欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (08): 1513-1521.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01513

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

水分胁迫对糜子植株苗期生长和光合特性的影响

冯晓敏1，张永清1,2,*   

  1. 1山西师范大学生命科学学院，山西临汾041004; 2 山西师范大学城市与环境学院，山西临汾041004
  • 收稿日期:2011-11-23 修回日期:2012-04-20 出版日期:2012-08-12 网络出版日期:2012-06-04
  • 通讯作者: 张永清, E-mail: yqzhang208@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由?国家自然科学基金项目(30871483)和山西省自然科学基金项目(2006011086)资助。

Effect of Water Stress on Seedling Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics in Broomcorn Millet

FENG Xiao-Min1,ZHANG Yong-Qing1,2,*   

  1. 1College of Life Science, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen 041000, China; 2 College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen 041000, China
  • Received:2011-11-23 Revised:2012-04-20 Published:2012-08-12 Published online:2012-06-04
  • Contact: 张永清, E-mail: yqzhang208@126.com

PDF

4294

被引次数

75

摘要： 选取耐旱性不同的糜子品种陇糜4号(强抗旱)、晋黍7号(旱敏感)和5283黄(中等抗旱)，采用盆栽控水试验，调查不同水分处理对糜子苗期主要性状和光合参数的影响。结果表明：(1)水分胁迫下各品种的株高、叶面积、根重、叶绿素含量、根系活力均呈下降趋势，且陇糜4号的降幅小于5283黄和晋黍7号。(2)水分胁迫下，3个品种的固定荧光值(Fo)和非光化学猝灭系数值(qN)均显著增加，在重度胁迫后，陇糜4号、5283黄和晋黍7号的Fo值分别比对照增加24.6%﹑34%和40.8%，qN值分别增加0.956、1.083和2.183，且表现为旱敏感品种晋黍7号的增加幅度大于强抗旱品种陇糜4号；各品种的可变荧光(Fv)、最大荧光(Fm)、最大光化学量子产量(Fv/Fm)、PSII的潜在活性(Fv/Fo)、光化学猝灭系数(qP)值均因水分胁迫而降低。在中度和重度胁迫时，与正常灌水相比差异达显著水平，降幅以晋黍7号>5283黄>陇糜4号。(3)各品种的净光合速率、蒸腾速率、气孔导度及胞间CO2浓度均因水分胁迫而下降，强抗旱品种陇糜4号各值的变化幅度均小于中等抗旱品种5283黄和旱敏感品种晋黍7号，表明陇糜4号的光合参数受水分胁迫的影响最小，较高的电子传递速率和较强的光能转化能力是陇糜4号适应干旱环境的重要生理特性。(4)水分胁迫导致糜子叶片对强光的敏感性增加，干旱和光抑制对光系统II造成的叠加伤害随干旱加重和品种抗旱性减弱而加剧，因此，对强光下的糜子幼苗应及时补水，以避免干旱和高光强的叠加伤害。

关键词: 糜子, 水分胁迫, 光响应, 叶绿素荧光参数

Abstract: The response of main growth characters and photosynthetic parameters in seedlings of Broomcorn millets cultivars Longmi 4 (drought resistant), Jinshu 7 (drought-sensitive) and 5283 Huang (medium drought resistant) to three different drought stresses and normal irrigation were studied in a pot experiment. The result showed that drought stress decreased plant height, leaf area, root weight, chlorophyll content, and root activity. In addition the decreased range of Jinshu 7 was bigger than that of Longmi 4 and 5283 Huang. With the increasing of drought stress, fixation fluorescence value (Fo) and non photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) increased significantly, in Longmi 4, 5283 Huang, and Jinshu 7, Fo increased by 24.6%, 34%, and 40.8%; qN increased by 0.956, 1.083, and 2.183, however,Fv, Fm, Fv/Fm, Fv/Fo, and qPall decreased under water stress,with the significant differences compared with that from those in the control under moderate stress and serious stress. Water stress decreased photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance and CO2 concentration, which were lower in Longmi 4 than in Jinshu 7 and 5283 Huang, indicating that higher photosynthetic efficiency, stronger light energy transfer capacity and greater relative growth rate in Longmi 4 may be the major physiological traits adapted to drought stress. Sensitivity of broomcorn millet leaves to light increased under water stress, making injury of drought and photo inhibition to photosystem II, the severer drought and the weaker drought resistance, therefore we should water the broomcorn millet seedlings to avoid the injury of severe drought and high light.

Key words: Proso, Drought stress, Light responses of photosynthesis, Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters

[1]Huo Z-G(霍治国), Bai Y-M(白月明), Wen M(温民), Chen L(陈林), Hu Y-L(胡延龙), Ye C-L(叶彩玲). The experimental research on water stress effects on growth and development of winter wheat. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2001, 21(9): 1528–1536 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[2]Zhang Y-Q(张永清), Miao G-Y(苗果园). Effects of fertilizing in immature soil to broomcorn millet root growing and its physiological ecology. Soil Water Conserv (水土保持学报), 2006, 20(3): 158–169 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[3]Zhang Y-Q(张永清), Miao G-Y(苗果园). The biological response of broomcorn millet root to drought stress with different fertilization levels. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 2(4): 601–606 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[4]Zhang R-H(张仁和), Xue J-Q(薛吉全), Pu J(浦军), Zhao B(赵兵), Zhang X-H(张兴华), Zheng Y-J(郑友军), Bu L-Z(卜令铎). Influence of drought stress on plant growth and photosynthetic traits in maize seedlings. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2011, 7(3): 521–528 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5]Wang L(王纶),Wang X-Y(王星玉), Wen Q-F(温琪汾), W B-E(武变娥). Research and utilization of proso millet germplasm resource in China. Plant Genet Resour (植物遗传资源报), 2005, 6(4): 474–477 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6]Wang Z-H(王正航), Wu X-S(武仙山), Chang X-P(昌小平), Li R-Z(李润植), Jing R-L(景蕊莲). Chlorophy U content and chlorophy U fluorescence kinetics parameters of flag leaf and their gray relational grade with yield in wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(2): 217–227 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7]Zhao L-Y(赵丽英), Deng X-P(邓西平), Shan L(山仑). Effects of osmotic stress on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of wheat seedling. Chin J Eco-Agic (中国生态农业学报), 2007, 15(1): 63–66 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8]Zhang L-M(张雷明), Shang-Guan Z-P(上官周平), Mao M-C(毛明策). Effect of long-term application of nitrogen fertilizer on leaf chlorophyll fluorescence of upland winter wheat. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2003, 14(5): 695–698 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9]Li S-Z(李绍长), Hu C-H(胡昌浩), Gong J(龚江). Effects of low phosphorus stress on the chlorophyll fluorescence of different phosphorus use efficient maize (Zea mays L.). Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(4): 365–370 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10]Zhang Q-D(张其德), Liu H-Q(刘合芹), Zhang J-H(张建华). Effect of limited irrigation on some photosynthetic functions of flag leaves in winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2000, 26(6): 869–873 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[11]Chen J-M(陈建明), Yu X-P(俞晓平), Cheng J-A(程家安). The application of chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics in the study of physiological responses of plants to environmental stresses. Acta Agric Zhejiangngensis (浙江农业学报), 2006, 18(1): 51–55 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12]Lu C M, Zhang J H. Effects of water stress on photosystem II photochemistry and its thermostability in wheat plants. J Exp Bot, 1999, 50: 1199–1206

[13]Zhang Z-L(张志良). Guidance of Plant Physiology Experiments (植物生理试验指导). Beijing: High Education Press, 1992. pp 88–154 (in Chinese)

[14]Efeoglu B, Ekmekci Y, Cicek N. Physiological responses of three maize cultivars to drought stress and recovery. South African J Bot, 2009, 75: 34–42

[15]Levitt J. Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses: Water, Radiation, Salt and Other Stresses, 2nd Edn. New York: Academic press, 1980. pp 25–280

[16]Xu D-Q(许大全). Photosynthetic Efficiency (光合作用效率). Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, 2002. pp 821–834 (in Chinese)

[17]Yang X-Q(杨晓青), Zhang S-Q(张岁崎), Liang Z-S(梁宗锁), Shan Y(山颖). Effects of water stress on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of different drought resistance winter wheat cultivars seedlings. Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin (西北植物学报), 2004, 24(5): 812–816 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18]Zhang R-H(张任和), Ma G-S(马国胜), Chai H(柴海), Zhang X-H(张兴华), Lu H-D(路海东), Xue J-Q(薛吉全). Effect of drought stress on chlorophyll fluorescence of maize leaves at seedling. Agric Res Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 2010, 28(6): 170–176 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19]Sharp R E, Poroyko V, Hejlek L G, Spollen W G, Springer G K, Bohnert H J, Nguyen H T. Root growth maintenance during water deficits: physiology to functional genomies. J Exp Bot, 2004, 55: 2343–2351

[20]Cao Y(曹昀), Wang G-X(王国祥). Effects of water content on germination and seedlings growth of sweet flag. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2007, 27(5): 1748–1755 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[21]Cong X(丛雪), Qi H(齐华), Meng F-C(孟凡超), Liu M(刘明). Effects of water stresses on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and membrane permeability of different maize varieties. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin (华北农学报报), 2010, 25(5): 141–144 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[22]Liu R-X(刘瑞显), Wang Y-H(王友华), Chen B-L(陈兵林), Guo W-Q(郭文琦), Zhou Z-G(周治国). Effects of nitrogen levels on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics under drought stress in cotton flowering and boll-forming stage. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(4): 675–683 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[23]Han R-H(韩瑞宏), Lu X-S(卢欣石), Gao G-J(高桂娟), Yang X-J(杨秀娟). Photosynthetic physiological response of alfalfa (Medicago satiava) to drought stress. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2007, 27(12): 5229–5237 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[24]Zhang J(张娟), Zhang Z-B(张正斌), Xie H-M(谢惠民), Dong B-D(董宝娣), Hu M-Y(胡梦云), Xu P(徐萍). The relationship between water use efficiency and related physiological traits in wheat leaves. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(12): 1593–1599 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[25]Ji T-H(冀天会), Zhang C-J(张灿军), Yang Z-G(杨子光), Guo J-W(郭军伟), Meng L-M(孟丽梅), Ma W(马雯). Study on the relationship of chlorophyll fluorescence characters and drought resistance of winter wheat varieties under drought stress. J Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 2005, 25(4): 64–66 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 张颖星, 宋裕祯, 王跃, 曹越, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. EMS诱导糜子优异性状突变体的筛选及表型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1388-1400.
[2] 宋裕祯, Bheel Chander Kumar, 王跃, 张颖星, 郭娟, Khound Rituraj, Santra Dipak Kumar, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. 糜子AP2亚家族全基因组鉴定及PmAP2-1和PmAP2-9耐盐功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1127-1139.
[3] 李新浩, 邢梦柯, 周梓惠, 李思烨, 任昊, 王洪章, 赖华江. 外源褪黑素通过协调光反应与暗反应增强玉米苗期的耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 839-856.
[4] 丁艺冰, 辛旭霞, 冯智尊, 郭娟, 曹越, 陈喜明, 王晓丹, 曹晓宁, SANTRA Dipak K, 陈凌, 乔治军, 王瑞云. 东北春播区糜子核心种质的荧光微卫星标记鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1728-1739.
[5] 望嘉翔, 郁雪婷, 李梦桃, 麦伟涛, 陈新, 王文泉. MeLAZY1c基因调控木薯株型的初步研究[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1514-1524.
[6] 丁艺冰, 辛旭霞, 冯智尊, 曹越, 郭娟, Dipak K SANTRA, 王瑞云, 陈喜明. 东北春播区糜子核心种质及其DNA分子身份证构建[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1181-1192.
[7] 曹越, 张立媛, 辛旭霞, 冯智尊, 郭娟, 王晓丹, 曹晓宁, SANTRA Dipak K, 陈凌, 乔治军, 王瑞云. 基于荧光SSR的宁夏糜子DNA分子身份证的构建[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(11): 2699-2711.
[8] 郭娟, 辛旭霞, 冯智尊, 曹越, 王晓丹, 曹晓宁, 陈凌, 乔治军, 王瑞云. 基于SSR的陕西糜子种质资源的分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(10): 2643-2653.
[9] 杨晓慧, 王碧胜, 孙筱璐, 侯靳锦, 徐梦杰, 王志军, 房全孝. 冬小麦对水分胁迫响应的模型模拟与节水滴灌制度优化[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2196-2209.
[10] 丁敏, 段政勇, 王宇卓, 薛亚鹏, 王海岗, 陈凌, 王瑞云, 乔治军. 糜子GBSSI基因功能标记的开发与验证[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(3): 703-718.
[11] 谢呈辉, 马海曌, 许宏伟, 徐郗阳, 阮国兵, 郭峥岩, 宁永培, 冯永忠, 杨改河, 任广鑫. 施氮量对宁夏引黄灌区麦后复种糜子生长、产量及氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 463-477.
[12] 李静, 王洪章, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝. 夏玉米不同栽培模式花后叶片光合性能的差异[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1351-1359.
[13] 侯红乾,林洪鑫,刘秀梅,冀建华,刘益仁,蓝贤瑾,吕真真,周卫军. 长期施肥处理对双季晚稻叶绿素荧光特征及籽粒产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(02): 280-289.
[14] 党科,宫香伟,陈光华,赵冠,刘龙,王洪露,杨璞,冯佰利. 糜子绿豆带状种植下糜子的氮素积累、代谢及产量变化[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(12): 1880-1890.
[15] DO Thanh-Trung,李健,张风娟,杨丽涛,李杨瑞,邢永秀. 甘蔗与抗旱性相关差异蛋白质组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(09): 1337-1346.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2