欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (04): 693-703.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00693

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

华北平原不同年代小麦品种旗叶光合特性对水分亏缺的响应

杨再洁,陈阜*,史磊刚,文新亚   

  1. 中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院 / 农业部农作制度重点开放实验室,北京 100193
  • 收稿日期:2012-07-14 修回日期:2012-11-16 出版日期:2013-04-12 网络出版日期:2013-01-04
  • 通讯作者: 陈阜, E-mail: chenfu@cau.edu.cn, Tel: 010-62733316
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2010CB951502)和农业部公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201103001)资助。

Responses of Photosynthetic Characteristics of Winter Wheat Cultivars Released in Different Decades to Water Deficit in North China Plain

YANG Zai-Jie,CHEN Fu*,SHI Lei-Gang,WEN Xin-Ya   

  1. College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
  • Received:2012-07-14 Revised:2012-11-16 Published:2013-04-12 Published online:2013-01-04
  • Contact: 陈阜, E-mail: chenfu@cau.edu.cn, Tel: 010-62733316

摘要:

为探讨华北平原不同年代小麦品种对水分亏缺的反应及适应机制,选取20世纪50年代以来的代表品种碧蚂1号、济南2号、泰山1号、冀麦26、冀麦38和济麦22,比较其在灌溉和雨养条件下旗叶光合特性。结果表明,当前品种济麦22的产量显著高于上述5个品种,产量的提高伴随着净光合速率和气孔导度的显著提高,二者密切相关;在灌溉条件下,济麦22的产量比上述5个品种分别增加54.4%39.4%23.4%18.9%4.2%,花后平均净光合速率分别增加30.0%15.9%15.2%9.8%5.5%,气孔导度分别增加46.1%35.9%23.1%7.3%6.6%;在雨养条件下,济麦22的产量比这5个品种分别增加46.0%37.6%21.5%18.8%3.2%,花后平均净光合速率分别增加41.5%29.1%19.8%11.2%6.7%,气孔导度分别增加68.4%48.7%30.6%10.7%10.6%。与灌溉条件下相比,雨养条件下不同年代小麦品种旗叶净光合速率和气孔导度均表现为降低的趋势,但济麦22的降低幅度低于上述5个品种,表明当前品种的旗叶光合特性对水分亏缺的适应性较强。雨养条件下,碧蚂1号、济南2号、泰山1号、冀麦26、冀麦38和济麦22的产量分别比灌溉条件下降低6.6%10.5%10.3%11.6%10.8% 11.7%,济麦22的下降幅度最大,表明当前品种的产量对水分亏缺的敏感性较强,在水分充足的条件下增产潜力较高。

关键词: 华北平原, 冬小麦, 品种演替, 光合特性, 水分亏缺

Abstract:

In order to understand the reaction and adaption mechanism to water deficit in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) planted in North China Plain, six cultivars (Bima 1 released in the 1950s, Jinan 2 released in the 1960s, Taishan 1 released in the 1970s, Jimai 26 released in the 1980s, Jimai 38 released in the 1990s, and Jimai 22 released in the 2000s) were grown under both irrigated and rain-fed conditions in two successive growing seasons from 2010 to 2012. The photosynthetic characteristics of flag leaf after anthesis and grain yields were compared under two water conditions. The yield of Jimai 22 was significantly higher than that of other cultivars. The increase of yield was along with the significant improvements of photosynthetic rate (Pn) and stomatal conductance (Gs). Under irrigated condition, Jimai 22 showed increases of 54.4%, 39.4%, 23.4%, 18.9%, and 4.2% in yield, 30.0%, 15.9%, 15.2%, 9.8%, and 5.5% in Pn, and 46.1%, 35.9%, 23.1%, 7.3%, and 6.6% in Gs compared with the previous cultivars Bima 1, Jinan 2, Taishan 1, Jimai 26, and Jimai 38, respectively. Under rain-fed condition, Jimai 22 showed increases of 46.0%, 37.6%, 21.5%, 18.8%, and 3.2% in yield, 41.5%, 29.1%, 19.8%, 11.2%, and 6.7% in Pn, and 68.4%, 48.7%, 30.6%, 10.7%, and 10.6% in Gs compared with the previous cultivars, respectively. Under rain-fed condition, the Pn and Gs of all cultivars were lower than those under irrigated condition, and these of Jimai 22 showed the least reduction, indicating that Jimai 22 has higher photosynthetic adaptation to water deficiency. However, compared with the irrigated treatment, the rain-fed treatment showed 6.6–11.7% of yield decrease in different cultivars, with the largest reduction percentage in Jimai 22. Therefore, we concluded that the current wheat cultivars in North China Plain have high-yield potential under water-sufficient condition, but they are sensitive to water deficiency, with a relatively strong photosynthetic adaptation to water deficiency.

Key words: North China Plain, Winter wheat, Cultivar evolvement, Photosynthetic characteristics, Water deficiency

[1]Yang S. The ten agricultural regions of China. In Xu G, Peel L J, eds. The Agriculture of China. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991. pp 108–143



[2]Xiao S-H(肖世和). Tend of wheat breeding and food security in China. Sci Tech Rev (科技导报), 2006, (4): 5–8 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]Jiang G M, Sun J Z, Liu H Q, Qu C M, Wang K J, Guo R J, Bai K Z, Gao L M, Kuang T Y. Changes in the rate of photosynthesis accompanying the yield increase in wheat cultivars released in the past 50 years. J Plant Res, 2003, 116: 347–354



[4]Fischer R A , Rees D , Sayre K D , Lu Z M , Candon A G , Saavedra A L. Wheat yield progress associated with higher stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate, and cooler canopies. Crop Sci, 1998, 38: 1467–1475



[5]Ren H-Z(任鸿遵), Li L(李林). Diagnosis of water supply and demand in the North China Plain. Geograph Res (地理研究), 2000, 19(3): 316–323 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[6]Patrizia R, Stefano P, Carmela G, Giovanni M, Carla P. Drought stress response in wheat physiological and molecular analysis of resistant and sensitive genotypes. Plant Cell Environ, 2006, 29: 2143–2152



[7]Hu M-Y(胡梦芸), Zhang Z-B(张正斌), Xu P(徐萍), Dong B-D(董宝娣), Li W-Q(李魏强), Li J-J(李景娟). Relationship of water use efficiency with photoassimilate accumulation and transport in wheat under deficit irrigation. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(11): 1884–1891 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]Xue Q W, Zhu Z X, Musick J T, Stewart B A, Dusek D A. Physiological mechanisms contri buting to the increased water- use efficiency in winter wheat under deficit irrigation. J Plant Physiol, 2006, 163: 154–164



[9]Jiang D(姜东), Xie Z-J(谢祝捷), Cao W-X(曹卫星), Dai T-B(戴廷波), Jing Q(荆奇). Effects of post-anthesis drought and water-logging on photosynthetic characteristics, assimilates transportation in winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(2): 175–182 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]Tambussi E A, Nogués S, Araus J L. Ear of durum wheat under water stress: water relations and photosynthetic metabolism. Planta, 2005, 221: 446–458



[11]Subrahmanyam D, Subash N, Haris A, Sikka A K. Influence of water stress on leaf photosynthetic characteristics in wheat cultivars differing in their susceptibility to drought. Photosynthetica, 2006, 44: 125–129



[12]Zhao H-M(赵红梅), Guo C-J(郭程瑾), Duan W-W(段巍巍), Qi Y-Q(齐永清), Wang X-Y(王笑颖), Li-Y-M(李雁鸣), Xiao K(肖凯). Studies on evaluation indices for drought resistance capacity in wheat varieties. J Plant Genet Resour (植物遗传资源学报), 2007, 8(1): 76–81 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]Xu Y-Y(许毓英). The main crop strains resources, potential and regional development countermeasures. Resour Sci (资源科学), 1991, 21(1): 9-14 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]Wang S-H(王士红), Jing Q(荆奇), Dai T-B(戴廷波), Jiang D(姜东), Cao W-X(曹卫星). Evolution characteristics of flag leaf photosynthesis and grain yield of wheat cultivars bred in different years. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2008, 19(6): 1255–1260 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]Zhang X Y, Chen S Y, Sun H Y, Wang Y M, Shao L W. Water use efficiency and associated traits in winter wheat cultivars in the North China Plain. Agric Water Manag, 2010, 97: 1117–1125



[16]Richards R A. Selectable traits to increase crop photosynthesis and yield of grain crops. J Exp Bot, 2000, 51: 447–458



[17]Lan J-H(兰进好), Zhang B-S(张宝石), Zhou H-F(周鸿飞), Liu Y-X(刘源霞), Li H-L(李洪利). Comparison on photosynthetic rate and interrelated characteristics of winter wheat varieties from different eras. J Shenyang Agric Univ (沈阳农业大学学报), 2003, 34(1): 12–15 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]Cao H M. Source-sink manipulation effects on post anthesis photosynthesis and grain setting on spike in winter wheat. Photosynthetica , 1998, 35: 453–459



[19]Dunin F X, Meyer W S, Wong S C, Reyenga W. Seasonal changes in water use and carbon assimilation of irrigated wheat. Agric For Meteorol, 1989, 45: 231–250



[20]Sayre K D, Rajeram S, Fischer R A. Yield potential progress in short bread wheat in north-west Mexico. Crop Sci, 1997, 37: 36–42



[21]Ahmadi A, Siosemardeh A. Investigation on the physiological basis of grain yield and drought resistance in wheat: leaf photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and non-stomatal limitations. Int J Agric Boil, 2005, 7: 807–811



[22]Chen X(陈旭), Hao M-D(郝明德), Xu J-J(许晶晶), Zhu Y-L(朱亚莉). Effect of drought stress on photosynthesis characteristics in flag leaf of wheat cultivars in different years in the central Shaanxi Plain. Agric Res Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 2012, 30(1): 159–169 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[23]Shang-Guan Z-P(上官周平). Physiological mechanism of highly efficiency use of limited water supply by winter wheat. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 1999, 10(1): 567–569 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[24]Yu Z-W(于振文). Crop Cultivation for Species (作物栽培学各论). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2003. p 42
[1] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[2] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[3] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[4] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[5] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[6] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[7] 吴柳格, 陈坚, 张鑫, 邓艾兴, 宋振伟, 郑成岩, 张卫建. 近二十年国审冬小麦品种的产量与品质性状变化趋势研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1814-1826.
[8] 陈如雪, 孙丽芳, 张芯源, 牟海萌, 张永新, 袁丽雪, 彭仕乐, 王壮壮, 王永华. 秸秆还田与微生物菌剂配施对冬小麦旗叶碳氮代谢及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1901-1913.
[9] 赵刚, 张建军, 党翼, 樊廷录, 王磊, 周刚, 王淑英, 李兴茂, 倪胜利, 米文博, 周旭姣, 程万莉, 李尚中. 黄土旱塬区秸秆覆盖量对不同降雨年型土壤水温效应和冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1643-1653.
[10] 王东, 王森, 尚丽, 冯浩伟, 张永巧, 崔佳鸣, 李爽, 章佳聪, 车欢. 补灌对黄土高原半湿润区冬小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1312-1325.
[11] 李培华, 李杰, 孟祥宇, 孙玉晨, 冯永佳, 李云丽, 刁邓超, 赵雯, 吴玮, 韩德俊, 张嵩午, 郑炜君. 高温胁迫下冷型小麦的抗逆性评估及其生理响应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1118-1130.
[12] 李乔, 叶杨春, 常旭虹, 王德梅, 王艳杰, 杨玉双, 马瑞琦, 赵广才, 蔡瑞国, 张敏, 刘希伟. 花后高温干旱逆境对冬小麦光合特性和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1077-1090.
[13] 王娇, 白海霞, 韩语燕, 梁惠, 冯雅楠, 张东升, 李萍, 宗毓铮, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇. CO2浓度升高、升温及其交互作用对良星99冬小麦叶片碳氮代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1061-1076.
[14] 王岩, 白春生, 李波, 范虹, 何蔚, 杨莉莉, 曹悦, 赵财. 覆膜免耕和灌水量对西北绿洲灌区玉米产量及光合特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 755-770.
[15] 张妍妍, 李迎, 刘栩辰, 黄超, 吕佳宁, 周海佳, 马守田, 秦安振, 高子乐, 吴光辉, 陈丹, 姬夏楠, 刘战东. 深松耕作条件下滴灌对冬小麦花后干物质积累及灌浆特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3065-3079.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!