欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 483-489.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00483

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

赤霉素对盐胁迫抑制水稻种子萌发的缓解作用的蛋白质组分析

温福平12;张檀1;张朝晖2;潘映红2*   

  1. 1西北农林科技大学林学院,陕西杨凌712100;2中国农业科学院作物科学研究所/国家农作物基因资源与基因改良重大科学工程,北京100081
  • 收稿日期:2008-08-15 修回日期:2008-12-13 出版日期:2009-03-12 网络出版日期:2009-01-16
  • 通讯作者: 潘映红
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(30471060),中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金(2060302-2-07),国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2008AA10Z115)资助

Proteome Analysis of Relieving Effect of gibberellin on the Inhibition of rice Seed Germination by Salt stress

WEN Fu-Ping12;ZHANG Tan1;ZHANG Zhao-Hui2;PAN Ying-Hong2*   

  1. 1College of Forestry, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100,China;2Institute of Crop Sciences/National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081,China
  • Received:2008-08-15 Revised:2008-12-13 Published:2009-03-12 Published online:2009-01-16
  • Contact: PAN Ying-Hong

PDF

2257

被引次数

101

摘要：

用粳稻日本晴(Oryza sativa L. cv.Nipponbare)，研究了盐胁迫对水稻种子萌发的抑制作用和赤霉酸(GA3)对盐胁迫的缓解作用；分别以H2O (对照），5 g L-1 NaCl (处理I)，5 g L-1 NaCl + 100 μmol L-1 GA3(处理II)培养水稻种苗48 h，提取芽中的蛋白质，利用双向电泳(2-DE)和基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)技术分析了水稻蛋白质组的变化。结果表明，在盐胁迫条件下，日本晴种子的萌发显著受到抑制,而GA3能显著缓解这种抑制作用；用ImageMaster软件分析2-DE凝胶,发现有4个蛋白质斑点表现出显著的变化，在盐胁迫下斑点S1、S2和S3表达下调而斑点S4消失，在GA3与盐共处理时，这4个蛋白质点的表达均有不同程度的恢复；经MALDI-TOF MS分析，其中2个蛋白质斑点(S1,S3)分别被鉴定为isoflavone reductase-like蛋白与葡萄糖磷酸变位酶，这些蛋白可能与GA3提高水稻耐盐性途径相关。

关键词: 水稻, 赤霉素, 盐胁迫, 蛋白质组

Abstract:

Salinity stress is a major abiotic stress to most plant including rice. It has been reported that gibberellic acid (GA3) can exert a natural beneficial effect on salt stressed rice. In this paper, the effect of salt stress on rice (Oryza sativa L. cv.Nipponbare) seed germination and the effect of GA3 on salt-stressed rice were investigated. A proteomic approach was employed to further understand the relieving effect of gibberellin on the inhibition of rice seed germination by salt stress. The 5-day-old rice seedlings were treated with H2O (control), 5 g L-1 NaCl (treated group I), and 5 g L-1 NaCl + 100 μmol L-1 GA3 (treated group II) for 48 h respectively. The proteins extracted from buds were separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and analyzed with Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). The results showed that the seed germination of Nipponbare was inhibited by salt stress significantly (see Table 1), while GA3 could reduce the inhibition significantly (see Table 2). Four protein spots showed differential expression in 2-DE. Three of these proteins were down-regulated (spots 1–3) and one protein disappeared (spots 4) under salt stress. Expression levels of these proteins were recovered partly when treated with GA3 and NaCl at the same time (see Fig. 1 and Fig. 2). Two protein spots were identified as isoflavone reductase-like protein and phosphoglucomutase (see Table 3). These differential expression proteins may play important role in the mechanism of the relieving effect of gibberellin on the inhibition of rice germination by salt stress.

Key words: Rice, Gibberellin, Salt stress, Proteome

[1]Chitteti B R, Peng Z. Proteome and phosphoproteome differential expression under salinity stress in rice (Oryza sativa) roots. J Proteome Res, 2007, 6: 1718–1727
[2]Dooki A D, Mayer-Posner F J, Askari H, Zaiee A A, Salekdeh G H. Proteomic responses of rice young panicles to salinity. Proteomics, 2006, 6: 6498–6507
[3]Parker R, Flowers T J, Moore A L, Harpham N V. An accurate and reproducible method for proteome profiling of the effects of salt stress in the rice leaf lamina. J Exp Bot, 2006, 57: 1109–1118
[4]Walia H, Wilson C, Zeng L, Ismail A M, Condamine P, Close T J. Genome-wide transcriptional analysis of salinity stressed japonica and indica rice genotypes during panicle initiation stage. Plant Mol Biol, 2007, 63: 609–623
[5]Nohzadeh Malakshah S, Habibi Rezaei M, Heidari M, Hosseini Salekdeh G. Proteomics reveals new salt responsive proteins associated with rice plasma membrane. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem, 2007, 71: 2144–2154
[6]Hoffmann-Benning S, Kende H. On the role of abscisic acid and gibberellin in the regulation of growth in rice. Plant Physiol, 1992, 99: 1156–1161
[7]Raskin I, Kende H. Role of gibberellin in the growth response of submerged deep water rice. Plant Physiol, 1984, 76: 947–950
[8]Kefford N P. Auxin-Gibberellin interaction in rice coleoptile elongation. Plant Physiol, 1962, 37: 380–386
[9]Konishi H, Yamane H, Maeshima M, Komatsu S. Characterization of fructose-bisphosphate aldolase regulated by gibberellin in roots of rice seedling. Plant Mol Biol, 2004, 56: 839–848
[10]Komatsu S, Konishi H. Proteome analysis of rice root proteins regulated by gibberellin. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics, 2005, 3: 132–142
[11]Komatsu S, Zang X, Tanaka N. Comparison of two proteomics techniques used to identify proteins regulated by gibberellin in rice. J Proteome Res, 2006, 5: 270–276
[12]Konishi H, Maeshima M, Komatsu S. Characterization of vacuolar membrane proteins changed in rice root treated with gibberellin. J Proteome Res, 2005, 4: 1775–1780
[13]Shen S, Sharma A, Komatsu S. Characterization of proteins responsive to gibberellin in the leaf-sheath of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedling using proteome analysis. Biol Pharm Bull, 2003, 26: 129–136
[14]Rodríguez A A, Stella A M, Storni M M, Zulpa G, Zaccaro M C. Effects of cyanobacterial extracellular products and gibberellic acid on salinity tolerance in Oryza sativa L. Saline Systems, 2006, 2: 7
[15]Liu W-X(刘伟霞), Pan Y-H(潘映红). Sample preparation methods suitable for wheat leaf proteome analysis. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2007, 40(10): 2169–2176 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]Pan R-C(潘瑞炽). Plant Physiology (植物生理学). Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2003. pp 292–293 (in Chinese)
[17]Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Ashikari M, Nakajima M, Itoh H, Katoh E, Kobayashi M, Chow T Y, Hsing Y I, Kitano H, Yamaguchi I, Matsuoka M. GIBBERELLIN INSENSITIVE DWARF1 encodes a soluble receptor for gibberellin. Nature, 2005, 437: 693–698
[18]Jiang C, Fu X. GA action: turning on de-DELLA repressing signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2007, 10: 461–465
[19]Feng S, Martinez C, Gusmaroli G, Wang Y, Zhou J, Wang F, Chen L, Yu L, Iglesias-Pedraz J M, Kircher S, Sch?fer E, Fu X, Fan L M, Deng X W. Coordinated regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana development by light and gibberellins. Nature, 2008, 451: 475–479
[20]Achard P, Cheng H, De Grauwe L, Decat J, Schoutteten H, Moritz T, Van Der Straeten D, Peng J, Harberd N P. Integration of plant responses to environmentally activated phytohormonal signals. Science, 2006, 311: 91–94
[21]Salekdeh G H, Siopongco J, Wade L J, Ghareyazie B, Bennett J. Proteomic analysis of rice leaves during drought stress and recovery. Proteomics, 2002, 2: 1131–1145
[22]Petrucco S, Bolchi A, Foroni C, Percudani R, Rossi G L, Ottonello S. A maize gene encoding an NADPH binding enzyme highly homologous to isoflavone reductases 1s activated in response to sulfur starvation. Plant Cell, 1996, 1: 69–80
[23]Babiychuk E, Kushnir S, Belles-Boix E, Van Montagu M, Inzé D. Arabidopsis thaliana NADPH oxidoreductase homologs confer tolerance of yeasts toward the thiol-oxidizing drug diamide. J Biol Chem, 1995, 270: 26224–26231
[24]Lers A, Burd S, Lomaniec E, Droby S, Chalutz E. The expression of a grapefruit gene encoding an isoflavone reductaselike protein is induced in response to UV irradiation. Plant Mol Biol, 1998, 36: 847–856
[25]Caspar T, Huber S C, Somerville C. Alterations in growth, photosynthesis, and respiration in a starch less mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) deficient in chloroplast phosphoglucomutase activity. Plant Physiol, 1985, 79: 11–17
[26]Hanson K R, McHale N A. A starchless mutant of Nicotiana sylvestris containing a modified plastid phosphoglucomutase. Plant Physiol, 1988, 88: 838–844
[27]Ke Y-Q(柯玉琴), Pan T-G(潘廷国), Ai Y-F(艾育芳). Effect of NaCl stress on permeability of plasma membrane and substance transformation in germinated rice seeds. Chin J Eco-agric (中国生态农业学报), 2002, 10(4): 10–12 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[2] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[3] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[4] 宋裕祯, Bheel Chander Kumar, 王跃, 张颖星, 郭娟, Khound Rituraj, Santra Dipak Kumar, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. 糜子AP2亚家族全基因组鉴定及PmAP2-1和PmAP2-9耐盐功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1127-1139.
[5] 陈伟, 卫万娟, 赵其兵, 常东伟, 余凌波, 翟鹏飞, 冯志明, 陈宗祥, 任仰涛, 杨鹏, 刘海浪, 李珍富, 杨永乐, 金彦刚, 左示敏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9编辑Hd6基因创制优质早熟水稻新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056.
[6] 石少阶, 刘凯, 陈姿夷, 王卉颖, 李三和, 周雷, 游艾青. 水稻矮化多分蘖基因DMT1的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1022-1034.
[7] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[8] 张宇, 刘芳, 蔡诚诚, 杨小华, 吉阿么石扎, 杨元军, 王西瑶. 溴乙烷与赤霉素协同处理破除马铃薯块茎休眠的机理初探[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 825-838.
[9] 叶凡, 李帅, 李思宇, 陈云, 窦超银, 刘立军. 不同节水灌溉方式对东北稻区水稻产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[10] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[11] 刘吉昌, 李思烨, 李雪婷, 王洪章, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 任昊. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐型夏玉米品种根系生长及养分吸收效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 565-577.
[12] 王婵, 吴莹莹, 李文奇, 李霞, 王芳权, 周彤, 杨杰. 基于HRM技术开发水稻抗条纹叶枯病基因STV11功能标记[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2547-2556.
[13] 陈惠莹, 何嘉欣, 朱斌, 黄士轩, 周星佑, 伍君权, 杨美艳. 水稻黄单胞菌噬菌体vB_XaS_HDB2的全基因组分析和生物学特性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2087-2099.
[14] 杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[15] 雷松翰, 范骏扬, 车艳奕, 代永东, 郑雨萌, 田维江, 桑贤春, 王晓雯. 水稻内卷叶突变体acl3的鉴定及调控基因的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1467-1479.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2