欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11): 1763-1770.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同施氮水平下两种品质类型小麦植株氮素形态的变化特征

杨铁钢1,2;戴廷波1;姜东1;荆奇1;曹卫星1,*   

  1. 1 南京农业大学农业部作物生长调控重点实验室,江苏南京210095;2 河南省农业科学院棉花油料研究所,河南郑州 450002
  • 收稿日期:2006-11-27 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-11-12 网络出版日期:2007-11-12
  • 通讯作者: 曹卫星

Characterizing Nitrogen Form Variations in Different Organs of Two Wheat Genotypes under Three Nitrogen Rates

YANG Tie-Gang12,DAI Ting-Bo1,JIANG Dong1,JING Qi1,CAO Wei-Xing1   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Argricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu; 2 Cotton and Oil Crop’s Research Institute, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan, China
  • Received:2006-11-27 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-11-12 Published online:2007-11-12
  • Contact: CAO Wei-Xing

摘要:

籽粒氮素获取能力对提高小麦产量和品质非常重要。选用小麦品种豫麦47(高籽粒蛋白含量,15.5%)和豫麦50(籽粒蛋白含量12.4%),研究了不同施氮水平下小麦植株不同器官营养性N素(AN)、功能性N素(FN)和结构性N素(SN)的变化及其基因型差异。结果表明,花后籽粒从营养器官获取氮素的能力以及利用营养器官氮素形成产量的能力,高蛋白品种豫麦47均显著高于低蛋白品种豫麦50。施氮水平对3类N素含量的影响小于品种效应,且3类N素的品种间差异在花后显著大于花前。在叶片和茎秆中,豫麦50的AN含量从拔节至灌浆期持续下降,而豫麦47持续升高;籽粒中,豫麦50的AN含量花后表现下降(由1.98~2.35 mg g–1下降到1.38~1.70 mg g–1),而豫麦47先降(由5.51~5.70 mg g–1陡降至花后17 d时的1.15~1.38 mg g–1)后升(由1.15~1.38 mg g–1缓慢上升至成熟时的1.29~3.29 mg g–1)。FN含量,两品种间在叶片和茎秆中的差异不显著。SN含量,在叶片和茎秆中两品种不同生育阶段变化趋势基本相同,均先升后降,以开花期最高,但豫麦47比豫麦50花后表现大幅度的显著下降;在籽粒中,两品种均呈现一定的下降趋势。但豫麦47开花时SN含量(3.70%~4.28%)极显著高于豫麦50(1.38%~1.74%),因此,其花后下降幅度也极显著大于豫麦50,3个施氮水平下成熟期比开花期豫麦47分别下降49%、49%和49%,而豫麦50仅下降7%、23%和21%。说明豫麦47籽粒比豫麦50具有较强的从营养器官获取氮素的能力,其开花时籽粒具有较高的SN含量,胚及胚乳细胞分裂对AN的需求较大,为籽粒从营养器官获取较多氮素提供了较大的“源动力”。SN合成决定着氮素的流动方向,是驱使氮素流动的重要因素;叶片和茎秆SN的分解物是花后转运氮素的主要来源。

关键词: 小麦, 功能性氮素, 营养性氮素, 结构性N素, 氮素同化

Abstract:

Wheat grains obtain nitrogen continuously through decomposition and assimilation of nitrogen compounds from vegetative organs after anthesis. The ability of grains obtaining nitrogen is an important factor to improve the yield and quality of wheat. To assess the ability differences, the field experiments were conducted under different nitrogen application rates using two wheat cultivars, Yumai 47 (grain protein content 15.5%) and Yumai 50 (grain protein content 12.4%). The results showed that Grain of Yumai47 had greater ability of obtaining nitrogen from its vegetative organs than that of Yumai 50. To reveal the physiological mechanism causing the difference between the two cultivars, investigation was carried out for the dynamic changes of three nitrogen forms as assimilable nitrogen (AN), functional nitrogen (FN) and structural nitrogen (SN) in wheat plants in responses to varied nitrogen rates. The data showed that AN, FN, and SN were affected more significantly by cultivars than by nitrogen rates, especially after anthesis. AN content in stems and leaves of low grain protein genotype Yumai 50 declined continuously after anthesis, while that of high grain protein genotype Yumai 47 increased. In grains, AN content in Yumai 50 decreased slowly from 1.98–2.35 mg g–1 to 1.38–1.70 mg g–1 after flowering. However, in Yumai 47 it declined sharply from 5.51–5.70 mg g–1 to 1.15–1.38 mg g–1 at 17 days after anthesis, and then increased from 1.15–1.38 mg g–1 to 3.01–3.29 mg g–1 under different nitrogen rates at maturity. The continuous increase of AN content in the stems and leaves from jointing to filling was closely related to the demand of grain protein formation in high protein genotype Yumai 47. FN content, which participated in absorption and assimilation within leaves, was not significantly different in two different genotypes. In addition to a sharper decrease of SN content in Yumai 47 than Yumai 50 after anthesis, SN content in stems and leaves showed a similar trend over development stages. They all increased with a peak at anthesis, and then exhibited a decreasing trend. In grains, changes of SN contents in two cultivars showed a similar trend, decreasing from anthesis to maturity, although Yumai 47 had a much higher SN content (3.70%–4.28%) at anthesis than Yumai 50(1.38%–1.74%). The results suggest that the higher SN content in grains at anthesis is the key factor caused greater nitrogen gain from the vegetative organs in Yumai 47. SN synthesis determines the direction of nitrogen flow, and the decomposition of SN in leaves and stems provided the key source for nitrogen translocation into grain.

Key words: Wheat, Assimilable nitrogen, Functional nitrogen, Structural nitrogen

[1] 胡文静, 李东升, 裔新, 张春梅, 张勇. 小麦穗部性状和株高的QTL定位及育种标记开发和验证[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1346-1356.
[2] 郭星宇, 刘朋召, 王瑞, 王小利, 李军. 旱地冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率及土壤氮素平衡对降水年型与施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[3] 付美玉, 熊宏春, 周春云, 郭会君, 谢永盾, 赵林姝, 古佳玉, 赵世荣, 丁玉萍, 徐延浩, 刘录祥. 小麦矮秆突变体je0098的遗传分析与其矮秆基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 580-589.
[4] 冯健超, 许倍铭, 江薛丽, 胡海洲, 马英, 王晨阳, 王永华, 马冬云. 小麦籽粒不同层次酚类物质与抗氧化活性差异及氮肥调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 704-715.
[5] 刘运景, 郑飞娜, 张秀, 初金鹏, 于海涛, 代兴龙, 贺明荣. 宽幅播种对强筋小麦籽粒产量、品质和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 716-725.
[6] 马红勃, 刘东涛, 冯国华, 王静, 朱雪成, 张会云, 刘静, 刘立伟, 易媛. 黄淮麦区Fhb1基因的育种应用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 747-758.
[7] 王洋洋, 贺利, 任德超, 段剑钊, 胡新, 刘万代, 郭天财, 王永华, 冯伟. 基于主成分-聚类分析的不同水分冬小麦晚霜冻害评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 448-462.
[8] 陈新宜, 宋宇航, 张孟寒, 李小艳, 李华, 汪月霞, 齐学礼. 干旱对不同品种小麦幼苗的生理生化胁迫以及外源5-氨基乙酰丙酸的缓解作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 478-487.
[9] 徐龙龙, 殷文, 胡发龙, 范虹, 樊志龙, 赵财, 于爱忠, 柴强. 水氮减量对地膜玉米免耕轮作小麦主要光合生理参数的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 437-447.
[10] 马博闻, 李庆, 蔡剑, 周琴, 黄梅, 戴廷波, 王笑, 姜东. 花前渍水锻炼调控花后小麦耐渍性的生理机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 151-164.
[11] 孟颖, 邢蕾蕾, 曹晓红, 郭光艳, 柴建芳, 秘彩莉. 小麦Ta4CL1基因的克隆及其在促进转基因拟南芥生长和木质素沉积中的功能[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 63-75.
[12] 韦一昊, 于美琴, 张晓娇, 王露露, 张志勇, 马新明, 李会强, 王小纯. 小麦谷氨酰胺合成酶基因可变剪接分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 40-47.
[13] 李玲红, 张哲, 陈永明, 尤明山, 倪中福, 邢界文. 普通小麦颖壳蜡质缺失突变体glossy1的转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 48-62.
[14] 罗江陶, 郑建敏, 蒲宗君, 范超兰, 刘登才, 郝明. 四倍体小麦与六倍体小麦杂种的染色体遗传特性[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1427-1436.
[15] 王艳朋, 凌磊, 张文睿, 王丹, 郭长虹. 小麦B-box基因家族全基因组鉴定与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1437-1449.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!