欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (12): 2273-2279.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.02273

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

麦长管蚜(Sitobion avenae F.)危害对春小麦面粉品质性状及面团流变学特性的影响

师桂英1,尚勋武1,*,王化俊1,2,马小乐1,胡秉芬1,李昌盛1   

  1. 1甘肃农业大学农学院,甘肃兰州730070;2甘肃省作物遗传改良与种质创新重点实验室,甘肃兰州730070
  • 收稿日期:2008-11-19 修回日期:2009-06-25 出版日期:2009-12-10 网络出版日期:2009-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 尚勋武, E-mail: shangxunwu@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由甘肃省自然科学基金(0710RJZA094),甘肃省农牧厅协作项目(034061),甘肃农业大学中青年创新基金(GAU-CX0520)资助。

Responses of Flour Quality and Dough Rheological Properties to Stiobion avenae F. Inoculated in Spring Wheat

SHI Gui-Ying1,SHANG Xun-Wu1,*,WANG Hua-Jun1,2,MA Xiao-Le1,HU Bing-Fen1,LI Chang-Sheng1   

  1. 1College of Agronomy,Gansu Agricultural University,Lanzhou 730070,China;2Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic & Gemplasm Enhancement,Gansu Agricultural University,Lanzhou 730070,China
  • Received:2008-11-19 Revised:2009-06-25 Published:2009-12-10 Published online:2009-09-10
  • Contact: SHANG Xun-Wu, E-mail: shangxunwu@163.com

摘要:

选用2个抗麦长管蚜(Sitobion avenae F.)小麦材料及4个感蚜材料, 利用人工接种方法研究了该蚜虫危害对小麦面粉品质的影响。结果表明, 蚜虫取食对面粉颗粒度没有显著影响, 但可引起小麦面粉灰分含量显著增加, 蛋白质含量、SDS沉降值、面团筋力、膨胀指数、面团延伸性、面团弹性、弹性指数显著降低, 从而降低面粉品质。抗蚜小麦04-9284C272及感蚜硬质小麦甘春20部分品质指标不发生变化或变化程度低于其他3个感蚜软质小麦。5个软质小麦蚜量高峰值与膨胀指数、面团弹性、SDS沉降值、面团筋力和蛋白质含量品质的降低幅度呈正相关, 相关系数分别为0.99680.96190.93100.91080.8886, 均达显著水平; 与灰分含量、面团延伸性和弹性指数相关性不显著。甘肃兰州拉面专用品种甘春20在高密度蚜虫危害后, 面粉品质下降, 但依然符合该专用粉的最适品质要求。

关键词: 抗蚜性, 小麦, 面粉品质, 籽粒硬度, 蚜虫

Abstract:

Sitobion avenae F., one of the important aphid species infesting spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in western China, causes not only yield loss but also quality degradation of wheat flour. In the authors’ earlier studies, two wheat lines with high resistance to S. avenae, 04-9284 and C272 were screened out from 521 accessions. Another five highly susceptible cultivars (lines) were also identified, including a specific cultivar “Guanchun 20” for Lanzhou hand-stretched noodles. The aims of the present study were to compare quality differences of resistant and susceptible wheat lines inoculated with aphids, and to assess the contributions of grain hardness and gliadin to aphid resistance. The lines 04-9284 and C272 (soft grain) were used as resistant lines, and four cultivars (lines), Ganchun 20 (hard grain) as well as Ganchuan 18, C162, and C167 (soft grain with specific ω gliadin in grains after aphid infecting) were susceptible to S. avenae. After artificial inoculation with S. avenae on 5 June, the density of aphid population was measured from 15 June to 20 July at an interval of 6–7 d. Flour quality and dough rheological properties were determined after grain maturing. The mean density of aphid population at peak occurrence was 4.3-fold higher in susceptible lines than in resistant lines. Aphid infecting resulted in no significant change in flour granule (t = 0.4312, P = 0.68), but induced significant increase in ash content (t = 2.9207, P = 0.03) and reductions in protein content (t = 2.5444, P = 0.05), SDS sedimentation value (t = 4.5736, P = 0.01), strength (t = 4.2517, P = 0.01), swelling (t = 6.6691, P = 0.00), extensibility (t = 3.1826, P = 0.02), tenacity (t = 3.6653, P = 0.01), and index of elastic (t = 2.8750, P = 0.03). In susceptible lines Ganchun 18, C162, and C167, aphid infecting significantly reduced quality parameters mentioned above excluding flour gradual and ash content. Ganchun 20 showed less influence than the other three susceptible lines,its protein content, swelling, and extensibility reduced insignificantly, and the other parameters decreased slightly. In resistant lines 04-9284 and C272, there were significant variations after aphid infecting only in strength and extensibility with much smaller values than those in the three susceptible lines. Correlation analysis showed that the peak aphid density in the five lines with soft grain was positively correlated with the decrease percentages of quality parameters, such as swelling (r = 0.9968,P<0.01), tenacity (r = 0.9619,P<0.01), SDS sedimentation, strength (r = 0.9108,P<0.05), and protein content (r = 0.8886,P<0.05). With respect to the hard-grain cultivar Ganchun 20, the flour quality was still qualified for processing hand-stretched noodles even at the high density of 214.67 aphids per tiller. Field investigation showed that the peak density of S. avenae on Ganchun 20 was 122.36–154.33 heads per tiller in common years, which is much fewer than that in this study. Therefore, Ganchun 20 is not degraded seriously in flour quality under normal occurrence of S. avenae and possesses a relative stability of quality in response to the infecting of aphid.

Key words: Aphids resistance, Wheat, Flour quality, Grain hardness, Aphid


[1] Hoffman T K, Kolb F L. Effects of barley yellow dwarf virus on root and shoot growth of winter wheat seedling grown in aeroponic culture. Plant Dis, 1997, 81: 497-500

[2] Özder N. Development and fecundity of Sitobion avenae on some wheat cultivars under laboratory conditions. Phytoparasitica, 2002, 30: 434-436

[3] Lee G, Stevens D J, Stokes S, Wratten S D. Duration of cereal aphid populations and the effects on wheat yield and bread making quality. Ann Appl Biol, 1981, 98: 169-178

[4] Basky Z, Fonagy A. Glutenin and gliadin contents of flour derived from wheat infested with different aphid species. Pest Manag Sci, 2003, 59: 426-430

[5] Shi G-Y(师桂英). Screening and evaluation for resistance to aphid (Sitobion avenae F.) and the resistant mechanism of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm. PhD Dissertation of Gansu Agricultural University, 2006. pp 7-9 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6] Shi G-Y(师桂英), Shang X-W(尚勋武), Wang H-J(王化俊), Ma X-L(马小乐).Screening for resistance to aphid (Sitobion avenae F.) of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm. J Lanzhou Univ (Nat Sci)(兰州大学学报?自然科学版), 2008, 44(5): 40-43 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7]Basky Z, Fonagy A. The effect of aphid infection and cultivar on the protein content governing baking quality of wheat. J Sci Food Agric, 2007, 87: 2488-2494

[8] Bask y Z, Fonagy A, Kiss B. Effect of aphid feeding on the glutenin, gliadin and total protein contents of wheat flour. Acta Phytopathol Entomol Hung, 2006, 41: 153-164

[9] Basky Z, Fonagy A, Kiss B. Baking quality of wheat flour affected by cereal aphids. Cereal Res Commun, 2006, 34: 1161-1166

[10] Li Q-S(李巧丝), Wu Y-Q(武予清), Li S-J(李素娟), Liu A-Z(刘爱芝), Liu Y-Y(刘媛媛). Effect of aphid feeding on bread baking quality of wheat. Plant Prot (植物保护), 2003, 29(1): 43-45 (in Chinese)

[11]Meng X-G(孟宪刚), Shang X-W(尚勋武), Zhang G-S(张改生), Lu J-L(路建龙), Shang L-P(尚立平). Effect of low molecular gluten subunits LMW GS on dough rheological properties .Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin (西北植物学报), 2004, 24(6): 959-965 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12] Cai Q-N(蔡青年), Zhang Q-W(张青文), Wang Y(王宇), Zhou M-Z(周明牂). Effects of the secondary substances on wheat resistance to Sitobion avenae F.Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2003, 36(8): 910-915 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13] Tottman D R, Broad H, Decimalcode for the growth stages of cereals. Ann Appl Biol, 1987, 110: 683-687

[14] Johansson E, Prieto-Linde M L, Svensson G, Jonsson J O. Infuences of cultivar, cultivation year and fertilizer rate on amount of protein groups and amount and size distribution of mono- and polymeric proteins in wheat. J Agric Sci, 2003, 140: 275-284

[15] Meng X-G(孟宪刚), Shang X-W(尚勋武), Zhang G-S(张改生), Chai S-X(柴守玺). Wheat flour quality requirement for Lanzhou hand stretched noodles: I. The relationship between the noodles quality and the general quality of wheat flour.Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005,31(4): 481-486 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16] Hu X S, Zhao H Y, Hu Z Q, Li D H,Zhang Y H. EPG comparison of Sitobion avenae (Fab.) feeding behavior on three wheat varieties. Agric Sci China, 2008, 7: 180-186

[17] Hu X-S(胡想顺), Zhao H-Y(赵惠燕), Hu Z-Q(胡祖庆), Li D-H(李东鸿),Zhang Y-H(张宇红). Comparison of Rhopalosiphum padi. Feeding behavior on seedlings of three wheat varieties. Acta Entomol Sin (昆虫学报), 2007, 50(11): 1105-1110 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18] Brett F C. Genetic implication soft kernel NIR hardness on milling and flour quality inbread wheat. Sci Food Agric, 1994, 65: 125-132

[19] Zhang Y, He Z H, Ye G Y. Milling quality and protein properties of autumn-sown Chinese winter wheats evaluated through multi-location trials. Euphytica, 2005, 143: 209-222

[20] Oda S, Komae K, Yasue T. Relation between starch granule protein and endosperm softness in Japanese wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Jpn J Breed, 1992,42: 161-165
[1] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[5] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[6] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1Pod-D1Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[7] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!