欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (03): 477-485.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00477

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

花生生育早期耐涝性室内鉴定对大田期的意义

李林1;熊璟2; 刘登望1;邹冬生1,*;肖浪涛3;王若仲3;刘飞1;赵伟1;覃国栋1;朱旭东4

  

  1. 1 湖南农业大学生物科学技术学院生态研究所,湖南长沙410128;2 湖南科技职业学院,湖南长沙410004;3 湖南省植物激素和生长发育重点实验室,湖南长沙410128;4 湖南农业大学农学院,湖南长沙410128
  • 收稿日期:2007-03-05 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-03-12 网络出版日期:2008-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 邹冬生

Importance of Identification of Waterlogging Tolerance at Early Growing Stages of Peanut in Laboratory to Field Screening

LI Lin1,LIU Deng-Wang1,ZOU Dong-Sheng1,*,XIAO Lang-Tao3,WANG Ruo-Zhong3,LIU Fei1,ZHAO Wei1,QIN Guo-Dong1,ZHU Xu-Dong4   

  1. 1 Institute of Ecology, College of Biosciences & Biotechnology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan; 2 Hunan Provincial Vocational College of Sciences & Technology, Changsha 410004, Hunan; 3 Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Phytohormones, Growth & Development, Changsha 410128, Hunan; 4 College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China
  • Received:2007-03-05 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-03-12 Published online:2008-03-12
  • Contact: ZOU Dong-Sheng

摘要: 为探索花生不同品种生育早期耐涝性差异及与大田耐涝性的关系,对8个品种的种子进行室内180 h浅、深水处理,对幼苗进行10 d淹涝和大田短(10 d)、长期(88 d)湿涝,测定发芽能力、幼苗生长发育和乙醇脱氢酶(ADH)活性、大田湿涝产量(WY10、WY88)和产量耐性系数(WTC10、WTC88)。结果表明,(1)花生对淹涝较敏感,其耐涝性因淹涝时期、程度(水深)和品种而异。浅涝时种子先露尖而后发芽;深涝时只露尖而不能形成幼芽。不同品种发芽期耐涝性差异较大。幼苗的根部受害程度远甚于地上部,根色、根重是不同品种耐性差异的主要表征指标。(2)花生幼苗根系ADH活性受淹涝即厌氧诱导的效应极为明显,其中淹涝3~10 d的ADH活性与耐涝性负相关,尤其是淹涝10 d后ADH活性高的品种,植株发育不良。(3)与大田所有产量耐涝性指标的相关性,ADH活性、根色均为负相关,单株根重、单株地上部重、单株总重则为正相关,尤其是根重与WY10 2年均呈显著正相关。(4)耐涝性鉴定时间,在发芽期浅、深水中分别以180、120 h为宜,幼苗期以3~10 d为宜。因此,花生生育早期耐涝性室内鉴定对大田期有重要参考价值。

关键词: 花生, 耐涝性, 鉴定, 生长发育, 产量, COLOR: black

Abstract: Waterlogging is one of the main limiting factors in worldwide peanut production. It is useful to develop a prompt approach for waterlogging tolerance screening at early growth stages. To study difference of waterlogging tolerance among peanut varieties and in the early growth stages and the correlation with waterlogging tolerance based on yield in the field, seeds of 8 varieties were planted in shallow and deep water for 180 h, seedlings were waterlogged with sand soil in laboratory for 10 days and in field for 10 d (short-term) and 88 d (long-term), then the germination ratio, seedlings growth and development indexes, alcohol dehydrogenase activity (ADH), field yields under waterlogging (WY10, WY88) and waterlogging tolerance coefficients(WTC10, WTC88)were measured. The results were as follows: (1) Peanut was sensitive to waterlogging, and the tolerance varied with waterlogging degree, varieties and imposing time. Seeds of each variety germinated in shallow water, while not in deep water. At seedling stage, roots were more severely reduced by waterlogging stress than above-ground parts of plant (AGPP), difference of waterlogging tolerance among varieties could be judged phenotypically by color and weight of roots. (2) Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) activity in peanut roots increased significantly under waterlogging condition (hypoxia induction). The plants of varieties with higher ADH activity after 10 d waterlogging were generally runt. (3) All waterlogging tolerance indexes based on yield were correlated with ADH activity and roots color negatively, and with weight of roots positively per plant, weights of AGPP and total plant positively, especially weight of roots were significantly and positively correlated with WY10. (4) The time for peanut waterlogging tolerance screening in shallow and deep water should be 180 and 120 h respectively at germinating stage, and 3–10 d at seedling stage. It can be concluded that indoor identification of waterlogging tolerance in laboratory at early stages is an important reference for on-farm test.

Key words: Peanut, Waterlogging tolerance, Identification, Growth and development, Yield, Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH)

[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657.
[4] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[5] 陆一楚, 李振影, 买春海, 赵晓蕊, 王利祥. 夜间复合体关键基因AhLUX1正向调控花生结瘤的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1658-1668.
[6] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[7] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[8] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[9] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[10] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[11] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[12] 谷春苗, 王润风, 黄璐, 刘浩, 鲁清, 李海芬, 李少雄, 何双呈, 洪彦彬, 陈小平, 谭斌, 余倩霞. 花生WOX基因家族的全基因组分析及不定芽再生候选基因的鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1326-1340.
[13] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[14] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[15] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!