欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (8): 2100-2114.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.14110

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

棉花在盐碱胁迫下代谢产物及通路的分析

郭家鑫(), 鲁晓宇, 陶一凡, 郭慧娟, 闵伟*()   

  1. 石河子大学农学院, 新疆石河子 832003
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-23 接受日期:2021-10-30 出版日期:2022-08-12 网络出版日期:2021-12-21
  • 通讯作者: 闵伟
  • 作者简介:E-mail: gjx19960323@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    兵团中青年科技创新领军人才计划项目(2020CB020);农业农村部西北绿洲农业环境重点实验室开放基金项目(XBLZ-20214)

Analysis of metabolites and pathways in cotton under salt and alkali stresses

GUO Jia-Xin(), LU Xiao-Yu, TAO Yi-Fan, GUO Hui-Juan, MIN Wei*()   

  1. Agricultural College, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2021-06-23 Accepted:2021-10-30 Published:2022-08-12 Published online:2021-12-21
  • Contact: MIN Wei
  • Supported by:
    Program of Youth Science and Technology Innovation Leader of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps(2020CB020);Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Northwest Oasis Agro-Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs(XBLZ-20214)

RichHTML

29

PDF

1057

摘要：

阐明植物盐碱胁迫下的代谢机制将有助于进一步优化育种和栽培, 从而提高盐碱地作物产量。本研究采用液相色谱-质谱(LC-MS), 对中性盐和碱性盐胁迫下棉花叶片代谢产物进行研究, 分析棉花在盐碱胁迫下的代谢差异。结果显示, 盐胁迫下棉花叶片中糖类在正负离子模式下分别有7种和2种上调, 氨基酸类各有3种上调, 有机酸类分别有12种和8种上调; 碱胁迫下棉花叶片中的糖类分别有3种和5种上调, 有机酸类分别有2种和9种上调, 氨基酸类各有2种上调。盐胁迫下发现10条差异代谢通路, 变化最明显的代谢通路是亚油酸代谢, 其次是淀粉和蔗糖代谢与精氨酸生物合成; 碱胁迫下发现5条差异代谢通路, 变化最明显的代谢通路是色氨酸代谢, 其次是精氨酸和脯氨酸代谢与柠檬酸循环(TCA循环)。棉花采取不同的代谢机制抵抗盐碱胁迫, 盐胁迫更倾向于积累糖类, 碱胁迫更倾向于积累有机酸; 在能量代谢方面, 盐胁迫下棉花淀粉和蔗糖代谢更加活跃, 碱胁迫下TCA循环更加活跃; 盐胁迫提高了棉花氮素同化能力, 碱胁迫降低了氮的同化能力。

关键词: 棉花, 盐胁迫, 碱胁迫, 代谢组, TCA循环, 有机酸

Abstract:

Elucidating the metabolic mechanism of plants under saline-alkali stress will help to further optimize breeding and cultivation, thereby increasing crop yields in saline-alkali soils. In this study, to analyze the differences in cotton metabolism under salt-alkali stress, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was used to study the metabolites of cotton leaves under neutral salt and alkaline salt stress. The results showed that under salt stress, 7 and 2 types of sugars in cotton leaves were up-regulated in positive and negative ion modes, 3 types of amino acids were up-regulated, and 12 and 8 types of organic acids were up-regulated in cotton leaves under alkali stress. There are three kinds and five kinds of up-regulation in sugars, two kinds and nine kinds of up-regulation in organic acids, and two kinds of up-regulation in amino acids. 10 differential metabolic pathways were detected under salt stress. The most obvious metabolic pathway was linoleic acid metabolism, followed by starch and sucrose metabolism and arginine biosynthesis. Five differential metabolic pathways were found under alkaline stress. The most significant metabolic pathway was tryptophan metabolism, followed by arginine and proline metabolism and citric acid cycle (TCA cycle). Cotton adopts different metabolic mechanisms to resist salt-alkali stress. Salt stress tended to accumulate sugars and alkali stress tended to accumulate organic acids. In terms of energy metabolism, cotton starch and sucrose metabolism was more active under salt stress, and TCA cycle was more active under alkali stress. Salt stress improves the nitrogen assimilation ability of cotton, and alkali stress reduces the nitrogen assimilation ability.

Key words: cotton, salt stress, alkali stress, metabolomics, TCA cycle, organic acids

表1

不同处理土壤盐碱类型及盐碱化程度"

处理
Treatment		 盐碱类型及盐碱化程度
Saline and alkaline		 含盐量
Salt content (g kg-1)		 电导率
EC1:5 (dS m-1)		 pH
(1:2.5)
CK 对照-非盐(碱)化 Control-non salting (alkalization) 0.53 0.17 8.16
CS NaCl-中度盐化 NaCl-moderate salinization 4.43 1.39 8.43
AS Na2CO3+NaHCO3-中度碱化 Na2CO3+NaHCO3-moderate alkalization 2.03 0.63 9.92

图1

盐碱胁迫下棉花各器官干物质质量叶(a)、茎(b)、根(c)和总生物量(d) 柱上不同小写字母表示不同处理在0.05水平差异显著。"

图2

盐碱胁迫对棉花叶片相对电导率和丙二醛含量的影响 柱上不同小写字母表示不同处理在0.05水平差异显著。"

图3

盐碱胁迫下主成分分析 a: 正离子模式; b: 负离子模式。"

图4

CS组对CK组的差异代谢物筛选火山图 a: 正离子模式; b: 负离子模式。散点大小代表OPLS-DA模型的VIP值, 散点越大VIP值越大。显著上调的代谢物以红色表示, 显著下调的代谢物以蓝色表示, 非显著差异的代谢物为灰色。"

图5

AS组对CK组的差异代谢物筛选火山图(a) POS (b) NEG a: 正离子模式; b: 负离子模式。散点大小代表OPLS-DA模型的VIP值, 散点越大VIP值越大。显著上调的代谢物以红色表示, 显著下调的代谢物以蓝色表示, 非显著差异的代谢物为灰色。"

图6

正离子模式下CS组对CK组的差异代谢物分析 a: 层次聚类热图分析; b: 差异代谢物分类图; c: 差异代谢物VIP得分图。"

图7

负离子模式下CS组对CK组的差异代谢物分析 a: 层次聚类热图分析; b: 差异代谢物分类图; c: 差异代谢物VIP得分图。"

图8

正离子模式下AS组对CK组的差异代谢物分析 a: 层次聚类热图分析; b: 差异代谢物分类图; c: 差异代谢物VIP得分图。"

图9

负离子模式下AS组对CK组的差异代谢物分析 a: 层次聚类热图分析; b: 差异代谢物分类图; c: 差异代谢物VIP得分图。"

图10

CS组对CK组的通路分析图 每个圆圈代表一个代谢途径, 颜色表示差异性大小, 颜色越深表示差异性越显著, 颜色越浅表示差异性越不显著。圆圈的大小表示影响值, 圆圈越大影响值越大, 圆圈越小影响值越小。1: 亚油酸代谢; 2: 淀粉和蔗糖代谢; 3: 精氨酸生物合成; 4: 半乳糖代谢; 5: 精氨酸和脯氨酸代谢; 6: 乙醛酸和二羧酸代谢; 7: 丙酮酸代谢; 8: 二苯乙烯类、二芳基庚类和姜辣素生物合成; 9: 苯丙酸生物合成; 10: 萜类主链生物合成。"

图11

AS组对CK组的通路分析图 每个圆圈代表一个代谢途径, 颜色表示差异性大小, 颜色越深表示差异性越显著, 颜色越浅表示差异性越不显著。圆圈的大小表示影响值, 圆圈越大影响值越大, 圆圈越小影响值越小。1: 色氨酸代谢; 2: 精氨酸和脯氨酸代谢; 3: 柠檬酸循环(TCA循环); 4: 泛酸和辅酶A生物合成; 5: 乙醛酸和二羧酸代谢。"

[1] Yamaguchi T, Blumwald E. Developing salt-tolerant crop plants: challenges and opportunities. Trends Plant Sci, 2005, 1012: 615-620.
[2] Ge Y, Li Y, Lv D K, Bai X, Ji W, Cai H, Wang A X, Zhu Y M. Alkaline-stress response in Glycine soja leaf identifies specific transcription factors and ABA-mediated signaling factors. Funct Integr Genomic, 2011, 11: 369-379.
doi: 10.1007/s10142-010-0191-2
[3] Wang G, Zhu Q G, Meng Q W, Wu C G. Transcript profiling during salt stress of young cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) seedlings via solexa sequencing. Acta Physiol Plant, 2012, 34: 107-115.
doi: 10.1007/s11738-011-0809-6
[4] 廖欢, 侯振安. 盐碱胁迫对不同棉花品种生长及离子组含量分布的影响. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57: 219-232.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2020.02.003
Liao H, Hou Z A. Effects of salt-alkali stress on the growth and ion group content distribution of different cotton varieties. Xinjiang Agric Sci, 2020, 57: 219-232. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] Li Y Y, Zhao K, Ren J H, Ding Y L, Wu L L, Catherine O. Analysis of the dielectric constant of saline-alkali soils and the effect on radar backscattering coefficient: a case study of soda alkaline saline soils in western Jilin province using RADARSAT2 data. Sci World J, 2014, 56: 30-45.
[6] Ashraf J, Zou D Y, Wang D Y, Malik W, Zhang Y P, Abid M A, Cheng H L, Yang Q H, Song G L. Recent insights into cotton functional genomics: progress and future perspectives. Plant Biotechnol J, 2018, 16: 699-713.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.12856
[7] Harris M A. Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Sci, 2003, 166: 3-16.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.10.024
[8] Ghoulam C, Foursy A, Fares K. Effects of salt stress on growth, inorganic ions and proline accumulation in relation to osmotic adjustment in five sugar et cultivars. Environ Exp Bot, 2002, 47: 39-50.
doi: 10.1016/S0098-8472(01)00109-5
[9] de Lacerda C F, Cambraia J, Oliva M A, Ruiz H A, Prisco J T. Solute accumulation and distribution during shoot and leaf development in two sorghum genotypes under salt stress. Environ Exp Bot, 2003, 49: 107-120.
doi: 10.1016/S0098-8472(02)00064-3
[10] Munns R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ, 2002, 25: 239-250.
doi: 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x
[11] Yang C, Xu H H, Wang L, Liu J, Shi D C, Wang D L. Comparative effects of salt-stress and alkaline-stress on the growth, photosynthesis, solute accumulation, and ion balance of barley plants. Photosynthetica, 2009, 47: 79-86.
doi: 10.1007/s11099-009-0013-8
[12] Gill S S, Tuteja N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2010, 48: 909-930.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016
[13] Ahmad P, Jaleel C A, Salem M A, Nabi G, Sharma S. Roles of enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants in pants during abiotic stress. Crit Rev Biotechnol, 2010, 30: 161-175.
doi: 10.3109/07388550903524243
[14] Ashraf M, Foolad M R. Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ Exp Bot, 2007, 592: 206-216.
[15] Li H W, Zang B S, Deng X W, Wang X P. Overexpression of the trehalose-6-phosphate synthase gene OsTPS1 enhances abiotic stress tolerance in rice. Planta, 2011, 234: 1007-1018.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-011-1458-0
[16] Leshem Y, Melamed B N, Cagnac O, Ronen G, Levine A. Suppression of Arabidopsis vesicle-SNARE expression inhibited fusion of H2O2 containing vesicles with tonoplast and increased salt tolerance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006, 103: 18008-18013.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604421103
[17] Bino R J, Hall R D, Fiehn O, Kopka J, Saito K, Draper J, Nikolau B J, Mendes P, Roessner-Tunali U, Beale M H. Potential of metabolomics as a functional genomics tool. Trends Plant Sci, 2004, 9: 418-425.
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.07.004
[18] Munns R, Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2008, 59: 651-681.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 pmid: 18444910
[19] Ma S Q, Lyu L, Meng C, Zhang C S, Li Y Q. Integrative analysis of the and transcriptome of sorghum bicolor reveals dynamic changes in flavonoids accumulation under saline-alkali stress. J Agric Food Chem, 2020, 68: 14781-14789.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c06249
[20] Gui G, Lyu C H, Stevanato P, Li R, Liu H, Yu L, Wang Y. Transcriptome analysis of salt-sensitive and tolerant genotypes reveals salt-tolerance metabolic pathways in sugar beet. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20: 5910-5928.
doi: 10.3390/ijms20235910
[21] Guo R, Shi L X, Yan C R, Zhong X, Gu F X, Liu Q, Xia X, Li H. Ionomic and metabolic responses to neutral salt or alkaline salt stresses in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. BMC Plant Biol, 2017, 17: 41-53.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-017-0994-6
[22] Guo R, Yang Z Z, Li F, Yan C R, Zhong X L, Liu Q, Xia X, Li H R, Zhao L. Comparative metabolic responses and adaptive strategies of wheat (Triticum aestivum) to salt and alkali stress. BMC Plant Biol, 2015, 15: 170-182.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0546-x
[23] Ampofo-Asiama J, Baiye V M M, Hertog M L A T M, Waelkens E, Geeraerd A H, Nicolai B M. The metabolic response of cultured tomato cells to low oxygen stress. Plant Biol, 2014, 16: 594-606.
doi: 10.1111/plb.12094
[24] Kim J K, Bamba T, Harada K, Fukusaki E, Kobayashi A. Time-coursemetabolic profiling in Arabidopsis thaliana cell cultures after salt stress treatment. J Exp Bot, 2006, 58: 415-424.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erl216
[25] Rizhsky L, Liang H J, Shuman J, Shulaev V, Davletova S. When defense pathways collide the response of Arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress. Plant Physiol, 2004, 134: 1683-1696.
doi: 10.1104/pp.103.033431
[26] Hodges D M, Delong J M, Prange F R K. Improving the thiobarbituric acid-reactive-substances assay for estimating lipid peroxidation in plant tissues containing anthocyanin and other interfering compounds. Planta, 1999, 207: 604-611.
doi: 10.1007/s004250050524
[27] Abbas G, Saqib M, Akhtar J, Haq M A U. Interactive effects of salinity and iron deficiency on different rice genotypes. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci, 2015, 178: 306-311.
doi: 10.1002/jpln.201400358
[28] Yang C, Chong J, Li C, Kim C, Shi D, Wang D. Osmotic adjustment and ion balance traits of an alkali resistant halophyte Kochia sieversiana during adaptation to salt and alkali conditions. Plant Soil, 2007, 294: 263-276.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9251-3
[29] Lokhande V H, Nikam T D, Patade V Y, Ahire M L, Suprasanna P. Efects of optimal and supra-optimal salinity stress on antioxidative defense, osmolytes and in vitro growth responses in Sesuvium portulacastrum L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult, 2011, 104: 41-49.
doi: 10.1007/s11240-010-9802-9
[30] 孙叶烁, 张国新, 丁守鹏, 姚玉涛, 丁冯洁. 盐胁迫对樱桃番茄风味品质的影响. 核农学报, 2022, 36: 838-844.
Sun Y S, Zhang G X, Ding S P, Yao Y T, Ding F J. Effects of salt stress on flavor compounds of cherry tomato fruits. J Nucl Agric Sci, 2022, 36: 838-844. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31] Hare P D, Cress W A, Staden J V. Dissecting the roles of osmolyte accumulation during stress. Plant Cell Environ, 1998, 21: 535-553.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1998.00309.x
[32] Liu X, Yang C, Zhang L, Li L, Liu S, Yu J, You L, Zhou D, Xia C, Zhao J. Metabolic profiling of cadmium-induced effects in one pioneer intertidal halophyte Suaeda salsa by NMR-based metabolomics. Ecotoxicology, 2011, 20: 1422-1431.
doi: 10.1007/s10646-011-0699-9
[33] Gagneul D, Aïnouche A, Duhaze C. A reassessment of the function of the so-called compatible solutes in the halophytic Plumbaginaceae Limonium latifolium. Plant Physiol, 2007, 144: 1598-1611.
pmid: 17468212
[34] Brosché M, Vinocur B, Alatalo E R, Lamminmäki A, Teichmann T, Ottow E A, Djilianov D, Afif D, Bogeat-Triboulot M B, Altman A, Polle A, Dreyer E, Rudd S, Paulin L, Auvinen P, Kangasjärvi J. Gene expression and metabolite profiling of Populus euphratica growing in the Negev desert. Genome Biol, 2005, 6: 681-689.
[35] Slama I, Abdelly C, Bouchereau A, Flowers T, Savouré A. Diversity, distribution and roles of osmoprotective compounds accumulated in halophytes under abiotic stress. Ann Bot, 2015, 115: 433-447.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu239
[36] Hasegawa P M, Bressan R A, Zhu J K, Bohnert H J. Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 2000, 51: 463-499.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.51.1.463
[37] Flowers T J, Colmer T D. Plant salt tolerance: adaptations in halophytes. Ann Bot, 2015, 115: 327-331.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu267
[38] Wang Y, Stevanato P, Yu L, Zhao H J, Sun X W, Sun F, Li J, Geng G. The physiological and metabolic changes in sugar beet seedlings under different levels of salt stress. J Plant Res, 2017, 1306: 1079-1093.
[39] Fougère F, Rudulier D L, Streeter J G. Effects of salt stress on amino acid, organic acid, and carbohydrate composition of roots, Bacteroids, and cytosol of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plant Physiol, 1991, 964: 1228-1236.
[40] Kaplan F, Kopka J, Haskell D W, Wei Z, Schiller K C, Gatzke N, Sun D Y, Charles L G. Exploring the temperature-stress metabolome of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol, 2004, 1364: 4159-4168.
[41] Rosa M, Prado C, Podazza G, Interdonato R, Pardo F E. Soluble sugars-metabolism, sensing and abiotic stress: a complex network in the life of plants. Plant Signal Behav, 2009, 4: 383-393.
[42] Yang Y. Guo Y. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant saltstress responses. New Phytol, 2018, 217: 523-539.
doi: 10.1111/nph.14920
[43] Singh M, Kumar J, Singh S, Singh V P, Prasad S M. Roles of osmoprotectants in improving salinity and drought tolerance in plants: a review. Rev Environ Sci Bio/Technol, 2015, 14: 407-426.
doi: 10.1007/s11157-015-9372-8
[44] Wang L, Li G, Wei S, Li L, Li J. Effects of exogenous glucose and sucrose on photosynthesis in triticale seedlings under salt stress. Photosynthetica, 2019, 571: 286-294.
[45] Less H, Galili G. Principal transcriptional programs regulating plant amino acid metabolism in response to abiotic stresses. Plant Physiol, 2008, 147: 316-330.
[46] Forde B G, Lea P J. Glutamate in plants: metabolism, regulation, and signaling. J Exp Bot, 2007, 58: 2339-2358.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm121
[47] Kirma M, Araujo W L, Fernie A R, Galili G. The multifaceted role of aspartate-family amino acids in plant metabolism. J Exp Bot, 2012, 63: 4995-5001.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers119
[48] Wang H, Ahan J, Wu Z H, Shi D C, Liu B, Yang C W. Alteration of nitrogen metabolism in rice variety ‘Nipponbare' induced by alkali stress. Plant Soil, 2012; 355: 131-147.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-1086-2
[49] Crawford N M, Glass A D M. Molecular and physiological aspects of nitrate uptake in plants. Trends Plant Sci, 1998, 3: 389-395.
doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01311-9
[50] Yang C, Chong J, Li C, Kim C, Shi D, Wang D. Osmotic adjustment and ion balance traits of an alkaline resistant halophyte Kochia sieversiana during adaptation to saline and alkaline conditions. Plant Soil, 2007, 294: 263-276.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9251-3
[51] Yang C W, Xu H H, Wang L L, Liu J, Shi D C, Wang D L. Comparative effects of salt stress and alkaline-stress on the growth, photosynthesis, solute accumulation, and ion balance of barley plants. Photosynthetica, 2009, 47: 79-86.
doi: 10.1007/s11099-009-0013-8
[52] Ma B, Chen J, Zheng H Y, Fang T, Ogutu C, Li S H, Han Y P, Wu B H. Comparative assessment of sugar and malic acid composition in cultivated and wild apples. Food Chem, 2015, 172: 86-91.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.032
[53] Chen W C, Cui P J, Sun H Y, Guo W Q, Yang C W, Jin H, Fang B, Shi D C. Comparative effects of salt and alkali stresses on organic acid accumulation and ionic balance of seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.). Ind Crops Prod, 2009, 30: 351-358.
doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.06.007
[54] Fu H J, Yu H Y, Li T X, Wu Y. Effect of cadmium stress on inorganic and organic components in xylem sap of high cadmium accumulating rice line (Oryza sativa L.). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2019, 168: 330-337.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.10.023
[55] Zhou L, Yu J, Yan P, Huang B. Metabolic pathways regulated by abscisic acid, salicylic acid and γ-aminobutyric acid in association with improved drought tolerance in creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera). Physiol Plant, 2017, 159: 42-58.
doi: 10.1111/ppl.12483 pmid: 27507681
[56] Baron K, Stasolla C. The role of polyamines during in vivo and in vitro development. In Vitro Cell Deve Biol Plant, 2008, 44: 384-395.
[57] Bueno M, Cordovilla M P. Polyamines in Halophytes. Front Recent Dev Plant Sci, 2019, 10: 439-445.
[58] 辛正琦, 代欢欢, 辛余凤, 何潇, 谢海艳, 吴能表. 盐胁迫下外源2,4-表油菜素内酯对颠茄氮代谢及TAs代谢的影响. 作物学报, 2021, 47: 2001-2011.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.04238
Xin Z Q, Dai H H, Xin Y F, He X, Xie H Y, Wu N B. Effects of exogenous 2,4-Epibrassinolide on nitrogen metabolism and TAs metabolism of Atropa belladonna L. under NaCl stress. Acta Agron Sin, 2021, 47: 2001-2011. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 王亚, 赵宜婷, 王宙, 杨俊芳, 张宏斌, 曹越. 转录组-代谢组联合分析蓖麻蜡质合成相关基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1774-1787.
[2] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[3] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[4] 张曦, 王广恩, 李邵琦, 刘祎, 李俊兰, 钱玉源. 基于转录组测序解析陆海杂交姊妹系马克隆值差异的形成机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1442-1458.
[5] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[6] 宋裕祯, Bheel Chander Kumar, 王跃, 张颖星, 郭娟, Khound Rituraj, Santra Dipak Kumar, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. 糜子AP2亚家族全基因组鉴定及PmAP2-1和PmAP2-9耐盐功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1127-1139.
[7] 郭颖, 张大效, 陈美霖, 陈冠宇, 刘建民, 杨晓虹, 韩冰. 野生燕麦和栽培燕麦的代谢组学分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 945-956.
[8] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[9] 周琦翔, 朱艳, 汪楚博, 朱柏林, 李俊博, 宋利兵. 基于DSSAT模型模拟气候变化对新疆棉花物候期及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 590-602.
[10] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[11] 刘吉昌, 李思烨, 李雪婷, 王洪章, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 任昊. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐型夏玉米品种根系生长及养分吸收效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 565-577.
[12] 蒋环琪, 段奥, 郭超, 黄晓梦, 艾德骏, 刘小雪, 谭静怡, 彭成林, 李曼菲, 杜何为. 渍水胁迫对玉米幼苗根系代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2295-2306.
[13] 孔德真, 桑伟, 聂迎彬, 李伟, 徐红军, 李江博, 刘鹏鹏, 田笑明. 小麦AL型细胞质雄性不育系与同型保持系穗花发育时期代谢物变化比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2454-2466.
[14] 郭栋财, 吕涛, 蔡永生, 买吾鲁达·艾合买提, 全家, 曲延英, 郑凯. 棉花纤维品质相关性状QTL元分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1445-1466.
[15] 王亚雯, 戚正阳, 尤佳琦, 聂新辉, 曹娟, 杨细燕, 涂礼莉, 张献龙, 王茂军. 棉花60K功能位点基因芯片的制备及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1178-1188.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2