欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 552-560.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.24034

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同甲哌鎓滴施剂型筛选及其对棉花生长发育调控效果研究

娄善伟1,2(), 高飞3, 王崇3, 田晓莉1, 杜明伟1, 段留生1,4,*()   

  1. 1中国农业大学农学院, 北京 100193
    2国家棉花工程技术研究中心, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830091
    3中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所, 北京 100081
    4北京农学院植物科技学院, 北京 102206
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-02 接受日期:2022-06-07 出版日期:2022-07-08 网络出版日期:2022-07-08
  • 通讯作者: 段留生
  • 作者简介:E-mail: wei.lou@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    新疆农业科学院自主培育项目(nkyzztd-002);新疆中央引导地方科技发展项目新疆棉花农业生产品质提升关键技术平台建设项目资助。

Screening of different dropping formulations about mepiquat chloride and their effects on cotton growth and development

LOU Shan-Wei1,2(), GAO Fei3, WANG Chong3, TIAN Xiao-Li1, DU Ming-Wei1, DUAN Liu-Sheng1,4,*()   

  1. 1College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
    2China National Cotton R&D Center, Urumqi 830091, Xinjiang, China
    3Institute of Agricultural Environment and Sustainable Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    4College of Plant Science and Technology Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, China
  • Received:2022-02-02 Accepted:2022-06-07 Published:2022-07-08 Published online:2022-07-08
  • Contact: DUAN Liu-Sheng
  • Supported by:
    Independent Cultivation Project of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences(nkyzztd-002);Xinjiang Central Guiding the Local Science and Technology Development

RichHTML

11

PDF

345

摘要：

棉田滴施甲哌鎓一直备受关注, 为研究新型缓释甲哌鎓滴施剂型及其对棉花调控的作用效果, 探寻缓释甲哌鎓滴施可行性。设5种剂型(H1、H2、H3、H4、H5)处理, 普通缩节胺(S)和清水对照(CK), 开展盆栽试验, 大田设低(90.0 g hm-2)、高(180.0 g hm-2) 2个浓度水平, 进行剂型筛及棉花农艺性状与产量调控效果调查。结果表明, 盆栽条件下, 5种不同剂型甲哌鎓滴施出苗整齐度基本在66%以上, 壮苗率受品种影响差别较大, 在40%~70%之间; 除H3外, 各剂型甲哌鎓滴施均有控高效果, 与CK和S相比, 株高分别降低32%~41%和24%~35%, 25 d后株高直观差异明显。大田条件下, 处理S控高效果最好, CK增高最快, 缓释甲哌鎓高浓度时各处理均有较好控高效果且与CK差异显著, 低浓度时H5株高61.0 cm, 与S效果相近且无显著差异, 其他处理与CK无显著差异。棉花株宽、茎粗、主茎叶数、果枝台数等农艺性状各剂型处理分别在26.0~35.0 cm、9.5~11.5 mm、13~14片、7~8台之间, 与CK和S比均没有显著影响。新型缓释甲哌鎓可促进现蕾, 使蕾铃数增加, 到6月28日(盛花期) H1低、高浓度下蕾铃花总数分别为12.7个和11.5个比S多2.0个和0.8个。最终产量表现为低浓度各处理均高于高浓度, H5产量最高, 为7267.26 kg hm-2, 分别高出CK和S 40%和33%, 其次为H1。综合分析, H1、H5控高塑型及产量表现比较好, 可进一步展开相关试验研究。

关键词: 棉花, 缓释甲哌鎓, 滴施, 调控, 农艺性状

Abstract:

The drop method of mepiquat chloride is an important research field in cotton. In order to explore the new sustained-release dropping formulation and its effect on cotton regulation, the following experiments were carried out. The dropping formulations were screened by pot cultivation with five kinds (H1, H2, H3, H4, and H5) of dripping application form, and common mepiquat chloride (S) and water as the control (CK). To investigate the screening of different dosage forms and the effect of regulating cotton agronomic characters and yield, two concentration levels of low and high (90.0 g hm-2 and 180.0 g hm-2) were set in the field. The results showed that under pot conditions, the uniformity of five different formulations of mepiquat chloride was basically above 66%, and the seedling growth rate greatly affected by the variety mostly between 40% and 70%. Plant height was reduced by 32%-41% and 24%-35%, respectively, and there was significantly different in plant height after 25 days. Under field conditions, treatment S had the best height control effect, CK increased the fastest, and all treatments had better height control effects at high concentrations of sustained-release mepiquat chloride and were significantly different from CK. At low concentrations, plant height of H5 was 61.0 cm. The effect was similar to S and had no significant difference, and other treatments had no significant difference with CK. Cotton plant width, stem diameter, the number of leaves in main stem, and the number of fruit branches were 26.0-35.0 cm, 9.5-11.5 mm, 13-14 pieces, and 7-8 sets, respectively, which had no significant difference with CK and S. The new type of sustained-release mepiquat chloride could promote bud initiation and increase boll numbers. By June 28 (peak flowering stage), the total number of flowers and bolls in two concentration levels of H1 were 12.7 and 11.5 per plant, respectively, which were 2.0 and 0.8 higher than that of S. The final yield of all treatments at low concentration was higher than that of high concentration. And the yield of H5 was the highest (7267.26 kg hm-2), which was 40% and 33% higher than CK and S, respectively, followed by H1. In conclusion, dropping formulations of H1 and H5 control plant height, shape plant type and yield performance was better, and further related experimental research can be carried out.

Key words: cotton, sustained release mepiquat, drip application, regulation, agronomic characters

表1

试验设计"

处理
Treatment		 6月4日第1次灌根
Frist time root watering on June 4
(g hm-2)		 6月28日第二次灌根
Second time root watering on June 28
(g hm-2)		 总量
Total
(g hm-2)
低浓度 LC 高浓度 HC 低浓度 LC 高浓度 HC 低浓度 LC 高浓度 HC
H1 30.0 60.0 60.0 120.0 90.0 180.0
H2 30.0 60.0 60.0 120.0 90.0 180.0
H3 30.0 60.0 60.0 120.0 90.0 180.0
H4 30.0 60.0 60.0 120.0 90.0 180.0
H5 30.0 60.0 60.0 120.0 90.0 180.0
S 30.0 60.0 90.0
CK — — —

表2

不同剂型甲哌鎓对盆栽棉花苗期整齐度和长势的影响"

处理
Treatment		 苗整齐率Neat rate of cotton seedling 壮苗率Strong seedling rate
新陆早78号
Xinluzao 78		 鲁棉研22号
Lumianyan 22		 新陆早78号
Xinluzao 78		 鲁棉研22号
Lumianyan 22
H1 66.7 100.0 50.0 66.7
H2 100.0 66.7 16.7 66.7
H3 66.7 66.7 50.0 83.3
H4 50.0 66.7 50.0 33.3
H5 100.0 100.0 33.3 100.0
S 66.7 66.7 66.7 66.7
CK 66.7 100.0 33.3 83.3

图1

不同品种棉花株高变化 处理同表1。"

图2

不同批次盆栽各处理棉花形态照片 处理同表1。"

图3

不同浓度田间处理株高变化情况 处理同表1。"

图4

不同浓度田间处理株高情况 不同小写字母表示在0.05水平差异显著。处理同表1。"

表3

不同处理棉花主要农艺性状情况"

处理
Treatment		 株宽
Plant height (cm)		 茎粗
Stem diameter (mm)		 主茎叶片数
No. of leaf		 果枝台数
No. of fruit branch		 果枝始节高
Height of first branch (cm)
低浓度
LC		 H1 33.0 a 10.9 a 14.0 a 7.3 a 25.3 a
H2 34.3 a 10.2 a 14.0 a 8.0 a 26.5 a
H3 32.8 a 10.5 a 13.2 a 8.0 a 27.5 a
H4 33.2 a 9.8 a 14.0 a 8.3 a 22.8 a
H5 29.5 a 10.1 a 13.5 a 7.7 a 23.3 a
S 33.8 a 10.4 a 13.3 a 8.0 a 21.2 a
CK 31.3 a 10.1 a 13.0 a 7.2 a 24.2 a
高浓度
HC		 H1 26.0 a 11.0 a 13.0 a 6.8 a 25.5 a
H2 23.0 a 10.6 a 12.7 a 7.0 a 22.2 a
H3 27.2 a 10.8 a 13.8 a 7.8 a 21.0 a
H4 28.2 a 10.1 a 13.5 a 7.7 a 21.8 a
H5 32.3 a 10.5 a 13.3 a 7.8 a 19.0 a
S 33.8 a 10.4 a 13.3 a 8.0 a 21.2 a
CK 31.3 a 10.1 a 13.0 a 7.2 a 24.2 a
DPC剂量之间
Between DPC doses		 H1 ns ns ns ns ns
H2 * ns ns ns ns
H3 ns ns ns ns *
H4 ns ns ns ns ns
H5 * ns ns ns *

图5

不同处理的蕾铃花变化情况 处理同表1。不同小写字母表示在0.05水平差异显著。"

表4

不同处理对棉花构成因子的影响"

处理
Treatment		 收获株数
Harvest plant of land
(×104 plant hm-2)		 单株结铃数
Boll No. per plant		 单铃重
Boll weight (g)		 籽棉产量
Seed cotton yield (kg hm-2)
低浓度
LC		 H1 22.20 a 6.0 a 5.21 a 6939.72 ab
H2 20.70 a 5.7 a 5.29 a 6205.17 ab
H3 22.80 a 5.2 a 5.18 a 6102.04 ab
H4 17.40 a 5.7 a 5.27 a 5196.22 b
H5 23.10 a 6.0 a 5.24 a 7267.26 a
S 21.20 a 5.7 a 5.22 a 6266.96 ab
CK 23.40 a 4.5 a 5.18 a 5451.03 b
高浓度
HC		 H1 22.50 a 4.8 a 5.25 a 5705.75 a
H2 23.70 a 4.3 a 5.21 a 5354.09 a
H3 21.90 a 4.3 a 5.29 a 5020.21 a
H4 21.75 a 4.8 a 5.25 a 5515.56 a
H5 24.00 a 5.0 a 5.20 a 6244.00 a
S 21.20 a 5.7 a 5.22 a 6266.96 a
CK 23.40 a 4.5 a 5.18 a 5451.03 a
[1] 范希峰, 田晓莉, 李召虎, 何钟佩, 翟志席, 段留生. 应用ICP-MS研究甲哌鎓对转Bt基因抗虫棉棉籽中无机元素含量的影响. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2009, 29: 1119-1122.
Fan X F, Tian X L, Li Z H, He Z P, Zhai H X, Duan L S. Effects of mepiquat chloride on inorganic elements contents in seeds of transgenic insect-resistant cotton determined by ICP-MS. Spectr Spectral Anal, 2009, 29: 1119-1122. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] Rademacher W. Growth retardants: effects on gibberellin biosynthesis and other metabolic pathways. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 2000, 51: 501-531.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.51.1.501
[3] 李保同. 甲哌啶在棉田土壤中的残留及动态研究. 农药, 1994, 4(22): 40-41.
Li B T. Residue and dynamics of meperidine in soil of cotton field. Pesticide, 1994, 4(22): 40-41 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 娄善伟, 董合忠, 田晓莉, 田立文. 新疆棉花“矮、密、早”栽培历史、现状和展望. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54: 720-732.
Lou S W, Dong H Z, Tian X L, Tian L W. The “short, dense and early” cultivation of cotton in Xinjiang: history, current situation and prospect. Sci Agric Sin, 2021, 54: 720-732. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] 张特, 王蜜蜂, 赵强. 滴施缩节胺与氮肥对棉花生长发育及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40: 1220-1226.
Zhang T, Wang M F, Zhao Q. Effects of DPC and nitrogen fertilizer through drip irrigation on growth and yield of cotton. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 1220-1226 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] 马素钧. 棉花喷施缩节胺的机理与技术. 河北农业科技, 1993, (6): 10.
Ma S J. Mechanism and technology of spraying DPC on cotton. Hebei Agric Sci Technol, 1993, (6): 10. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 段留生, 张一, 唐祚舜, 何钟佩, 翟志席. 甲哌鎓对棉花幼苗侧根发生的诱导效应和机理研究. 西北植物学报, 2002, 22: 877-882.
Duan L S, Zhang Y, Tang Z S, He Z P, Zhai Z X. Effects of mepiquat chloride on lateral roots initiation of cotton seedling and its mechanism. Acta Bota Boreali-Occident Sin, 2002, 22: 877-882. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] Almeida A Q D, Rosolem C A. Cotton root and shoot growth as affected by application of mepiquat chloride to cotton seeds. Acta Sci Agron, 2012, 34: 61-65.
[9] 张凤娇. 不同打顶剂对棉花生长发育及产量品质的影响. 塔里木大学硕士学位论文, 新疆阿拉尔, 2021.
Zhang F J. Effects of Different Topping Agents on Growth, Yield and Quality of Cotton. MS Thesis of Tarim University, Alar, Xinjiang, China, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 罗宏海, 赵瑞海, 韩春丽, 张旺锋. 缩节胺(DPC)对不同密度下棉花冠层结构特征与产量性状的影响. 棉花学报, 2011, 23: 334-340.
Luo H H, Zhao R H, Han C L, Zhang W F. Effects of growth regulators (DPC) on canopy architecture and yield characteristics of cotton under different planting densities. Cotton Sci, 2011, 23: 334-340. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 陈晓娇. DPC浸种促进棉花侧根发育的激素机制及结合态ABAscFv的制备. 中国农业大学博士学位论文, 北京, 2017.
Chen X J. The Hormone Mechanism of DPC Promoting Lateral Root Formationin Cotton Seedling and the Preparation of Conjugated ABA scFv. PhD Dissertation of China Agricultural University, Beijing, China, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 王宁, 田晓莉, 段留生, 严根土, 黄群, 李召虎. 缩节胺浸种提高棉花幼苗根系活力中的活性氧代谢. 作物学报, 2014, 40: 1220-1226.
Wang N, Tian X L, Duan L S, Yan G T, Huang Q, Li Z H. Metabolism of reactive oxygen species involved in increasing root vigor of cotton seedlings by soaking seeds with mepiquat chloride. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 1220-1226. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 赵文超, 杜明伟, 黎芳, 田晓莉, 李召虎. 应用缩节安(DPC)调控棉花株型的定位定量效应研究. 作物学报, 2019, 45: 1059-1069.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.84162
Zhao W C, Du M W, Li F, Tian X L, Li Z H. Location- and quantity-based effects of mepiquat chloride application on cotton plant-type. Acta Agron Sin, 2019, 45: 1059-1069. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 李颖, 陈金湘, 李垚垚, 易九红. 缩节胺在棉花上的应用概况. 作物研究, 2008, 22(增刊1): 457-459.
Li Y, Chen X J, Li Y Y, Yi J H. Application of DPC in cotton. Crop Res, 2008, 22(S1): 457-459 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 李雪琴, 郭新萍. 用缩节胺处理棉种不断完善棉花系统化调技术. 农村科技, 1997, (6): 4.
Li X Q, Guo X P. Treatment of cotton seeds with DPC and continuous improvement of cotton systematic adjustment technology. Rural Sci Technol, 1997, (6): 4. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] 雷斌, 恽友兰, 张云生, 周春江, 蔡红梅, 徐公赦, 黄乐平. 根用多功能缓释缩节胺在棉花上的应用研究. 新疆农业科学, 2007, 44: 502-505.
Lei B, Yun Y L, Zhang Y S, Zhou C J, Cai H M, Xu G S, Huang L P. Application of the multifunctional and slowly releasing of root use shrink-burl-amine to cotton. Xinjiang Agric Sci, 2007, 44: 502-505. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17] 杨建荣, 马富裕, 尹小龙, 慕志新, 朱家辉. 随水滴施缩节安和多效唑对棉花幼苗生长发育的影响. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 5(4): 284-287.
Yang J R, Ma F Y, Yin X L, Mu Z X, Zhu J H. A study on the effect of DPC and PP333 dissolved in water during irrigation on the growth of cotton seedling. J Shihezi Univ (Nat Sci), 2001, 5(4): 284-287. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] 赵强, 张巨松, 田晓莉, 彭小峰, 李斌, 艾买提江, 周春江. 南疆棉花种子包衣缓释缩节胺化控技术的初步研究. 新疆农业科学, 2010, 47: 25-30.
Zhao Q, Zhang J S, Tian X L, Peng X F, Li B, Aimaitijiang, Zhou C J. Chemical treatment of slow-release mepiquat chloride from coated cotton seed in South Xinjiang. Xinjiang Agric Sci, 2010, 47: 25-30. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] 周春江, 田晓莉, 李松林, 恽友兰. 缓释缩节胺包衣处理对棉花农艺及经济性状的调控效果. 中国棉花, 2004, 31(9): 14-16.
Zhou C J, Tian X L, Li S L, Yun Y L. Effect of slow release DPC coating on Agronomic and economic characters of cotton. China Cotton, 2004, 31(9): 14-16. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] 田晓莉, 谢湘毅, 周春江, 杨培珠, 王保民, 段留生, 李松林, 恽友兰, 何钟佩, 李召虎. 植物生长调节剂甲哌鎓在土壤中的降解及其影响因子. 农业环境科学学报, 2008, 27: 1726-1731.
Tian X L, Xie X Y, Zhou C J, Yang P Z, Wang B M, Duan L S, Li S L, Yun Y L, He Z P, Li Z H. Factors affecting the degradation of mepiquat chloride in soil. journal of agro-environment science. J Agro-Environ Sci, 2008, 27: 1726-1731. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] 何钟佩, 李丕明, 奚惠达, 李召虎, 白玉良. DPC化控技术在棉花上的应用和发展——从防止徒长到系统的定向诱导. 北京农业大学学报, 1991, (S1): 58-63.
He Z P, Li P M, Xi H D, Li Z H, Bai Y L. The using and development of DPC chemical controlling technique in cotton culture. J Beijing Agric Univ, 1991, (S1): 58-63. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] 刘翠, 张巨松, 魏鑫, 徐新霞. 甲哌鎓化控对南疆杂交棉功能叶生理指标及产量性状的影响. 棉花学报, 2014, 26: 122-129.
Liu C, Zhang J S, Wei X, Xu X X. Effects of mepiquat chloride on physiological indicators of leaf function and characteristics of yield of hybrid cotton in South Xinjiang. Cotton Sci, 2014, 26: 122-129. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 赵强, 周春江, 张巨松, 李松林, 恽友兰, 田晓莉. 化学打顶对南疆棉花农艺和经济性状的影响. 棉花学报, 2011, 23: 329-333.
Zhao Q, Zhou C J, Zhang J S, Li S L, Yun Y L, Tian X L. Effect of chemical detopping on the canopy and yield of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) in south Xinjiang. Cotton Sci, 2011, 23: 329-333. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] 韩焕勇, 杜明伟, 王方永, 陈兵, 田晓莉. 北疆棉区增效缩节胺应用剂量对棉花农艺和经济性状的影响. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32: 327-330.
Han H Y, Du M W, Wang F Y, Chen B, Tian X L. Effects of DPC+ Application dose on agronomic and economic traits of cotton in northern Xinjiang. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2019, 32: 327-330. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] 廖宝鹏, 任晓明, 杜明伟, Egrinya Eneji A, 徐东永, 田晓莉, 李召虎. 缩节胺系统化控促进棉花产量器官发育的研究. 见:第十九届中国作物学会学术年会论文摘要集, 2020. p 321.
Liao B P, Ren X M, Du M W, Egrinya Eneji A, Xu Y D, Tian X L, Li Z H. Study on promoting the development of yield organs of cotton by systematic and chemical control of ketamine. In:Proceedings of 19th Annual Academic Conference of the Crop Science Society of China, 2020. p 321. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26] 徐新霞, 苏丽丽, 魏鑫, 刘翠, 张巨松. DPC对杂交棉生长发育调控效应研究. 新疆农业科学, 2015, 52: 1237-1242.
Xu X X, Su L L, Wei X, Liu C, Zhang J S. Regulating effect of DPC on hybrid cotton growing development. Xinjiang Agric Sci, 2015, 52: 1237-1242. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27] 石治鹏, 李敏, 林忠旭, 李晓方, 李定国. 缩节胺对棉花生长发育的调控效应研究进展. 河南农业科学, 2017, 46(7): 1-8.
Shi Z P, Li M, Lin Z X, Li X F, Li D G. Research progress on regulating effect of DPC on cotton growth and development. J Henan Agric Sci, 2017, 46(7): 1-8. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 孙智超, 张吉旺. 弱光胁迫影响玉米产量形成的生理机制及调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(1): 12-23.
[2] 柯会锋, 张震, 谷淇深, 赵艳, 李培育, 张冬梅, 崔彦茹, 王省芬, 吴立强, 张桂寅, 马峙英, 孙正文. 低磷胁迫下陆地棉苗期根生物量相关性状全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(9): 2168-2179.
[3] 李名江, 雷建峰, 祖丽皮耶•托合尼亚孜, 代培红, 刘超, 刘晓东. 棉花GhIQM1基因克隆及抗黄萎病功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(9): 2265-2273.
[4] 郭瑶, 柴强, 殷文, 范虹. 玉米密植光合生理机制及应用途径研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(8): 1871-1883.
[5] 郭家鑫, 鲁晓宇, 陶一凡, 郭慧娟, 闵伟. 棉花在盐碱胁迫下代谢产物及通路的分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(8): 2100-2114.
[6] 荐红举, 张梅花, 尚丽娜, 王季春, 胡柏耿, 吕典秋. 利用WGCNA筛选马铃薯块茎发育候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(7): 1658-1668.
[7] 祝令晓, 宋世佳, 李浩然, 孙红春, 张永江, 白志英, 张科, 李安昌, 刘连涛, 李存东. 基于耐低氮综合指数的棉花苗期耐低氮品种筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(7): 1800-1812.
[8] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[9] 周静远, 孔祥强, 张艳军, 李雪源, 张冬梅, 董合忠. 基于种子萌发出苗过程中弯钩建成和下胚轴生长的棉花出苗壮苗机制与技术[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1051-1058.
[10] 孙思敏, 韩贝, 陈林, 孙伟男, 张献龙, 杨细燕. 棉花苗期根系分型及根系性状的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1081-1090.
[11] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[12] 郑曙峰, 刘小玲, 王维, 徐道青, 阚画春, 陈敏, 李淑英. 论两熟制棉花绿色化轻简化机械化栽培[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 541-552.
[13] 张艳波, 王袁, 冯甘雨, 段慧蓉, 刘海英. 棉籽油分和3种主要脂肪酸含量QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 380-395.
[14] 张特, 王蜜蜂, 赵强. 滴施缩节胺与氮肥对棉花生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 396-409.
[15] 梁曦彤, 高先原, 周琳, 穆春, 杜明伟, 李芳军, 田晓莉, 李召虎. 利用病毒诱导的基因沉默cDNA文库高通量筛选鉴定棉花功能基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(12): 2967-2977.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2