欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (02): 182-188.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

灌浆期短暂高温对小麦淀粉形成的影响

刘萍;郭文善;浦汉春;封超年;朱新开;彭永欣   

  1. 扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2005-01-11 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-02-12 网络出版日期:2006-02-12
  • 通讯作者: 郭文善

Effects of Transient High Temperature during Grain Filling Period on Starch Formation in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

LIU Ping; GUO Wen-Shan; PU Han-Chun; FENG Chao-Nian; ZHU Xin-Kai and PENG Yong-Xin   

  1. Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology
  • Received:2005-01-11 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-02-12 Published online:2006-02-12
  • Contact: GUO Wen-Shan

摘要:

采用人工气候室控温,研究了灌浆期高温对弱、中筋两个小麦品种淀粉形成的影响。结果表明,温度从25℃升至30℃有利于籽粒总淀粉积累,当灌浆温度超过30℃时,温度升高,总淀粉含量下降,40℃时总淀粉含量最低。在相同温度条件下,小麦淀粉的形成以花后第25~27天高温胁迫影响最大,花后第33~35天高温胁迫影响最小。当温度超过25℃时,随温度的升高,剑叶可溶性糖、蔗糖含量和SPS酶活性呈下降趋势。40℃处理使SS、SBE酶活性最低,峰值在25~30℃之间。40℃高温胁迫下,弱筋小麦扬麦9号籽粒淀粉粒呈椭圆型,与蛋白质鞘结合较疏松,角质化程度低;中筋小麦扬麦12籽粒淀粉粒受到伤害,呈扁圆形,并出现裂纹,说明灌浆期短暂高温胁迫对扬麦12的影响大于对扬麦9号。

关键词: 小麦, 短暂高温, 灌浆期, 淀粉形成

Abstract:

Wheat grain quality is affected by the environment. Temperature is a major component in environmental variation and has a marked effect on grain filling in wheat. Short period of heat shock, such as over 30℃ for a few days, happens frequently during grain filling in China and many wheat-growing areas in the world, and has become an important factor limiting wheat quality. Starch is the major storage substance in grains of wheat, comprising 65%–70% of dry weight. Investigating the effects of transient high temperature during grain filling period on starch formation and its context is useful for understanding the mechanism of heat damage and improving wheat quality under high temperature stress.
Four temperature levels, i.e. daily average temperature 25℃, 30℃, 35℃ and 40℃, respectively, were set in a phytotron, and wheat plants during different grain filling stages, including the 15th–17th, 19th–21st, 25th-27th and 33rd-35th day after anthesis (DAA), were treated. The wheat cultivars tested were Yangmai 9 with weak-gluten and Yangmai 12 with medium-gluten. Results showed that grain starch content was highest in the treatment of 30℃ and was lowest in the treatment of 40℃ in two cultivars .Under the same temperature, the effects of heat shock during the 25th–27th DAA were greatest, while that during the 33rd–35th DAA were lowest (Table 1). For the treatments of the 25th–27th DAA, the higher the temperature, the lower the soluble sugar and sucrose contents and sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) activity in flag leaves. Sucrose synthase (SS), starch branching enzyme (SBE) activities were lowest in 40℃ treatment, and SS and SBE activities reached maximum in 25–30℃ treatments (Fig. 2–4). As for starch morphology, the granules in grains were in ellipsoid shape and combined loosely with protein sheath for 40℃ treatment of Yangmai 9 (PlateⅠ­3, 4), but were damaged and in flat ball shape with a crack for that of Yangmai 12 (PlateⅠ­7, 8). Starch granules of Yangmai 9 were slightly damaged for 30℃ treatment (PlateⅠ­1, 2). At the 1st day after 30℃ heat shock treatment, the cracked granules were observed for Yangmai 12, but disappeared at maturity (PlateⅠ­5, 6). While in 40℃ treatment, the crack could still be observed at maturity. It indicated that the heat damage at 30℃ for 3d could be considerably compensated other than at 40℃. It was probable that a kind of protective mechanism for enzymes existed in the endosperm, which had the critical temperature of 30℃. Resistance to high temperature varied with cultivars, and Yangmai 9 was stronger than Yangmai 12.

Key words: Wheat, Transient high temperature, Grain filling period, Starch formation

中图分类号: 

  • S512
[1] 胡文静, 李东升, 裔新, 张春梅, 张勇. 小麦穗部性状和株高的QTL定位及育种标记开发和验证[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1346-1356.
[2] 郭星宇, 刘朋召, 王瑞, 王小利, 李军. 旱地冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率及土壤氮素平衡对降水年型与施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[3] 付美玉, 熊宏春, 周春云, 郭会君, 谢永盾, 赵林姝, 古佳玉, 赵世荣, 丁玉萍, 徐延浩, 刘录祥. 小麦矮秆突变体je0098的遗传分析与其矮秆基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 580-589.
[4] 冯健超, 许倍铭, 江薛丽, 胡海洲, 马英, 王晨阳, 王永华, 马冬云. 小麦籽粒不同层次酚类物质与抗氧化活性差异及氮肥调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 704-715.
[5] 刘运景, 郑飞娜, 张秀, 初金鹏, 于海涛, 代兴龙, 贺明荣. 宽幅播种对强筋小麦籽粒产量、品质和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 716-725.
[6] 马红勃, 刘东涛, 冯国华, 王静, 朱雪成, 张会云, 刘静, 刘立伟, 易媛. 黄淮麦区Fhb1基因的育种应用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 747-758.
[7] 徐龙龙, 殷文, 胡发龙, 范虹, 樊志龙, 赵财, 于爱忠, 柴强. 水氮减量对地膜玉米免耕轮作小麦主要光合生理参数的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 437-447.
[8] 王洋洋, 贺利, 任德超, 段剑钊, 胡新, 刘万代, 郭天财, 王永华, 冯伟. 基于主成分-聚类分析的不同水分冬小麦晚霜冻害评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 448-462.
[9] 陈新宜, 宋宇航, 张孟寒, 李小艳, 李华, 汪月霞, 齐学礼. 干旱对不同品种小麦幼苗的生理生化胁迫以及外源5-氨基乙酰丙酸的缓解作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 478-487.
[10] 马博闻, 李庆, 蔡剑, 周琴, 黄梅, 戴廷波, 王笑, 姜东. 花前渍水锻炼调控花后小麦耐渍性的生理机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 151-164.
[11] 孟颖, 邢蕾蕾, 曹晓红, 郭光艳, 柴建芳, 秘彩莉. 小麦Ta4CL1基因的克隆及其在促进转基因拟南芥生长和木质素沉积中的功能[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 63-75.
[12] 韦一昊, 于美琴, 张晓娇, 王露露, 张志勇, 马新明, 李会强, 王小纯. 小麦谷氨酰胺合成酶基因可变剪接分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 40-47.
[13] 李玲红, 张哲, 陈永明, 尤明山, 倪中福, 邢界文. 普通小麦颖壳蜡质缺失突变体glossy1的转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 48-62.
[14] 罗江陶, 郑建敏, 蒲宗君, 范超兰, 刘登才, 郝明. 四倍体小麦与六倍体小麦杂种的染色体遗传特性[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1427-1436.
[15] 王艳朋, 凌磊, 张文睿, 王丹, 郭长虹. 小麦B-box基因家族全基因组鉴定与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1437-1449.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!