欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (08): 1459-1463.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01459

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

棉花源库比对中、下部果枝叶生理活性及铃重的影响

孙红春;李存东*;张月辰;路文静   

  1. 河北农业大学河北省作物生长调控实验室, 河北保定071001
  • 收稿日期:2007-06-05 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-08-12 网络出版日期:2008-08-12
  • 通讯作者: 李存东

Effects of Source/Sink Ratio on Boll Weight and Physiological Activities of Leaves at Middle and Lower Fruiting Branches in Cotton

SUN Hong-Chun,LI Cun-Dong*,ZHANG Yue-Chen,LU Wen-Jing   

  1. Hebei Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding, 071001, Hebei, China
  • Received:2007-06-05 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-08-12 Published online:2008-08-12
  • Contact: LI Cun-Dong

摘要: 以转基因抗虫杂交棉中棉所29(CCRI29)为材料,通过去叶和去蕾处理,研究改变源库比对大田棉花中、下部果枝叶生理活性的影响。结果表明:减库处理可以提高中、下部果枝叶片中蛋白质的含量,促进后期果枝叶中叶绿素的合成,延长叶片功能期。减源处理促进中、下部果枝叶生长前期果枝叶中叶绿素含量,表现出暂时性的超补偿效应,但是在果枝叶生长后期,叶绿素含量快速下降;并且减源处理不利于叶片中蛋白质的合成。提高源/库比、降低源/库比均降低了中、下部果枝叶中SOD和POD活性,对MDA含量的影响为:减源>CK>减库。源库比例的改变影响叶片的寿命和功能,改变棉花源库比,打破了源库平衡,其叶片的生理活性也会发生相应变化。受源器官生理特性变化的影响,不同处理单铃重差异较大,表现为:减库>CK>减源。

关键词: 棉花, 源库比, 果枝叶, 生理活性

Abstract: Cotton is one of important cash crops, but so far, few studies on the boll and leaf system at the same node position in cotton were reported. In this study, the effects of source/sink ratio on growth and development and physiological characteristics in cotton were evaluated using CCRI29, a BT-transgenic hybrid cotton cultivar. Three treatments were designed in the experiment: picking off buds on the fruit branch at 8 d after anthesis for leaving two or three leaves to support one boll (PB), picking off some leaves on the fruit branch at 8 d after anthesis for leaving one leaf to support two bolls (PL), and normal training managements (CK). The results indicated that in PB treatment, the content of soluble protein increased and the chlorophyll content in the later growth stage boosted in middle and lower fruit branch leaves, prolonging the function period of the leaves. In PL treatment, the chlorophyll content of leaves was promoted in the earlier growth stage, and decreased sharply in the later growth stage, and the soluble protein content of leaves was the lowest among the three treatments, suggesting that there was a temporarily physiological compensation effect in fruit branch leaves, but the leaf senescence was accelerated by cutting leaves at late growth stage. Altered the ratio of source/sink also affected the SOD and POD activities and MDA content in fruit branch leaves, showing a tendency that both increasing and decreasing source/sink ratio could reduce the activities of SOD and POD. The MDA content of leaf under different treatments was ranked as PL>CK>PB. The results of statistic analysis indicated that there were a significant, positive correlation between SOD activity and POD activity ( r = 0.845**, P < 0.01) in CK treatment, but no correlation between SOD and POD activities after changing the source/sink ratio, indicating that the ratio of source/sink affected the physiological characteristics and function period of fruit branch leaves in cotton. As a result of changing source/sink ratio, the ringle boll weigh was PB>CK>PL.

Key words: Cotton, Source-sink ratio, Fruit-branch leaf, Physiological activity

[1] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[2] 张曦, 王广恩, 李邵琦, 刘祎, 李俊兰, 钱玉源. 基于转录组测序解析陆海杂交姊妹系马克隆值差异的形成机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1442-1458.
[3] 周琦翔, 朱艳, 汪楚博, 朱柏林, 李俊博, 宋利兵. 基于DSSAT模型模拟气候变化对新疆棉花物候期及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 590-602.
[4] 郭栋财, 吕涛, 蔡永生, 买吾鲁达·艾合买提, 全家, 曲延英, 郑凯. 棉花纤维品质相关性状QTL元分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1445-1466.
[5] 王亚雯, 戚正阳, 尤佳琦, 聂新辉, 曹娟, 杨细燕, 涂礼莉, 张献龙, 王茂军. 棉花60K功能位点基因芯片的制备及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1178-1188.
[6] 丁俊沣, 许映飞, 张祥, 陈媛, 陈德华. 生长调节剂吲哚丁酸对移栽棉苗成活及生长发育的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3331-3341.
[7] 哈丽哈什·依巴提, 张炎, 李青军, 徐新朋, 何萍. 基于产量反应和农学效率的棉花智能化推荐施肥方法研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3052-3064.
[8] 李亚玮, 徐盈盈, 左春阳, 刘若男, 梁亚军, 孔杰, 张献龙, 闵玲. 棉花减数分裂进程鉴定体系构建及其对高温胁迫的响应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2570-2580.
[9] 陈佳伟, 林艳, 张明星, 周诗晶, 饶力群, 周池, 李鑫. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌YCH92对棉花根际土壤微生物群落及棉花产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2821-2835.
[10] 谢章书, 谢学方, 屠小菊, 刘爱玉, 董合忠, 周仲华. 植物激素对棉花蕾铃脱落的调控研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 1-29.
[11] 辛明华, 秘雅迪, 王国平, 李小飞, 李亚兵, 董合林, 韩迎春, 冯璐. 行距配置和种植密度对棉花干物质生产及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 221-232.
[12] 李超, 付小琼. 基于GYT双标图综合评价黄河流域中熟杂交棉花区域试验品种[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 30-43.
[13] 艾莎, 李莎, 方治伟, 李论, 李甜甜, 高利芬, 陈利红, 肖华锋, 万人静, 闫多子, 武星廷, 彭海, 韩瑞玺, 周俊飞. 棉花MNP标记位点开发及其在DNA指纹图谱构建中的应用[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2267-2278.
[14] 李航, 刘丽, 黄乾, 刘文豪, 司爱君, 孔宪辉, 王旭文, 赵福相, 梅拥军, 余渝. 棉花种质资源萌发期耐盐性鉴定及筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1147-1157.
[15] 乐愉, 王涛, 张献龙, 林忠旭. 陆地棉重组自交系再生能力和遗传转化效率筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1172-1180.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!