欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 217-227.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00217

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

小麦旗叶叶绿素含量及荧光动力学参数与产量的灰色关联度分析

王正航1，武仙山2，昌小平2，李润植1，景蕊莲2,*   

  1. 1山西农业大学，山西太谷 030801；2国家基因资源与遗传改良重大科学工程 / 农业部作物种质资源利用重点实验室 / 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所，北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2009-07-27 修回日期:2009-12-08 出版日期:2010-02-10 网络出版日期:2009-12-21
  • 通讯作者: 景蕊莲, E-mail: jingrl@caas.net.cn, Tel: 010-82105829
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家高技术研究发展计划（863计划）项目（2006AA100201）和国家转基因生物新品种培育重大专项（2008ZX08002-002）资助。

Chlorophyll Content and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Kinetics Parameters of Flag Leaf and Their Gray Relational Grade with Yield in Wheat

WANG Zheng-Hang1,WU Xian-Shan2,CHANG Xiao-Ping2,LI Run-Zhi1,JING Rui-Lian2*   

  1. 1 Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, China; 2 National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement / Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture / Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, china
  • Received:2009-07-27 Revised:2009-12-08 Published:2010-02-10 Published online:2009-12-21
  • Contact: JING Rui-Lian, E-mail: jingrl@caas.net.cn, Tel: 010-82105829

PDF

2211

被引次数

134

摘要：

为探讨干旱胁迫条件下小麦旗叶光合性状的变化及其对产量的影响，以小麦RIL群体(旱选10号×鲁麦14) F8代的305个株系及其亲本为材料，分析雨养和灌溉两种水分条件下，开花期和灌浆期旗叶叶绿素含量和叶绿素荧光动力学参数的变化情况、相关关系、遗传力、基因数目以及不同性状与产量的关系。结果表明，在两种水分条件下，RIL群体性状多数表现超亲现象，变异系数为1.12%~67.05%。雨养条件下抗旱亲本旱选10号的旗叶叶绿素含量及叶绿素荧光动力学参数比水地品种鲁麦14表现稳定。两种水分条件下，两个生育时期的旗叶叶绿素含量极显著正相关，而荧光动力学参数相关性表现复杂，Fm与Fv、Fo/Fm与Fv/Fm之间相关性最高，相关系数大于0.994。在所有性状中，叶绿素含量的遗传力最高；多数性状在雨养条件下的基因数目多于灌溉条件的，控制灌浆期Fv/Fo的基因数目最多，达34对。灰色关联度分析显示，灌浆期Fm、Fv及Fo与Fm曲线之间的面积对产量影响较大，可以作为选择抗旱高光效小麦的重要评价指标。

关键词: 小麦, RIL群体, 干旱胁迫, 叶绿素含量, 叶绿素荧光动力学参数, 产量, 灰色关联度

Abstract:

Drought stress impacts photosynthetic characteristics and results in a diminished output in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). In the variety screening and breeding of wheat for high photosynthetic efficiency and drought resistance, indices for the assessment are of great importance. Although a few investigators have studied the physiological mechanism of photosynthesis on the basis of the chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics parameters with several wheat varieties, the relationships between these parameters and grain yield were not completely clear. The inheritance of chlorophyll related traits under different water conditions has not been reported, especially using genetic populations.To dissect the dynamics of photosynthetic characteristics and the heritabilities of chlorophyll content and chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics parameters in wheat, the authors have constructed a set of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) through crossing a highly drought-resistant variety, Hanxuan 10, and a high-yielding variety Lumai 14 grown in irrigated areas. In this study, 305 RILs of F8 generation were evaluated in well-watered and rainfed (drought stress) environments, and traits of chlorophyll content and 7 chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics parameters in flag leaves were measured at flowering and filling stages. Most of the mean values of traits showed substantial transgressive segregation in the RILs, and the variation coefficients ranged from 1.12% to 67.05% under both water regimes. All traits measurements except for Fo and Fo/Fm in the RILs and their parents were lower under rainfed condition than under the well-watered condition.The chlorophyll content andthe chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics parameters were more stable in Hanxuan 10 than in Lumai 14. Significantly positive correlations were observed in chlorophyll content between either water conditions or growth stages, and the correlation coefficients ranged from 0.499 (P < 0.01) to 0.717 (P < 0.01). However, correlations among the chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics parameters were complex, of which the largest correlation coefficients (more than 0.994) were observed between Fm and Fv and between Fo/Fm and Fv/Fm. Among all the traits tested, chlorophyll content had the highest heritability that was no less than 0.81 in both treatments. According to the primary estimates, most traits under rainfed condition were controlled by more genes than under well-watered condition. For instance, the maximum genes, totally 34, were detected for Fv/Fo at filling stage under rainfed condition; 33 genes were detected for Fv at filling stage under rainfed condition and for Fv/Fm and Fo/Fm at flowering stage under rainfed condition; 32 genes were found for Fm at filling stage under rainfed condition. The gray relational grade analysis indicated that Fv, Fm, and the area between curves of Fo and Fm at filling stage made important impacts on the grain yield. Therefore, they are considered as important indices for in the selection of drought tolerance and high photosynthetic efficiency in wheat.

Key words: Wheat, Recombinant inbred lines, Drought stress, Chlorophyll content, Chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics parameters, Yield, Gray relational grade

[1] Lu C M, Zhang J H. Effects of water stress on photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and photoinhibition in wheat plants. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1998, 25: 883-892
[2] Inoue T, Inanaga S, Sugimoto Y, El Siddig K. Contribution of pre-anthesis assimilates and current photosynthesis to grain yield, and their relationships to drought resistance in wheat cultivars grown under different soil moisture. Photosynetica, 2004, 42: 99-104
[3] Wardlaw I F. Interaction between drought and chronic high temperature during kernel filling in wheat in a controlled environment. Ann Bot, 2002, 90: 469-476
[4] Cao W-D(曹卫东), Jia J-Z(贾继增), Jin J-Y(金继运). Identification and interaction analysis of QTL for chlorophyll content in wheat seedlings. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2004, 10(5): 473-478(in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] Walulu R S, Rosenow D T, Wester D B, Nguyen H T. Inheritance of the stay-green trait in sorghum. Crop Sci, 1994, 34: 970-972
[6] Van Oosterom E, Jayachandran R, Bidinger F R. Diallel analysis of the stay-green trait and its components in sorghum. Crop Sci, 1996, 36: 540-555
[7] Borrell A K, Hammer G L, Douglas A C L. Does maintaining green leaf area in sorghum improve yield under drought? I. Leaf growth and senescence. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 1026-1037
[8] Borrell A K, Hammer G L. Nitrogen dynamics and the physiological basis of stay-green in sorghum. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 1295-1307
[9] Verma V, Foulkes M J, Worland A J,Sylvester-Bradley R, Caligari P D S, Snape J W. Mapping quantitative trait loci for leaf senescence as a yield determinant in winter wheatunder optical and drought-stressed environments. Euphytica, 2004, 135: 255-263
[10] Hafsi M, Mechmeche W, Bouamama L, Djekoune A, Zaharieva M, Monneveux P. Flag leaf senescence, as evaluated by numerical image analysis, and its relationship with yield under drought in durum wheat. J Agron Crop Sci, 2000, 185: 275-280
[11] Richard R A. Physiological traits used in the breeding of new cultivars for water-scarce environments. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress, Brisbane, Australia, 2004

[2009-01-11]. http://www.cropscience.org.au/icsc2004/ symposia/1/3/1470_richardsr.htm
[12] Borrell A K, Hammer G L, van Oosterom E. Stay-green: A consequence of balance between supply and demand for nitrogen during grain filling? Ann Appl Biol, 2001, 138: 91-95
[13]Genty B, Briantais J M, Baker N R. The relationship between quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence U. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1989, 990: 87-92
[14] Tambussi E A, Nogués S, Araus J L. Ear of durum wheat under water stress: water relations and photosynthetic metabolism. Planta, 2005, 221: 446-458
[15] Lu C M, Zhang J H. Effects of water stress on photosystem II photochemistry and its thermostability in wheat plants. J Exp Bot, 1999, 50: 1199-1206
[16] Zhang Y J, Zhao C J, Liu L Y, Wang J H, Wang R C. Chlorophyll fluorescence detected passively by difference reflectance spectra of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) leaf. J Integr Plant Biol, 2005, 47: 1228-1235
[17] Zhao L-Y(赵丽英), Deng X-P(邓西平), Shan L(山仑). Effects of osmotic stress on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of wheat seedling. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2005, 16(7): 1261-1264 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] Krause G H, Weis E. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: The basics. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol,1991, 42: 313-349
[19] Wu C-A(吴长艾), Meng Q-W(孟庆伟), Zou Q(邹琦). Comparative study on the photo oxidative response in different wheat cultivate leaves. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2003, 29(3): 339-344 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] Xu C-C(许长成), Li D-Q(李德全), Zou Q(邹琦). Effect of drought on chlorophyll fluorescence and xanthophyll cycle components in winter wheat leaves with different ages. Acta Phytophysiol Sin (植物生理学报), 1999, 25(1): 29-37 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] Songsri P, Jogloy S, Kesmala T, Vorasoot N, Akkasaeng C, Patanothai A, Holbrook C C. Heritability of drought resistance traits and correlation of drought resistance and agronomic traits in peanut. Crop Sci, 2008, 48: 2245-2253
[22] Gao S-J(高三基), Luo J(罗俊), Chen R-K(陈如凯), Zhang M-Q(张木清), Pan D-R(潘大仁). Photosynthetic physiology indexes of the drought resistance of sugarcane and its comprehensive evaluation. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2002, 28(1): 94-98 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] Grzesiak S, Grzesiak M T, Filek W, Stabryta J. Evaluation of physiological screening tests for breeding drought resistant triticale (× Triticosecale Wittmack). Acta Physiol Plant, 2003, 25: 29-37
[24] Wang S-Q(王士强), Hu Y-G(胡银岗), She K-J(佘奎军), Zhou L-L(周琳璘), Meng F-L(孟凡磊). Gray relational grade analysis of agronomical and physic-biochemical traits related to drought tolerance in wheat. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2007, 40(11): 2452-2459 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]Wang Y-S(王永士), Guo R-L(郭瑞林), He D-X(贺德先), Yang C-L(杨春玲), Ma C-P(马翠萍), Xie L-F(谢利芬), Guo A-B(郭安斌), Song S-Q(宋世强), Fan H-B(范华兵). Application of grey relational degree analysis to selection of strong-gluten wheat cultivars in Anyang. J Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 2009, 29(2): 271-274 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]Wang B(王斌), Zhao B-H(赵帮宏), Zheng G-R(郑桂茹).Grey relational analysis based on space concept and evaluation research on cost-benefit of wheat. Chin Agric Sci Bull (中国农学通报), 2009, 25(7): 264-267 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27] Cheng X-F(成雪峰), Zhang F-Y(张凤云). Application of grey correlation analysis in summer soybean breeding. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2009, 28(1): 31-35 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28] Zhai H-Q(翟虎渠), Wang J-K(王建康). Application Quantitative Genetics (应用数量遗传). Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2007. p 62 (in Chinese)
[29] Maxwell K, Johnson G N. Chlorophyll fluorescence: A practical guide. J Exp Bot, 2000, 51: 659-688
[30] Jiang C D, Gao H Y, Zou Q. Changes of donor and accepter side in photosystem II complex induced by iron deficiency in attached soybean and maize leaves. Photosynthetica, 2003,41:267-271
[31] Hu X-H(胡学华), Pu G-L(蒲光兰), Xiao Q-W(肖千文), Liu Y-H(刘永红), Deng J-L(邓家林). Effects of water stress on chlorophyll fluorescence in leaves of plum. Chin J Eco-Agric (中国生态农业学报), 2007, 15(1): 75-77 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32] Zhang Q-D(张其德), Zhang J-H(张建华), Liu H-Q(刘合芹), Li J-M(李建民). Effects of limited irrigation and different fertilization ways on some photosynthetic functions of flag leaves in winter wheat. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2000, 6(1): 24-29 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33] Song L-L(宋丽丽), Guo Y-P(郭延平), Xu K(徐凯). Protective mechanism in photo inhibition of photosynthesis in Citrus unshiu leaves. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2003, 14(1): 47-50 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34] Zhang Q-Y(张秋英), Li F-D(李发东), Liu M-Y(刘孟雨). Effect of water stress on the photosynthesis of flag leaf of winter wheat. Agric Res Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 2002, 20(3): 80-84 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35] Zhang S-R(张守仁). A discussion on chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics parameters and their significance. Chin Bull But (植物学通报), 1999, 16(4): 444-448 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36] Yang D L, Jing R L, Chang X P, Li W. Genetic analysis of quantitative traits associated with soluble carbohydrate content of doubled haploid population in wheat stem. Genetics,2007, 176: 571-584
[37] Yang D L, Jing R L, Chang X P, Li W. Quantitative trait loci mapping for chlorophyll fluorescence and associated traits in wheat. J Integr Plant Biol,2007, 49: 646-654
[38] Fang B-T(方保停), Guo T-C(郭天才), Wang C-Y(王晨阳), He S-L(何盛莲). Effects of limited irrigation on the kinetics parameters of chlorophyll fluorescence in filling stage and grain yield of winter wheat. Agric Res Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 2007, 25(1): 116-119 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[8] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[9] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[10] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[11] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[12] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[13] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[14] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[15] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2