Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agron Sin ›› 2017, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11): 1696-1704.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.01696

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION · PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Activity and Physico Chemical Properties of Trypsin Inhibitor in Bruchid-Resistant Mung Bean

FAN Yan-Ping1,ZHANG Yao-Wen2,ZHAO Xue-Ying2,ZHANG Xian-Hong1,*   

  1. 1College of Agriculture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, China; 2Institute of Crop Science, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Taiyuan 030000, China
  • Received:2016-12-18 Revised:2017-07-23 Online:2017-11-12 Published:2017-08-10
  • Contact: 张仙红, E-mail: zxh6288@sina.com E-mail:ndxxxy@126.com
  • Supported by:

    The study was supported by the China Agriculture Research System (GARS-08-G11).

Abstract:

Taking bruchid-resistant mung bean lines including B18, B20, B24, and A22 as experimental materials, a susceptible variety mung bean Jinlyu 1 as control, the activity of trypsin inhibitor and the stability of mung bean trypsin inhibitor under high temperature, pH and ultrasonic were measured. The trypsin inhibitor activities of four bruchid-resistant mung bean lines were significantly higher than those of control (Jinlyu 1). There were significant differences of trypsin inhibitor activity between four bruchid-resistant mung bean lines and the control at the 1% probability level. Among them, B18 had the highest activity (70.2 TI U g–1), following by B20 and A22, and B24 had the lowest one (55.2 TI U g–1). When treated with temperature, pH and amplitude of ultrasonic, the residual activities of trypsin inhibitor from the four bruchid-resistant mung bean lines were higher than those of control. The residual activities decreased with the increase of temperature and time of warm bath, which enhanced initially and then weakened when pH value was elevating between 2–12, with the highest when pH ranged from six to eight. The residual activities also reduced with the increasing ultrasonic intensity and treatment time. Among the four tested lines, B18 had the highest tolerance to high temperature, high acid and alkali stress, and ultrasonic intensity; B20 had the moderate tolerance, B24 had the lowest tolerance to high temperature, acid and alkali stress, while A22 had the lowest tolerance to ultrasonic treatment. We concluded that among four lines, B18 and B20 have the highest residual activity of bruchid-resistant mung bean trypsin inhibitor under temperature, pH and ultrasonic treatments, being of higher value of its application.

Key words: Bruchid-resistant mung bean, Trypsin inhibitor, Activity, Temperature, pH, Ultrasonic

[1] 廖海, 杜林方, 周嘉裕. 植物中蛋白类蛋白酶抑制剂的研究进展. 天然产物研究与开发, 2002, 14(1): 80–84
Liao H, Du L F, Zhou J Y. Research progress of protein protease inhibitors in plants. Nat Prod Res Dev, 2002, 14(1): 80–84 (in Chinese)
[2] 万善霞, 王婉婉, 滑静, 张淑平. 胰蛋白酶抑制剂在不同领域的研究概况. 北京农学院学报, 2003, 18: 152–155
Wan S X, Wang W W, Hua J, Zhang S P. Research status of trypsin inhibitor in different fields. J Beijing Agric Coll, 2003, 18: 152–155 ( in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] 罗玉娇, 李滨, 舒衡平, 蒋立平. Kunitz型胰蛋白酶抑制剂的研究进展. 中国生化药物杂志, 2012, 33: 316–319
Luo Y J, Li B, Shu H P, Jiang L P. Research advances in Kunitz trypsin inhibitor. Chin J Biochem Pharm, 2012, 33: 316–319 ( in Chinese)
[4] 吴国昭, 朱克岩, 曾任森. 大豆胰蛋白酶抑制剂对斜纹夜蛾生长发育的影响. 生态环境学报, 2013, 22: 1335–1340
Wu G Z, Zhu K Y, Zeng R S. Effect of soybean trypsin inhibitor on the growth and development of Spodoptera litura. Ecol Environl Sci, 2013, 22: 1335–1340 (in Chinese)
[5] 王荣春, 孙建华, 何述栋, 马莺. 胰蛋白酶抑制剂的结构与功能研究进展. 食品科学, 2013, 34(9): 364–368
Wang R C, Sun J H, He S D, Ma Y. Recent advance in research on the structure and function of trypsin inhibitor. Food Sci, 2013, 34(9): 364–368 ( in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] Oliveira A S, Migliolo L, Aquino R O, Ribeiro J K C, Macedo L L P, Andrade L B, Bemquerer M P, Santos E A, Kiyota S, Sales M P. Purification and characterization of a trypsin-papain inhibitor from Pithecelobium dumosum seeds and its vitro effects towards digestive enzymes from insect pest. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2007, 45: 858–865
[7] 刘大伟, 陈立杰, 段玉玺. 灰皮支黑豆胰蛋白酶抑制剂基因的克隆及其在胞囊线虫胁迫下的表达分析. 河南农业科学, 2016, 39(4): 94–97
Liu D W, Chen L J, Duan Y X. Cloning of soybean Kunitz trypsin inhibitor gene from huipizhiheidou and expression analysis in soybean infected by Heterodera glycines. J Henan Agric Sci, 2016, 39(4): 94–97 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] Ye X Y, Ng T B, Rao P F. A Bowman-Birk-type trypsin-chymotrypsin inhibitor from broad beans. Bichem Biophys Res Commun, 2001, 289: 91–96
[9] Evandro F F, Wong J H, Ng T B. Thermostable Kunitz trypsin inhibitor with cytokine inducing, antitumor and HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitory activities from Korean large black soybeans. J Biosci Bioeng, 2010, 109: 211–217
[10] 王长良, 张永忠, 孙志刚. Bowman-Birk型大豆胰蛋白酶抑制剂研究进展. 大豆科学, 2007, 26: 757–761
Wang C L, Zhang Y Z, Sun Z G. Progress on the research of Bowman-Birk soybean trypsin inhibitor. Soybean Sci, 2007, 26: 757–761 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] Kobayashi H, Suzuki M, Kanayama N, Terao T. A soybean Kunitz trypsin inhibitor suppresses ovarian cancer cell invasion by blocking urokinase upregulation. Clin Exp Metastas, 2004, 21: 159–166
[12] 张少娟, 薛晓鸥, 刘同祥, 艾浩, 牛建昭. 大豆胰蛋白酶抑制剂对人宫颈癌Hela细胞增殖的影响. 辽宁医学院学报, 2008, 29: 106–109
Zhang S J, Xue X O, Liu T X, Ai H, Niu J Z. The effect of soybean typsin inhibitor on Proliferation of Human Hela Cells. J Liaoning Med Univ, 2008, 29: 106–109 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] Ho V S M, Ng T B. A Bowman-Birk trypsin inhibitor with antiproliferative activity from Hokkaido large black soybeans. J Pept Sci, 2008, 14: 278–282
[14] 吴燕子. 重组荞麦胰蛋白酶抑制剂对乳腺癌细胞MCF-7作用的研究. 山西大学硕士学位论文, 山西太原, 2015
Wu Y Z. Study on Effects of Recombinant Buckwheat Trypsin Inhibitor in Breast Cancer Cell Lines MCF-7. MS Thesis of Shanxi University, Shanxi, China, 2015 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 白崇智, 李玉英, 李芳, 张政, 王转花. 重组荞麦胰蛋白酶抑制剂诱导肝癌细胞H22凋亡的作用及其机制. 细胞生物学杂志, 2009, 31: 79–83
Bai C Z, Li Y Y, Li F, Zhang Z, Wang Z H. Effect of recombinant buckwheat trypsin inhibitor on apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma cell line H22 and its mechanism. Chin J Cell Biol, 2009, 31: 79–83 (in Chinese)
[16] 李娇, 崔晓东, 马晓丽, 王转花. 重组荞麦胰蛋白酶抑制剂延长C. elegans寿命的作用机制. 中国生物化学与分子生物学报, 2016, 32: 1112–1120
Li J, Cui X D, Ma X L, Wang Z H. Mechanism underlying prolongevity induced by rBTI in Caenorhabditis elegans. Chin J Biochem Mol Biol, 2016, 32: 1112–1120 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17] Sagili R R, Pankiw T, Zhu-Salzman K. Effects of soybean trypsin inhibitor on hypopharyngeal gland protein content, total midgut protease activity and survival of the honey bee(Apis mellifera L.). J Insect Physiol, 2005, 51: 953–957
[18] Zeng R S, Su Y J, Ye M, Xie L J, Chen M, Song Y Y. Plant induced defense and biochemical mechanisms. J South China Agric Univ, 2008, 29: 1–6
[19] Zeng R S, Niu G, Wen Z, Schuler M A, Berenbaum M R. Allelochemical induction of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases and amelioration of xenobiotic toxicity in Helicoverpa zea. J Chem Ecol, 2007, 33: 449–461
[20] 戚正武, 任梅轩, 屈贤铭, 罗珊珊, 周元聪, 王克夷, 曹天钦. 绿豆胰蛋白酶抑制剂化学与物化特征及其与活力的关系. 中国生理科学会学术会议论文, 北京, 1964. pp 43–44
Qi Z W, Ren M X, Qu X M, Luo S S, Zhou Y C, Wang K Y, Cao T Q. Characterization of chemical and physicochemical properties of mung bean trypsin inhibitor and its relationship with viability. In: Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Physiological Sciences, Beijing, China, 1964. pp 43–44 (in Chinese)
[21] 屈贤铭, 罗珊珊, 任梅轩, 戚正武; 曹天钦. 绿豆胰蛋白酶抑制剂的研究: Ⅱ. 抑制剂A、B组份的关系及其化学结构的特征. 生物化学与生物物理学报, 1964, 4: 588–597
Qu X M, Luo S S, Ren M X, Qi Z W, Cao T Q. Studies on inhibitors of mung bean trypsin: II. The relationship between inhibitors, A, B components and their chemical structure characteristics. Acta Biochim Biophysi Sin, 1964, 4: 588–597 (in Chinese)
[22] 谭复隆, 戚正武. 绿豆胰蛋白酶抑制剂两活性区域的拆分. 生理科学, 1982, 2(5): 13
Tan F L, Qi Z W. Resolution of two active region of mung bean trypsin inhibitor. Physiol Sci, 1982, 2(5): 13 (in Chinese)
[23] 曲梅, 韩锦铂, 孟延发. 绿豆胰蛋白酶抑制剂对蛋白质前体加工酶的抑制活性. 第二军医大学学报, 2006, 27: 258–262
Qu M, Han J B, Meng Y F. Inhibitory activity of mung bean trypsin inhibitor on protein precursor processing enzymes. Acad J Second Mil Med Univ, 2006, 27: 258–262 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] 赵现明. 豆类胰蛋白酶抑制剂的提取分离及纯化. 哈尔滨工业大学硕士学位论文, 黑龙江哈尔滨, 2013
Zhao X M. Extraction, Isolation and Purification of Trypsin Inhibitors from Leguminosae. MS Thesis of Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, 2013 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] 邵彪, 汪少芸, 饶平凡. 黑豆胰蛋白酶抑制剂的纯化及性质研究. 中国食品学报, 2010, 10(6): 47–53
Shao B, Wang S Y, Rao P F. Studies on Purification and characterization of trypsin inhibitor from black soybean. Chin J Food Sci, 2010, 10(6): 47–53 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26] 阮景军. 苦荞麦胰蛋白酶抑制剂的分离纯化、基因克隆表达及其抗病虫害研究. 四川农业大学博士学位论文, 四川成都, 2011
Ruan J J. Study on Isolation, Purification, Gene Cloning and Expression of Trypsin Inhibitor of Tartary Buckwheat and Resistance to Diseases and Insect Pest. PhD Dissertation of Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan, China, 2011 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27] 王静, 朱庆华, 陈杰. 紫花芸豆胰蛋白酶抑制剂的分离纯化及降糖作用研究. 临床合理用药杂志, 2015, 8(9): 126–127
Wang J, Zhu Q H, Chen J. Purification and partial characterization of trypsin inhibitor from Phaseolus vulgaris. J Clinic Ration Use Drugs, 2015, 8(9): 126–127 (in Chinese)
[28] 阮景军, 唐自钟, 陈惠, 程剑平. 核桃胰蛋白酶抑制剂的纯化及抑制植物病原真菌研究. 西南农业学报, 2016, 29: 826–830
Ruan J J, Tang Z Z, Chen H, Cheng J P. Purification of trypsin inhibitor from walnut and its inhibition on plant pathogenic fungi. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2016, 29: 826–830 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29] 赵亚蕊, 李宗伟, 赵超, 付荣, 王兴华, 李卓玉. 重组绿豆胰蛋白酶抑制剂片段对肠癌细胞SW480迁移的影响. 山西大学学报, 2012, 35: 126–129
Zhao Y R, Li Z W, Zhao C, Fu R, Wang X H, Li Z Y. Effect of recombinant mung bean trypsin inhibitor fragment on the migration of SW480 in human colon cancer cells. J Shanxi Univ, 2012, 35: 126–129 (in Chinese)
[30] 王莎莎, 马岳, 李玉银, 罗深恒, 刁爱坡, 龙民慧. 绿豆胰蛋白酶抑制剂BBI诱导肺腺癌A549细胞凋亡. 华南师范大学学报, 2013, 45(3): 91–94
Wang S S, Ma Y, Li Y Y, Luo S H, Diao A P, Long M H. Apoptosis of lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells induced by mung bean trypsin inhibitor BBI. J South China Norm Univ, 2013, 45(3): 91–94 (in Chinese)
[31] Godbole S, Krishna T, Bhatia C. Purification and characterization of protease inhibitors from pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp) seeds. J Sci Food agric, 1994, 64: 87–93
[32] Huang H, Kwok K C, Liang H H. Inhibitory activity and conformation changes of soybean trypsin inhibitors induced by ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem, 2008, 15: 724–730
[33] EI-Shamei Z, WU J W, Haard N F. Influence of wound injury on accumulation of proteinase inhibitors in leaf and stem tissues of two processing tomato cultivars(L). J Food Biochm, 1996, 20(5): 155–171
[34] 江均平, 李春红, 张涛, 云冬梅, 杨雪丰. 绿豆胰蛋白酶抑制剂的含量、多型性及稳定性. 食品科学, 2013, 34(11): 32–35
Jiang J P, Li C H, Zhang T, Yun D M, Yang X F. Activity, Polymorphism and stability of trypsin inhibitor from mung Beans. Food Sci, 2013, 34(11): 32–35 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35] 赵琳琳. 大豆胰蛋白酶抑制因子对小鼠胰腺结构功能及基因表达的影响. 吉林农业大学硕士学位论文, 吉林长春, 2014
Zhao L L. The Effect of Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor on Structure and Function and Gene Expression Profile in Pancreas of Mice. MS Thesis of Jilin Agricultural University, Jilin, China, 2014 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36] 张宾. 大豆胰蛋白酶抑制剂的制备、理化性质和抗黄曲霉作用. 中国海洋大学博士学位论文, 山东青岛, 2010
Zhang B. Preparation, Purification and Properties of Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor with Anti-Aspergillus flavus Activity. PhD Dissertation of Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China, 2010 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37] 黄惠华, 粱汉华, 郭乾初. 超声波对大豆胰蛋白酶抑制剂活性及二级结构的影响. 食品科学, 2004, 25(3): 29–33
Huang H H, Liang H H, Guo Q C. Li C H, Zhang T, Yun D M, Yang X F. Different Effects of Ultrasound on Two Types of Soybean Trypsin Inhibitors in Activity and Structures. Food Sci, 食品科学, 2004, 25(3): 29–33 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38] Hilder V A, Gatehouse A M R, Sheerman S E, Barker R F, Boulter D. A novel mechanism of insect resistance engineered into tobacco. Nature, 1987, 300: 160–163
[39] 柳武革, 薛庆中. 蛋白酶抑制剂及其在抗虫基因工程中的应用. 生物技术通报, 2000, (1): 20–25
Liu W G, Xue Q Z. Proteinase inhibitors and their application in insect-resistant gene engineering. Biotechnol Inform, 2000, (1): 20–25 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[1] Liu En-Bo, Chen Jing, Li Hong-Xing, Yu Ning-Ning, Ren Bai-Zhao, Zhao Bin, Liu Peng, Zhang Ji-Wang. Shading inhibits ear and tassel development of summer maize by altering source-sink balance and regulating carbohydrate metabolism [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] Ma Xiao-Qian, Qin Na, Dai Shu-Tao, Qin Jia-Fan, Li Xiao-Yan, Wang Shu-Ting, Liu Zhong-Ling, Li Jun-Xia. Phenotypic variation analysis of 175 foxtail millet (Setaria italica) germplasm accessions under two environments [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1757-1773.
[3] Jin Yu-He, Wang Xue-Fei, Xu Zhang-Yi-Wa, Miao Yi-Ning, Jiang Yun-Jie, Yi Ying, Miao De-Lin, Zhu Jing-Yi, Zhong Yi-Fan, Chen Ming-Heng, Fang Fang, Liu Peng. Effects of exogenous hormones on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and the antioxidant enzyme system in soybean leaves under low-temperature stress [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[4] Hu Zhao, Qian Run, Xie Feng-Pu, Ying Su-Ping. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the SPX gene family in rice under phosphorus treatment [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[5] Zhang Zhen, Feng Lian-Jie, Shi Yu, Yu Zhen-Wen, Zhang Yong-Li. Yield formation of wheat with different ear types under water-saving supplementary irrigation conditions [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[6] Zhang Si-Si, Zhao Xiang-Hui, Zhou Yang, Yao Yun-Feng, Zhu Rong-Yu, Dong Yuan-Jie, Hu Guo-Qing, Xu Tong, Liu Zhao-Xin. Effects of plowing and green manure returning in winter fallow period on soil physicochemical properties and yield in continuously cropped peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[7] Ren Yi-Han, Zhao Man-Li, Dai Jing, Li Yin-Shui, Gu Chi-Ming, Yang Lu, Du Xue-Zhu, Hu Wen-Shi, Qin Lu. Effects of dynamic changes in leaf functional nitrogen on photosynthetic rate and photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency in Brassica napus [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1459-1471.
[8] Zhao Jia-Xue, Zhou Long-Hao, Guo Qi-Yuan, Shang Lun-Xiao, Wang Han, Liu Zhi-Tao, Chen Xi, Zhang Xiao-Pei, Song Xian-Liang, Ahmedov Miraziz Baltaevich, Mao Li-Li. Long-term stubble return and subsoiling enhance cotton yields in coastal saline-alkali soils by improving soil conditions and photosynthetic characteristics [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[9] Yang Yang, Chang Shi-Hui, Tian Hong-Li, Yi Hong-Mei, Wang Lu, Ren Jie, Fan Ya-Ming, Liu Ya-Wei, Wang Feng-Ge, Zhao Jiu-Ran. Genetic diversity analysis of nationally approved maize varieties in different ecological regions [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[10] Guo Xing-Yu, Hu Dan, Lin Su-Qi, Wang Meng-Kai, Tan Wen-Feng, Huang Chuan-Qin. Biochar combined with chemical fertilizer increases maize yield and soil ecosystem multifunctionality in an intercropped maize-soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[11] Zhang Hong-Rong, Wang Fei-Er, Li Pan, Qiu Hai-Long, Zhu Jing, Zhao Lian-Hao, Nan Yun-You, He Wei, Fan Zhi-Long, Hu Fa-Long, Chai Qiang, Yin Wen. Photosynthetic characteristics of 20% reduced irrigation combined with 25% organic substitution for chemical fertilizer in increasing silage maize yield [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[12] Kuai Jie, Lou Hong-Xiang, Tan Xiao-Qiang, Gao Geng-Dong, Shao Dong-Li, Xiao Sheng-Nan, Zhao Jie, Xu Zheng-Hua, Wang Jing, Wang Bo, Zhou Guang-Sheng. Physiological basis and practical strategies for enhancing rapeseed yield under direct seeding [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 982-992.
[13] Cai Hong-Wei, Yu Ai-Zhong, Jiang Ke-Qiang, Wang Peng-Fei, Wang Yu-Long, Huo Jian-Zhe, Pang Xiao-Neng, Yin Bo, Shang Yong-Pan. Key mechanisms underlying the enhancement of sweet maize yield through partial substitution of chemical fertilizers with organic manure in arid irrigation districts [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[14] Cui Xue-Mei, Liu Yan-Di, Liu Jing-Hui, Mi Jun-Zhen, Wu Jun-Ying, Zhao Bao-Ping. Study on the relationship between physiological characteristics of superior and inferior grains with yield in different oat genotypes [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[15] Xu Jian-Xia, Ding Yan-Qing, Cao Ning, Cheng Bin, Gao Xu, Li Wen-Zhen, Wang Ruo-Ruo, Wang Lei, Zhang Li-Yi. Phenotypic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of 397 sorghum germplasm resources in Guizhou, China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 1073-1087.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!