欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (02): 232-236.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于穗层反射光谱的小麦籽粒蛋白质含量监测的研究

卢艳丽;李少昆;王克如; 谢瑞芝;高世菊;王刚   

  1. 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2005-01-18 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-02-12 网络出版日期:2006-02-12
  • 通讯作者: 李少昆

Prediction of Grain Protein Content Using Ear Layer Spectral Reflectance Data

LU Yan-Li;LI Shao-Kun; WANG Ke-Ru;XIE Rui-Zhi;GAO Shi-Ju and WANG Gang   

  1. Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2005-01-18 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-02-12 Published online:2006-02-12
  • Contact: LI Shao-Kun

摘要:

本试验对近地面高光谱仪监测小麦的不同测定方法进行了探讨,并比较了各方法对籽粒蛋白质含量(GPC)的预测能力。结果表明,穗全氮含量(ETNC)与穗层光谱反射率(Rel)的相关系数普遍高于与冠层光谱反射率(Rc)的相关系数。同时,基于小麦光谱反射率、穗全氮含量、籽粒蛋白质含量三者之间的相关性,选择了包括植被指数在内的20个穗层光谱特征参量,与ETNC进行相关分析,建立了最佳光谱特征参量预测ETNC以及ETNC预测籽粒蛋白质含量(GPC)的统计相关模型。通过2个模型的链接,建立了利用比值植被指数RVI[890,670]预测GPC的回归模型,可以较好地预测小麦籽粒蛋白质含量。在相同条件下,相对于以往基于冠层光谱的方法,基于穗层光谱的RVI[890,670]对GPC的预测表现出较大的优势,决定系数R2由0.662提高到0.865,总均方根差RMSE由0.851降低到0.734。本研究为实现田间条件下小麦氮素及相关品质指标的便携式监测仪的开发研制提供了初步的依据。

关键词: 小麦, 穗层光谱反射率, 含氮量, 籽粒蛋白质含量

Abstract:

Remote sensing has been successfully applied in assessing crop biophysical and biochemical variables, such as leaf area index, chlorophyll, nitrogen and so on. But the grain quality non-destructive predicting is a new project focused on remote sensing application in agriculture. Some researchers have investigated quality prediction through estimating leaf nitrogen content with canopy reflected spectral characteristic parameters. But the canopy spectrum achieved by traditional method is a mixed spectrum affected by plant, soil and other factors, so from that it is difficult to extract the interested information. In this research, an improved method was used to determine grain protein content (GPC). The results showed that the ear layer spectral reflectance (Rel) measured by the improved method was closer to single ear spectral reflectance (Re) than canopy spectral reflectance (Rc) by traditional method (Fig.2). Based on the highly relativity of Rel, ear total nitrogen content (ETNC) and GPC, 20 spectral characteristics parameters were selected in this study, and the correlations between ETNC and them were analyzed respectively. It indicated that ear layer spectral parameters had stronger correlation with ETNC than canopy ones(Table 2). The new model was established to predict GPC using ratio vegetation index (RVI[890,670]). The coefficient of determination was increased from 0.662 from Rel, to 0.865 from Rc, and the Root mean square error(RSME)decreased from 0.851 to 0.734 (Fig.4), which indicated that the prediction model using RVI[890,670] calculated from Rel is more reliable and practicable than that from canopy spectral reflectance. The results provide the theoretical foundation and technique support for measuring wheat nitrogen status or quality parameters by aviation and spaceflight remote sensing.

Key words: Wheat, Spectral, Total nitrogen content, Grain protein content

中图分类号: 

  • S512,S123
[1] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[5] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[6] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[7] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!