欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (08): 1459-1463.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01459

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

棉花源库比对中、下部果枝叶生理活性及铃重的影响

孙红春;李存东*;张月辰;路文静   

  1. 河北农业大学河北省作物生长调控实验室, 河北保定071001
  • 收稿日期:2007-06-05 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-08-12 网络出版日期:2008-08-12
  • 通讯作者: 李存东

Effects of Source/Sink Ratio on Boll Weight and Physiological Activities of Leaves at Middle and Lower Fruiting Branches in Cotton

SUN Hong-Chun,LI Cun-Dong*,ZHANG Yue-Chen,LU Wen-Jing   

  1. Hebei Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding, 071001, Hebei, China
  • Received:2007-06-05 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-08-12 Published online:2008-08-12
  • Contact: LI Cun-Dong

摘要: 以转基因抗虫杂交棉中棉所29(CCRI29)为材料,通过去叶和去蕾处理,研究改变源库比对大田棉花中、下部果枝叶生理活性的影响。结果表明:减库处理可以提高中、下部果枝叶片中蛋白质的含量,促进后期果枝叶中叶绿素的合成,延长叶片功能期。减源处理促进中、下部果枝叶生长前期果枝叶中叶绿素含量,表现出暂时性的超补偿效应,但是在果枝叶生长后期,叶绿素含量快速下降;并且减源处理不利于叶片中蛋白质的合成。提高源/库比、降低源/库比均降低了中、下部果枝叶中SOD和POD活性,对MDA含量的影响为:减源>CK>减库。源库比例的改变影响叶片的寿命和功能,改变棉花源库比,打破了源库平衡,其叶片的生理活性也会发生相应变化。受源器官生理特性变化的影响,不同处理单铃重差异较大,表现为:减库>CK>减源。

关键词: 棉花, 源库比, 果枝叶, 生理活性

Abstract: Cotton is one of important cash crops, but so far, few studies on the boll and leaf system at the same node position in cotton were reported. In this study, the effects of source/sink ratio on growth and development and physiological characteristics in cotton were evaluated using CCRI29, a BT-transgenic hybrid cotton cultivar. Three treatments were designed in the experiment: picking off buds on the fruit branch at 8 d after anthesis for leaving two or three leaves to support one boll (PB), picking off some leaves on the fruit branch at 8 d after anthesis for leaving one leaf to support two bolls (PL), and normal training managements (CK). The results indicated that in PB treatment, the content of soluble protein increased and the chlorophyll content in the later growth stage boosted in middle and lower fruit branch leaves, prolonging the function period of the leaves. In PL treatment, the chlorophyll content of leaves was promoted in the earlier growth stage, and decreased sharply in the later growth stage, and the soluble protein content of leaves was the lowest among the three treatments, suggesting that there was a temporarily physiological compensation effect in fruit branch leaves, but the leaf senescence was accelerated by cutting leaves at late growth stage. Altered the ratio of source/sink also affected the SOD and POD activities and MDA content in fruit branch leaves, showing a tendency that both increasing and decreasing source/sink ratio could reduce the activities of SOD and POD. The MDA content of leaf under different treatments was ranked as PL>CK>PB. The results of statistic analysis indicated that there were a significant, positive correlation between SOD activity and POD activity ( r = 0.845**, P < 0.01) in CK treatment, but no correlation between SOD and POD activities after changing the source/sink ratio, indicating that the ratio of source/sink affected the physiological characteristics and function period of fruit branch leaves in cotton. As a result of changing source/sink ratio, the ringle boll weigh was PB>CK>PL.

Key words: Cotton, Source-sink ratio, Fruit-branch leaf, Physiological activity

[1] 周静远, 孔祥强, 张艳军, 李雪源, 张冬梅, 董合忠. 基于种子萌发出苗过程中弯钩建成和下胚轴生长的棉花出苗壮苗机制与技术[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1051-1058.
[2] 孙思敏, 韩贝, 陈林, 孙伟男, 张献龙, 杨细燕. 棉花苗期根系分型及根系性状的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1081-1090.
[3] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[4] 郑曙峰, 刘小玲, 王维, 徐道青, 阚画春, 陈敏, 李淑英. 论两熟制棉花绿色化轻简化机械化栽培[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 541-552.
[5] 张艳波, 王袁, 冯甘雨, 段慧蓉, 刘海英. 棉籽油分和3种主要脂肪酸含量QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 380-395.
[6] 张特, 王蜜蜂, 赵强. 滴施缩节胺与氮肥对棉花生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 396-409.
[7] 赵文青, 徐文正, 杨锍琰, 刘玉, 周治国, 王友华. 棉花叶片响应高温的差异与夜间淀粉降解密切相关[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1680-1689.
[8] 岳丹丹, 韩贝, Abid Ullah, 张献龙, 杨细燕. 干旱条件下棉花根际真菌多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1806-1815.
[9] 曾紫君, 曾钰, 闫磊, 程锦, 姜存仓. 低硼及高硼胁迫对棉花幼苗生长与脯氨酸代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1616-1623.
[10] 马欢欢, 方启迪, 丁元昊, 池华斌, 张献龙, 闵玲. 棉花GhMADS7基因正调控棉花花瓣发育[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5): 814-826.
[11] 许乃银, 赵素琴, 张芳, 付小琼, 杨晓妮, 乔银桃, 孙世贤. 基于GYT双标图对西北内陆棉区国审棉花品种的分类评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 660-671.
[12] 周冠彤, 雷建峰, 代培红, 刘超, 李月, 刘晓东. 棉花CRISPR/Cas9基因编辑有效sgRNA高效筛选体系的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 427-437.
[13] 卢合全, 唐薇, 罗振, 孔祥强, 李振怀, 徐士振, 辛承松. 商品有机肥替代部分化肥对连作棉田土壤养分、棉花生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2511-2521.
[14] 王晔, 刘钊, 肖爽, 李芳军, 吴霞, 王保民, 田晓莉. 转PSAG12-IPT基因对棉花叶片衰老及产量和纤维品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2111-2120.
[15] 杨琴莉, 杨多凤, 丁林云, 赵汀, 张军, 梅欢, 黄楚珺, 高阳, 叶莉, 高梦涛, 严孙艺, 张天真, 胡艳. 棉花花器官突变体的鉴定及候选基因的克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(10): 1854-1862.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!