欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (01): 89-94.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00089

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

小麦流式分选染色体的鉴定

郭东伟1,2;胡甘2;佘茂云3;李连城1;陈明1;徐兆师1;马有志1,*   

  1. 1 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所分子育种系, 北京100081; 2 西北农林科技大学农学院, 陕西杨凌712100; 3 新疆农业大学农学院, 新疆乌鲁木齐830052

  • 收稿日期:2007-05-15 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-01-12 网络出版日期:2008-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 马有志

Identification of Wheat Chromosomes Sorted by Flow Cytometry

GUO Dong-Wei12,HU Gan2,SHE Mao-Yun3,LI Lian-Cheng1,CHEN Ming1,XU Zhao-Shi1,MA You-Zhi1*
  

  1. 1 Department of Molecular Breeding, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081; 2 Agronomy Coll-ege, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi; 3 Agronomy College, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 810012, Xinjiang, China

  • Received:2007-05-15 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-01-12 Published online:2008-01-12
  • Contact: MA You-Zhi

摘要:

构建染色体BAC文库对于简化拥有庞大基因组植物的测序、物理作图和基因克隆具有重要意义。分选染色体的鉴定是整个文库构建过程的关键环节之一。 本文在前人研究的基础上, 分别采用荧光原位杂交(FISH)、原位PCR(C-PRINS)和PCR方法, 对分选的6VS、3B和7BL染色体(臂)进行了鉴定。结果表明, 这3种方法都能对流式分选染色体进行有效鉴定, 其中PCR法速度最快、重复性好, 但结果不具可视性、也不能鉴定分选纯度; 而FISH法重复性好、结果具有可视性、能够鉴定分选纯度, 但操作程序复杂耗时, 受探针特异性的限制; C-PRINS法则综合了上述两种方法的优点, 是最具潜力的鉴定方法, 如果与液体原位杂交相结合, 有可能为解决染色体分选问题开辟新的途径, 但也存在重复性差、杂交信号不稳定的缺点。

关键词:

小麦染色体, 流式分选, PCR, 原位PCR, 荧光原位杂交

Abstract:

Construction of chromosome specific BAC library plays an important role for simplifying sequencing, physical mapping and gene cloning of plant with complexity genome such as common wheat, identification of sorted chromosome is a vital step of library construction. Although there were some reports about identification of sorted chromosomes using different methods, the sorted chromosomes were different normal chromosomes and the applicability and feature of various identification methods had also not been commented by the numbers yet. Based on previous research, the identifications of 6VS, 3B and 7BL chromosomes (arms) sorted from ditelosomic and common wheat were performed through fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), primed in situ DNA labeling (C-PRINS) and PCR amplification methods respectively. The results showed that all of these three methods could efficiently identify the flow sorted chromosomes. The chromosome staining before flow sorting and chromosome damage from physical shear force during chromosome suspension preparation and flow sorting did not impact obviously the results of identification. After comparing to these three protocols, the PCR approach was the fastest with better repetition which adapted to determine rapidly constitute of chromosomal peaks on the univariate flow karyotype histogram, but there were no visible signals and the purity of sorted chromosomes could not be determined were the disadvantages of this approach. The FISH approach could provide a visible and repetitive result and was suit for identifying purity of the sorted chromosomes, but it was time-consuming, complex and necessary for special probes. C-PRINS combined the advantages of FISH and PCR, had potential for chromosomes identification, although the hybridization signals was instable and repetition was not so good at present, if combined this method with in situ hybridization in suspension, a new way for chromosome flow sorting might be set up. The features of these three methods, some key points during the identification process and their applicability also were discussed.

Key words:

Wheat chromosome, Flow sorting, PCR, C-PRINS, FISH

[1] 单露英, 李俊, 李亮, 张丽, 王颢潜, 高佳琪, 吴刚, 武玉花, 张秀杰. 转基因玉米NK603基体标准物质研制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1059-1070.
[2] 王霞, 尹晓雨, 于晓明, 刘晓丹. 干旱锻炼对B73自交后代当代干旱胁迫记忆基因表达及其启动子区DNA甲基化的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1191-1198.
[3] 黄成, 梁晓梅, 戴成, 文静, 易斌, 涂金星, 沈金雄, 傅廷栋, 马朝芝. 甘蓝型油菜BnAPs基因家族成员全基因组鉴定及分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 597-607.
[4] 李增强, 丁鑫超, 卢海, 胡亚丽, 岳娇, 黄震, 莫良玉, 陈立, 陈涛, 陈鹏. 铅胁迫下红麻生理特性及DNA甲基化分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(6): 1031-1042.
[5] 孙平勇, 张武汉, 张莉, 舒服, 何强, 彭志荣, 邓华凤. 水稻氮高效、耐冷基因OsGRF4功能标记的开发及其利用[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 684-690.
[6] 卢海, 李增强, 唐美琼, 罗登杰, 曹珊, 岳娇, 胡亚丽, 黄震, 陈涛, 陈鹏. 红麻DNA甲基化响应镉胁迫及甲基化差异基因的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2324-2334.
[7] 郑清雷,余陈静,姚坤存,黄宁,阙友雄,凌辉,许莉萍. 甘蔗Rieske Fe/S蛋白前体基因ScPetC的克隆及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(6): 844-857.
[8] 李俊,李亮,李夏莹,宋贵文,沈平,张丽,翟杉杉,柳方方,吴刚,张秀杰,武玉花. 转基因玉米MIR604基体标准物质研制[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(4): 473-483.
[9] 杨梦婷, 张春, 王作平, 邹华文, 吴忠义. 玉米ZmbHLH161基因的克隆及功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(12): 2008-2016.
[10] 高世武,傅志伟,陈云,林兆里,许莉萍,郭晋隆. 甘蔗热带种金属硫蛋白家族基因的克隆及响应重金属胁迫的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(02): 166-178.
[11] 周向阳,赵亮,狄佳春,陈旭升. 2个抗虫棉的外源Bt基因分子鉴定及其染色体定位[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1440-1445.
[12] 孙婷婷,王文举,娄文月,刘峰,张旭,王玲,陈玉凤,阙友雄,许莉萍,李大妹,苏亚春. 甘蔗脂氧合酶基因ScLOX1的克隆与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(7): 1002-1016.
[13] 殷龙飞,王朝阳,吴忠义,张中保,于荣. 玉米ZmGRAS31基因的克隆及功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(7): 1029-1037.
[14] 王作敏,刘瑾,孙士超,张新宇,薛飞,李艳军,孙杰. 彩色棉多药和有毒化合物输出蛋白MATE家族基因的鉴定及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(9): 1380-1392.
[15] 王玲,刘峰,戴明剑,孙婷婷,苏炜华,王春风,张旭,毛花英,苏亚春,阙友雄. 甘蔗ScWRKY4基因的克隆与表达特性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(9): 1367-1379.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!