row number on chromosome 1 of maize. PLoS One, 2016,11:e0150276.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150276 pmid: 26930509
[10] Liu L, Du Y F, Shen X M, Li M F, Sun W, Huang J, Liu Z J, Tao Y S, Zheng Y L, Yan J B, Zhang Z X . KRN4 controls quantitative variation in maize kernel row number. PLoS Genet, 2015,11:e1005670.
[11] 李雪华, 李新海, 郝传芳, 田清震, 张世煌 . 干旱条件下玉米耐旱相关性状的QTL一致性图谱构建. 中国农业科学, 2005,38:882-890.
Li X H, Li X H, Hao C F, Tian Q Z, Zhang S H . Consensus map of the QTL relevant to drought tolerance of maize under drought conditions. Sci Agric Sin, 2005,38:882-890 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 赵小强, 方鹏, 彭云玲, 高巧红, 曾文静, 任斌 . 基于两个相关群体的玉米6个穗部性状QTL定位. 农业生物技术学报, 2018,26:729-742.
Zhao X Q, Fang P, Peng Y L, Gao Q H, Zeng W J, Ren B . QTL mapping for six ear-related traits based on two maize ( Zea mays) related populations. J Agric Biotech, 2018,26:729-742 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 赵小强, 方鹏, 彭云玲, 张金文, 曾文静, 任斌, 高巧红 . 基于两个相关群体的玉米7个主要农艺性状遗传分析和QTL定位. 草业学报, 2018,27(9):152-165.
Zhao X Q, Fang P, Peng Y L, Zhang J W, Zeng W J, Ren B, Gao Q H . Genetic analysis and QTL mapping for seven agronomic traits in maize ( Zea mays) using two connected populations. Acta Pratacult Sin 2018,27(9):152-165 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 彭云玲, 赵小强, 任续伟, 李健英 . 开花期干旱胁迫对不同基因型玉米生理特性和产量的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014,32(3):9-14.
Peng Y L, Zhao X Q, Ren X W, Li J Y . Genotypic differences in response of physiological characteristics and grain yield of maize inbred lines to drought stress at flowering stage. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2014,32(3):9-14 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 彭云玲, 赵小强, 任续伟, 李健英 . 干旱胁迫对不同株型玉米大喇叭口期生长的影响. 中国沙漠, 2013,33:1064-1070.
Peng Y L, Zhao X Q, Ren X W, Li J Y . Effect of drought stress on growth of different plant type maize ( Zea mays) in the bell-mouthed period. J Desert Res, 2013,33:1064-1070 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] 赵小强, 彭云玲, 李建英, 任续伟 . 16份玉米自交系的耐盐性评价. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014,32(5):40-45.
Zhao X Q, Peng Y L, Li J Y, Ren X W . Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance in 16 maize inbred lines. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2014,32(5):40-45 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] 彭云玲, 赵小强, 闫慧萍, 武金欢 . 不同玉米自交系耐深播性评价及遗传多样性分析. 草业学报, 2016,25(7):73-86.
Peng Y L, Zhao X Q, Yan H P, Wu J H . Deep-sowing tolerance and genetic diversity of maize inbred lines. Acta Pratacult Sin, 2016,25(7):73-86 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] Zhao X Q, Peng Y L, Zhang J W, Fang P ,Wu B Y. Mapping QTLs and meta-QTLs for two inflorescence architecture traits in multiple maize populations under different watering environments.Mol Breed, 2017, 37: 91.
[19] Zhao X Q, Fang P, Zhang J W, Peng Y L . QTL mapping for six ear leaf architecture traits under water-stressed and well-watered conditions in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Breed, 2018,137:60-72.
doi: 10.1111/pbr.12559
[20] 石云素, 黎裕, 王天宇 . 玉米种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006, pp 1-98.
Shi Y S, Li Y, Wang T Y. Descriptors and Data Standard for Maize (Zea mays). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006, pp 1-98(in Chinese).
[21] Knapp S J, Stroup W W, Ross W M . Exact confidence intervals for heritability on a progeny mean basis. Crop Sci, 1985,25:192-194.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1985.0011183X002500010046x
[22] Churchill G A, Doerge R W . Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics, 1994,138:963-971
doi: 10.1101/gad.8.21.2653 pmid: 7851788
[23] Stuber C W, Edwards M D, Wendel J . F1 molecular marker facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize: II. Factors influencing yield and its component traits. Crop Sci, 1987,27:639-648.
[24] McCouch S R, Cho Y G, Yano P E, Paul E, Blinstrub M, Morishima H, Kinoshita T . Report on QTL nomenclature. Rice Genet Newslett, 1997,14:11-13.
[25] Yang J, Zhu J, Williams R W . Mapping the genetic architecture of complex traits in experimental populations. Bioinformatics, 2007,23:1527-1536.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm143 pmid: 17459962
[26] Tuberosa R, Salvi S, Sanguineti M C, Landi P, Maccaferri M, Conti S . Mapping QTL regulating morpho-physiological traits and yields: case studies, shortcomings and perspectives in drought-stress maize. Ann Bot, 2002,89:941-963.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf134 pmid: 12102519
[27] 李叶蓓, 陶洪斌, 王若男, 张萍, 吴春江, 雷鸣, 张巽, 王璞 . 干旱对玉米穗发育及产量的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2015,23:383-391.
Li Y B, Tao H B, Wang R N, Zhang P, Wu C J, Lei M, Zhang X, Wang P . Effect of drought on ear development and yield of maize. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2015,23:383-391 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] Robinson H F, Comstock R E, Harvey P H . Genotypic and phenotypic correlations in corn and their implications in selection. Agron J, 1951,43:282-287.
doi: 10.2134/agronj1951.00021962004300060007x
[29] 李忠南, 王越人, 邬生辉, 张淑萍, 李光发 . 玉米品种穗轴重和出籽率性状的相关及遗传关系研究. 玉米科学, 2012,20(5):33-39.
Li Z N, Wang Y R, Wu S H, Zhang S P, Li G F . Character analysis of maize variety and the genetic relationship. J Maize Sci, 2012,20(5):33-39 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30] Messmer R, Fracheboud Y, Banziger M, Vargas M, Stamp P, Ribaut J M . Drought stress and tropical maize: QTL-by-environment interactions and stability of QTLs across environments for yield components and secondary traits. Theor Appl Genet, 2009,119:913-930.
[31] 马金亮, 张春荣, 董华芳, 席章营, 夏宗良, 丁俊强, 吴建宇 . 玉米果穗出子率QTL定位及上位性分析. 河南农业大学学报, 2010,44:233-237.
Ma J L, Zhang C R, Dong H F, Xi Z Y, Xia Z L, Ding J Q, Wu J Y . QTL mapping and epistasis analysis for rate of kernel production in maize. J Henan Agric Univ, 2010,44:233-237 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[32] 张伟强, 库丽霞, 张君, 韩赞平, 陈彦惠 . 玉米出籽率、籽粒深度和百粒重的QTL分析. 作物学报, 2013,39:455-463.
Zhang W Q, Ku L X, Zhang J, Han Z P, Chen Y H . QTL analysis of kernel ratio, kernel depth, and 100-kernel weight in maize (Zea mays L.). Acta Agron Sin, 2013,39:455-463 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33] Li J Z, Zhang Z W, Li Y L, Wang Q L, Zhou Y G . QTL consistency and meta-analysis for grain yield components in three generations in maize. Theor Appl Genet, 2011,122:771-782.
[34] Wang Y J, Xu J, Deng D X, Ding H D, Bian Y L, Yin Z T, Wu Y R, Zhou B, Zhao Y . A comprehensive meta-analysis of plant morphology, yield, and virus disease resistance QTL in maize (Zea mays L.). Planta, 2016,243:459-471.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-015-2419-9 pmid: 26474992
[35] 兰进好, 李新海, 高树仁, 张宝石, 张世煌 . 不同生态环境下玉米产量性状QTL分析. 作物学报, 2005,31:1253-1259.
Lan J H, Li X H, Gao S R, Zhang B S, Zhang S H . QTL analysis of yield components in maize under different environments. Acta Agron Sin, 2005,31:1253-1259 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[36] Zhuang J Y, Lin H X, Lu J . Analysis of QTL× environment interaction for yield components and plant height in rice. Theor Appl Genet, 1997,55:799-808.
doi: 10.1007/s001220050628
[37] 谭巍巍, 王阳, 李永祥, 刘成, 刘志斋, 彭勃, 王迪, 张岩, 孙宝成, 石云素, 宋燕春, 杨德光, 王天宇, 黎裕 . 不同环境下多个玉米穗部性状的QTL分析. 中国农业科学, 2011,44:233-244.
Tan W W, Wang Y, Li Y X, Liu C, Liu Z Z, Peng B, Wang D, Zhang Y, Sun B C, Shi Y S, Song Y C, Yang D G, Wang T Y, Li Y . QTL analysis of ear traits in maize across multiple environments. Sci Agric Sin, 2011,44:233-244 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[38] Tanksley S D, Ahn N, Causse M. RFLP mapping of the rice genome. In: Proceeding of Second International Rice Genetics Symposium. Rice Genetics II. Los Banos, Laguna, the Philippines: International Rice Research Institute, 1991. pp 435-442
[39] 赵小强 . 玉米株型相关耐旱遗传机制研究. 甘肃农业大学博士学位论文, 甘肃兰州, 2018.
Zhao X Q . Genetic mechanisms study of drought tolerance related to plant architecture in maize (Zea mays L.). PhD Dissertation of Gansu Agricultural University ,Gansu, Lanzhou, China, 2018 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[40] Hagiwara W E, Qnish K, Takamure I, Sano Y . Transgressive segregation due to linked QTLs for grain characteristics of rice. Euphytica, 2006,150:27-35.
doi: 10.1007/s10681-006-9085-8
[41] 常立国, 何坤辉, 崔婷婷, 薛吉全, 刘建超 . 玉米出籽率的QTL定位及其与环境互作分析. 农业生物技术学报, 2017,25:517-525.
Chang L G, He K H, Cui T T, Xue J Q, Liu J C . QTL mapping and QTL × environment interaction analysis of kernel ratio in maize (Zea mays). J Agric Biotechnol, 2017,25:517-525 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[3] 郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657.
[4] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[5] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[6] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[7] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[8] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[9] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[10] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[11] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[12] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[13] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
[14] 郭向阳, 涂亮, 王栋, 刘鹏飞, 王安贵, 易强, 任洪, 李刚, 祝云芳, 吴迅, 蒋喻林, 田丰, 陈泽辉. 热带Suwan种质在我国玉米种质改良中的创新与利用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 655-664.
[15] 马亮, 马璐, 张舒钰, 章慧敏, 王仁明, 宋旭东, 张振良, 冒宇翔, 陆虎华, 陈国清, 郝德荣, 周广飞. 玉米苞叶数目转录组分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 790-801.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2