欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (02): 231-239.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00231

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

利用表达分析和基因沉默方法研究硫代硫酸硫转移酶基因TaTST与小麦抗白粉病反应的关系

贺洋，岳洁瑜，王华忠   

  1. 天津师范大学生命科学学院 / 细胞遗传与分子调控天津市重点实验室，天津 300387
  • 收稿日期:2011-08-08 修回日期:2011-10-13 出版日期:2012-02-12 网络出版日期:2011-12-01
  • 通讯作者: 王华忠, E-mail: skywhz@mail.tjnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由天津市自然科学基金(08JCYBJC05000)和天津市高等学校科技发展基金(200100606)资助。

Gene Expression Profiling and Silencing Reveal the Relationship between TaTST, a Wheat Thiosulfate Sulfurtransferase Gene, and the Resistance Response of Wheat to Powdery Mildew

HE Yang, YUE Jie-Yu, WANG Hua-Zhong   

  1. School of Life Sciences / Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cyto-Genetical & Molecular Regulation, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China
  • Received:2011-08-08 Revised:2011-10-13 Published:2012-02-12 Published online:2011-12-01
  • Contact: 王华忠, E-mail: skywhz@mail.tjnu.edu.cn

PDF

1318

被引次数

5

摘要： 硫代硫酸硫转移酶参与植物体内的硫代谢、氰化物的清除以及活性氧的生成与清除，与植物抗病反应密切相关。小麦抗、感白粉病近等基因系材料在接种白粉菌后均诱导表达硫代硫酸硫转移酶基因TaTST，并在接种后0~48 h内呈现2次诱导峰值，分别与白粉菌初次接触识别和附着胞侵入、吸器形成时间相对应，也与2次氧突发时间对应。TaTST在感病材料上的诱导表达水平明显高于在抗病材料上，由此导致的活性氧过度清除可能是导致感病反应的原因之一。TaTST也参与抗病反应过程。利用病毒诱导的基因沉默技术(virus-induced gene silencing, VIGS)创造了TaTST基因沉默的抗病植株。尽管充分发病时间后沉默植株叶片上并未观察到肉眼可见的病斑，但侵染早期白粉菌成功侵入频率的增加和次级菌丝的有限伸长说明TaTST沉默植株抗病水平下降。TaTST沉默导致乳突致密度下降和H2O2在细胞内的扩散时间延迟。因此，TaTST可能通过调节活性氧的积累和扩散、乳突的形成等小麦-白粉菌互作早期的寄主细胞反应而参与小麦对白粉菌的抗侵入过程。

关键词: 小麦, 白粉菌, 硫代硫酸硫转移酶, VIGS

Abstract: Plant thiosulfate sulfurtransferase (TST), which participates in sulfur metabolism, removal of cyanide, generation and removal of reactive oxygen species (ROS), is closely related to plant disease resistance. The wheat TST-encoding gene TaTST was induced by the powdery mildew pathogen fungus Blumeria graminis f.sp. tritici (Bgt) in both theresistant and the susceptible wheat near-isogenic lines. Two expression peaks of TaTST were found from 0 to 48 h after inoculation of Bgt, corresponding to the initial contact and recognition between the host cell and Bgt and the invasion attempt of appressoria and haustoria formation. The two expression peaks were also in agreement with the two oxygen burst reactions. The induced expression level of TaTST was significantly higher in the susceptible line than in the resistant line, which may result in excessive removal of ROS as a response to Bgt infection and so contribute to the process of diseasesusceptibility. TaTST also involved in the process of disease resistance. The method of virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) was used to silence the TaTST gene of the resistant line. Although TaTST-silencing plants did not produce visible mildew spots or lesions, they showed reduction of resistance to powdery mildew with the increased successful penetration rate and limited elongation of secondary hypha. Decreased density of papilla and delayed H2O2 spreading in the Bgt-challenged host cells of the VIGS plants suggest that TaTST possibly affects the Bgt penetration process in resistance response through participating in the ROS accumulation and spread and the papilla formation at early stage of wheat-Bgt interaction.

Key words: Wheat, Blumeria graminis f.sp. tritici (Bgt), Thiosulfate sulfurtransferase (TST), VIGS

[1]Cipollone R, Ascenzi P, Visca P. Common themes and variations in the rhodanese superfamily. IUBMB Life, 2007, 59: 51–59

[2]Saidu Y. Physicochemical features of rhodanese: A review. Afr J Biotechnol, 2004, 3: 370–374

[3]Papenbrock J, Guretzki S, Henne M. Latest news about the sulfurtransferase protein family of higher plants. Amino Acids, 2011, 41: 43–57

[4]Bartels A, Mock H P, Papenbrock J. Differential expression of Arabidopsis sulfurtransferases under various growth conditions. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2007, 45: 178–187

[5]Papenbrock J, Schmidt A. Characterization of two sulfurtransferase isozymes from Arabidopsis thaliana. Eur J Biochem, 2000, 267: 5571–5579

[6]Mao G H, Wang R G, Guan Y F, Liu Y D, Zhang S Q. Sulfurtransferases 1 and 2 play essential roles in embryo and seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biol Chem, 2011, 286: 7548–7557

[7]Niu J-S(牛吉山), Yu L(于玲), Ma Z-Q(马正强), Chen P-D(陈佩度), Liu D-J(刘大钧). Molecular cloning, characterization and mapping of a rhodanese like gene in wheat. Acta Genet Sin (遗传学报), 2002, 29(3): 266–272 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8]Walz C, Giavalisco P, Schad M, Juenger M, Klose J, Kehr J. Proteomics of curcurbit phloem exudate reveals a network of defence proteins. Phytochemistry, 2004, 65: 1795–1804

[9]Dubuis P H, Marazzi C, Staedler E, Mauch F. Sulphur deficiency causes a reduction in anti- microbial potential and leads to increased disease susceptibility of oilseed rape. Phytopathology, 2005, 153: 27–36

[10]Bartels A. Functional charactersation of sulfurtransferase proteins in higher plants. PhD Dissertation of Leibniz University, Hannover, Germany, 2006

[11]Vennesland B, Castric P A, Conn E E, Solomonson L P, Volini M, Westley J. Cyanide metabolism. Fed Proc, 1982, 41: 2639–2648

[12]Grossmann K. A role for cyanide, derived from ethylene biosynthesis, in the development of stress symptoms. Physiol Plant, 1996, 97: 772–775

[13]Seo S, Mitsuhara I, Feng J, Iwai T, Hasegawa M, Ohashi Y. Cyanide, a coproduct of plant hormone ethylene biosynthesis, contributes to the resistance of rice to blast fungus. Plant Physiol, 2011, 155: 502–514

[14]Donadio S, Sha?ee A, Hutchinson R. Disruption of a rhodanese like gene results in cysteine auxotrophy in Saccharopolyspora erythraea. J Bacteriol, 1990, 172: 350–360

[15]Rausch T, Wachter A. Sulfur metabolism: a versatile platform for launching defence operations. Trends Plant Sci, 2005, 10: 504–509

[16]Papenbrock J, Bartels A, Hartmann F, Hartmann J, Triulzi T. Reduced sulfur in the plant cell: enzymatic formation and functional roles. In: Sirko A, De Kok L J, Haneklaus S, Hawkesford M J, Rennenberg H, Kaito S, Schnug E, Stulen I, eds. Sulfur metabolism in higher plants. Weikersheim: Markgraf Publishers, 2009. pp 217–219

[17]Nandi D L, Horowitz P M, Westley J. Rhodanese as a thioredoxin oxidase. Int J Biochem Cell Biol, 2000, 32: 465–473

[18]Petty I T, Hunter B G, Wei N, Jackson A O. Infectious barley stripe mosaic virus RNA transcribed in vitro from full-length genomic cDNA clones. Virology, 1989, 171: 342–349

[19]Livak K J, Schmittgen T D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCt method. Methods, 2001, 25: 402–408

[20]Hückelhoven R, Fodor J, Preis C, Kogel K H. Hypersensitive cell death and papilla formation in barley attacked by the powdery mildew fungus are associated with hydrogen peroxide but not with salicylic acid accumulation. Plant Physiol, 1999, 119: 1251–1260

[21]Caldo R A, Nettleton D, Wise R P. Interaction-dependent gene expression in Mla-specified response to barley powdery mildew. Plant Cell, 2004, 16: 2514–2528

[22]Hückelhoven R, Kogel K H. Reactive oxygen intermediates in plant-microbe interactions: Who is who in powdery mildew resistance? Planta, 2003, 216: 891–902

[23]Liu G S, Sheng X Y, Greenshields D L, Ogieglo A, Kaminskyj S, Selvaraj G, Wei Y D. Profiling of wheat class III peroxidase genes derived from powdery mildew-attacked epidermis reveals distinct sequence-associated expression patterns. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 2005, 18: 730–741

[24]Harrach B D, Fodor J, Pogány M, Preuss J, Barna B. Antioxidant, ethylene and membrane leakage responses to powdery mildew infection of near-isogenic barley lines with various types of resistance. Eur J Plant Pathol, 2008, 121: 21–33

[25]Caplan J L, Mamillapalli P, Burch-Smith T M, Czymmek K, Dinesh-Kumar S P. Chloroplastic protein NRIP1 mediates innate immune receptor recognition of a viral effector. Cell, 2008, 132: 449–462

[26]Feng H Q, Sun K, Li M Q, Li H Y, Li X, Li Y, Wang Y F. The expression, function and regulation of mitochondrial alternative oxidase under biotic stresses. Mol Plant Pathol, 2010, 11: 429–40

[27]Li Z-H(李政红), Gao D-S(高东升), Li X-L(李宪利). The relation between endormancy and changes in two main electron transport pathways of nectarine (Prunus persica var. nectariana) buds. J Plant Physiol Mol Biol (植物生理与分子生物学学报), 2006, 32(2): 156–162 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2