欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (02): 301-305.

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

春小麦籽粒灌浆期沉淀值动态的定量研究

赵秀兰;李文雄   

  1. 中国科学院大气物理研究所东亚区域气候-环境重点实验室/全球变化东亚区域中心,北京100029
  • 收稿日期:2004-11-16 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-02-12 网络出版日期:2006-02-12
  • 通讯作者: 赵秀兰

Dynamic Changes in Grain Sedimentation Test Value of Spring Wheat during Grain Filling

ZHAO Xiu-Lan;LI Wen-Xiong   

  1. Key Laboratory of Regional Climate-Environment for East Asia, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences / START Regional Center for Temperate East Asia, Beijing 100029
  • Received:2004-11-16 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-02-12 Published online:2006-02-12
  • Contact: ZHAO Xiu-Lan

摘要:

以3个不同品质类型春小麦品种为材料,在设定不 同肥力和气象条件等环境因子基础上,通过建立灌浆期籽粒沉淀值动态曲线拟合方程,定量揭示籽粒沉淀值的动态与规律。结果表明,灌浆期籽粒沉淀值随时间的变化符合一元三次多项式凸性曲线,即自开花始先增后降的单峰曲线。灌浆期籽粒沉淀值的动态,不同基因型具有不同特点。高蛋白强筋、高蛋白中筋和低蛋白弱筋品种曲线峰值分别出现在开花后28 d、23 d和30 d前后。各品种沉淀值积累速度的动态特点是成熟时沉淀值高蛋白强筋品种最高,高蛋白中筋品种次之,低蛋白弱筋品种最低的主要原因。

关键词: 春小麦, 籽粒沉淀值, 动态变化, 曲线拟合方程, 定量

Abstract:

Field experiments with three spring wheats genotypes were carried out in Harbin in 2002 to study quantitatively the dynamic change of grain sedimentation test value affected by environmental factors including fertility and meterological condition. The results showed that the dynamic change of grain sedimentation test value with varied days after anthesis was well fitted with the third-order curve convex in shape. For different genotypes, the characteristics of their dynamic changes were different. Moreover, the differences of grain sedimentation test value between genotypes were varied during the period of grain filling. The dates corresponding to the curve peak values of the high protein-rich gluten genotype, the high protein—medium gluten genotype and low protein-poor gluten genotype were the 28th, 23rd and 30th day after anthesis, respectively. The dynamic change shapes of the accumulation velocity curves for grain sedimentation test value in different genotypes were responsible for their sedimentation values at mature period, which were the highest in high protein-rich gluten genotype, the medium in high protein-medium gluten genotype, and the lowest in low protein-poor gluten genotype.

Key words: Spring wheat, Grain sedimentation test value, Dynamic change, Fitting curve equation, Quantitative

中图分类号: 

  • S512
[1] 李增强, 丁鑫超, 卢海, 胡亚丽, 岳娇, 黄震, 莫良玉, 陈立, 陈涛, 陈鹏. 铅胁迫下红麻生理特性及DNA甲基化分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(6): 1031-1042.
[2] 卢海, 李增强, 唐美琼, 罗登杰, 曹珊, 岳娇, 胡亚丽, 黄震, 陈涛, 陈鹏. 红麻DNA甲基化响应镉胁迫及甲基化差异基因的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2324-2334.
[3] 侯慧芝, 张绪成, 方彦杰, 于显枫, 王红丽, 马一凡, 张国平, 雷康宁. 全膜微垄沟播对寒旱区春小麦苗期土壤水热环境及光合作用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(9): 1398-1407.
[4] 郑清雷,余陈静,姚坤存,黄宁,阙友雄,凌辉,许莉萍. 甘蔗Rieske Fe/S蛋白前体基因ScPetC的克隆及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(6): 844-857.
[5] 马明生, 郭贤仕, 柳燕兰. 全生物降解地膜覆盖对旱地土壤水分状况及春小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(12): 1933-1944.
[6] 高世武,傅志伟,陈云,林兆里,许莉萍,郭晋隆. 甘蔗热带种金属硫蛋白家族基因的克隆及响应重金属胁迫的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(02): 166-178.
[7] 常建忠,董春林,张正,乔麟轶,杨睿,蒋丹,张彦琴,杨丽莉,吴佳洁,景蕊莲. 小麦抗逆相关基因TaSAP1的5′非翻译区内含子功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1311-1318.
[8] 孙婷婷,王文举,娄文月,刘峰,张旭,王玲,陈玉凤,阙友雄,许莉萍,李大妹,苏亚春. 甘蔗脂氧合酶基因ScLOX1的克隆与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(7): 1002-1016.
[9] 王作敏,刘瑾,孙士超,张新宇,薛飞,李艳军,孙杰. 彩色棉多药和有毒化合物输出蛋白MATE家族基因的鉴定及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(9): 1380-1392.
[10] 王玲,刘峰,戴明剑,孙婷婷,苏炜华,王春风,张旭,毛花英,苏亚春,阙友雄. 甘蔗ScWRKY4基因的克隆与表达特性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(9): 1367-1379.
[11] 李鹏,张琳,叶吉妮,贺诗瑶,贾军伟,潘爱虎,唐雪明. 抗病转基因水稻M12及其产品成分的定性、定量PCR检测方法[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(7): 949-955.
[12] 赵财,王巧梅,郭瑶,殷文,樊志龙,胡发龙,于爱忠,柴强. 水氮耦合对地膜玉米免耕轮作小麦干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(11): 1694-1703.
[13] 段方猛, 罗秋兰, 鲁雪莉, 齐娜伟, 刘宪舜, 宋雯雯. 玉米油菜素甾醇生物合成关键酶基因ZmCYP90B1的克隆及其对逆境胁迫的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(03): 343-356.
[14] 秦丽霞, 李静, 张换样, 李盛, 竹梦婕, 焦改丽, 吴慎杰. 棉花半乳糖基转移酶基因GhGalT1启动子的克隆及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(02): 218-226.
[15] 赵立娜,刘子会,段硕楠,张园园,李国良,郭秀林. 小麦热激转录因子基因TaHsfB2d的克隆和特性及其对耐热性的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(01): 53-62.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!