欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (04): 711-718.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00711

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

双季稻区不同栽培方式对早稻生育期、干物质积累及产量的影响

唐海明1,逄焕成2,肖小平1,*,聂泽民3,汤文光1,于天一2,汪柯1,李强4,杨光立1   

  1. 1 湖南省土壤肥料研究所, 湖南长沙 410125; 2 中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所, 北京 100081; 3 湖南省南县农业局, 湖南南县 413200; 4 湖南省南县三仙湖农技站, 湖南南县 41320
  • 收稿日期:2013-09-03 修回日期:2014-01-12 出版日期:2014-04-12 网络出版日期:2014-02-14
  • 通讯作者: 肖小平, E-mail: hntfsxxping@163.com, Tel: 0731-84691345
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家“十二五”公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201103001)和国家“十二五”科技支撑计划项目(2012BAD20B05-01)资助。

Effects of Different Cultivation Methods on Growth Stage, Dry Matter Accumulation and Yield of Early Rice in Double Cropping Rice Field

TANG Hai-Ming1,PANG Huan-Cheng2,XIAO Xiao-Ping1,*,NIE Ze-Min3,TANG Wen-Guang1,YU Tian-Yi2,WANG Ke1,LI Qiang4,YANG Guang-Li1   

  1. 1 Hunan Soil and Fertilizer Institute, Changsha 410125, China; 2 Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 3 Nanxian Agricultural Bureau, Nanxian 413200, China; 4 Sanxianhu Agrotechnical Station, Nanxian 413202, China
  • Received:2013-09-03 Revised:2014-01-12 Published:2014-04-12 Published online:2014-02-14
  • Contact: 肖小平, E-mail: hntfsxxping@163.com, Tel: 0731-84691345

RichHTML

PDF

1341

被引次数

17

摘要：

为探明洞庭湖平原双季稻区不同栽培方式对早稻生育期、干物质积累及产量的影响, 以常规稻和杂交稻为材料, 系统比较研究了塑料软盘育秧抛栽、手插和机插3种栽培方式。结果表明, 与机插相比, 抛栽和手插促进了早稻生育进程, 全生育期缩短, 抛栽和手插分别缩短5~8 d和2~4 d。群体根系和地上部干重均表现为抛栽>手插>机插, 差异均达显著水平。成熟期植株根系和穗干物质占总干物质量的比例为抛栽>手插>机插, 茎干物质的比例为手插>抛栽>机插; 叶干物质比例在分蘖期和齐穗期为机插>手插>抛栽, 灌浆期和成熟期为手插>抛栽>机插。分蘖期、齐穗期和灌浆期, 抛栽和手插水稻叶片SPAD值均显著高于机插; 成熟期, 各处理间无显著差异。水稻叶面积指数表现为抛栽>手插>机插。不同栽培方式间水稻产量差异显著, 抛栽最高, 机插最低; 抛栽和手插分别比机插增产1203.3~1346.7 kg hm-2和776.7~1045.4 kg hm-2。说明不同栽培方式水稻干物质积累和产量有各自特征, 与手插和机插相比, 抛栽处理干物质总量大而且分配合理, 有利于改善产量构成因素, 增加水稻产量。

关键词: 水稻, 栽培方式, 生育期, 干物质, 产量

Abstract:

To explore the characteristics of growth and development of early rice with different cultivation methods in the double cropping rice system in the Dongting Lake plain, we analyzed the growth stage, dry matter accumulation and distribution, grain yield of early rice with conventional and hybrid rice varieties by using seedling throwing (ST), hand transplanting (HT) and machine transplanting (MT). The results showed that the growth process of ST and HT was earlier and their whole growth period was 5−8 and 2−4 days shortened than that of MT, respectively. For dry matter weight of population, there was significant difference among the three cultivation methods at the main growth stages of early rice, showing on order ST>HT>MT. The dry matter weight ratio of root and panicle to total plant at mature stage and the dry matter weight of stem were both in a trend of HT>ST>MT. The dry matter weight ratio of leaf to total plant was MT>HT>ST at tillering and heading stages, and HT>ST>MT at grain filling and mature stages, respectively. In addition, the leaf SPAD of rice with ST and HT was significantly higher than that with MT at tillering, heading and grain filling stages. But there was no significant difference among ST, HT and MT at mature stage. Meanwhile, the leaf area index for different cultivation methods was ST>HT>MT at the main growth stages of early rice. Yield of early rice with different cultivation methods was significantly different, and that of ST was the highest, while that of MT was the lowest. Compared with MT, the yield of ST and HT increased by 1203.3−1346.7 and 776.7−1045.4 kg ha-1, indicating that the dry matter accumulation and yield of early rice with different cultivation methods have their own characteristics. Compared with HT and MT, ST had significantly higher total dry matter accumulation and its reasonable distribution, and improved yield and yield components.

Key words: Rice, Cultivation method, Growth stage, Dry matter, Yield

[1]FAO. Statistical Databases. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of United Nations, 2011



[2]马殿荣, 陈温福, 王庆祥, 苏芳莉, 周淑清, 陈健. 水稻乳苗抛栽与其他栽培方式的比较研究. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2003, 34: 336−339



Ma D R, Chen W F, Wang Q Q, Su F L, Zhou S Q, Chen J. Between rice nursling scattering and other planting patterns. J Shenyang Agric Univ, 2003, 34: 336−339 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]何瑞银, 罗汉亚, 李玉同, 汪小函, 张璐. 水稻不同种植方式的比较试验与评价. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(1): 167−171



He R Y, Luo H Y, Li Y T, Wang X H, Zhang L. Comparison and analysis of different rice planting methods in China. Trans CSAE, 2008, 24(1): 167−171 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]程建平, 罗锡文, 樊启洲, 张集文, 吴建平, 王在满, 臧英. 不同种植方式对水稻生育特性和产量的影响. 华中农业大学学报, 2010, 29: 1−5



Cheng J P, Luo X W, Fan Q Z, Zhang J W, Wu J P, Wang Z M, Zang Y. Influence of different planting methods on growth and development characteristics and yield of rice. J Huazhong Agric Univ, 2010, 29: 1−5 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[5]罗锡文, 谢方平, 欧颖刚, 李佰祥, 郑丁科. 水稻生产不同栽植方式的比较试验. 农业工程学报, 2004, 20(1): 136−139



Luo X W, Xie F P, Ou Y G, Li B X, Zheng D K. Experimental investigation of different transplanting methods in paddy production. Trans CSAE, 2004, 20(1): 136−139 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[6]金军, 薛艳凤, 于林惠, 李伟, 徐丹, 羌勋良. 水稻不同种植方式群体质量差异比较. 中国稻米, 2006, (6): 31−33



Jin J, Xue Y F, Yu L H, Li W, Xu D, Qiang X L. Analysis on the different of quality of rice between different planting patterns. China Rice, 2006, (6): 31−33 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]池忠志, 姜心禄, 郑家国. 不同种植方式对水稻产量的影响及其经济效益比较. 作物杂志, 2008, (2): 73−75



Chi Z Z, Jiang X L, Zheng J G. Comparison of yield and economic effect of rice under different planting patterns. Crops, 2008, (2): 73−75 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]程建平, 吴建平, 王友根, 张集文, 方磊. 机插对籼型杂交水稻生育特性和产量的影响. 中国农机化, 2009, (6): 45−48



Cheng J P, Wu J P, Wang Y G, Zhang J W, Fang L. Growth characteristics and yield formation of rice mechanized transplanting. Chin Agric Mechanization, 2009, (6): 45−48 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[9]李合松, 王学华, 吴卫国, 唐启源, 邓立平, 蔺万煌. 不同栽插方式对米粉稻生长发育和产量及稻米品质的影响. 湖南农业大学学报, 2007, 33: 391−395



Li H S, Wang X H, Wu W G, Tang Q Y, Deng L P, Lin W H. Effects of different transplanting methods on growth development and yield as well as quality of noodle rice. J Hunan Agric Univ, 2007, 33: 391−395 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]郎有忠, 窦永秀, 王美娥, 张祖建, 朱庆森. 水稻生育期对籽粒产量及品质的影响. 作物学报, 2012, 38: 528−534



Lang Y Z, Dou Y X, Wang M E, Zhang Z J, Zhu Q S. Effects of growth duration on grain yield and quality in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38: 528−534 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]魏祥进, 徐俊锋, 江玲, 王洪俊, 周振玲, 翟虎渠, 万建民. 我国水稻主栽品种抽穗期多样性的遗传分析. 作物学报, 2012, 38: 10−22



Wei X J, Xu J F, Jiagn L,Wang H J, Zhou Z L, Zhai H Q, Wan J M. Genetic analysis for the diversity of heading date of cultivated rice in China. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38: 10−22 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]李秀芬, 贾燕, 黄元才, 臧鑫. 播栽期对水稻产量和产量构成因素及生育期的影响. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23(5): 98−100



Li X F, Jia Y, Huang Y C, Zang X. Effects of seeding time on grain yield, yield components and growth duration in different rice varieties. Chin J Ecol, 2004, 23(5): 98−100 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]黄雅丽, 陈刚, 陈楠, 黄义德. 播期和密度对麦茬中粳稻皖稻68生育期和产量形成的影响. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(15): 95−99



Huang Y L, Chen G, Chen N, Huang Y D. The effect of sowing date and density of rice stubble in Wandao 68 reproductive period and yield formation. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2009, 25(15): 95−99 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]李杰, 张洪程, 董洋阳, 倪晓诚, 杨波, 龚金龙, 常勇, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕. 不同生态区栽培方式对水稻产量、生育期及温光利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44: 2661−2672



Li J, Zhang H C, Dong Y Y, Ni X C, Yang B, Gong J L, Chang Y, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y. Effects of cultivation methods on yield, growth stage and utilization of temperature and illumination of rice in different ecological regions. Sci Agric Sin, 2011, 44: 2661−2672 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]魏金连, 潘晓华. 夜间温度升高对早稻生长发育及产量的影响. 江西农业大学学报, 2008, 30: 427−432



Wei J L, Pan X H. Effects of night temperature increase on growth and yield of early season rice. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis, 2008, 30: 427−432 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]吴文革, 张洪程, 钱银飞, 陈烨, 徐军, 吴桂成, 翟超群, 霍中洋, 戴其根. 超级杂交中籼水稻物质生产特性分析. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21: 287−293



Wu W G, Zhang H C, Qian Y F, Cheng Y, Xu J, Wu G C, Zhai C Q, Huo Z Y, Dai Q G. Analysis on dry matter production characteristics of middle-season indica super hybrid rice. Chin J Rice Sci, 2007, 21: 287−293 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]李杰, 张洪程, 常勇, 龚金龙, 郭振华, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 高辉. 不同种植方式水稻高产栽培条件下的光合物质生产特征研究. 作物学报, 2011, 37: 1235−1248



Li J, Zhang H C, Chang Y, Gong J L, Guo Z H, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Gao H. Characteristics of photosynthesis and matter production of rice with different planting methods under high-yielding cultivation condition. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37: 1235−1248 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]马殿荣, 陈温福, 苏英山, 李磊鑫, 高峰. 水稻乳苗抛栽与其它栽培方式干物质生产特性的比较研究. 辽宁农业科学, 2004, (5): 6−9



Ma D R, Chen W F, Su Y S, Li L X, Gao F. Comparison of dry matter accumulation between rice nursing seedlings scattering and other planting patterns. Liaoning Agric Sci, 2004, (5): 6−9 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[19]刘军, 余铁桥. 大穗型水稻超高产产量形成特点及物质生产分析. 湖南农业大学学报, 1998, 24(1): 1−6



Liu J, Yu T Q. Analysis of the formation of super-high yield of big panicle rice and its dry matter production. J Hunan Agric Univ, 1998, 24(1): 1−6 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[6] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[7] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[8] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[9] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[10] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[11] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[12] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[13] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[14] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[15] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2