Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica，

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 676-686.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.42031

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES·MOLECULAR GENETICS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Response of osalr3 mutant to exogenous organic acids and plant growth regulators under aluminum stress

SU Chang(), MAN Fu-Yuan, WANG Jing-Bo, FENG Jing, JIANG Si-Xu, ZHAO Ming-Hui()   

  1. Rice Research Institute, Shenyang Agricultural University / Collaborative Innovation Center for Genetic Improvement and High Quality and Efficiency Production of Northeast Japonica Rice in China, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2024-06-26 Accepted:2024-11-08 Online:2025-03-12 Published:2024-11-21
  • Contact: *E-mail: mhzhao@syau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA(CARS-01-09);Major Scientific and Technological Special Project of Liaoning Province(2022JH1/10200003);Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program(XLYC2008025)

RichHTML434

17

PDF

499

Abstract:

Soil acidification and aluminum (Al) toxicity have become significant challenges affecting rice growth and yield. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate Al-tolerance-related genes and elucidate their molecular mechanisms. In a previous Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS), the gene OsAlR3, associated with Al tolerance, was identified. OsAlR3 was shown to regulate Al tolerance in rice through phenotypic and physiological mechanisms. While organic acids and plant growth regulators are known to be involved in Al resistance, the specific role of OsAlR3 in these processes remains unclear. This study examined the responses of wild-type (WT) and osalr3 knockout mutants to exogenous organic acids (citric acid (CA), oxalic acid (OA), and malic acid (MA)) and plant growth regulators (brassinolide (BR) and auxin (IAA)). Compared to WT, the osalr3 mutant exhibited significantly reduced total root length, inter-root pH, and organic acid content, while above-ground and below-ground Al3+ content, malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide anion (O2?), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity were significantly increased under Al stress. The osalr3 mutant showed heightened sensitivity to Al stress compared to WT.

Exogenous application of organic acids and BR increased total root length, CA, OA, and MA content, and decreased above-ground and below-ground Al3+ content, MDA, O2?, H2O2 content, and SOD activity, thereby reducing the Al toxicity in osalr3 mutants. In contrast, although auxin application increased total root length and reduced above-ground Al3+ content in the mutant, it significantly increased below-ground Al3+ content, along with MDA, O2?, and H2O2 levels, which were markedly different from those of WT. In summary, exogenous application of organic acids (CA, OA, and MA) and BR positively influenced OsAlR3 function, while IAA application negatively regulated OsAlR3 function under Al stress.

Key words: rice, OsAlR3, organic acids, plant growth regulators, Al toxicity

Fig. 1

Mutation sites in osalr3 knockout mutants"

Fig. 2

Effect of exogenous organic acids and plant growth regulators on total root length in rice (A): phenotypes of WT and osalr3 mutants under exogenous organic acid and plant growth regulators treatments; (B): total root length of WT and osalr3 mutants under exogenous organic acid and plant growth regulators treatments. Scale bar is 10 cm. Control indicated 0 μmol L-1 Al3+ treatment; Al indicates 100 μmol L-1 Al3+ treatment; Al+CA indicates 100 μmol L-1 Al3++100 μmol L-1 citric acid (CA) treatment; Al+OA indicates 100 μmol L-1 Al3++100 μmol L-1oxalic acid (OA) treatment; Al+MA indicates 100 μmol L-1 Al3++100 μmol L-1 malic acid (MA) treatment; Al+BR indicates 100 μmol L-1 Al3++0.1 mg L-1 brassinolide (BR) treatment; Al+ IAA indicates 100 μmol L-1 Al3++5 mg L-1 auxin (IAA) treatment. ** indicates a significant difference at the 0.01 level, and ns indicates no significance."

Fig. 3

Effects of exogenous organic acids and plant growth regulators on Al3+ content in rice Abbreviations and treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 2. * indicates a significant difference at the 0.05 level, ** indicates a significant difference at the 0.01 level, and ns indicates no significance, respectively."

Fig. 4

Effects of exogenous organic acids and plant growth regulators on above ground and under ground dry weight of rice Abbreviations and treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 2. * indicates a significant difference at the 0.05 level, and ns indicates no significance."

Fig. 5

Effects of externally applied organic acids and plant growth regulators on inter-root pH in rice Abbreviations and treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 2. * indicates a significant difference at the 0.05 level, and ns indicates no significance."

Fig. 6

Effect of external application of organic acids and plant growth regulators on the amount of organic acids in the rice root system Abbreviations and treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 2. * indicates significant difference at 0.05 level; ** indicates a significant difference at the 0.01 level, and ns indicates no significance."

Fig. 7

Effect of external application of organic acids and plant growth regulators on antioxidant enzyme systems in rice roots Abbreviations and treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 2. * indicates a significant difference at the 0.05 level; ** indicates a significant difference at the 0.01 level, and ns indicates no significance."

Fig. 8

Effect of exogenously applied organic acids and plant growth regulators on the expression level of OsAlR3 Abbreviations and treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 2. ** indicates a significant difference at the 0.01 level."

[1] Chauhan D K, Yadav V, Vaculík M, Gassmann W, Pike S, Arif N, Singh V P, Deshmukh R, Sahi S, Tripathi D K. Aluminum toxicity and aluminum stress-induced physiological tolerance responses in higher plants. Crit Rev Biotechnol, 2021, 41: 715-730.
[2] 李晟昱, 周琪, 何汶珈, 乔景璇, 李晓琳, 包格根. 水稻铝害研究进展. 仲恺农业工程学院学报, 2023, 36(1): 55-62.
Li S Y, Zhou Q, He W J, Qiao J X, Li X L, Bao G G. Review on aluminum toxicity in rice. J Zhongkai Univ Agric Eng, 2023, 36(1): 55-62 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] Yokosho K, Yamaji N, Ma J F. An Al-inducible MATE gene is involved in external detoxification of Al in rice. Plant J, 2011, 68: 1061-1069.
[4] 邓晓霞, 李月明, 姚堃姝, 乔婧文, 王竞红, 蔺吉祥. 植物适应酸铝胁迫机理的研究进展. 生物工程学报, 2022, 38: 2754-2766.
Deng X X, Li Y M, Yao K S, Qiao J W, Wang J H, Lin J X. Advances in the mechanism of plant adaptation to acid aluminum stress. Chin J Biotechnol, 2022, 38: 2754-2766 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] Riaz M, Yan L, Wu X W, Hussain S, Aziz O, Jiang C C. Mechanisms of organic acids and boron induced tolerance of aluminum toxicity: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2018, 165: 25-35.
[6] Liu J M, Khan S, Hu Y, Yin L Y, Huang J Q. Physiological mechanisms of exogenous organic acids to alleviate aluminum toxicity in seedlings of mungbean, buckwheat, and rice. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2023, 203: 108031.
[7] An Y, Zhou P, Xiao Q, Shi D Y. Effects of foliar application of organic acids on alleviation of aluminum toxicity in alfalfa. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci, 2014, 177: 421-430.
[8] 毛轩雯, 王志超, 阮心依, 孙靖菲, 张雅婷, 陆锦灏, 邵甜甜, 王娴, 肖佳敏, 肖莉, 叶梦瑶, 吴玉环, 刘鹏. 外源有机酸对铝胁迫下菊芋生理响应系统的调控效应. 植物学报, 2023, 58: 573-589.
doi: 10.11983/CBB23006
Mao X W, Wang Z C, Ruan X Y, Sun J F, Zhang Y T, Lu J H, Shao T T, Wang X, Xiao J M, Xiao L, Ye M Y, Wu Y H, Liu P. Regulatory effects of exogenous organic acids on the physiological responses of Helianthus tuberosus under aluminium stress. Chin Bull Bot, 2023, 58: 573-589 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] 师瑞红, 谢国生, 曾汉来, 张端品. 外源有机酸缓解水稻幼苗根系铝毒的生理机制. 中国生态农业学报, 2007, 15: 97-101.
Shi R H, Xie G S, Zeng H L, Zhang D P. Physiological mechanism of alleviating aluminum toxicity in rice seedling root by exogenous organic acids. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2007, 15: 97-101 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] 王月平. 有机酸对铝胁迫下油菜生长生理及缓解机制研究. 浙江师范大学硕士学位论文, 浙江金华, 2013.
Wang Y P. Effects of Organic Acids on Growth Physiology and Alleviating Mechanism of Rape under Aluminum Stress. MS Thesis of Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China, 2013 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] 孙远秀. 外源有机酸对西瓜铝毒害缓解作用的研究. 四川农业大学硕士学位论文, 四川雅安, 2016.
Sun Y X. Study on Alleviating Effect of Exogenous Organic Acids on Aluminum Toxicity of Watermelon. MS Thesis of Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an, Sichuan, China, 2016 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] Qin H, He L N, Huang R F. The coordination of ethylene and other hormones in primary root development. Front Plant Sci, 2019, 10: 874.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00874 pmid: 31354757
[13] Yang Z B, Geng X Y, He C M, Zhang F, Wang R, Horst W J, Ding Z J. TAA1-regulated local auxin biosynthesis in the root- apex transition zone mediates the aluminum-induced inhibition of root growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 2014, 26: 2889-2904.
[14] Lyu B S, Yan Z W, Tian H Y, Zhang X S, Ding Z J. Local auxin biosynthesis mediates plant growth and development. Trends Plant Sci, 2019, 24: 6-9.
doi: S1360-1385(18)30247-4 pmid: 30448230
[15] Wang Q, Nian F, Zhao L, Li F, Yang H, Yang Y. Exogenous indole-3-acetic acid could reduce the accumulation of aluminum in root apex of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)under Al stress. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2013, 13: 534-543.
[16] Abdullahi B A, Gu X G, Gan Q L, Yang Y H. Brassinolide amelioration of aluminum toxicity in mungbean seedling growth. J Plant Nutr, 2002, 26: 1725-1734.
[17] Zhao M H, Song J Y, Wu A T, Hu T, Li J Q. Mining beneficial genes for aluminum tolerance within a core collection of rice landraces through genome-wide association mapping with high density SNPs from specific-locus amplified fragment sequencing. Front Plant Sci, 2018, 9: 1838.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01838 pmid: 30619409
[18] Wang J B, Su C, Cui Z B, Huang L X, Gu S, Jiang S X, Feng J, Xu H, Zhang W Z, Jiang L L, Zhao M H. Transcriptomics and metabolomics reveal tolerance new mechanism of rice roots to Al stress. Front Genet, 2023, 13: 1063984.
[19] Su C, Wang J B, Feng J, Jiang S X, Man F Y, Jiang L L, Zhao M H. OsAlR3 regulates aluminum tolerance through promoting the secretion of organic acids and the expression of antioxidant genes in rice. BMC Plant Biol, 2024, 24: 618.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05298-9 pmid: 38937693
[20] Zou L N, Jiang O Y, Zhang S, Duan G L, Gustave W, An X, Tang X J. Effects of citric acid on arsenic transformation and microbial communities in different paddy soils. Environ Res, 2024, 249: 118421.
[21] Zhu G Y, Shi X C, Wang S Y, Wang B, Laborda P. Antifungal mechanism and efficacy of kojic acid for the control of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean. Front Plant Sci, 2022, 13: 845698.
[22] Chai J X, Li J W, Liu Q T, Chen Z H, Liu Z D. Differential changes in respiratory metabolism and energy status in the outer pericarp and core tissues affect the ripening of ‘Xuxiang’ kiwifruit. Postharvest Biol Technol, 2024, 212: 112876.
[23] 刘鹏, 应小芳, 徐根娣, 蔡妙珍, 王芳, 罗虹. 铝对大豆质膜透性和POD、CAT活性的影响. 浙江师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 28: 300-303.
Liu P, Ying X F, Xu G D, Cai M Z, Wang F, Luo H. Effect of aluminum on the permeability of plasma membrane and activities of CAT and POD of soybean. J Zhejiang Norm Univ (Nat Sci), 2005, 28: 300-303 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] 陈钰佩, 高翠民, 任彬彬, 胡香玉, 沈其荣, 郭世伟. 水分胁迫下氮素形态影响水稻根系通气组织形成的生理机制. 南京农业大学学报, 2017, 40: 273-280.
Chen Y P, Gao C M, Ren B B, Hu X Y, Shen Q R, Guo S W. Physiological mechanism of nitrogen forms affect aerenchyma formation of rice root under water stress. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 2017, 40: 273-280 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] 黄晓梅, 李东玉, 范金霞, 陈秀玲, 赵红晓. 木醋液对茄子和水稻幼苗保护性酶影响研究. 东北农业大学学报, 2016, 47(12): 23-29.
Huang X M, Li D Y, Fan J X, Chen X L, Zhao H X. Effect of pyroligneous acid on protective enzymes of eggplant and rice seedlings. J Northeast Agric Univ, 2016, 47(12): 23-29 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26] 马西亚. 硅对水稻镉的吸收与分配影响效应. 海南大学硕士学位论文, 海南海口, 2020.
Ma X Y. Effect of Silicon on Cadmium Absorption and Distribution in Rice. MS Thesis of Hainan University, Haikou, Hainan, China, 2020 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] 刘玉民. 酸铝环境马尾松根系分泌物特性及其缓解铝毒的根际效应. 西南大学博士学位论文, 重庆, 2018.
Liu Y M. The Characteristics and Rhizosphere Effects in Alleviating Al-toxicity of Pinus massoniana Root Exudation in Acid- aluminum Environment. PhD Dissertation of Southwest University, Chongqing, China, 2018 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 闫磊. 硼对柑橘枳砧根系铝毒缓解效应及机理研究. 华中农业大学博士学位论文, 湖北武汉, 2020.
Yan L. Alleviating Effect and Mechanism of Boron on Aluminum Toxicity in Roots of Citrus Aurantii Rootstock. PhD Dissertation of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China, 2020 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] Yin L N, Wang S W, Eltayeb A E, Uddin M I, Yamamoto Y, Tsuji W, Takeuchi Y, Tanaka K. Overexpression of dehydroascorbate reductase, but not monodehydroascorbate reductase, confers tolerance to aluminum stress in transgenic tobacco. Planta, 2010, 231: 609-621.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-009-1075-3 pmid: 19960204
[30] He H, Li Y, He L F. Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in Solanaceae plants. South Afr J Bot, 2019, 123: 23-29.
[31] 李冰洋, 苟少校, 郭海海, 郭炎峰, 魏运民, 蒋林峰, 玉永雄. B和Si对紫花苜蓿铝毒的缓解作用. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2024, 12(6), 227-235.
Li B Y, Gou S X, Guo H H, Guo Y F, Wei Y M, Jiang L F, Wang Y X. Detoxification of boron and silicon on aluminum toxicity of Medicago sativa L. J Gansu Agric Univ, 2024, 12(6), 227-235 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[32] Kochian L V, Piñeros M A, Liu J P, Magalhaes J V. Plant adaptation to acid soils: the molecular basis for crop aluminum resistance. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2015, 66: 571-598.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043014-114822 pmid: 25621514
[33] 宋鑫, 徐杉, 何映辉. 植物耐铝毒机制研究进展. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49: 31-34.
Song X, Xu S, He Y H. Research progress on mechanisms of plant aluminum tolerance. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2021, 49: 31-34 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[34] 张慧敏, 刘东华. 植物耐铝毒害机理研究. 江西农业, 2019, (6): 127-129.
Zhang H M, Liu D H. Mechanism of aluminum tolerance in plants. Jiangxi Agric, 2019, (6): 127-129 (in Chinese).
[35] 何龙飞, 王爱勤. 外源有机酸对小麦铝毒害的缓解效应. 华北农学报, 2002, 17(增刊1): 75-79.
He L F, Wang A Q. Ameliorating effects of organic acids on aluminum toxicity in wheat. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2002, 17(S1): 75-79 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[36] 郭妮, 刘亚敏, 周文颖, 刘玉民, 张盛楠. 外源草酸缓解马尾松根系铝毒. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31: 1086-1095.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2019.07.08
Guo N, Liu Y M, Zhou W Y, Liu Y M, Zhang S N. Alleviation of aluminum stress by exogenous oxalic acid in root system of Pinus massoniana Lamb. Acta Agric Zhejiangensis, 2019, 31: 1086-1095 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[37] Kopittke P M, Blamey F P C. Theoretical and experimental assessment of nutrient solution composition in short-term studies of aluminium rhizotoxicity. Plant Soil, 2016, 406: 311-326.
[38] 许桂莲. 施硼提高根际pH缓解豌豆铝毒的作用. 佛山科学技术学院硕士学位论文, 广东佛山, 2017.
Xu G L. Boron Enhances Rhizopshere pH and Alleviates Aluminum Toxicity to Pea (Pisum sativum). MS Thesis of Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong, China, 2017 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[39] Park W, Kim H S, Park T W, Lee Y H, Ahn S J. Functional characterization of plasma membrane-localized organic acid transporter (CsALMT1) involved in aluminum tolerance in Camelina sativa L. Plant Biotechnol Rep, 2017, 11: 181-192.
[40] 柳聚阁. 铝毒胁迫下大豆根部的生理和表达谱特征及耐铝毒相关MATE基因的功能分析. 南京农业大学博士学位论文, 江苏南京, 2017.
Liu J G. Characteristics of Physiology and Expression Profiling of Soybean Roots under Aluminum Toxicity and Functional Study of the MATE Gene Related to Aluminum Tolerance. PhD Dissertation of Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 2017 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[41] 马小伟. 橡胶树根系分泌有机酸耐铝的生理和分子机制研究. 海南大学硕士学位论文, 海南海口, 2021.
Ma X W. The Physiological and Molecular Mechanisms of Rubber Trees Tolerating Aluminum Toxicity by Organic Acid Secretion. MS Thesis of Hainan University, Haikou, Hainan, China, 2021 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[42] Guo T R, Yao P C, Zhang Z D, Wang J J, Wang M. Involvement of antioxidative defense system in rice seedlings exposed to aluminum toxicity and phosphorus deficiency. Rice Sci, 2012, 19: 207-212.
[43] Esmaielzadeh S, Fallah H, Niknejad Y, Mahmoudi M, Tari D B. Methyl jasmonate increases aluminum tolerance in rice by augmenting the antioxidant defense system, maintaining ion homeostasis, and increasing nonprotein thiol compounds. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2022, 29: 46708-46720.
[44] Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Zahan M I, Karim M M, Imran S, Hunter C T, Islam M S, Mia M A, Hannan M A, Rhaman M S, Hossain M A, Brestic M, Skalicky M, Murata Y. Citric acid-mediated abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22: 7235.
[45] Zhang X Y, Chen J, Liu X Y, Chen X P, Liu L, Niu Y H, Wang R. The relief effects of organic acids on Scirpus triqueter L.under Pyrene-lead stress. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2019, 26: 15828-15837.
[46] Bilal S, Khan A, Imran M, Khan A L, Asaf S, Al-Rawahi A, Al-Azri M S A, Al-Harrasi A, Lee I J. Silicon- and boron-induced physio-biochemical alteration and organic acid regulation mitigates aluminum phytotoxicity in date palm seedlings. Antioxidants (Basel), 2022, 11: 1063.
[47] Jin Q F, Wang Z, Chen Y N, Luo Y P, Tian N, Liu Z H, Huang J N, Liu S Q. Transcriptomics analysis reveals the signal transduction mechanism of brassinolides in tea leaves and its regulation on the growth and development of Camellia sinensis. BMC Genomics, 2022, 23: 29.
doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-08179-9 pmid: 34991475
[48] Shahid M, Javed M T, Mushtaq A, Akram M S, Mahmood F, Ahmed T, Noman M, Azeem M. Microbe-mediated mitigation of cadmium toxicity in plants. In: Cadmium Toxicity and Tolerance in Plants. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2019. pp 427-449.
[49] Wei Z Y, Li J. Brassinosteroids regulate root growth, development, and symbiosis. Mol Plant, 2016, 9: 86-100.
doi: S1674-2052(15)00456-6 pmid: 26700030
[50] Kang Y H, Breda A, Hardtke C S. Brassinosteroid signaling directs formative cell divisions and protophloem differentiation in Arabidopsis root meristems. Development, 2017, 144: 272-280.
[51] Sharma P, Kumar A, Bhardwaj R. Plant steroidal hormone epibrassinolide regulate-heavy metal stress tolerance in Oryza sativa L.by modulating antioxidant defense expression. Environ Exp Bot, 2016, 122: 1-9.
[52] Anfang M R, Shani E. Transport mechanisms of plant hormones. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2021, 63: 102055.
[53] Zhang M L, Lu X D, Li C L, Zhang B, Zhang C Y, Zhang X S, Ding Z J. Auxin efflux carrier ZmPGP1 mediates root growth inhibition under aluminum stress. Plant Physiol, 2018, 177: 819-832.
doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01379 pmid: 29720555
[54] Liu G C, Gao S, Tian H Y, Wu W W, Robert H S, Ding Z J. Correction: local transcriptional control of YUCCA regulates auxin promoted root-growth inhibition in response to aluminium stress in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet, 2021, 17: e1009964.
[55] Rahman A, Bannigan A, Sulaman W, Pechter P, Blancaflor E B, Baskin T I. Auxin, actin and growth of the Arabidopsis thaliana primary root. Plant J, 2007, 50: 514-528.
[1] Chen Xue-Yan, He Hua-Chuan, Li Zheng-Jia, Dong Xin-Pan, Li Ou-Qi, Liu Xiao-Yun, Li Dan-Ping, Chen Zhi-Wei, Liu Guo-Xia, Lyu Sheng-Yuan, Wu Yin-Ying, Zhao Zhen-Dong, Cao Xin-You, Wan He-Ping. Dynamic changes in root organic acid secretion and its transcriptional regulatory mechanisms in ‘Jimai 60’ seedlings under combined salinity-alkalinity stress in hydroponics [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[2] Hu Zhao, Qian Run, Xie Feng-Pu, Ying Su-Ping. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the SPX gene family in rice under phosphorus treatment [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[3] Zou Yi-Mei, Xu Min, Wang Hai-Yang, Yao Hui, Wang Jia-Feng, Liu Hao, Ren Dai-Sheng. Analysis of transcription factor regulatory networks in two-line male sterile rice seedling roots in response to salt stress [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[4] Yan An, Jiang Kun-Wei, Wang Rong-Yuan, Tian Lin, Zhang Lu, Wang Yun, Xu Jian-Long. Identification and cloning of SVN7 controlling small vascular bundle number in the rice flag leaf [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[5] Chen Wei, Wei Wan-Juan, Zhao Qi-Bing, Chang Dong-Wei, Yu Ling-Bo, Zhai Peng-Fei, Feng Zhi-Ming, Chen Zong-Xiang, Ren Yang-Tao, Yang Peng, Liu Hai-Lang, Li Zhen-Fu, Yang Yong-Le, Jin Yan-Gang, Zuo Shi-Min. Developing new germplasm of high-quality and early-maturing rice by editing Hd6 via CRISPR/Cas9 [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056.
[6] Shi Shao-Jie, Liu Kai, Chen Zi-Yi, Wang Hui-Ying, Li San-He, Zhou Lei, You Ai-Qing. Cloning and functional analysis of the dwarf and multi-tiller gene DMT1 in rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 1022-1034.
[7] Qin Yi-Yan, Fu Yao, Su Chang, Li Na, Xu Jing-Ru, Cheng Xiao-Ran, Zhang Qi, Zhao Ming-Hui. Functional analysis of OsST41 regulating salt tolerance in rice seedlings [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[8] Liu Chang-You, Wang Shen, Shi Hui-Ying, Shen Ying-Chao, Sun Lei, Wang Yan, Zhang Zhi-Xiao, Su Qiu-Zhu, Tian Jing, Fan Bao-Jie. QTL mapping for bruchid resistance in an adzuki bean distant hybridization population using rice bean genetic resources [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(3): 936-944.
[9] Ye Fan, Li Shuai, Li Si-Yu, Chen Yun, Dou Chao-Yin, Liu Li-Jun. Effects of water-saving irrigation on rice yield and population quality in Northeast China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[10] Liu Ning, Fan Ping, Wang Cheng, Chen Qi-Qi, Cheng Qing-Yue, Tie Xia-Na, Tang Jing-Sha, Liu Bin-Bin, Xie Hong-Kun, Wang Jia-Yue, Shi Yuan-Qing, Ma Jun. Effects of reduced nitrogen application combined with organic fertilizer on yield formation and nitrogen utilization in mechanically transplanted rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(3): 866-880.
[11] Zhu Jin-Juan, Wang Hui-Ping, Yang Guo-Dong, Wang Yu-Cheng, Yang Chen, Wang Bin, Agustiani Nurwulan, Tu Jun-Ming, Bi Jun-Guo, Cui Ke-Hui, Huang Jian-Liang, Peng Shao-Bing, Yuan Shen. Effects of water management and variety type on grain yield and quality in ratoon rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(1): 295-315.
[12] WANG Chan, WU Ying-Ying, LI Wen-Qi, LI Xia, WANG Fang-Quan, ZHOU Tong, YANG Jie. Development of functional markers of rice stripe disease resistance gene STV11 based on HRM technique [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(9): 2547-2556.
[13] GUO Bao-Wei, WANG Wang, WANG Kai, WANG Yan, ZENG Xin, JING Xiu, WANG Jing, NI Xin-Hua, XU Ke, ZHANG Hong-Cheng. Population dynamic characteristics and formation mechanisms of super high-yielding of two types of glutinous rice in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze Rive [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(9): 2433-2453.
[14] CHEN Hui-Ying, HE Jia-Xin, ZHU Bin, HUANG Shi-Xuan, ZHOU Xing-You, WU Jun-Quan, YANG Mei-Yan. Whole genome analysis and biological characterization of phage vB_XaS_ HDB2 infected with Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(8): 2087-2099.
[15] YANG Hai-Yang, WU Lin-Xuan, LI Bo-Wen, SHI Han-Feng, YUAN Xi-Long, LIU Jin-Zhao, CAI Hai-Rong, CHEN Shi-Yi, GUO Tao, WANG Hui. OsWRI3, identified based on QTL mapping, regulates seed shattering in rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Add: No. 80 Xueyuan South Rd, Beijing 100081, P. R. China E-mail: zwxb301@caas.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd