欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (08): 1450-1458.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01450

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

高产小麦耗水特性及干物质的积累与分配

郑成岩1;于振文1,*;马兴华1;王西芝2;白洪立2   

  1. 1山东农业大学农业部小麦栽培生理与遗传改良重点开放实验室, 山东泰安 271018; 2山东省兖州市农业科学研究所, 山东兖州
    272000
  • 收稿日期:2007-11-29 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-08-12 网络出版日期:2008-08-12
  • 通讯作者: 于振文

Water Consumption Characteristic and Dry Matter Accumulation and Distribution in High-Yielding Wheat

ZHENG Cheng-Yan1,YU Zhen-Wen1*,MA Xing-Hua1,WANG Xi-Zhi2,BAI Hong-Li2

  

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Wheat Cultivation Physiology and Genetic Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, Shandong; 2 Institute of Agricultural Sciences of Yanzhou City, Yanzhou 272000, Shandong, China
  • Received:2007-11-29 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-08-12 Published online:2008-08-12
  • Contact: YU Zhen-Wen

摘要: 在2005—2006年和2006—2007年小麦生长季降水量分别为128.0 mm和246.4 mm条件下, 采用不同灌水量处理, 研究了高产条件下冬小麦的耗水特性和小麦干物质的积累与分配。结果表明, 底水和拔节水分别灌溉60 mm处理(W2)在两个生长季获得了最高的籽粒产量, 2005—2006年生长季其水分利用效率和灌溉水的利用效率均显著高于其他灌水处理; 2006—2007年生长季, 其水分利用效率较高, 降水量、灌水量和土壤供水量分别占农田耗水量的47.32%、23.04%和29.64%; 与不灌水处理(W0)相比, 灌水处理显著提高开花后干物质的积累量和开花后干物质积累量对籽粒的贡献率, 以W2处理最高, 分别达8 241.59 kg hm-2和84.18%。灌水量过多显著减少光合产物向籽粒的分配, 使产量降低。随灌水量增加, 小麦全生育期耗水量显著增大, 灌水量占农田耗水量的比例增加, 降水量和土壤供水量占农田耗水量的比例均降低, 以土壤供水量所占比例降低最大。综合考虑小麦的籽粒产量和水分利用效率, 在本试验条件下, 以底水和拔节水各60 mm的灌溉量为最优。在小麦生长季降雨量为246.4 mm条件下, 仅灌60 mm底水亦可获得较高的籽粒产量, 其土壤供水量占农田耗水量的比例和灌溉水的利用效率高于底水和拔节水处理。

关键词: 小麦, 耗水特性, 干物质积累与分配, 籽粒产量

Abstract: Water resource deficiency is one of major problems in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in North Plain of China. Irrigation plays an important role to obtain high grain yield and quality. Currently, many reports on the basis of different experiments and cultivars have suggested several irrigation regimes in wheat, but no consistent conclusion is available due to interactions between eco-environment and cultivar. In this study, two winter wheat cultivars were used under high-yielding cultivation in 2005–2007 growing seasons (with precipitations of 128.0 and 246.4 mm, respectively) to reveal the effects of irrigation amount on water consumption characteristics and dry matter accumulations in various organs. The results showed that the yield of treatment W2 (irrigated each 60 mm before sowing and at jointing) was the highest and the WUE of treatment W2 was significantly higher than that of other irrigation treatments in 2005–2006 and 2006–2007 wheat growing seasons. And when the precipitation was 246.4 mm from sowing to maturity in 2006–2007, the ratios of precipitation, irrigation amount and soil water amount to water consumption amount in treatment W2 were 47.32%, 23.04%, and 29.64%, respectively. Compared with in treatment W0, dry matter accumulation amount after anthesis and contribution of dry matter accumulation amount after anthesis to grains in irrigated treatments increased significantly with the highest of 8 241.59 kg ha-1 and 84.18% respectively in W2. However over-irrigation significantly reduced the photosynthate and grain yield. Water consumption amount increased significantly with increasing irrigation amount, and the ratio of irrigation amount to water consumption amount increased too, but the ratio of precipitation to water consumption amount and the ratio of soil water amount to water consumption amount both decreased. The variation in the ratio of soil water amount to water consumption was larger than others. As far as grain yield, WUE and WUE of irrigation concerned in the experiment, the most appropriate treatment for recommendation was treatment W2, which was irrigated 60 mm before sowing and at jointing stage respectively. The ratio of soil water amount to water consumption amount and the WUE of irrigation were higher in treatment W1 than in treatment W2, and the grain yield in treatment W1 was 8 797.73 kg ha-1 when the precipitation was 246.4 mm. The results can offer a useful reference for formulating water-saving cultivation techniques in the areas with different water resources.

Key words: Wheat, Water consumption characteristic, Dry matter accumulation and distribution, Grain yield

[1] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[5] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[6] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1Pod-D1Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[7] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!