欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 1498-1502.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同试点氮肥水平对强筋小麦加工品质性状及其稳定性的影响

赵广才1;万富世2;常旭虹1;刘利华1;杨玉双1;池忠志1;杨丽珍1   

  1. 1中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,北京100081,2农业部种植业管理司,北京100026
  • 收稿日期:2005-12-06 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-10-12 网络出版日期:2006-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 赵广才

Effects of Nitrogen Levels and Experimental Sites on Processing Quality Characteristics and Stability in Strong Gluten Wheat

ZHAO Guang-Cai1,WAN Fu-Shi2,CHANG Xu-Hong1,LIU Li-Hua1,YANG Yu-Shuang1,CHI Zhong-Zhi1,YANG Li-Zhen1   

  1. 1 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081; 2 Department of Crop Production, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100026, China
  • Received:2005-12-06 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-10-12 Published online:2006-10-12
  • Contact: ZHAO Guang-Cai

摘要:

用7个强筋小麦品种,分别在6个省试验,研究氮肥及生态环境对其加工品质及其稳定性的影响。结果表明,在施氮0~300 kg/hm2范围内,湿面筋、沉降值、吸水率、形成时间、稳定时间、延伸性、面包体积均随施氮量增加逐渐提高,其中形成时间、稳定时间、湿面筋、沉降值的变异系数较大,表明这些性状对氮肥反应敏感,吸水率对氮肥反应迟钝,稳定性较好。稳定时间在不同试验点的变异系数最大,吸水率的变异系数最小。稳定时间、形成时间、拉伸面积在不同品种间变异系数差别较大,而其他品质指标的变异系数差别较小。把施氮处理和试验点统一作为环境因素,把不同品种作为基因型因素,利用AMMI模型对主要加工品质指标进行分析,其中湿面筋、形成时间、延伸性、面包体积和面包评分的环境效应大于基因型效应;而沉降值、吸水率、稳定时间、拉伸面积的基因型效应大于环境效应;基因型与环境(G´E)的交互作用对各项品质性状均有极显著影响。

关键词: 施氮水平, 基因型, 环境, 强筋小麦, 加工品质

Abstract:

The wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain quality was affected by genetic factors, ecological and cultivated conditions. The quality characteristics of the same variety would be convertible under different environment conditions. Seven cultivars of strong gluten wheat from main productive area were planted in six provinces to study N-fertilizer and environment effects on processing quality characteristics with the treatments of different N-fertilizer applications. The date was analyzed by AMMI model. The results indicated that within the range of 0–300 kg/ha fertilizer levels, wet gluten content, sedimentation, water absorption, development time, stable time, extensibility and bread volume all increased with the amount of N-fertilizer added. The CV of wet gluten content, sedimentation, development time and stable time were bigger, which indicate that these characters are sensitivity to N-fertilizer. While water absorption was not sensitive to nitrogen application, showing a better stability. In different sites, the CV of stable time was the highest and the CV of water absorption was the lowest. Among different cultivars, the CV of development time, stable time and extension area were bigger, but the CV of other quality characters was lower. Analysis of main processing quality characters by AMMI, when regard the N-fertilizer treatment and experimental site as environment factors and cultivars as genotype factor, it showed that effect of environment on wet gluten content, development time, extensibility, bread volume and bread score was more than genotype, while the effect of genotype on sedimentation, water absorption, stable time and extension area was more than environment. The interaction (G×E) of all quality indexes was extremely significant. In this trial, the amount of N-fertilizer application affected mostly the paste development time, next to which were the stable time, the wet gluten content, sedimentation and extension area in sequence. The water absorption was very stable. Some of the processing quality characteristics were sensitive to the environmental effect, while others were dependent on the genotype.

Key words: Nitrogen rate, Genotype, Environment, Strong gluten wheat, Processing quality

中图分类号: 

  • S512
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[3] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[4] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
[5] 高园, 李霞, 魏少博, 田小海, 周文彬. 植物光合午休研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2253-2265.
[6] 王曜阔, 王文政, 张敏, 刘希伟, 杨敏, 李昊昱, 张灵鑫, 闫彦菲, 蔡瑞国. 水氮运筹对冬小麦籽粒GMP合成和面粉加工品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2176-2189.
[7] 胡朋举, 郭颂, 宋亚辉, 金欣欣, 苏俏, 杨永庆, 王瑾. 多环境下花生含油量遗传及QTL定位分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 324-333.
[8] 姜骁, 赵健鑫, 毕竞男, 许静, 殷祥贞, 赵旭红, 潘丽娟, 陈娜, 马俊卿, 韩鹏, 杨珍, 迟晓元. 中国北方主产区主要地理和气候因子对花生农艺性状和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2805-2820.
[9] 赵海红, 李梦媛, 刘锦婧, 王园园, 杜磊, 王娟, 董承光, 李成奇. 利用3VmrMLM方法检测陆地棉株高QTN及QTN-环境互作(QEI)[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2619-2631.
[10] 胡亮亮, 周洪妹, 王晓磊, 王素华, 李彩菊, 魏云山, 王丽侠, 程须珍, 陈红霖. 小豆产量相关性状的基因型与环境互作效应及稳定性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2581-2594.
[11] 彭杰, 谢晓麒, 张钊, 姚晓芬, 邱深, 陈丹丹, 顾晓娜, 王玉洁, 王晨晨, 杨国正. 夏直播棉花产量与冠层微环境的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2371-2382.
[12] 岳海旺, 魏建伟, 刘朋程, 陈淑萍, 卜俊周. 基于GYT双标图分析对黄淮海生态区玉米品种综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 836-856.
[13] 郝佳乐, 赵炯超, 赵明宇, 王艺璇, 逯杰, 石晓宇, 高真真, 褚庆全. 气候变化背景下我国天麻种植适宜性和适宜区的评估[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 1004-1014.
[14] 刘颖超, 方敦煌, 徐海明, 童治军, 肖炳光. 烟草生物碱性状的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 42-54.
[15] 董志强, 吕丽华, 姚艳荣, 张经廷, 张丽华, 姚海坡, 申海平, 贾秀领. 水氮互作下强筋小麦师栾02-1产量和品质[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(7): 1942-1953.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!