欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 809-818.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.91067

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 •    下一篇

小麦脱落酸受体基因TaPYR1介导植株抵御干旱逆境功能研究

韩乐,杜萍萍,肖凯()   

  1. 河北农业大学农学院, 河北保定071001
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-09 接受日期:2020-01-15 出版日期:2020-06-12 网络出版日期:2020-02-14
  • 通讯作者: 肖凯
  • 作者简介:E-mail:hanle95@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(31872869);国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD0300902)

Functional characteristics of TaPYR1, an abscisic acid receptor family gene in mediating wheat tolerance to drought stress

HAN Le,DU Ping-Ping,XIAO Kai()   

  1. College of Agronomy, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, Hebei, China
  • Received:2019-11-09 Accepted:2020-01-15 Published:2020-06-12 Published online:2020-02-14
  • Contact: Kai XIAO
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation of China(31872869);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFD0300902)

RichHTML

111

PDF

1262

摘要：

脱落酸(ABA)受体PYR/PYL/RCAR通过与渗透胁迫诱导的ABA结合, 参与植株体内ABA介导的信号转导过程, 在调控植株干旱逆境抵御过程中具有重要的生物学功能。本文研究了鉴定的1个干旱响应的PYR家族成员TaPYR1的分子特征、应答干旱表达模式及其介导植株抵御干旱逆境的功能。结果表明, TaPYR1与植物种属中部分PYR基因在氨基酸序列水平上高度同源, 编码蛋白含有PYR家族成员保守结构域, 翻译蛋白经内质网分选后定位于细胞质膜。TaPYR1基因在小麦根、叶中均呈明显的干旱诱导表达模式, 在干旱胁迫48 h表达量达到峰值。与野生型对照(WT)相比, 超表达TaPYR1烟草转化株系, 干旱处理下植株长势增强, 干鲜重增加。干旱处理下, 转化株系较对照的光合能力增强, 细胞保护酶活性提高, 渗透调节物质脯氨酸和可溶性糖含量增加。研究表明, TaPYR1通过在转录水平上应答干旱逆境, 改善干旱胁迫下的植株相关生理过程, 在增强植株抵御干旱逆境能力中发挥重要作用。

关键词: 小麦, ABA受体基因, 表达, 遗传转化, 功能鉴定

Abstract:

ABA receptors are involved in the mediation of ABA signaling transduction through interaction with abscisic acid (ABA) molecules induced by osmotic stresses and play critical roles in regulating the drought stress tolerance in plants. In this study, TaPYR1, an ABA family gene in wheat that was shown to be differentially expressed in our previous transcriptome analysis was used to analyze its molecular property, expression patterns under drought stress condition, and functions in mediating plant adaptation to drought stress. TaPYR1 shares high similarities to its plant counterparts at amino acid level. TaPYR1 protein contains the conserved domains specified by the plant PYR proteins and was targeted onto the plasma membrane after endoplasmic reticulum (ER) assortment. The expression of TaPYR1 was induced in both roots and leaves under drought, with the highest expression levels at 48 h of drought treatment. Transgene analysis on TaPYR1 was performed to assess the gene function in mediating plant drought tolerance. Compared with wild type (WT), the tobacco lines overexpressing TaPYR1 enhanced growth vigor and increased fresh and dry weight under drought stress. In addition, the transgenic lines with TaPYR1 overexpression also increased photosynthetic function, enhanced activities of cellular antioxidant enzymes, and elevated the contents of osmolytes (i.e., proline and soluble sugar) under drought condition. Our investigation suggests that TaPYR1 transcriptively responds to drought stress signaling and plays an important role in regulating plant drought adaptation by improving the associated physiological processes.

Key words: Triticum aestivum, ABA receptor gene, expression, genetic transformation, functional characterization

附表1

NtSOD、NtCAT和NtPOD家族基因特异性扩增引物"

目的基因
Gene		 登录号
Accession number		 上游引物
Forward primer (5'-3')		 下游引物
Reverse primer (5'-3')
NtSOD1 KJ874395 GTGGACATGTCGTGTCAAGG TTCTCACCAACTCCTGCACTT
NtFeSOD KF724056 CATCACAGAGCTTATGTCGACA CTAGAACTGACTGCTTCCCA
NtSOD2 EU123521 ATGTCACGGGACCACATTAC AACCCTTCCACCAGCATTTC
NtMnSOD2 AB093097 GACGGACCTTAGCAACAGGG ACCAATGGGTCCTGATTAGCAG
NtCAT NTU07627 GTCTCAGGCTGACAAGTCTT ACGGAAGACAGAGTAGCAGC
NtCAT1 EF532799 CAAGGATCTCTACGACTCGATT CTTGAGGGCAAATAATCCACCT
NtCAT1;1 NTU93244 TCCTGCTAATGCTCCAAAGTGT AATGCATATGTATTAGGAATGCTC
NtCAT1;2 HF564632 GGTATCGACTTGGACCAAACTA GGTCTCACATTAAGCCTAGAAG
NtCAT1;3 HF564631 TTGCAGCCGGTGGGAAGATT GGTCTCACATTAAGCCTAGAAG
NtCAT3 HF564633 GTCTTGGGCCAAACTATCTGCA TCAGCTTCACATTGTGGGCC
NtPOD1;1 L02124 GGAATTTGTCCTCAAGGTGGAA CTTATTGGAATTGCCATTTCAGC
NtPOD1;2 AB044154 CTGACATGGTCTGTGCCTAC TCAGTTGATAGCAGAGCAAACTT
NtPOD1;3 AB044153 AAGATCTTGTCGCTCTTACTGG AATTGGATTTTCCAGCTTGCG
NtPOD1;4 D11396 TGCTGGTAGTCAAAGTCAGTTTT CCCATGTTGAACACGTTCTTACC
NtPOD1;5 AB178953 AACAGCAACAACGTTAACCCAGC TTAATTTTGGACCACATTCAGGA
NtPOD1;6 AB027753 TCAACTCCACTGGTGGCCCT AATTCGATTTTGCAGCTTGCGC
NtPOD1;7 AB027752 GCCCAAGAAGTTCAGGCTCA ATACAAATACAGTCCTTTACTCG
NtPOD2;1 AB178954 AGGGGAAAAGACCTCACCAC AGTTTCCCATCTTGATCATAGCA
NtPOD4 AY032675 AGACTCAAAGATAGCAAACCTCA CTTCCTGATGTCACCCTTGA
NtPOD9 AY032674 CACCACCTTCATTCAACGCTA ACATCTCAGACAAAACACTTGTC

图1

TaPYR1蛋白的分子特征 A: TaPYR1蛋白结构预测; B: TaPYR1蛋白多重序列比对; C: TaPYR1氨基酸水平系统进化分析。"

图2

根叶中TaPYR1应答干旱胁迫逆境表达模式 0 h, 处理前对照; 6、12、24和48 h, 干旱处理时间点; R24 h和R48 h, 恢复处理时间点。"

图3

干旱胁迫下转化株系的植株生长特征 A: 干旱胁迫下TaPYR1转化株系植株生长情况; B: 干旱胁迫下TaPYR1转化株系干质量。WT, 野生型; Sen 1和Sen 2, 正义表达TaPYR1株系; Anti 1和Anti 2, 反义表达TaPYR1株系。误差线表示标准差, 符号*表示相对于WT的差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

图4

干旱胁迫下转化株系的光合特性 A: 光合速率(Pn); B: 胞间CO2浓度(Ci); C: 叶绿体光化学淬灭系数 (NPQ); D: 光系统II光化学效率(ФPSII)。误差线表示标准差, 符号*表示相对于WT的差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

图5

干旱胁迫下转化株系的气孔关闭及叶片持水特征 A: 气孔关闭特征; B: 叶片持水力。"

图6

干旱胁迫下转化株系的细胞保护酶活性及渗透物质含量 A: SOD活性; B: CAT活性; C: POD活性; D: MDA含量; E: 脯氨酸含量; F: 可溶性糖含量。误差线表示标准差, 符号*表示相对于WT的差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

图7

干旱胁迫下转化株系的保护酶基因表达模式 A: SOD家族基因; B: CAT家族基因C: POD家族基因。误差线表示标准差, 符号*表示相对于WT的差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

[1] 居辉, 熊伟, 许吟隆, 林而达 . 气候变化对我国小麦产量的影响. 作物学报, 2005,31:98-101.
Ju H, Xiong W, Xu Y L, Lin L D . Effects of climate change on wheat yield in China. Acta Agron Sin, 2005,31:98-101 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] Bi H, Kovalchuk N, Langridge P, Tricker P J, Lopato S, Borisjuk N . The impact of drought on wheat leaf cuticle properties. BMC Plant Biol, 2017,17:85.
[3] Arbona V, Zandalinas S I, Manzi M, González-Guzmán M, Rodriguez P L, Gómez-Cadenas A . Depletion of abscisic acid levels in roots of flooded Carrizo citrange (Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf. × Citrus sinensis L. Osb.) plants is a stress-specific response associated to the differential expression of PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors. Plant Mol Biol, 2017,93:623-640.
[4] Ha Y M, Shang Y, Yang D, Nam K H . Brassinosteroid reduces ABA accumulation leading to the inhibition of ABA-induced stomatal closure. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2018,504:143-148.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.08.146
[5] Huang X, Shi H, Hu Z, Liu A, Amombo E, Chen L, Fu J . ABA is involved in regulation of cold stress response in Bermudagrass. Front Plant Sci, 2017,8:1613.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01613
[6] Li W, De Ollas C, Dodd I C . Long-distance ABA transport can mediate distal tissue responses by affecting local ABA concentrations. J Integr Plant Biol, 2018,60:16-33.
doi: 10.1111/jipb.12605
[7] Park E J, Kim T H . Production of ABA responses requires both the nuclear and cytoplasmic functional involvement of PYR1. Biochem Biophysic Res Commun, 2017,484:34-39.
[8] Liu S, Lü Z, Liu Y, Li L, Zhang L . Network analysis of ABA-dependent and ABA-independent drought responsive genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genet Mol Biol, 2018,41:624-637.
[9] Sussmilch F C, Atallah N M, Brodribb T J, Banks J A, Mcadam S A M . Abscisic acid (ABA) and key proteins in its perception and signaling pathways are ancient, but their roles have changed through time. Plant Sig Behav, 2017,12:e1365210.
[10] Han S, Min M K, Lee S Y, Lim C W, Bhatnagar N, Lee Y, Shin D, Chung K Y, Lee S C, Kim B G, Lee S . modulation of ABA signaling by altering VxGPhiL motif of PP2Cs in Oryza sativa. Mol Plant, 2017,10:1190-1205.
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.08.003
[11] Nakashima K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K . ABA signaling in stress- response and seed development. Plant Cell Rep, 2013,32:959-970.
doi: 10.1007/s00299-013-1418-1
[12] Verslues P E . ABA and cytokinins: challenge and opportunity for plant stress research. Plant Mol Biol, 2016,91:629-640.
[13] Dittrich M, Mueller H M . The role of Arabidopsis ABA receptors from the PYR/PYL/RCAR family in stomatal acclimation and closure signal integration. Nat Plants, 2019,5:1002-1011.
[14] Huang A X, She X P, Zhao J L, Zhang Y Y . Inhibition of ABA-induced stomatal closure by fusicoccin is associated with cytosolic acidification-mediated hydrogen peroxide removal. Bot Stud, 2010,55:33.
[15] Guo C, Zhao X, Liu X, Zhang L, Gu J, Li X, Lu W, Xiao K . Function of wheat phosphate transporter gene TaPHT2;1 in Pi translocation and plant growth regulation under replete and limited Pi supply conditions. Planta, 2013,237:1163-1178.
[16] Sun Z H, Ding C H, Li X J, Xiao K . Molecular characterization and expression analysis of TaZFP15, a C2H2-type zinc finger transcription factor gene in wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). J Integr Agric, 2012,1:35-46.
[17] Huang X S, Liu J H, Chen X J . Overexpression of PtrABF gene, a bZIP transcription factor isolated from Poncirus trifoliata, enhances dehydration and drought tolerance in tobacco via scavenging ROS and modulating expression of stress-responsive genes. BMC Plant Biol, 2010,10:230.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-230
[18] Wang X H, Xu K Z, Li D Y, Zhang Z A, Wu Z H . Changes of soluble sugar content and specific leaf weight in soybean genetic improvement. Soybean Sci, 2007,26:879-884
[19] Joo H, Lim C W, Lee S C . Identification and functional expression of the pepper RING type E3 ligase, CaDTR1, involved in drought stress tolerance via ABA-mediated signalling. Sci Rep, 2016,6:30097.
[20] Lim C W, Lee S C . Pepper protein phosphatase type 2C, CaADIP1 and its interacting partner CaRLP1 antagonistically regulate ABA signalling and drought response. Plant Cell Environ, 2016,39:1559-1575.
[21] Park C, Lim C W, Baek W, Kim J H, Lim S, Kim S H, Kim K N, Lee S C . The pepper WPP domain P protein, CaWDP1, acts as a novel negative regulator of drought stress via ABA signaling. Plant Cell Physiol, 2017,58:779-788.
[22] Fujita Y, Yoshida T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K . Pivotal role of the AREB/ABF-SnRK2 pathway in ABRE-mediated transcription in response to osmotic stress in plants. Physiol Plant, 2013,147:15-27.
[23] Han S, Lee Y, Park E J, Min M K, Lee Y, Kim T H, Kim B G, Lee S . Structural determinants for pyrabactin recognition in ABA receptors in Oryza sativa. Plant Mol Biol, 2019,100:319-333.
doi: 10.1007/s11103-019-00862-6
[24] Tischer S V, Wunschel C, Papacek M, Kleigrewe K, Hofmann T, Christmann A, Grill E . Combinatorial interaction network of abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors from Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2017,114:10280-10285.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706593114
[25] Yang J, Zhao S, Zhao B, Li C . Overexpression of TaLEA3 induces rapid stomatal closure under drought stress in Phellodendron amurense Rupr. Plant Sci, 2018,277:100-109.
[26] Jin J, Lauricella D, Armstrong R, Sale P, Tang C . Phosphorus application and elevated CO2 enhance drought tolerance in field pea grown in a phosphorus-deficient vertisol. Ann Bot, 2015,116:975-985.
[27] Shi G C, Fu J Y, Rong L J, Zhang P Y, Xiao K . TaMIR1119, a miRNA family member of wheat ( Triticum aestivum), is essential in the regulation of plant drought tolerance. J Integr Agric, 2018,17:2369-2378.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61879-3
[1] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4] 左同鸿, 张贺翠, 曾静, 朱利泉. 甘蓝自交不亲和相关基因BoPUB3L的克隆与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1698-1710.
[5] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[6] 王文辕, 燕雪嘉, 刘玉霖, 孙晓彤, 李亚楠, 唐鑫华, 石瑛. 耐弱光马铃薯品种筛选及转录因子编码基因StPIF3的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1631-1645.
[7] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[8] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[9] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[10] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[11] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[12] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[13] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[14] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[15] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2