欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 2185-2190.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.02185

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

1970-2000年代玉米单交种的遗传产量增益分析方法的比较

慈晓科1,2,张世煌1,谢振江1,徐家舜1,卢振宇1,茹高林1,张德贵1,李新海1,谢传晓1,白丽1,李明顺1,*,董树亭2,*   

  1. 1 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所, 北京 100081; 2 山东农业大学农学院 / 作物生物学国家重点实验室, 山东泰安 271018
  • 收稿日期:2010-06-17 修回日期:2010-08-04 出版日期:2010-12-12 网络出版日期:2010-10-14
  • 通讯作者: 李明顺, E-mail: mshunli@yahoo.com.cn; 董树亭, E-mail: stdong@sdau.edn.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家玉米产业技术体系, 国家科技支撑计划项目(2007BAD31B03, 2006BAD01A03)和中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(2060302-2)资助。

Comparison of Analysis Method of Genetic Yield Gain for the Single-Cross Hybrids Released During 1970s–2000s

CI Xiao-Ke1,2,ZHANG Shi-Huang1,XIE Zhen-Jiang1,XU Jia-Shun1,LU Zhen-Yu1,RU Gao-Lin1,ZHANG De-Gui1,LI Xin-Hai1,XIE Chuan-Xiao1,BAI Li1,LI Ming-Shun1,*,DONG Shu-Ting2,*   

  1. 1 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 2 State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology / College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China
  • Received:2010-06-17 Revised:2010-08-04 Published:2010-12-12 Published online:2010-10-14
  • Contact: 李明顺, E-mail: mshunli@yahoo.com.cn; 董树亭, E-mail: stdong@sdau.edn.com

PDF

2322

被引次数

19

摘要： 以田间试验为基础, 对直接种植法的不同方法进行分析, 以期找到适合我国的评估方法, 为遗传产量增益的研究提供理论支持。以1970s–2000s期间大面积推广的杂交种为材料, 分别于2005–2006年(试验1)以及2007–2008年(试验2)在新疆农业科学院和北京顺义试验基地进行。每个试验设置3种密度。依据1970年代单交种在3.0万株 hm-2密度下的产量与2000年代的单交种在6.0万株 hm-2密度下的年均单位面积的产量差异, 计算得到1970s–2000s期间我国玉米遗传产量年增益速率为94.7 kg hm-2。在7.5万株 hm-2密度下, 2000年代单交种较1970年代单交种的产量增值是遗传因素作用的结果。1970年代单交种在1.5万株hm-2密度下的产量与2000年代单交种在7.5万株 hm-2密度下的产量差值是育种与栽培共同作用的结果。由二者的比值得到育种对总产量增益的贡献率为52.9%。Duvick的直接种植法适用于我国评估遗传产量增益速率, Tollnaar的试验设置方法适用于评估我国玉米遗传贡献率。

关键词: 玉米, 密度, 遗传, 产量增益

Abstract: The different methods belonging to planting direct were analyzed in order to find out appropriate one to evaluate genetic yield gain based on our experiment. Maize hybrids, spanning four decades (from 1970s–2000s), and representing the main maize areas in China and the most popular hybrids of their time were tested during 2005–2006 and 2007–2008 in Beijing and Xinjiang. Trials were conducted under three plant densities. The difference between the yield of the 1970s hybrids with 30 000 plants ha-1 and the yield of the 2000s hybrids was divided by 40 years, providing an estimated genetic yield gain per year of 94.7 kg ha-1. The difference between the yield of the 2000s hybrids and the yield of the 1970s hybrids with 75 000 plants ha-1 resulted from genetics. The difference between the yield of the 1970s hybrids with 15 000 plants ha-1 and the yield of the 2000s hybrids with 75 000 plants ha-1 was due to breeding and management. The ratio showed the contribution of breeding to total yield gain was 52.9%. Direct planting method proposed by Duvick was applicable to evaluate the genetic yield gain. The experiment design conducted by Tollnaar was applicable to evaluate the contribution of genetics to total yield gain.

Key words: Maize, Density, Genetic, Yield gain

[1]Duvick D N. The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize. Adv Agron, 2005, 86: 83-145
[2]Li S-K(李少昆), Wang C-T(王崇桃). Evolution and development of maize production techniques in China. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2009, 42(6): 1941-1951 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]Zhang S-H(张世煌), Xu Z-G(徐志刚). Cultival system changes and its effect on agricultural technique. Crops (作物杂志), 2009, (1): 1-3 (in Chinese)
[4]Dong S-T(董树亭). Eco-Physiology and Formation of Yield and Quality in Maize (玉米生态生理与产量品质形成). Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006. pp 168-222 (in Chinese)
[5]Castleberry R M, Crum C W, Krull C F. Genetic yield improvement of US maize cultivars under varying fertility and climatic environments. Crop Sci, 1984, 24: 33-36
[6]Tollenaar M. Genetic improvement in grain yield of commercial maize hybrids grown in Ontario from 1959 to 1988. Crop Sci, 1989, 29: 1365-1371
[7]Cardwell V B. Fifty years of Minnesota corn production: Sources of yield increase. Agron J, 1982, 74: 984-990
[8]Duvick D N. Genetic Contribution to Yield Gains of Five Major Crop Plants. In USA: CAAS Special Publication, 1981. pp 10-54
[9]Huo S-P(霍仕平), Yan Q-J(晏庆九), Xu L-M(许明陆). Analysis of hybrid maize breeding in Southwest region of China. Foreign Agric-Rain Field Crop (国外农学——杂粮作物), 1996, (5): 45-52 (in Chinese)
[10]Huo S-P(霍仕平), Yan Q-J(晏庆九), Xu L-M(许明陆). Gain of grain yield and other traits of hybrids for 20 years in West south of China. Rain Fed Crops (杂粮作物), 2001, 21(1): 5-8 (in Chinese)
[11]Zhang Z-M(张泽民), Liu F-M(刘丰明), Li X-Y(李雪英). Genetic contribution to kernel yield and yield components of hybrid maize, 1963 to 1933 in Henan Province. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1998, 24(2): 182-185 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]Duvick D N. Genetic contributions to advances in yield of U S maize. Maydica, 1992, 37: 69-79
[13]Zhang S-H(张世煌), Xu W-P(徐伟平), Li M-S(李明顺), Li X-H(李新海), Xu J-S(徐家舜). Challenge and opportunity in maize breeding program. Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2008, 16(6): 1-5 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Duvick D N. Genetic rates of gain in hybrid maize yields during the past 40 years. Maydica, 1977, 22: 187-196
[15]Xie Z-J(谢振江), Li M-S(李明顺), Xu J-S(徐家舜), Zhang S-H(张世煌). Contributions of genetic improvement to yields of maize hybrids during different eras in North China. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2009, 42(3): 781-789 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]Duvick D N. Genetic Contributions to Yield Gains of U.S. Hybrid Maize, 1930 to 1980. American CSSA Special Publication No. 7, 1984. pp 15-47
[17]Tollenaar M, Lee E A. Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize. Field Crops Res, 2002, 75: 161-169
[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[3] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[6] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[7] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[8] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[9] 张全军, 吴东丽, 刘聪, 朱永超, 杨大生, 孔祥胜. 1981—2024年长江中下游油菜发育期时空格局演变特征[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1140-1152.
[10] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[11] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[12] 徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 王若若, 王磊, 张立异. 397份高粱种质资源在贵州表型多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1073-1087.
[13] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[14] 马海会, 张国平, 杨思存, 王红丽. 不同密度下氮肥运筹对半干旱区青贮玉米碳氮积累与转运特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1193-1207.
[15] 田春艳, 陆鑫, 吴才文, 徐超华, 刘家勇, 边芯, 桃联安. 基于荧光SSR的甘蔗创新种质遗传多样性分析及育种潜力评估[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1057-1072.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2