欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (09): 1105-1109.

• 研究论文 •    下一篇

小麦抗白粉病新基因的AFLP和SSR标记及其染色体定位

李韬;张增艳;林志珊;陈孝;高珊;辛志勇   

  1. 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,农业部遗传育种重点开放实验室,北京100081
  • 收稿日期:2005-01-06 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2005-09-12 网络出版日期:2005-09-12
  • 通讯作者: 辛志勇

Mapping of a Novel Gene Conferring Resistance to Wheat Powdery Mildew Using AFLP and SSR Markers

LI Tao;ZHANG Zeng-Yan;LIN Zhi-Shan;CHEN Xiao;GAO Shan;XIN Zhi-Yong   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081
  • Received:2005-01-06 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2005-09-12 Published online:2005-09-12
  • Contact: XIN Zhi-Yong

摘要:

M53 (YAV2/TEZ//Ae.squarrosa 249) 是硬粒小麦与粗山羊草的双二倍体合成种,携带一个抗白粉病新基因,暂命名为Pm-M53,该基因对北京地区白粉病优势生理小种15号表现免疫抗性。本研究利用来源于杂交组合M53/宛7107的一个F2群体,在苗期采用白粉病15号小种(Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici)接种,抗病反应型鉴定表明,抗感比例符合3∶1,说明其抗性受显性单基因控制;对部分F2植株的F3株系的抗病鉴定进一步证明了F2鉴定的可靠性;利用AFLP和SSR标记技术结合F2分离群体对目的基因进行了遗传作图,将目的基因定位在5D染色体的长臂上。其中AFLP标记P16M16-109(Apm109)和P5M16-161(Apm161)与目的基因的遗传距离分别为1.0和3.0 cM。SSR标记Xwmc289b、Xgwm583和Xgwm292与目的基因的遗传距离分别为20.0、33.0和24.0 cM。这些标记位于目的基因的两侧。利用中国春遗传背景的缺-四体和双端体结合AFLP标记Apm109确证了SSR标记定位的可靠性,进一步证明该基因是一个新的抗白粉病基因。

关键词: 小麦, 白粉病, 新基因, 遗传作图, 染色体定位

Abstract:

Powdery mildew caused by Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici (Bgt) is one of the most serious diseases in wheat. DNA markers such as AFLP and SSR have been very effective for defining and mapping new resistance genes in plants. M53 (YAV2/TEZ//Ae. squarrosa 249) is a synthetic wheat of Triticum durum and Aegilops tauschii. This synthetic wheat carries a resistance gene, tentatively designated Pm-M53, conferring resistance to the No.15 isolate of Bgt that has been prevailing in wheat fields in Beijing area and endangering the local wheat production in recent years. In the present study, the resistance pattern of a F2 population (118 individuals) derived from cross of M53 and Wan7107 was analyzed through inoculation with No.15 isolate. The response patterns showed that the R∶S segregation ratio fits 3∶1, suggesting that the gene of interest be a single dominant gene, which was confirmed by F3 progeny test. AFLP and SSR markers were then used to search genetically linked markers to the target gene. Using JoinMap V3.0 with Kosambi’s function and other options left at default values, two AFLP markers P16M16-109 (Apm109) and P5M16-161 (Apm161) were identified to be tightly linked to Pm-M53, with genetic distances of 1.0 and 3.0 cM, respectively, and three SSR markers, Xwmc289b, Xgwm583 and Xgwm292, all assigned to the long arm of chromosome 5D, were also found to be associated with the gene, with genetic distances of 20.0, 33.0 and 24.0 cM, respectively. These markers flanked Pm-M53. Apm161, Xwmc289b and Xgwm583 were placed at one side, Apm109 and Xgwm292 at the opposite. From proximal to distal in order, the arrangement of the gene and its coupling markers on the long arm of chromosome 5D was Xgwm583, Xwmc289b, Apm161, Pm-M53 Apm109 and Xgwm292. Physical location of the gene was carried out using two Chinese Spring nullisomic-tetrasomic lines CSN5BT5D and CSN5DT5B, and two ditelosomic lines CSDT5DS and CSDT5DL by means of tightly linked AFLP marker APm109. The results therefore corroborate the allocation of the gene to chromosome arm 5DL. The specific position on the chromosome indicated Pm-M53 was a new powdery mildew resistance gene. It could play an important role in wheat breeding programs for powdery mildew resistance. The relationship of the gene with other reported resistant genes to powdery mildew on the D genome was discussed.

Key words: Wheat, Powdery mildew, Resistance gene, Molecular mapping, Physical location

中图分类号: 

  • S512
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!