欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (07): 1105-1111.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.01105

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同栽培方式对长江下游棉田资源利用效率的影响

张常赫,戴艳娇,杨洪坤,张馨月,杜祥备,陈兵林,周治国*   

  1. 南京农业大学农学院 / 农业部作物生长调控重点开放实验室,江苏南京 210095
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-16 修回日期:2015-05-04 出版日期:2015-07-12 网络出版日期:2015-05-14
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项经费项目(201203096)资助。

Effects of Different Cultivation Patterns on Cotton Field Resources Use Efficiency in Yangtze River Valley

ZHANG Chang-He,DAI Yan-Jiao,YANG Hong-Kun,ZHANG Xin-Yue,DU Xiang-Bei,CHEN Bing-Lin,ZHOU Zhi-Guo*   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology & Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture / Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
  • Received:2015-01-16 Revised:2015-05-04 Published:2015-07-12 Published online:2015-05-14

摘要:

我国农业对自然环境依赖性强,农业生产环境相对恶劣、资源利用效率低下,作物栽培理论与技术需要不断创新和完善。为建立与当前生产模式相匹配的作物高产高效栽培管理方式,选用棉花品种泗杂3号,于2012—2013年在长江下游棉区(江苏大丰)不同地力水平田块(高、低)进行麦棉两熟栽培管理方式定位试验,设超高产栽培、常规栽培和高产高效栽培,系统测定棉花生物量、产量和生育期间的温光、氮肥资源利用效率。结果表明,栽培方式和地力水平显著影响棉花产量,而产量的差异主要由温光、氮肥资源利用效率的差异造成。棉花产量提高的限制因子是低下的资源利用效率。高产高效栽培较常规栽培产量提高27.5%,温光资源利用效率分别提高27.7%、23.4%、氮肥偏生产力提高10.1%,是长江下游较为适宜的栽培方式。因此未来生产中应进一步合理优化栽培方式来提高棉田资源利用效率,以达到高产高效的目标。

关键词: 棉花, 栽培管理方式, 产量, 资源利用效率

Abstract:

The agricultural production in China is mainly dependent on nature environment. But the use efficiency of field resources in China is lower than those in developed countries, and the current crop cultivation theory and technology need to be innovated and improved continuously. The efficiency field stationary experiments using cotton cultivate Siza 3 with different cultivation patterns were carried out in high and low soil fertility levels in Dafeng, Jiangsu province. The cultivation patterns included super high cultivation patterns (SH), farmers practice cultivation (FP), high yield and high efficiency cultivation (HH). The result showed that lint yield of cotton was significantly affected by cultivation patterns and soil fertility levels. Lint yield difference was correlated with the differences of temperature production efficiency (TPE), radiation use efficiency (RUE) and nitrogen partial factor productivity (NPEP) under different cultivation patterns. Our results suggested that the key factor limited cotton production is the lower resources use efficiency. The lint yield, temperature and radiation use efficiency and nitrogen partial factor productivity of HH were 27.5%, 27.7%, 23.4%, and 10.1% higher than there of FP. Therefore, HH should be encouraged to extend in the Yangtze River Valley, and field resources use efficiency in wheat-cotton double cropping system should be further improved in the future for increasing cotton productivity.

Key words: Cotton, Cultivation patterns, Yield, Resources use efficiency

[1]Ali H, Afzal M N, Muhammad D. Effect of sowing dates and plant spacing on growth and dry matter partitioning in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Pakistan J Bot, 2009, 41: 2145–2155



[2]Ali M A, Tatla Y H, Aslam M. Response of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) to potassium fertilization in arid environment. J Agric Res, 2007, 45: 191–198



[3]Ruiz R, Bertero H. Light interception and radiation use efficiency in temperate quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars. Eur J Agron, 2008, 29: 144–152



[4]Zhang L, Van der Werf W, Bastiaans L, Zhang S, Li B, Spiertz J H J. Light interception and utilization in relay intercrops of wheat and cotton. Field Crops Res, 2008, 107: 29–42



[5]Dong H Z , Kong X Q , Li W J, Tang W, Zhang D M. Effects of plant density and nitrogen and potassium fertilization on cotton yield and uptake of major nutrients in two fields with varying fertility. Field Crops Res, 2010, 119: 106–113



[6]Kaggwa-Asiimwe R, Andrade-Sanchez P, Wang G Y. Plant architecture influences growth and yield response of upland cotton to population density. Field Crops Res, 2013, 145: 52–59



[7]Braunack M, Bange M, Johnston D. Can planting date and cultivar selection improve resource use efficiency of cotton systems? Field Crops Res, 2012, 137: 1–11



[8]Ali, Hakoomat A, Muhammad N A, Shakeel M, Dilbaugh. Effect of cultivars and sowing dates on yield and quality of (Gossypium hirsutum L) cotton. J Food, Agric Environ, 2009, 7: 244–247



[9]Milroy S P, Bange M P. Nitrogen and light responses of cotton photosynthesis and implications for crop growth. Crop Sci, 2003, 43: 904–913



[10]Boquet D J, Breitenbeck G A. Nitrogen rate effect on partitioning of nitrogen and dry matter by cotton. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 1685–1693



[11]O’Connell M G, O’Leary G J, Whitfield D M, Connor D J. Interception of photosynthetically active radiation and radiation-use efficiency of wheat, field pea and mustard in a semi-arid environment. Field Crops Res, 2004, 85: 111–124



[12]Steduto P, Albrizio R. Resource use efficiency of field-grown sunflower, sorghum, wheat and chickpea: II. Water use efficiency and comparison with radiation use efficiency. Agric For Meteorol, 2005, 130: 269–281



[13]Howden S M, Soussana J F, Tubiello F N, Chhetri N, Dunlop M, Meinke H. Adapting agriculture to climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104: 19691–19696



[14]Smit B, Skinner M W. Adaptation options in agriculture to climate change: a typology. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change, 2002, 7: 85–114



[15]Du X B, Chen B L, Shen T Y, Zhang Y X, Zhou Z G. Effect of cropping system on radiation use efficiency in double–cropped wheat–cotton. Field Crops Res, 2015, 170: 21–31



[16]Van Opstal N V, Caviglia O P, Melchiori R J M. Water and solar radiation productivity of double-crops in a humid temperature area. Aust J Crop Sci, 2011, 5: 1760–1766



[17]Caviglia O P, Sadras V O, Andrade F H. Intensi?cation of agriculture in the south-eastern Pampas I. Capture and efficiency in the use of water and radiation in double-cropped wheat-soybean. Field Crops Res, 2004, 87: 117–129



[18]Ferrise R, Triossi A, Stratonovitch P, Bindi M, Martre P. Sowing date and nitrogen fertilization effects on dry matter and nitrogen dynamics for durum wheat: an experimental and simulation study. Field Crops Res, 2010, 117: 245–257



[19]Willey R W. Resource use in intercropping systems. Agric Water Manag, 1990, 17: 215–231



[20]Read J J, Reddy K R, Jenkins J N. Yield and fiber quality of upland cotton as influenced by nitrogen and potassium nutrition. Eur J Agron, 2006, 24: 282–290



[21]Kaggwa-Asiimwe R, Andrade-Sanchez P, Wang G. Plant architecture influences growth and yield response of upland cotton to population density. Field Crops Res, 2013, 145: 52–59



[22]Tsubo M, Walker S. A model of radiation interception and use by a maize-bean intercrop canopy. Agric For Meteorol, 2002, 110: 203–215



[23]Hou Z A, Li P F, Li B G, Gong J, Wang Y N. Effects of fertigation scheme on N uptake and N use efficiency in cotton. Plant Soil, 2007, 290: 115–126



[24]McConnell J S, Baker W H, Miller D M, Frizzell B S, Varvil J J. Nitrogen fertilization of cotton cultivars of differing maturity. Agron J, 1993, 85: 1151–1156



[25]Yang G Z, Tang H Y, Tong J, Nie Y C, Zhang X L. Effect of fertilization frequency on cotton yield and biomass accumulation. Field Crops Res, 2012, 125: 161–166



[26]Yan X, Jin J Y, He P, Liang M Z. Recent advances on the technologies to increase fertilizer use efficiency. Agric Sci China, 2008, 7: 469–479



[27]Koch B, Khosla R, Frasier W M, Westfall D G, Inman D. Site-specific management: economic feasibility of variable-rate nitrogen application utilizing site-specific management zones. Agron J, 2004, 96: 1572–1580

[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[6] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[7] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[8] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[9] 张曦, 王广恩, 李邵琦, 刘祎, 李俊兰, 钱玉源. 基于转录组测序解析陆海杂交姊妹系马克隆值差异的形成机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1442-1458.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[12] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[13] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[14] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[15] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!