欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (09): 1612-1618.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01612

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

花铃期渍水对棉纤维糖代谢的影响及其与纤维比强度的关系

杨长琴1,2,刘瑞显2,张国伟2,杨富强2,周治国1,*   

  1. 1 南京农业大学农学院 / 农业部南方作物生理生态重点开放实验室, 江苏南京210095; 2 江苏省农业科学院经济作物研究所,江苏南京210014
  • 收稿日期:2014-02-24 修回日期:2014-06-16 出版日期:2014-09-12 网络出版日期:2014-07-09
  • 通讯作者: 周治国, E-mail: giscott@njau.edu.cn, Tel: 025-84396813
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(31171487, 31371583)资助。

Sugar Metabolism and its Relationship with Fiber Strength Affected by Waterlogging during Flowering and Bolling Stage in Cotton

YANG Chang-Qin1,2,LIU Rui-Xian2,ZHANG Guo-Wei2,YANG Fu-Qiang2,ZHOU Zhi-Guo1,*   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology & Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture / Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; 2 Institute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
  • Received:2014-02-24 Revised:2014-06-16 Published:2014-09-12 Published online:2014-07-09
  • Contact: 周治国, E-mail: giscott@njau.edu.cn, Tel: 025-84396813

摘要:

 以美棉33B为材料,2007和2009年在江苏南京池栽条件下设置渍水试验,研究花铃期渍水对棉纤维糖代谢的影响及其与纤维比强度的关系。结果表明,渍水条件下花后17~38 d纤维蔗糖和β-1,3-葡聚糖含量均值分别降低24.86%~81.30%和8.59%~36.30%,纤维素最大累积速率在受渍害较轻条件下增加而受渍害较重条件下降低,但快速持续期缩短,成熟期纤维素含量降低,比强度下降3.57%~10.03%。受渍害较轻条件下,花后17~38 d纤维蔗糖合酶(SS)和蔗糖磷酸合酶(SPS)活性均值分别增加8.45%~24.59%和12.79%~18.20%,生成碳源用于维持生存代谢,而受渍害较重条件下分别降低7.06%~8.16%和11.40%~11.64%;蔗糖酶和β-1,3-葡聚糖酶活性在花后17 d后降低。因此,渍水条件下纤维加厚发育期碳源供应不足、碳代谢消耗增加或代谢被抑制是最终比强度下降的重要原因。

关键词: 棉花, 花铃期, 渍水, 纤维相关物质和酶, 纤维比强度

Abstract:

The experiments were conducted using a cotton cultivar NuCOTN 33B with pool culture under different waterlogging treatments in 2007 and 2009 to study effects of waterlogging on carbohydrate metabolism and its relationship with fiber strength during flowering and bolling stage in Nanjing, China. The results showed that the mean values of sucrose and β-1,3-glucan contents decreased by 24.86% to 81.30% and 8.59% to 36.30% respectively at 17 to 38 days after anthesis under waterlogging. The maximum rate of cellulose accumulation increased in response to mild waterlogging conditions, decreased in response to serious conditions, but the duration of maximum cellulose accumulation shortened, which resulted in the decrease in cellulose content. The value of fiber strength at mature period decreased by 3.57% to 10.03% under waterlogging. The mean values of SS and SPS activities increased by 8.45% to 24.59% and 12.79% to 18.20% respectively in response to mild waterlogging conditions, but decreased by 7.06% to 8.16% and 11.40% to 11.64% respectively at 17 to 38 days after anthesis in response to the serious waterlogging conditions, which were due to enhanced metabolic demands. Waterlogging decreased the activities of sucrase and β-1,3-glucanase at 17 days after anthesis. Therefore, insufficient carbon source, together with the increased carbon consumption or the inhibited sugar metabolism were potential factors contributing to low fiber strength for waterlogging plants.

Key words: Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), Flowering and bolling stage, Waterlogging, Key matters and enzymes, Fiber strength

[1]Reddy K R, Davidonis G H, Johnson A S, Vinyard B T. Temperature regime and carbon dioxide enrichment alter cotton boll development and fiber properties. Agron J, 1999, 91: 851–858



[2]刘瑞显, 郭文琦, 陈兵林, 周治国, 孟亚利. 氮素对花铃期干旱再复水后棉花纤维比强度形成的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15: 662–669



Liu R X, Guo W Q, Chen B L, Zhou Z G, Meng Y L. Effects of nitrogen on cotton fiber strength formation under water stress and rewatering during the flowering and boll-forming stage. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2009, 15: 662–669 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]刘继华, 尹承佾, 于凤英, 孙清荣, 王永民, 贾景农, 边栋材, 陈学留. 棉花纤维强度的形成机理与改良途径. 中国农业科学, 1994, 27(5): 10–16



Liu J H, Yin C Y, Yu F Y, Sun Q R, Wang Y M, Jia J N, Bian D C, Chen X L. Formation mechanism and improvement approach of cotton (Gossypium) fiber strength. Sci Agric Sin, 1994, 27(5): 10–16 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]束红梅, 王友华, 陈兵林, 胡宏标, 张文静, 周治国. 棉花纤维素累积特性的基因型差异及与纤维比强度形成的关系. 作物学报, 2007, 33: 921–926



Shu H M, Wang Y H, Chen B L, Hu H B, Zhang W J, Zhou Z G. Genotypic differences in cellulose accumulation of cotton fiber and its relationship with fiber strength. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33: 921–926 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[5]Doblin M S, Kurek I, Jacok W D. Cellulose biosynthesis in plants: from genes to rosettes. Plant Cell Physiol, 2002, 43: 1407–1420



[6]Shu H M, Wang Y H, Zhang W J, Zhou Z G. Activity changes of enzymes associated with fiber development and relationship with fiber specific strength in two cotton cultivars. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34: 437–446



[7]胡宏标, 张文静, 王友华, 陈兵林, 周治国. 棉纤维加厚发育相关物质对纤维比强度的影响. 西北植物学报, 2007, 27: 726–733



Hu H B, Zhang W J, Wang Y H, Chen B L, Zhou Z G. Matters related with cotton fiber thickening development and fiber strength. Acta Bot Bor-Occid Sin, 2007, 27: 726–733 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]Haigler C H, Milka I D, Hogan P S, Salnkov V V, Hwang S, Martin K, DelMer D P. Carbon partitioning to cellulose synthesis. Plant Mol Biol, 2001, 47: 29–51



[9]Michelle B V, Haigler C H. Sucrose-phosphate synthase activity rises in correlation with high-rate cellulose synthesis in three heterotrophic systems. Plant Physiol, 2001, 127: 1234–1242



[10]Koch K. Sucrose metabolism: regulatory mechanisms and pivotal roles in sugar sensing and plant development. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2004, 7: 235–246.



[11]Shimizu Y, Aotsuka S, Hasegawa O, Kawada T, Sakuno T, Sakai F, Hayashi T. Changes in levels of mRNAs for cell wall-related enzymes in growing cotton fiber cells. Plant Cell Physiol, 1997, 38: 375–378.



[12]Shu H M, Zhou Z G, Xu N Y, Wang Y H, Zheng M. Sucrose metabolism in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fiber under low temperature during fiber development. Eur J Agron, 2009, 31: 61–68



[13]冯营, 赵新华, 王友华, 马溶慧, 周治国. 棉纤维发育过程中糖代谢生理特征对氮素的响应及其与纤维比强度形成的关系. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42: 93–102



Feng Y, Zhao X H, Wang Y H, Ma R H, Zhou Z G. Responses of carbohydrate metabolism to nitrogen in cotton fiber development and its relationships with fiber strength formation. Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42: 93–102 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]马溶慧, 许乃银, 张传喜, 李文峰, 冯营, 屈磊, 王友华, 周治国. 氮素调控棉花纤维蔗糖代谢及纤维比强度的生理机制. 作物学报, 2008, 34: 2143–2151



Ma R H, Xu N Y, Zhang C X, Li W F, Feng Y, Qu L, Wang Y H, Zhou Z G. Physiological mechanism of sucrose metabolism in cotton fiber and fiber strength regulated by nitrogen. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34: 2143–2151 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]汤章城主编. 现代植物生理学实验指南. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999. pp 126–128



Tang Z C ed. Modern Laboratory Manual of Plant Physiology. Beijing: Science Press, 1999. pp 126–128 (in Chinese)



[16]Köhle H, Jeblick W, Poten F, Blaschek W, Kauss H. Chitosan-elicited callose synthesis in soybean cells as a Ca2+-dependent process. Plant Physiol, 1985, 77: 544–551



[17]Updegraff D M. Semimicro determination of cellulose in biological materials. Anal Biochem, 1969, 32: 420-424



[18]Konishi L, Nakai T, Sakai F Hayashi T. Formation of callose from sucrose in cotton fiber microsomal membranes. Jpn Wood Res Soc, 2001, 47: 331–335



[19]Pettigrew W T. Environmental effects on cotton fiber carbohydrate concentration and quality. Crop Sci, 2001, 41: 1108–1113



[20]Hook D D, Brown C L. Root adaptations and relative flood tolerance of five hardwood species. Forensic Sci, 1973, 19: 225–229



[21]Wäfler U and Meier H. Enzyme activities in developing cotton fibers. Plant Physiol Bioch, 1994, 32: 697–702



[22]Sairam R K, Dharmar K, Chinnusamy V, Meena R C. Waterlogging-induced increase in sugar mobilization, fermentation, and related gene expression in the roots of mungbean (Vignaradiata). J Plant Physiol, 2009, 166: 602–616



[23]Kumutha D, Sairam R K, Ezhilmathi K, Chinnusamy V, Meena R C. Effect of waterlogging on carbohydrate metabolism in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.): Upregulation of sucrose synthase and alcohol dehydrogenase. Plant Sci, 2008, 175: 706–716



[24]Springer B, Werr W, Starlinger P, Bennett D C, Zokolica M, Freeling M. The shrunken gene on chromosome 9 of Zea mays L. is expressed in various plant tissues and encodes an anaerobic protein. Mol Gen Genet, 1986, 205: 46l–468



[25]Haigler C H. Substrate supply for cellulose synthesis and its stress sensitivity in the cotton fiber. In: Brown R M Jr, Saxena I, eds. Cellulose: Molecular and Structural Biology, Springer: New York, 2007. pp 147–168



[26]施美芬, 曾波, 申建红, 类淑桐, 朱智, 刘建辉. 植物水淹适应与碳水化合物的相关性. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34: 855–866



Shi M Fen, Zeng B, Shen J H, Lei S T, Zhu Z, Liu J H. A review of the correlation of flooding adaptability and carbohydrates in plants. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2010, 34: 855–866 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[1] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[2] 张曦, 王广恩, 李邵琦, 刘祎, 李俊兰, 钱玉源. 基于转录组测序解析陆海杂交姊妹系马克隆值差异的形成机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1442-1458.
[3] 周琦翔, 朱艳, 汪楚博, 朱柏林, 李俊博, 宋利兵. 基于DSSAT模型模拟气候变化对新疆棉花物候期及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 590-602.
[4] 蒋环琪, 段奥, 郭超, 黄晓梦, 艾德骏, 刘小雪, 谭静怡, 彭成林, 李曼菲, 杜何为. 渍水胁迫对玉米幼苗根系代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2295-2306.
[5] 郭栋财, 吕涛, 蔡永生, 买吾鲁达·艾合买提, 全家, 曲延英, 郑凯. 棉花纤维品质相关性状QTL元分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1445-1466.
[6] 王亚雯, 戚正阳, 尤佳琦, 聂新辉, 曹娟, 杨细燕, 涂礼莉, 张献龙, 王茂军. 棉花60K功能位点基因芯片的制备及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1178-1188.
[7] 丁俊沣, 许映飞, 张祥, 陈媛, 陈德华. 生长调节剂吲哚丁酸对移栽棉苗成活及生长发育的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3331-3341.
[8] 哈丽哈什·依巴提, 张炎, 李青军, 徐新朋, 何萍. 基于产量反应和农学效率的棉花智能化推荐施肥方法研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3052-3064.
[9] 李亚玮, 徐盈盈, 左春阳, 刘若男, 梁亚军, 孔杰, 张献龙, 闵玲. 棉花减数分裂进程鉴定体系构建及其对高温胁迫的响应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2570-2580.
[10] 陈佳伟, 林艳, 张明星, 周诗晶, 饶力群, 周池, 李鑫. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌YCH92对棉花根际土壤微生物群落及棉花产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2821-2835.
[11] 谢章书, 谢学方, 屠小菊, 刘爱玉, 董合忠, 周仲华. 植物激素对棉花蕾铃脱落的调控研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 1-29.
[12] 辛明华, 秘雅迪, 王国平, 李小飞, 李亚兵, 董合林, 韩迎春, 冯璐. 行距配置和种植密度对棉花干物质生产及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 221-232.
[13] 李超, 付小琼. 基于GYT双标图综合评价黄河流域中熟杂交棉花区域试验品种[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 30-43.
[14] 艾莎, 李莎, 方治伟, 李论, 李甜甜, 高利芬, 陈利红, 肖华锋, 万人静, 闫多子, 武星廷, 彭海, 韩瑞玺, 周俊飞. 棉花MNP标记位点开发及其在DNA指纹图谱构建中的应用[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2267-2278.
[15] 陈娟, 杨婷婷, 闫素辉, 雍玉东, 张士雅, 李文阳. 拔节期渍水对软质小麦淀粉粒度分布与糊化特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1877-1884.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!