欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (08): 1450-1458.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01450

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

高产小麦耗水特性及干物质的积累与分配

郑成岩1;于振文1,*;马兴华1;王西芝2;白洪立2   

  1. 1山东农业大学农业部小麦栽培生理与遗传改良重点开放实验室, 山东泰安 271018; 2山东省兖州市农业科学研究所, 山东兖州
    272000
  • 收稿日期:2007-11-29 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-08-12 网络出版日期:2008-08-12
  • 通讯作者: 于振文

Water Consumption Characteristic and Dry Matter Accumulation and Distribution in High-Yielding Wheat

ZHENG Cheng-Yan1,YU Zhen-Wen1*,MA Xing-Hua1,WANG Xi-Zhi2,BAI Hong-Li2

  

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Wheat Cultivation Physiology and Genetic Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, Shandong; 2 Institute of Agricultural Sciences of Yanzhou City, Yanzhou 272000, Shandong, China
  • Received:2007-11-29 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-08-12 Published online:2008-08-12
  • Contact: YU Zhen-Wen

摘要: 在2005—2006年和2006—2007年小麦生长季降水量分别为128.0 mm和246.4 mm条件下, 采用不同灌水量处理, 研究了高产条件下冬小麦的耗水特性和小麦干物质的积累与分配。结果表明, 底水和拔节水分别灌溉60 mm处理(W2)在两个生长季获得了最高的籽粒产量, 2005—2006年生长季其水分利用效率和灌溉水的利用效率均显著高于其他灌水处理; 2006—2007年生长季, 其水分利用效率较高, 降水量、灌水量和土壤供水量分别占农田耗水量的47.32%、23.04%和29.64%; 与不灌水处理(W0)相比, 灌水处理显著提高开花后干物质的积累量和开花后干物质积累量对籽粒的贡献率, 以W2处理最高, 分别达8 241.59 kg hm-2和84.18%。灌水量过多显著减少光合产物向籽粒的分配, 使产量降低。随灌水量增加, 小麦全生育期耗水量显著增大, 灌水量占农田耗水量的比例增加, 降水量和土壤供水量占农田耗水量的比例均降低, 以土壤供水量所占比例降低最大。综合考虑小麦的籽粒产量和水分利用效率, 在本试验条件下, 以底水和拔节水各60 mm的灌溉量为最优。在小麦生长季降雨量为246.4 mm条件下, 仅灌60 mm底水亦可获得较高的籽粒产量, 其土壤供水量占农田耗水量的比例和灌溉水的利用效率高于底水和拔节水处理。

关键词: 小麦, 耗水特性, 干物质积累与分配, 籽粒产量

Abstract: Water resource deficiency is one of major problems in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in North Plain of China. Irrigation plays an important role to obtain high grain yield and quality. Currently, many reports on the basis of different experiments and cultivars have suggested several irrigation regimes in wheat, but no consistent conclusion is available due to interactions between eco-environment and cultivar. In this study, two winter wheat cultivars were used under high-yielding cultivation in 2005–2007 growing seasons (with precipitations of 128.0 and 246.4 mm, respectively) to reveal the effects of irrigation amount on water consumption characteristics and dry matter accumulations in various organs. The results showed that the yield of treatment W2 (irrigated each 60 mm before sowing and at jointing) was the highest and the WUE of treatment W2 was significantly higher than that of other irrigation treatments in 2005–2006 and 2006–2007 wheat growing seasons. And when the precipitation was 246.4 mm from sowing to maturity in 2006–2007, the ratios of precipitation, irrigation amount and soil water amount to water consumption amount in treatment W2 were 47.32%, 23.04%, and 29.64%, respectively. Compared with in treatment W0, dry matter accumulation amount after anthesis and contribution of dry matter accumulation amount after anthesis to grains in irrigated treatments increased significantly with the highest of 8 241.59 kg ha-1 and 84.18% respectively in W2. However over-irrigation significantly reduced the photosynthate and grain yield. Water consumption amount increased significantly with increasing irrigation amount, and the ratio of irrigation amount to water consumption amount increased too, but the ratio of precipitation to water consumption amount and the ratio of soil water amount to water consumption amount both decreased. The variation in the ratio of soil water amount to water consumption was larger than others. As far as grain yield, WUE and WUE of irrigation concerned in the experiment, the most appropriate treatment for recommendation was treatment W2, which was irrigated 60 mm before sowing and at jointing stage respectively. The ratio of soil water amount to water consumption amount and the WUE of irrigation were higher in treatment W1 than in treatment W2, and the grain yield in treatment W1 was 8 797.73 kg ha-1 when the precipitation was 246.4 mm. The results can offer a useful reference for formulating water-saving cultivation techniques in the areas with different water resources.

Key words: Wheat, Water consumption characteristic, Dry matter accumulation and distribution, Grain yield

[1] 胡文静, 李东升, 裔新, 张春梅, 张勇. 小麦穗部性状和株高的QTL定位及育种标记开发和验证[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1346-1356.
[2] 郭星宇, 刘朋召, 王瑞, 王小利, 李军. 旱地冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率及土壤氮素平衡对降水年型与施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[3] 付美玉, 熊宏春, 周春云, 郭会君, 谢永盾, 赵林姝, 古佳玉, 赵世荣, 丁玉萍, 徐延浩, 刘录祥. 小麦矮秆突变体je0098的遗传分析与其矮秆基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 580-589.
[4] 冯健超, 许倍铭, 江薛丽, 胡海洲, 马英, 王晨阳, 王永华, 马冬云. 小麦籽粒不同层次酚类物质与抗氧化活性差异及氮肥调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 704-715.
[5] 刘运景, 郑飞娜, 张秀, 初金鹏, 于海涛, 代兴龙, 贺明荣. 宽幅播种对强筋小麦籽粒产量、品质和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 716-725.
[6] 马红勃, 刘东涛, 冯国华, 王静, 朱雪成, 张会云, 刘静, 刘立伟, 易媛. 黄淮麦区Fhb1基因的育种应用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 747-758.
[7] 王洋洋, 贺利, 任德超, 段剑钊, 胡新, 刘万代, 郭天财, 王永华, 冯伟. 基于主成分-聚类分析的不同水分冬小麦晚霜冻害评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 448-462.
[8] 陈新宜, 宋宇航, 张孟寒, 李小艳, 李华, 汪月霞, 齐学礼. 干旱对不同品种小麦幼苗的生理生化胁迫以及外源5-氨基乙酰丙酸的缓解作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 478-487.
[9] 徐龙龙, 殷文, 胡发龙, 范虹, 樊志龙, 赵财, 于爱忠, 柴强. 水氮减量对地膜玉米免耕轮作小麦主要光合生理参数的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 437-447.
[10] 马博闻, 李庆, 蔡剑, 周琴, 黄梅, 戴廷波, 王笑, 姜东. 花前渍水锻炼调控花后小麦耐渍性的生理机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 151-164.
[11] 孟颖, 邢蕾蕾, 曹晓红, 郭光艳, 柴建芳, 秘彩莉. 小麦Ta4CL1基因的克隆及其在促进转基因拟南芥生长和木质素沉积中的功能[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 63-75.
[12] 韦一昊, 于美琴, 张晓娇, 王露露, 张志勇, 马新明, 李会强, 王小纯. 小麦谷氨酰胺合成酶基因可变剪接分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 40-47.
[13] 李玲红, 张哲, 陈永明, 尤明山, 倪中福, 邢界文. 普通小麦颖壳蜡质缺失突变体glossy1的转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 48-62.
[14] 罗江陶, 郑建敏, 蒲宗君, 范超兰, 刘登才, 郝明. 四倍体小麦与六倍体小麦杂种的染色体遗传特性[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1427-1436.
[15] 王艳朋, 凌磊, 张文睿, 王丹, 郭长虹. 小麦B-box基因家族全基因组鉴定与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1437-1449.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!