欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (03): 381-388.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.00381

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 •    下一篇

小麦种子根结构及胚芽鞘长度的QTL分析

刘秀林1,2,昌小平2,李润植1,景蕊莲2,*   

  1. 1 山西农业大学,山西太谷 030801;2 国家农作物基因资源与基因改良重大科学工程 / 农业部作物种质资源与生物技术重点开放实验室 / 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,北京100081
  • 收稿日期:2010-08-18 修回日期:2010-12-06 出版日期:2011-03-12 网络出版日期:2011-01-17
  • 通讯作者: 景蕊莲, E-mail: jingrl@caas.com.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2010CB125905)和CGIAR挑战计划项目(GCP, G7010.02.01)资助。

Mapping QTLs for Seminal Root Architecture and Coleoptile Length in Wheat

LIU Xiu-Lin1,2,CHANG Xiao-Ping2,LI Run-Zhi1,JING Rui-Lian2,*   

  1. 1 Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, Shanxi, China; 2 National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement / Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm & Biotechnology, Ministry of Agriculture / Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2010-08-18 Revised:2010-12-06 Published:2011-03-12 Published online:2011-01-17
  • Contact: 景蕊莲, E-mail: jingrl@caas.com.cn

摘要: 为探讨小麦种子根结构及胚芽鞘长度的遗传基础,以小麦DH群体(旱选10号×鲁麦14)的150个株系为材料,利用凝胶室培养幼苗,测定种子根的数目和最大根长、胚芽鞘长度、根苗干重比等性状,并通过扫描仪测定幼苗种子根的总长度、根直径及角度。利用已经构建的DH群体遗传连锁图谱,采用基于混合线性模型的复合区间作图法分析上述性状的QTL。在1A、1B、2B、2D、3B、4A、4D、5A、5B、6A、7A和7B共12条染色体上检测到12个加性效应QTL和7对加性×加性互作效应QTL。QTL的加性效应值在0.02~8.45之间,对表型变异的贡献率为5.64%~12.37%。7对加性×加性互作效应QTL分布在1A–2B(2)、1A–6A、1B–2D、5B–6A、6A–7A和6A–7B等6对染色体之间,其互作效应值为0.20~7.45,对表型变异的贡献率为8.70%~15.90%。在染色体3B和7A上各检测到1个种子根结构相关性状的QTL簇。

关键词: 小麦, 种子根结构, 胚芽鞘长度, 数量性状位点, DH群体, 凝胶室

Abstract: Root system is important for belowground nutrients acquisition, and is also an important part to respond to drought stress. The purpose of this study was to dissect the genetic basis of seminal root architecture and coleoptile length of wheat by mapping quantitative trait loci (QTLs) of target traits. A doubled haploid (DH) population with 150 lines derived from a cross between two common Chinese wheat varieties Hanxuan 10 and Lumai 14 was used as the plant materials. Gel-chamber was employed to evaluate seminal root architecture traits, including maximum root length (MRL), root number (RN), total root length (TRL), root diameter (RD), root angle (RA), ratio of root dry weight to shoot dry weight (RDW/SDW), and coleoptile length (CL) of seedlings. QTLs for these traits were detected using mixed-model-based composite interval mapping method. A total of 12 additive-effect QTLs and 7 pairs of additive × additive QTLs associated with the target traits were mapped on chromosomes 1A, 1B, 2B, 2D, 3B, 4A, 4D, 5A, 5B, 6A, 7A, and 7B. The phenotypic variation explained by individual additive-effect QTL varied from 5.64% to 12.37%. The additive effects ranged from 0.20 to 7.45. The phenotypic variation explained by each pair of epistatic QTLs varied from 8.70% to 15.90%. Two QTL clusters for seedling root traits were detected on chromosomes 3B and 7A. These results would be helpful to maker-assisted selection of seminal root architecture and coleoptile.

Key words: Wheat, Seminal root architecture, Coleoptile length, QTL, DH lines, Gel-chamber

[1]Ma Y-X(马元喜). The Root of Wheat (小麦的根). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1999. pp 1–20 (in Chinese)
[2]Manschadi A M, Hammer G L, Christopher J T, deVoil P. Genotypic variation in seedling root architectural traits and implications for drought adaptation in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Soil, 2008, 303: 115–129
[3]Manschadi A M, Christopher J, de Voil P, Hammer G L. The role of root architectural traits in adaptation of wheat to water-limited environments. Funct Plant Biol, 2006, 33: 823–837
[4]Hurd E A. Growth of roots of seven varieties of spring wheat at high and low moisture levels. Agron J, 1968, 60: 201–205
[5]Miao G-Y(苗果园), Zhang Y-T(张云亭), Yin J(尹钧), Hou Y-S(侯跃生), Pan X-L(潘幸来). A study on the development of root system in winter wheat under unirrigated conditions in semi-arid loess plateau. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1989, 19(2): 104–115 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]Liang Y-L(梁银丽), Chan P-Y(陈培元). Characteristic of Wheat Varieties in Arid Region (旱地小麦品种的特征特性). In: Shan L. Fundamentals of Physiology and Ecology in Arid Agriculture. Beijing: Science Press, 1998. pp 259–266 (in Chinese)
[7]Li L-H(李鲁华), Li S-Q(李世清), Zhai J-H(翟军海), Shi J-H(史俊海). Review of the relationship between wheat roots and water stress. Acta Bot Boreali-Occident Sin (西北植物学报), 2001, 21(1): 1–7 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]Chang X-P(昌小平), Wang H(王嬛), Yang L(杨莉). Changes of root activity and water state at seedling stage of winter wheat varieties with different drought-resistance under different water conditions. Plant Physio Commun (植物生理学通讯), 1996, 32(3): 178–182 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]Duan S-S(段舜山), Gu W-X(谷文祥), Zhang D-Y(张大勇), Li F-M(李凤民). Relationship between root system characteristics and drought resistance of wheat populations in semiarid region. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 1997, 8(2): 134–138 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]Dhanda S S, Sethi G S, Behl R K. Indices of drought tolerance in wheat genotypes at early stages of plant growth. J Agron Crop Sci, 2004, 190: 6–12
[11]Champoux M C, Wang G, Sarkarung S, Mackill D J, Toole T C O, Huang N, McCouch S R. Locating genes associated with root morphology and drought avoidance in rice via linkage to molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet, 1995, 90: 969–981
[12]Ray J D, Yu L X, Mccouch S R, Mackill D J, Toole T C O, Huang N, MeCouch S R. Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with root penetration ability in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet, 1996, 92: 627–636
[13]Mu P(穆平), Li Z-C(李自超), Li C-P(李春平), Zhang H-L(张洪亮), Wu C-M(吴长明), Li C(李晨), Wang X-K(王象坤). QTL mapping and G×E interaction for root traits in a DH population from japonica upland and lowland rice cross under three ecosystems. Chin Sci Bull (科学通报), 2003, 48(20): 2162–2169 (in Chinese)
[14]Zhang Z-B(张正斌), Xu P(徐萍). Reviewed on wheat genome. Heredity (遗传), 2002, 24(3): 389–394 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]Zhou X-G(周晓果), Jing R-L(景蕊莲), Hao Z-F(郝转芳), Chang X-P(昌小平), Zhang Z-B(张正斌). Mapping QTL for seedling root traits in common wheat. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2005, 38(10): 1951–1957 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]Li Z-K(李卓坤), Peng T(彭涛), Zhang W-D(张卫东), Xie Q-G(谢全刚), Tian J-C(田纪春). Analysis of QTLs for root traits at seedling stage using an “Immortalized F2” population of wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(3): 442–448 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]Bengough A G, Gordon D C, Al-Menaie H, Ellis R P, Allan D, Keith R, Thomas W T B, Forster B P. Gel observation chamber for rapid screening of root traits in cereal seedlings. Plant & Soil, 2004, 262: 63–70
[18]Sanguineti M C, Li S, Maccaferri M, Corneti S, Rotondo F, Chiari T, Tuberosa R. Genetic dissection of seminal root architecture in elite durum wheat germplasm. Ann Appl Biol, 2007, 151: 291–305
[19]Jing R-L(景蕊莲), Chang X-P(昌小平), Jia J-Z (贾继增), Hu R-H (胡荣海). Establishing wheat doubled haploid population for genetic mapping by anther culture. Biotechnology (生物技术), 1999, 9(3): 4–8 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]Hao Z F, Chang X P, Guo X J, Jing R L, Li R Z, Jia J Z. QTL mapping for drought tolerance at stages of germination and seedling in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using a DH population. Sci Agric China, 2003, 2: 943–949
[21]Yang J, Zhu J. Predicting superior genotypes in multiple environments based on QTL effects. Theor Appl Genet, 2005, 110: 1268−1274
[22]McIntosh R A, Hart G E, Devos K M, Rogers W J. Catalogue of gene symbols for wheat. 1999. http://grain.jouy.inra.fr/ggpages/wgc
[23]Reyniers F N, Binh T. Screening with Phosphorus32 for rooting depth among varieties of rain-fed rice. Paper Presented in the Conference on Rice in Africa, IITA, lbadan, NIgeria, 1977
[24]Jing R-L(景蕊莲), Hu R-H(胡荣海), Zhu Z-H(朱志华), Chang X-P(昌小平). A study on heritabilities of seedling morphological traits and drought resistance in winter wheat cultivars of different genotype. Act Bot Boreal-Occident Sin (西北植物学报), 1997, 17(2): 152–157 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]Price A H, Steele K A, Moore B J, Jones R G W. Upland rice grown in soil-?lled chambers and exposed to contrasting water-de?cit regimes: II. Mapping quantitative trait loci for root morphology and distributing. Field Crops Res, 2002, 76: 25–43
[26]An D G, Su J Y, Liu Q Y, Zhu Y G, Tong Y P, Li J M, Jing R L, Li B, Li Z S. Mapping QTLs for nitrogen uptake in relation to the early growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant & Soil, 2006, 284: 73–84
[27]Xu J-L(徐建龙), Xue Q-Z(薛庆中), Luo L-J(罗利军), Li Z-K(黎志康). QTL dissection of panicle number per plant and spikelet number per panicle in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Genet Sin (遗传学报), 2001, 28(8): 752–759 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]Zhang K-P(张坤普), Xu X-B(徐宪斌), Tian J-C(田纪春). QTL mapping for grain yield and spike related traits in common wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(2): 270−278 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]Rebetzke G J, Bruce S E, Kirkegaard J A. Longer coleoptiles improve emergence through crop residues to increase seedling number and biomass in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant & Soil, 2005, 272: 87–100
[30]Botwright T L, Rebetzke G J, Condon A G, Richards R A. The effect of rat genotype and temperature on coleoptile growth and dry matter partitioning in young wheat seedlings. Aust J Plant Physiol, 2001, 15: 417–423
[31]Rebetzke G J, Ellis M H, Bonnett D G., Richards R A. Molecular mapping of genes for coleoptile growth in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2007, 114: 1173–1183
[32]Rebetzke G J, Appels R, Morrison A, Richards R A, McDonald G, Ellis M H, Spielmeyer W, Bonnett D G. Quantitative trait loci on chromosome 4B for coleoptile length and early vigour in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Aust J Agric Res, 2001, 52: 1221–1234
[33]Landjeva S, Neumann K, Lohwasser U, Börner A. Molecular mapping of genomic regions associated with wheat seedling growth under osmotic stress. Biol Plantarum, 2008, 52: 259–266
[34]Wu X S, Wang Z H, Chang X P, Jing R L. Genetic dissection of the developmental behaviours of plant height in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under diverse water regimes. J Exp Bot, 2010, 61: 2923–2937
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1Pod-D1Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!