欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (08): 1354-1360.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01354

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

小麦TaPHYA基因亚家族的克隆及表达分析

王霞1,2,**,马燕斌2,3,4,**,宋梅芳2,孟凡华2,李秀全2,杨丽2,吴霞4,杨克诚3,*,杨建平2,*   

  1. 1山西运城学院生命科学系,山西运城 044000;2中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,北京100081;3四川农业大学玉米研究所,四川雅安625014;
    4山西省农业科学院棉花研究所,山西运城 044000
  • 收稿日期:2012-03-08 修回日期:2012-04-20 出版日期:2012-08-12 网络出版日期:2012-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 杨建平, E-mail: yangjianping@caas.net.cn, Tel: 010-82105859; 杨克诚, Tel: 0835-2882465
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家转基因生物新品种培育重大专项(2011ZX08010-002), 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2009CB118300)和国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2008AA10Z121)资助。

Isolation and Expression Patterns of TaPHYA Gene Subfamily in Common Wheat

WANG Xia1,2,**,MA Yan-Bin2,3,4,**,MENG Fan-Hua2,LI Xiu-Quan2,YANG Li2,Wu-Xia4,YANG Ke-Cheng3,*,YANG Jian-Ping2 ,*   

  1. 1 Department of Life Science, Yuncheng University, Yuncheng 044000, China; 2 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 3 Maize Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 450002, China; 4 Cotton Research Institute, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yuncheng 044000, China
  • Received:2012-03-08 Revised:2012-04-20 Published:2012-08-12 Published online:2012-06-05
  • Contact: 杨建平, E-mail: yangjianping@caas.net.cn, Tel: 010-82105859; 杨克诚, Tel: 0835-2882465

摘要: 光敏色素是一类与作物农艺性状密切相关的基因家族。本研究克隆了中国春小麦光敏色素TaPHYA1、TaPHYA2和TaPHYA3基因完整的编码序列,并对它们进行了生物信息学以及转录分析。在NCBI数据库中对其推测的氨基酸序列进行BLAST分析,发现TaPHYA1和TaPHYA3氨基酸序列中包含光敏色素基因完整的功能结构域。系统进化树分析表明,小麦TaPHYA1、TaPHYA2和TaPHYA3之间进化关系相近,且与单子叶植物玉米、水稻的PHYA聚为一个亚类。另外,TaPHYA的表达丰度具有组织特异性,在茎、叶、穗中表达量分别是根中的1.35、0.34和0.87倍;而在同光质条件下,其表达丰度也具有光质特异性,TaPHYA的总表达量在黑暗和远红光条件下最高,在蓝光条件下次之,而红光和白光条件下最低。该结果为深入研究小麦光敏色素A基因亚家族的功能奠定了基础。

关键词: 小麦, 光敏色素A, 组织特异性, 表达分析

Abstract: Phytochromes (PHYs) are important genes relating to crop agronomic traits. In this paper, TaPHYA1, TaPHYA2, and TaPHYA3 were cloned fromcv. Chinese Spring(Triticum aestivum L.). Theputative domains ofTaPHYA1, TaPHYA2, and TaPHYA3 proteins were predicted via the NCBI Protein BLAST. Either TaPHYA1 or TaPHYA3 was composed of a GAF domain, a PHYtochrome domain, two PAS domains, a His Kinase A domain, and a Histidine kinase-like ATPase domain.Phylogenetic tree analysis indicated that TaPHYA1, TaPHYA2, and TaPHYA3 were closer to PHYA members of monocot plants (ZmPHYA, SbPHYA, and OsPHYA) rather than to those of dicot plants (AtPHYA and GmPHYA). Expression levels of TaPHYAs were analyzed using semi quantitative RT-PCR and real time PCR assays.Tissue-specific expression of total TaPHYA was also detected in stem, leaf, and spike,whose levelswere 1.35, 0.34, and 0.87 times of that in root. Additionally, TaPHYA showed high expression level in darkness, far-red, and blue light conditions, but low expression level in red and white light conditions. The transcription level of TaPHYA in the seedlings grown in the darkness or under far-red light was four or three times of that in seedlings grown in red light, respectively.

Key words: Triticum aestivum, Phytochrome A, Tissue-specific expression, Transcription expression analysis

[1]Wang H, Deng X W. Dissecting the phytochrome A-dependent signaling network in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci, 2003, 8: 172–178

[2]Schepens I, Duek P, Fankhauser C. Phytochrome-mediated light signalling in Arabidopsis. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2004, 7: 564–569

[3]Garg A K, Sawers R J H, Wang H, Kim J K, Walker J M, Brutnell T P, Parthasarathy M V, Vierstra R D, Wu R J. Light-regulated overexpression of an Arabidopsis phytochrome A gene in rice alters plant architecture and increases grain yield. Planta, 2006, 223: 627–636

[4]Thiele A, Herold M, Lenk I, Quail P H, Gatz C. Heterologous expression of Arabidopsis phytochrome B in transgenic potato influences photosynthetic performance and tuber development. Plant Physiol, 1999, 120: 73–81

[5]Dehesh K, Tepperman J, Christensen A H, Quail P H. phyB is evolutionarily conserved and constitutively expressed in rice seedling shoots. Mol Gen Genet, 1991, 225: 305–313

[6]Basu D, Dehesh K, Schneider-Poetsch H J, Harrington S E, McCouch S R, Quail P H. Rice PhyC gene: structure, expression, map position and evolution. Plant Mol Biol, 2000, 44: 27–42

[7]Takano M, Kanegae H, Shinomura T, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Furuya M. Isolation and characterization of rice phytochrome A mutants. Plant Cell, 2001, 13: 521–534

[8]Takano M, Inagaki N, Xie X, Yuzurihara N, Hihara F, Ishizuka T, Yano M, Nishimura M, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Shinomura T. Distinct and cooperative functions of phytochromes A, B, and C in the control of deetiolation and flowering in rice. Plant Cell, 2005, 17: 3311–3325

[9]Sheehan M J, Farmer P R, Brutnell T P. Structure and expression of maize phytochrome family homeologs. Genetics, 2004, 167: 1395–1405

[10]Gaut B S, Doebley J F. DNA sequence evidence for the segmental allotetraploid origin of maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1997, 94: 6809–6814

[11]Ma Y-B(马燕斌), Li Z(李壮), Cai Y-F(蔡应繁), Zhou P(周朋), Xiao Y(肖阳), Huang Y-B(黄玉碧), Fu F-L(付凤玲), Pan G-T(潘光堂), Yang K-C(杨克诚), Yang J-P (杨建平). Isolation, protein structures and expression patterns responding to different light treatments of two phytochrome A genes in maize (Zea mays L.). Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2010, 43(10): 1985–1993 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12]Wu F Q, Zhang X M, Li D M, Fu Y F. Ectopic expression reveals a conserved PHYB homolog in soybean. PLoS One, 2011, 6: e27737. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027737

[13]Ogihara Y, Shimizu, H, Hasegawa K, Tsujimoto H, Sasakuma T. Chromosome assignment of four photosynthesis-related genes and their variability in wheat species. Theor Appl Genet, 1994, 88: 383–394

[14]Kulshreshtha R, Kumar N, Balyan H S, Gupta P K, Khurana P, Tyagi A K, Khurana J P. Structural characterization, expression analysis and evolution of the red/far-red sensing photoreceptor gene, phytochrome C (PhyC), localized on the ‘B’ genome of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Planta, 2005, 221: 675–689

[15]Li Z(李壮), Ma Y-B (马燕斌), Cai Y-F(蔡应繁), Wu S-W(吴锁伟), Xiao Y(肖阳), Meng F-H(孟凡华), Fu F-L(付风铃), Huang Y-B(黄玉碧), Yang J-P(杨建平). Cloning and expression analysis of TaPhyB3 in Triticum aestivum. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(5): 779–787 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16]Devos K M, Beales J, Ogihara Y, Doust A N. Comparative sequence analysis of the Phytochrome C gene and its upstream region in allohexaploid wheat reveals new data on the evolution of its three constituent genomes. Plant Mol Biol, 2005, 58: 625–641

[17]Yu B-L(余波澜), Huang C-F(黄朝峰), Zhou W-J(周文娟), Zhang W-J(张文俊). Evolution study of wheat (Tritium aestivum L.) A, B and D genome based on DNA sequence similarity. Acta Genet Sin (遗传学报), 2001, 28(7): 635–639 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18]Yu H-X (于海霞), Tian J-C(田纪春). Review of genome B in T. aestivum L. Mol Plant Breed (分子植物育种), 2008, 6(4): 724–732 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19]Clough R C, Jordan-Beebe E T. Sequences within both the N- and C-terminal domains of phytochrome A are required for PFR ubiquitination and degradation. Plant J, 1999, 17: 155–167

[20]Weller J L, Batge S L, Smith J J, Kerckhoffs L H, Sineshchekov V A, Murfet I C, Reid J B. A dominant mutation in the pea PHYA gene confers enhanced responses to light and impairs the light-dependent degradation of phytochrome A. Plant Physiol, 2004, 135: 2186–2195

[21]Müller R, Fernández A P, Hiltbrunner A, Schäfer E, Kretsch T. The histidine kinase-related domain of Arabidopsis phytochrome A controls the spectral sensitivity and the subcellular distribution of the photoreceptor. Plant Physiol, 2009, 150: 1297–1309

[22]Hennig L, Buche C. Dynamic properties of endogenous phytochrome A in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Physiol, 1999, 121: 571–577

[23]Quail P H. Phytochrome: A light-activated molecular switch that regulates plant gene expression. Annu Rev Genet, 1991, 25: 389–409

[24]Wang H, Ma L, Habashi J, Li J, Zhao H, Deng X W. Analysis of far-red light-regulated genome expression profiles of phytochrome A pathway mutants in Arabidopsis. Plant J, 2002, 32: 723–733

[25]Canton F R, Quail P H. Both phyA and phyB mediate light-imposed repression of PhyA gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol, 1999, 121: 1207–1215

[26]Somers D E, Quail P H. Temporal and spatial expression patterns of PhyA and PhyB genes in Arabidopsis. Plant J, 1995, 7: 413–427
[1] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4] 左同鸿, 张贺翠, 曾静, 朱利泉. 甘蓝自交不亲和相关基因BoPUB3L的克隆与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1698-1710.
[5] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[6] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[7] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1Pod-D1Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[9] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[10] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[11] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[12] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[13] 田立涛, 丁宁, 王树林, 齐恩芳, 张荣, 王蕊蕊, 马利雯, 李建武, 杨江伟. 马铃薯Argonaute基因家族鉴定及晚疫病诱导表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1116-1126.
[14] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[15] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!